![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IMG_0552-2-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
If you’re shopping around for a luxury diving watch, you would have no doubt heard of the wide range of Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster dive watch collections. These legendary diving watches, both brands are Swiss-made, have been around since the late 1940’s/early1950s. They have been battling for the top spot in the luxury diving watch range ever since.
\n\n\n\nThe preference between the Omega Seamaster and the Rolex Submariner will continue to be the topic of debate between divers. But when it comes to making the decision of which one to buy, assessing all the elements of both will certainly help. Read on to learn more about these legendary dive watch ranges to find out which one will suit you.
\n\n\n\nThe Submariner was launched by Rolex in 1953 exclusively as the first ever divers’ watch waterproof to a depth of 100m. With decades of innovation, today’s Submariners are waterproof to a depth of 300m.
\n\n\n\nIf you’re a fan of James bond movies, you would have seen the Rolex Submariner appear many times. Although the real deal doesn’t have secret agent gadgets, it is still one of the most prestigious dive watches on the market.
\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner has been considered the high-end diver’s watch that all others will be compared to, with reliability, robustness, and functionality as the core focus. The durable design and unidirectional rotatable bezel have made this watch one of the top choices for divers. The hardwearing scratch-resistant materials survive the challenging nature of the sport while the 60-minute graduation allows divers to monitor their no-decompression limit (NDL) and decompression stop time accurately.
\n\n\n\nOverall the reliable functionality and the elite reputation of Rolex have made the Rolex Submariner one of the top picks of diver’s watches.
\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IMG_0529-2-2-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
Omega dived into the marine watch world back in the 1930s and has been championed by underwater explorers and famous diving pioneers ever since. From Yves Le Prier- inventor of the SCUBA mask and cylinder to Charles William Beebe- the first deep-sea explorer. Omega became known as the trusted diving watch brand for ocean explorers.
\n\n\n\nIt’s no surprise that the first Seamaster was modeled after the waterproof watches worn by the British Military in World War II. The Seamaster brought a new level of waterproofness to the table by integrating an O-ring for a better seal unaffected by changes in temperature.
\n\n\n\nThe Omega Seamaster 300 was waterproof to 200m and became the favorite dive watch of the godfather of SCUBA diving Jacques Cousteau in 1963.
\n\n\n\nOmega kicked Rolex out of the James Bond dressing room when the costume designer discovered the British Naval history of the Omega was more fitting to James Bond’s character. The Omega Seamaster received a new boost of popularity as the new leader of premium dive watches.
\n\n\n\nThe incredibly authentic maritime history of Omega and the innovative design allows the Omega Seamaster to remain one of the most respected and trusted dive watches to date.
\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IMG_0544-2-2-Edit-1024x682.jpg\")
Both the Rolex Submariner range and the Omega Seamaster range have welcomed a wide selection of different models over the years. Their high-quality fundamental design features remain the same yet their design features and prices differ.
\n\n\n\nThe Submariner is part of Rolex’s Oyster Perpetual line which is then split into the Submariner collection and the Submariner Date. The Submariner Date as the name suggests was the first Submariner model to show the date on the right side of the face.
\n\n\n\nWith more than 40 Submariner models crafted over the years, along with a few limited edition models, you have plenty to choose from. Each model has a unique reference number engraved between the lugs at the 12 o’clock side where the bracelet attaches to the watch.
\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster is Omega’s oldest current collection of watches. Over the years there has been a wide range of adaptations of the Seamaster resulting in dive watches to dress watches and more.
\n\n\n\nThere are currently 9 collections of the Seamaster including the Seamaster 300, the Railmaster, the Ploprof, and the Bullhead Chronograph. There is also a selection of limited edition models such as the Olympic Official Time Keeper. The model serial number on the Omega Seamaster is engraved on the back of the watch.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IMG_0545-2-2-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
The image that may pop into your head when you think of the Submariner or the Seamaster may be fairly similar. The classic stainless steel linked strap with a heavy-duty housing and dark watch face. However, there has been a vast range of different designs using a variety of materials over the decades with a wide selection available today.
\n\n\n\nThe stainless steel Submariner is available with or without the date display known as the Submariner Date. You can choose the anniversary option which has a green bezel and dial nicknamed ‘the Kermit’ by fans. The Submariner Date is available in yellow gold, white gold, or a bi-color mix of the two.
\n\n\n\nWith all the different face colors, bezel colors, and strap options, there are a total number of 8 different Submariners to choose from. Most of the models have maintained the classic Rolex Submariner design.
\n\n\n\nOmega branched out from the original Seamaster design and became a little more adventurous with colors, materials, and features. The Seamaster 300M has retained the traditional style most similar to the Submariner with an additional Helium Escape Valve on the case.
\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster is available in a variety of contemporary metal finishes such as steel, gold, ceramic, titanium, and platinum. You can choose from a variety of case sizes, face and bezel colors, dial options, and wrist strap materials. You can also opt for the standard date display or with chronograph movement.
\n\n\n\nSo if you’re looking for something a little different from the traditional Submariner or Seamaster 300M design, you can find it within the Seamaster collection.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IMG_0539-2-2-Edit-1024x682.jpg\")
Even after all your research and assessments of each feature, design, and model of the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster, most of the time your decision will come down to the price.
\n\n\n\nAs with most Rolex watch models, the Submariner range has a higher price tag than the Seamaster. The price of course depends on the model and age of the Submariner or Seamaster you choose.
\n\n\n\nFor a new Rolex Submariner, you could be looking at a price range of around $9,000 to up to $38,000. The price of a new Omega Seamaster dive watch could range from around $8,000 to $12,000 or more for limited edition models.
\n\n\n\nIf buying new doesn’t fit well with your budget you could always browse the pre-owned market to find older-generation models for a great price. Even in the pre-owned selection of Rolex and Omega dive watches, you’ll usually need to pay for Rolex.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IMG_0542-2-2-Edit-1024x682.jpg\")
To make choosing a little easier for you, we have compiled a quick reference of the pros and cons of each dive watch range.
\n\n\n\nRolex is an internationally recognized brand with an impeccable reputation for premium quality watches.
\n\n\n\nThe Submariner will hold its value being a Rolex and have a high resale value.
\n\n\n\nIt has an anti-reflective coating on the inside of the crystal which eliminates the chance of it being scratched off.
\n\n\n\nThe movement precision is second to none and rigorously tested by Rolex.
\n\n\n\nThe ceramic Cerachrom bezel is famous for being super smooth and easy to rotate.
\n\n\n\nThere’s no getting away from the higher price tag of any Rolex compared to other brands.
\n\n\n\nThe movement doesn’t undergo final testing from a third party to ensure unbiased results.
\n\n\n\nThere are limited style options if you’re not a fan of the classic Submariner design.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IMG_0556-2-2-Edit-1024x682.jpg\")
It has an unbeatable user history of professional ocean explorers and the pioneers of SCUBA diving.
\n\n\n\nThere is a wide variety of different styles, colors, and materials to choose from.
\n\n\n\nYou can purchase the Seamaster for around half of the price of a Submariner.
\n\n\n\nThe new Seamaster Diver 300m Co-Axial Master Chronometer is resistant to interference from magnetic waves of up to 15,000 Gauss or 1.5 Tesla.
\n\n\n\nThe illuminating watch hands and features make the Seamaster more legible in dark conditions.
\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster features a manual helium escape valve to reduce the risk of the crystal popping off at the surface after a long dive.
\n\n\n\nAlthough the Seamaster will hold its value well, it won’t beat the resale value of the Submariner.
\n\n\n\nThe anti-reflective coating is on the outside of the crystal making it more prone to being scratched off.
\n\n\n\nThe movement is considered slightly less accurate than the Submariner’s chronometer.
\n\n\n\nThe bezel is not as easy to rotate as the Submariner’s ceramic version.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/IMG_0548-2-2-Edit-2-1024x682.jpg\")
In the end, choosing a Rolex Submariner or an Omega Seamaster will depend on which features you value the most. If you’re looking for a more classic look with impeccable accuracy, maybe the Submariner range is for you. If you prefer an alternative design with more innovative features, then go for the Omega Seamaster range.
\n\n\n\nResearching the finer design details of the various models within the Submariner range and the Seamaster range will also help narrow down your search. Read more about the various models in our other articles. Happy diving!
\nThe post Submariner vs Seamaster:\u00a0The Ultimate Buying Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "If you’re shopping around for a luxury diving watch, you would have no doubt heard of the wide range of Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster dive watch collections. These legendary diving watches, both brands are Swiss-made, have been around since the late 1940’s/early1950s. They have been battling for the top spot in the luxury diving watch range ever since.\n\n\n\nThe preference between the Omega Seamaster and the Rolex Submariner will continue to be the topic of debate between divers. But when it comes to making the decision of which one to buy, assessing all the elements of both will certainly help. Read on to learn more about these legendary dive watch ranges to find out which one will suit you.\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner Range\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Submariner was launched by Rolex in 1953 exclusively as the first ever divers’ watch waterproof to a depth of 100m. With decades of innovation, today’s Submariners are waterproof to a depth of 300m.\n\n\n\nIf you’re a fan of James bond movies, you would have seen the Rolex Submariner appear many times. Although the real deal doesn’t have secret agent gadgets, it is still one of the most prestigious dive watches on the market. \n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner has been considered the high-end diver’s watch that all others will be compared to, with reliability, robustness, and functionality as the core focus. The durable design and unidirectional rotatable bezel have made this watch one of the top choices for divers. The hardwearing scratch-resistant materials survive the challenging nature of the sport while the 60-minute graduation allows divers to monitor their no-decompression limit (NDL) and decompression stop time accurately. \n\n\n\nOverall the reliable functionality and the elite reputation of Rolex have made the Rolex Submariner one of the top picks of diver’s watches.\n\n\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Submariner Watches\n\n\n\nThe Omega Seamaster Range\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOmega dived into the marine watch world back in the 1930s and has been championed by underwater explorers and famous diving pioneers ever since. From Yves Le Prier- inventor of the SCUBA mask and cylinder to Charles William Beebe- the first deep-sea explorer. Omega became known as the trusted diving watch brand for ocean explorers.\n\n\n\nIt’s no surprise that the first Seamaster was modeled after the waterproof watches worn by the British Military in World War II. The Seamaster brought a new level of waterproofness to the table by integrating an O-ring for a better seal unaffected by changes in temperature.\n\n\n\nThe Omega Seamaster 300 was waterproof to 200m and became the favorite dive watch of the godfather of SCUBA diving Jacques Cousteau in 1963. \n\n\n\nOmega kicked Rolex out of the James Bond dressing room when the costume designer discovered the British Naval history of the Omega was more fitting to James Bond’s character. The Omega Seamaster received a new boost of popularity as the new leader of premium dive watches.\n\n\n\nThe incredibly authentic maritime history of Omega and the innovative design allows the Omega Seamaster to remain one of the most respected and trusted dive watches to date.\n\n\n\n\n\tShop Omega Seamaster Watches\n\n\n\nSubmariner vs. Seamaster: Selection of Models\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nBoth the Rolex Submariner range and the Omega Seamaster range have welcomed a wide selection of different models over the years. Their high-quality fundamental design features remain the same yet their design features and prices differ. \n\n\n\nRolex Submariner\n\n\n\nThe Submariner is part of Rolex’s Oyster Perpetual line which is then split into the Submariner collection and the Submariner Date. The Submariner Date as the name suggests was the first Submariner model to show the date on the right side of the face.\n\n\n\nWith more than 40 Submariner models crafted over the years, along with a few limited edition models, you have plenty to choose from. Each model has a unique reference number engraved between the lugs at the 12 o’clock side where the bracelet attaches to the watch.\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster is Omega’s oldest current collection of watches. Over the years there has been a wide range of adaptations of the Seamaster resulting in dive watches to dress watches and more.\n\n\n\nThere are currently 9 collections of the Seamaster including the Seamaster 300, the Railmaster, the Ploprof, and the Bullhead Chronograph. There is also a selection of limited edition models such as the Olympic Official Time Keeper. The model serial number on the Omega Seamaster is engraved on the back of the watch. \n\n\n\nSubmariner vs. Seamaster: Design & Materials\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe image that may pop into your head when you think of the Submariner or the Seamaster may be fairly similar. The classic stainless steel linked strap with a heavy-duty housing and dark watch face. However, there has been a vast range of different designs using a variety of materials over the decades with a wide selection available today.\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner\n\n\n\nThe stainless steel Submariner is available with or without the date display known as the Submariner Date. You can choose the anniversary option which has a green bezel and dial nicknamed ‘the Kermit’ by fans. The Submariner Date is available in yellow gold, white gold, or a bi-color mix of the two. \n\n\n\nWith all the different face colors, bezel colors, and strap options, there are a total number of 8 different Submariners to choose from. Most of the models have maintained the classic Rolex Submariner design.\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster\n\n\n\nOmega branched out from the original Seamaster design and became a little more adventurous with colors, materials, and features. The Seamaster 300M has retained the traditional style most similar to the Submariner with an additional Helium Escape Valve on the case.\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster is available in a variety of contemporary metal finishes such as steel, gold, ceramic, titanium, and platinum. You can choose from a variety of case sizes, face and bezel colors, dial options, and wrist strap materials. You can also opt for the standard date display or with chronograph movement. \n\n\n\nSo if you’re looking for something a little different from the traditional Submariner or Seamaster 300M design, you can find it within the Seamaster collection.\n\n\n\nSubmariner vs. Seamaster Pricing\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nEven after all your research and assessments of each feature, design, and model of the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster, most of the time your decision will come down to the price. \n\n\n\nAs with most Rolex watch models, the Submariner range has a higher price tag than the Seamaster. The price of course depends on the model and age of the Submariner or Seamaster you choose.\n\n\n\nFor a new Rolex Submariner, you could be looking at a price range of around $9,000 to up to $38,000. The price of a new Omega Seamaster dive watch could range from around $8,000 to $12,000 or more for limited edition models. \n\n\n\nIf buying new doesn’t fit well with your budget you could always browse the pre-owned market to find older-generation models for a great price. Even in the pre-owned selection of Rolex and Omega dive watches, you’ll usually need to pay for Rolex. \n\n\n\nSubmariner vs Seamaster: A Summary\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nTo make choosing a little easier for you, we have compiled a quick reference of the pros and cons of each dive watch range. \n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Pros\n\n\n\nRolex is an internationally recognized brand with an impeccable reputation for premium quality watches. \n\n\n\nThe Submariner will hold its value being a Rolex and have a high resale value.\n\n\n\nIt has an anti-reflective coating on the inside of the crystal which eliminates the chance of it being scratched off.\n\n\n\nThe movement precision is second to none and rigorously tested by Rolex.\n\n\n\nThe ceramic Cerachrom bezel is famous for being super smooth and easy to rotate.\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Cons\n\n\n\nThere’s no getting away from the higher price tag of any Rolex compared to other brands.\n\n\n\nThe movement doesn’t undergo final testing from a third party to ensure unbiased results.\n\n\n\nThere are limited style options if you’re not a fan of the classic Submariner design.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster Pros\n\n\n\nIt has an unbeatable user history of professional ocean explorers and the pioneers of SCUBA diving.\n\n\n\nThere is a wide variety of different styles, colors, and materials to choose from.\n\n\n\nYou can purchase the Seamaster for around half of the price of a Submariner.\n\n\n\nThe new Seamaster Diver 300m Co-Axial Master Chronometer is resistant to interference from magnetic waves of up to 15,000 Gauss or 1.5 Tesla.\n\n\n\nThe illuminating watch hands and features make the Seamaster more legible in dark conditions.\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster features a manual helium escape valve to reduce the risk of the crystal popping off at the surface after a long dive.\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster Cons\n\n\n\nAlthough the Seamaster will hold its value well, it won’t beat the resale value of the Submariner.\n\n\n\nThe anti-reflective coating is on the outside of the crystal making it more prone to being scratched off.\n\n\n\nThe movement is considered slightly less accurate than the Submariner’s chronometer.\n\n\n\nThe bezel is not as easy to rotate as the Submariner’s ceramic version.\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner vs. Omega Seamaster: The Verdict\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nIn the end, choosing a Rolex Submariner or an Omega Seamaster will depend on which features you value the most. If you’re looking for a more classic look with impeccable accuracy, maybe the Submariner range is for you. If you prefer an alternative design with more innovative features, then go for the Omega Seamaster range. \n\n\n\nResearching the finer design details of the various models within the Submariner range and the Seamaster range will also help narrow down your search. Read more about the various models in our other articles. Happy diving!\nThe post Submariner vs Seamaster:\u00a0The Ultimate Buying Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2022-12-21T10:14:41-08:00", "date_modified": "2022-12-21T10:14:42-08:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/rolex-watches-vs-omega-watches.png", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=55640", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/breitling-vs-omega.html", "title": "Breitling vs. Omega \u2013 Full Brand Comparison", "content_html": "\nWhen it comes to Swiss watches, it’s only natural to compare Breitling and Omega. Both watches have played an integral role in sports, aviation, and space travel history and have contributed essential innovations to the watch industry.
\n\n\n\nWhile both brands offer an extensive line of watches in all styles, Breitling and Omega are known for their advanced chronographs, including the Breitling Navitimer and the Omega Speedster. Chronographs are multifunctional watches with a stopwatch feature and may include other functions like a date-time function, navigational tools, and more.
\n\n\n\nThese multifunctional masterpieces have been used by pilots, sea captains, and astronauts. They have also been used at the Olympics and other sporting events due to their precision and accuracy.
\n\n\n\nWith so much in common and so many iconic styles, it can be next to impossible to determine which one is the winner. However, there are some differences. Let’s look at what sets these watches apart from each other.
\n\n\n\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_9325-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
Both brands hailed from family-owned watch operations in Switzerland and came from modest beginnings before taking the world by storm. See how it all started.
\n\n\n\nBreitling was founded in 1884 by L\u00e9on Breitling in Saint-Imier, Switzerland. While the operation started small, by the beginning of the 20th century, athletes and aviators wore these timepieces. Among other innovations, Breitling is credited with creating the wrist-worn chronograph in 1915. It was essentially a watch that could be used as a stopwatch, and it quickly became coveted by sportsmen.
\n\n\n\nPopular models: Breitling has had its fair share of popular watches over the last century, including the Navitimer, the brand’s signature navigational chronograph with its unique slide rule that allows you to calculate average speeds. They also have many entry-level watches to choose from and their popular \u200b\u200bSuperocean and Chronmat watches.
\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\n\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_9334-2-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
Louis Brandt founded Omega in 1848 in La Chaux-de-Fonds. Like Breitling, it quickly grew in esteem due to its unparalleled attention to detail and commitment to innovation. By 1892, the company created the first-minute repeating watch, and by 1900, Omega received the Grand Prize award in Paris at the 1900 Universal Exposition- the highest honor at the time.
\n\n\n\nPopular Models: Omega also has an excellent selection of popular watches, but none as famous as the Omega Speedmaster. In 2021, an Omega Speedmaster dethroned Elvis Presley’s Tiffany Omega watch as the most expensive Omega ever sold. This 1957 Speedster was purchased for $3.4 million in November 2021. Omega is also known for its Seamaster line and the Constellation line.
\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\n\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_9337-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
Omega and Breitling have been pushing the boundaries of innovation for more than 100 years, turning wristwatches into multifunctional tools that guided men through the air, sea, and later in space. Breitling is credited with creating the first wrist-worn chronograph, whereas Omega later became the official timekeeper of the Olympic games and NASA.
\n\n\n\nWhile Omega is currently the official watch of NASA, the first Swiss watch in space was the Breitling that Scott Carpenter wore as he circled the earth in 1962. However, Omega’s place in space history was cemented when Buzz Aldrin wore his in 1969 during the first moon landing.
\n\n\n\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_9330-2-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
Both watches were integral to history, but what about today’s watches? Which one comes out ahead?
\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to what sets these watches apart, one key difference has become the movement types. While both brands offer several different movement types depending on the lineup, Omega produces its movements entirely in-house, while Breitling outsources many components. Omega’s movements are also inherently more complex, which allows it to support all the functions of these watches and provides the unparalleled accuracy Omega is known for.
\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to brand recognition, Breitling and Omega are neck and neck, and while each watch’s brand has its own style, both brands produce stunning watches for any occasion. It’s worth noting that chronographs, especially those with many functions, tend to be larger, which applies to both brands.
\n\n\n\nWhile Omega is known for its superior movement, Breitling has always had a history of innovation. From the creation of the self-winding chronograph movement in 1969 to their newly released smartwatch, Breitling always has something new up its sleeve. However, Omega has also had its fair share of innovation, creating the master co-axial anti-magnetic movement type that offers seamless movement.
\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to exclusivity, both watches are considered high-end luxury watches. However, Omega watches tend to cost a bit more, partially due to their movement types and partially due to their limited editions and marketing efforts. However, both watches make a statement wherever you go.
\n\n\n\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_9332-2-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
When it comes to purchasing one of these Swiss watches, there are several things that you will want to consider. Keep reading to learn more.
\n\n\n\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_9322-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
When it comes down to it, you really can’t go wrong with either a Breitling or an Omega watch. They are sturdy and robust, and both are designed for people who live bold, adventurous lives. It all comes down to preference and budget. When it comes to fine Swiss watchmakers, it would be unfair to choose just one. Fortunately, at Bob’s Watches, you don’t have to. We carry an excellent selection of certified-pre-owned Rolexes, Breitlings, Omegas, and more.
\n\n\n\nHave a luxury watch you no longer want? We might be able to help. We buy vintage and preowned watches and can offer you a fair value for your watch. Contact us today to learn more.
\nThe post Breitling vs. Omega – Full Brand Comparison appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "When it comes to Swiss watches, it’s only natural to compare Breitling and Omega. Both watches have played an integral role in sports, aviation, and space travel history and have contributed essential innovations to the watch industry. \n\n\n\nWhile both brands offer an extensive line of watches in all styles, Breitling and Omega are known for their advanced chronographs, including the Breitling Navitimer and the Omega Speedster. Chronographs are multifunctional watches with a stopwatch feature and may include other functions like a date-time function, navigational tools, and more. \n\n\n\nThese multifunctional masterpieces have been used by pilots, sea captains, and astronauts. They have also been used at the Olympics and other sporting events due to their precision and accuracy. \n\n\n\nWith so much in common and so many iconic styles, it can be next to impossible to determine which one is the winner. However, there are some differences. Let’s look at what sets these watches apart from each other. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nBreitling VS Omega: Which is Best?\n\n\n\nBoth brands hailed from family-owned watch operations in Switzerland and came from modest beginnings before taking the world by storm. See how it all started. \n\n\n\nBreitling\n\n\n\nBreitling was founded in 1884 by L\u00e9on Breitling in Saint-Imier, Switzerland. While the operation started small, by the beginning of the 20th century, athletes and aviators wore these timepieces. Among other innovations, Breitling is credited with creating the wrist-worn chronograph in 1915. It was essentially a watch that could be used as a stopwatch, and it quickly became coveted by sportsmen. \n\n\n\nPopular models: Breitling has had its fair share of popular watches over the last century, including the Navitimer, the brand’s signature navigational chronograph with its unique slide rule that allows you to calculate average speeds. They also have many entry-level watches to choose from and their popular \u200b\u200bSuperocean and Chronmat watches. \n\n\n\n\n\tShop Breitling Watches\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOmega\n\n\n\nLouis Brandt founded Omega in 1848 in La Chaux-de-Fonds. Like Breitling, it quickly grew in esteem due to its unparalleled attention to detail and commitment to innovation. By 1892, the company created the first-minute repeating watch, and by 1900, Omega received the Grand Prize award in Paris at the 1900 Universal Exposition- the highest honor at the time. \n\n\n\nPopular Models: Omega also has an excellent selection of popular watches, but none as famous as the Omega Speedmaster. In 2021, an Omega Speedmaster dethroned Elvis Presley’s Tiffany Omega watch as the most expensive Omega ever sold. This 1957 Speedster was purchased for $3.4 million in November 2021. Omega is also known for its Seamaster line and the Constellation line. \n\n\n\n\n\tShop Omega Watches\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nA History of Swiss Watchmaking Innovation\n\n\n\nOmega and Breitling have been pushing the boundaries of innovation for more than 100 years, turning wristwatches into multifunctional tools that guided men through the air, sea, and later in space. Breitling is credited with creating the first wrist-worn chronograph, whereas Omega later became the official timekeeper of the Olympic games and NASA. \n\n\n\nSwiss Watches in Space \n\n\n\nWhile Omega is currently the official watch of NASA, the first Swiss watch in space was the Breitling that Scott Carpenter wore as he circled the earth in 1962. However, Omega’s place in space history was cemented when Buzz Aldrin wore his in 1969 during the first moon landing.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nBreitling vs. Omega Compared\n\n\n\nBoth watches were integral to history, but what about today’s watches? Which one comes out ahead? \n\n\n\nWhich Movement Types Are Best?\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to what sets these watches apart, one key difference has become the movement types. While both brands offer several different movement types depending on the lineup, Omega produces its movements entirely in-house, while Breitling outsources many components. Omega’s movements are also inherently more complex, which allows it to support all the functions of these watches and provides the unparalleled accuracy Omega is known for. \n\n\n\nWhich Brand Has The Best Style?\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to brand recognition, Breitling and Omega are neck and neck, and while each watch’s brand has its own style, both brands produce stunning watches for any occasion. It’s worth noting that chronographs, especially those with many functions, tend to be larger, which applies to both brands. \n\n\n\nWhat Are The New Features?\n\n\n\nWhile Omega is known for its superior movement, Breitling has always had a history of innovation. From the creation of the self-winding chronograph movement in 1969 to their newly released smartwatch, Breitling always has something new up its sleeve. However, Omega has also had its fair share of innovation, creating the master co-axial anti-magnetic movement type that offers seamless movement. \n\n\n\nWhich Brand Has The Best Exclusivity & Pricing?\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to exclusivity, both watches are considered high-end luxury watches. However, Omega watches tend to cost a bit more, partially due to their movement types and partially due to their limited editions and marketing efforts. However, both watches make a statement wherever you go. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nChoosing the Right Swiss Watch\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to purchasing one of these Swiss watches, there are several things that you will want to consider. Keep reading to learn more. \n\n\n\nStyle: Breitlings and Omegas tend to be substantial watches, especially those with advanced features. This allows the user to make calculations easier. However, both brands carry smaller watches as well as women’s lines.\nFunctionality: Many Breitling and Omega models are designed to be tools, as well as premium wristwear, and several models come with navigational features, calendar features, and more. You’ll want to consider which functions you can’t live without.\nNew or Used: There are several factors to consider when choosing between a new or a used one. While it’s always nice to have a brand-new watch, purchasing a preowned watch allows you to access older models or models that are no longer in production. It also allows you to see how well that watch’s value has increased over time.\nLong-Term Investment: The aftermarket value of luxury watches varies wildly, and the market is constantly changing. If you are buying the watch as an investment or may wish to sell it, do extensive research on which styles have held their value.\nAuthenticity: When buying Swiss watches, especially high-end or rare models, it’s essential to purchase your watch from a reputable party. At Bob’s Watches, we offer to provide you with a certificate of authenticity with every purchase.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n Omega vs. Breitling: You Don’t Have to Choose\n\n\n\nWhen it comes down to it, you really can’t go wrong with either a Breitling or an Omega watch. They are sturdy and robust, and both are designed for people who live bold, adventurous lives. It all comes down to preference and budget. When it comes to fine Swiss watchmakers, it would be unfair to choose just one. Fortunately, at Bob’s Watches, you don’t have to. We carry an excellent selection of certified-pre-owned Rolexes, Breitlings, Omegas, and more.\n\n\n\nHave a luxury watch you no longer want? We might be able to help. We buy vintage and preowned watches and can offer you a fair value for your watch. Contact us today to learn more. \nThe post Breitling vs. Omega – Full Brand Comparison appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2022-11-30T10:07:00-08:00", "date_modified": "2022-12-01T10:24:02-08:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Breitling-vs-Omega.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=55535", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/omega-seamaster-300m-vs-rolex-submariner.html", "title": "Omega Seamaster 300m vs Rolex Submariner", "content_html": "\nWhen it comes to diver watches, the pre-owned Omega Seamaster 300m and Rolex Submariner are notable mentions. They are not only the two well-known and most recognizable Swiss watches but both are committed to bringing premium value to their customers.
\n\n\n\nBut which watch comes at the top when it comes to the battle of dive watches? As a watch enthusiast, you have to compare these two timepieces before making a purchase. Our team of experts offers a detailed comparison guide of these two big diver watches – Seamaster 300m vs Rolex Submariner to help you determine which watch belongs on your wrist.
\n\n\n\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Omega_SeaMaster_20JM4496-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
First launched in 1993, the Omega Seamaster 300m was a replacement for the Seamaster 200. It received immediate success from divers, athletes, and movie stars. Some of the watch\u2019s milestones throughout history include:
\n\n\n\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_3469-Edit-1024x682.jpg\")
In 1953, Rolex launched the Submariner watch ref. 6204 to a wide and appreciative audience, and as expected, it was a notiable and historic day for Rolex. The brand continued releasing different references of the watch, making some type of alteration intended to perfect the overall watch design. Here is a timeline of some notable Rolex Submariner iteration releases:
\n\n\n\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Omega_SeaMaster_20JM9384-2-Edit-1-1024x682.jpg\")
When it comes to luxury watches, their legacy plays an important role for timepiece aficionados. As a watch enthusiast, you want to buy more than a timepiece. You want to be part of a legacy created by an iconic watch. The Rolex Submariner is a legendary timepiece that has been around since the 1950s while the Seamaster 300M first came on the watch scene in the 90s.
\n\n\n\nDespite their 40-year age difference, both these diver watches share a claim to fame in the pop culture scene. Sean Connery and Roger Moore wore the Rolex Submariner when playing James Bond. Additionally, Pierce Brosnan wore the Omega Seamaster 300M in the Bond film GoldenEye.
\n\n\n\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_8722-2-Edit-2-1-1024x682.jpg\")
From its original piece to the most recent edition, the Submariner continues to stay true to its roots. Even with a modern touch, the watch remains more traditional in its design. It has a 41-mm case and black dial that offers incredible style and design depth. The Rolex Submariner also features a ceramic diving bezel and a satin Oyster bracelet. You can also shorten or lengthen your bracelet thanks to the watch\u2019s Glidelock clasp.
\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M also has some resemblances to its original 1993 model. But it’s a bit bolder with the design of its current reference compared to the Rolex Submariner. The recent iteration offers a bolder, more futuristic appearance. It has a complex case design with a 42 mm diameter. Both the watch\u2019s bezel and dial are made of ceramic. It also features hypnotic laser-engraved waves. While the design of the Rolex Submariner is more traditional and timeless, the Seamaster’s design is fresh and modern.
\n\n\n\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Omega_quartz_20JM6003-Edit-1024x682.jpg\")
In terms of technology, the Seamaster 300M offers more compared to the Rolex Submariner. While both watches offer 300 meters (about 984 ft.) of water resistance, there is quite a difference in testing. The Seamaster 300M is truly sent to an actual depth of 300 meters for its ranking whereas the Submariner is tested through the simulation of pressure at 300 meters below the waves.
\n\n\n\nUnlike the Submariner, the Seamaster 300M is powered by a caliber 8800 that’s METAS-certified. It also has a COSC-certified chronometer title with an impressive precision of -0/+5 seconds per day. The accurate movements can also withstand magnetic fields accumulating to about 15,000 gausses.
\n\n\n\nHowever, the Rolex Submariner takes the win when it comes to the power reverse. It delivers a 70-hour power reverse compared to the Seamaster’s 55 hours. As a Rolex caliber 3130, the Submariner also has a Superlative Chronometer designation, which ensures precise movement and an accuracy of -2/+2 seconds per day.
\n\n\n\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_2085-Edit-1-1-1024x682.jpg\")
The Seamaster 300M has a well-manufactured dial. It offers a somewhat PC-like animated effect with its laser-etched waves.
While the quality of the Seamaster’s dial is better than the Submariner’s, no luxury watch impresses with outstanding haptics like the Rolex Submariner. It delivers a haptic experience that\u2019s extraordinary and a feast for your senses. The watch\u2019s smooth and soft bracelet complements the sharp, precise edges well.
It also has a clasp that closes snugly with a satisfying snap. Additionally, the unidirectional dive bezel of the Submariner offers wonderful clicks with every turn. Compared to the Submariner\u2019s bezel, the Seamaster\u2019s ceramic bezel can’t turn as accurately.
\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner is a more well-known watch compared to the Seamaster 300M. It has about 100% brand awareness. When you wear it, you can expect to be noticed almost anywhere. The Omega watch is a close second when it comes to brand recognition. It has about 70% popularity globally. With your Omega Seamaster 300M watch, you can also anticipate turning heads.
\n\n\n\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Omega_20JM0524-2-Edit-2-1-1024x682.jpg\")
There is a substantial price difference between the Seamaster 300m and the Rolex Submariner. The Submariner costs more than the Seamaster 300m. You can expect to pay double the Seamaster’s price to get the Submariner model. But at just under $6,000, the Seamaster 300M gives you value for money. However, the Seamaster will most likely not increase in value over the years like the Submariner. If you are purchasing a watch as a financial investment, the Rolex Submariner is the right choice. But in case you are on a strict budget and still want a premium, luxury watch, you can never go wrong with a Seamaster 300M.
\n\n\n\nA warranty shows if a brand can stand behind its models. The warranty can help determine the highest quality watch brand when comparing the two watch brands. The warranties on both brands are rather remarkable. The Omega Seamaster 300M and Rolex Submariner watches come with a 5-year warranty.
\n\n\n\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_3466-Edit-1024x682.jpg\")
Both Seamaster 300M and the Rolex Submariner are top-rated timepieces and either one will look good on your wrist. Making a choice comes down to your needs, tastes, and budget. Both watches are made of high-quality materials and have very similar capabilities If anything, the Seamaster 300m has the edge on technical ability thanks to its antimagnetic and Co-Axial-equipped movements, which provide buyers quite a lot of value in terms of performance. With costs, the Rolex Submariner comes with a pretty hefty price tag. It all boils down to whether you want to spend twice as much money on a Rolex watch. Remember the Submariner can hold or increase its value better or even appreciate.
\n\n\n\nNeed to buy a Seamaster 300M or Rolex Submariner watch? Look no further than Bob’s Watches. We offer authentic Omega and Rolex watches at fair market value. You can also sell your used Rolex and Omega watches to us. Get in touch to learn home.
\nThe post Omega Seamaster 300m vs Rolex Submariner appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "When it comes to diver watches, the pre-owned Omega Seamaster 300m and Rolex Submariner are notable mentions. They are not only the two well-known and most recognizable Swiss watches but both are committed to bringing premium value to their customers.\n\n\n\nBut which watch comes at the top when it comes to the battle of dive watches? As a watch enthusiast, you have to compare these two timepieces before making a purchase. Our team of experts offers a detailed comparison guide of these two big diver watches – Seamaster 300m vs Rolex Submariner to help you determine which watch belongs on your wrist.\n\n\n\nA Brief History\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster 300m\n\n\n\nFirst launched in 1993, the Omega Seamaster 300m was a replacement for the Seamaster 200. It received immediate success from divers, athletes, and movie stars. Some of the watch\u2019s milestones throughout history include:\n\n\n\n1993: Frenchman Roland Specker wore the Seamaster 300m as he dove 80m underwater, attaining a world record for freshwater free dive. This effectively put the watch through its paces in a deep-water environment.1994: Seamaster Diver 300M was credited with the first “Watch of the Year” award by readers of the Armbanduhren – a German magazine.1995: Sir Peter Blake and other sailors of Team New Zealand wore the Seamaster 300M as they made sailing history by winning America\u2019s Cup. During the same year, James Bond wore the watch in the film GoldenEye. This made the Seamaster 300m a pop culture staple.1996: The instructors of the Ice Rock Club of Zermatt effectively tested the Seamaster 300M in freezing waters at Lake Theodule. It proved the watch\u2019s ability to perform in tough conditions.1997: The Seamaster 300M was a preferred choice for an athlete like swimmer Alexander Popov and tennis champion Martina Hingis.2000: Sir Peter Blake formed the famous Blakexpeditions foundation, which was committed to researching ecological and marine issues globally. The Seamaster 300M was worn during the research.2006 and Beyond: Daniel Craig wore the Seamaster 300M in the film Casino Royale, where he played James Bond. To date, the Seamaster 300m and other Omega timepieces have featured in about 9 James Bond movies.\n\n\n\n\n\tShop Omega Seamaster Watches\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner\n\n\n\nIn 1953, Rolex launched the Submariner watch ref. 6204 to a wide and appreciative audience, and as expected, it was a notiable and historic day for Rolex. The brand continued releasing different references of the watch, making some type of alteration intended to perfect the overall watch design. Here is a timeline of some notable Rolex Submariner iteration releases:\n\n\n\n1954: Compared to the ref. 6204, the ref. 6205 has a slightly thicker case and a larger crown.1955-1956: The ref. 6200 features an 8mm crown with a thicker case. It is also water resistant to 200m.1955-1959: Featuring a small crown and thinner case, Ref. 6536 has the Cal. 1030 movement.1957-1960: The ref. 6536/1 looks identical to the ref. 6536 but it features a chronometer-rated model.1956-1959: The ref. 6538 has a bigger crown with a chronometer-rated caliber. It was featured on the big screen when Sean Connery wore it in the first James Bond film – Dr. No – in 1962.1958: The ref. 5510 was the first Rolex Submariner to feature the Cal. 1530. It’s the rarest timepiece among the big crown vintage Submariner watches.1958-1962: With a small crown, the ref. 5508 is the first Submariner with a Superlative Chronometer designation.\n\n\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Submariner Watches\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M vs Rolex Submariner: Heritage\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to luxury watches, their legacy plays an important role for timepiece aficionados. As a watch enthusiast, you want to buy more than a timepiece. You want to be part of a legacy created by an iconic watch. The Rolex Submariner is a legendary timepiece that has been around since the 1950s while the Seamaster 300M first came on the watch scene in the 90s.\n\n\n\nDespite their 40-year age difference, both these diver watches share a claim to fame in the pop culture scene. Sean Connery and Roger Moore wore the Rolex Submariner when playing James Bond. Additionally, Pierce Brosnan wore the Omega Seamaster 300M in the Bond film GoldenEye.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M vs Rolex Submariner: Design\n\n\n\nFrom its original piece to the most recent edition, the Submariner continues to stay true to its roots. Even with a modern touch, the watch remains more traditional in its design. It has a 41-mm case and black dial that offers incredible style and design depth. The Rolex Submariner also features a ceramic diving bezel and a satin Oyster bracelet. You can also shorten or lengthen your bracelet thanks to the watch\u2019s Glidelock clasp.\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M also has some resemblances to its original 1993 model. But it’s a bit bolder with the design of its current reference compared to the Rolex Submariner. The recent iteration offers a bolder, more futuristic appearance. It has a complex case design with a 42 mm diameter. Both the watch\u2019s bezel and dial are made of ceramic. It also features hypnotic laser-engraved waves. While the design of the Rolex Submariner is more traditional and timeless, the Seamaster’s design is fresh and modern.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M vs Rolex Submariner: Technology\n\n\n\nIn terms of technology, the Seamaster 300M offers more compared to the Rolex Submariner. While both watches offer 300 meters (about 984 ft.) of water resistance, there is quite a difference in testing. The Seamaster 300M is truly sent to an actual depth of 300 meters for its ranking whereas the Submariner is tested through the simulation of pressure at 300 meters below the waves.\n\n\n\nUnlike the Submariner, the Seamaster 300M is powered by a caliber 8800 that’s METAS-certified. It also has a COSC-certified chronometer title with an impressive precision of -0/+5 seconds per day. The accurate movements can also withstand magnetic fields accumulating to about 15,000 gausses.\n\n\n\nHowever, the Rolex Submariner takes the win when it comes to the power reverse. It delivers a 70-hour power reverse compared to the Seamaster’s 55 hours. As a Rolex caliber 3130, the Submariner also has a Superlative Chronometer designation, which ensures precise movement and an accuracy of -2/+2 seconds per day.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M vs Rolex Submariner: Quality\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster 300M has a well-manufactured dial. It offers a somewhat PC-like animated effect with its laser-etched waves.While the quality of the Seamaster’s dial is better than the Submariner’s, no luxury watch impresses with outstanding haptics like the Rolex Submariner. It delivers a haptic experience that\u2019s extraordinary and a feast for your senses. The watch\u2019s smooth and soft bracelet complements the sharp, precise edges well.\n\n\n\nIt also has a clasp that closes snugly with a satisfying snap. Additionally, the unidirectional dive bezel of the Submariner offers wonderful clicks with every turn. Compared to the Submariner\u2019s bezel, the Seamaster\u2019s ceramic bezel can’t turn as accurately.\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M vs Rolex Submariner: Popularity\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner is a more well-known watch compared to the Seamaster 300M. It has about 100% brand awareness. When you wear it, you can expect to be noticed almost anywhere. The Omega watch is a close second when it comes to brand recognition. It has about 70% popularity globally. With your Omega Seamaster 300M watch, you can also anticipate turning heads.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M vs Rolex Submariner: Prices and Market Performance\n\n\n\nThere is a substantial price difference between the Seamaster 300m and the Rolex Submariner. The Submariner costs more than the Seamaster 300m. You can expect to pay double the Seamaster’s price to get the Submariner model. But at just under $6,000, the Seamaster 300M gives you value for money. However, the Seamaster will most likely not increase in value over the years like the Submariner. If you are purchasing a watch as a financial investment, the Rolex Submariner is the right choice. But in case you are on a strict budget and still want a premium, luxury watch, you can never go wrong with a Seamaster 300M.\n\n\n\nSeamaster 300M vs Rolex Submariner: Warranty\n\n\n\nA warranty shows if a brand can stand behind its models. The warranty can help determine the highest quality watch brand when comparing the two watch brands. The warranties on both brands are rather remarkable. The Omega Seamaster 300M and Rolex Submariner watches come with a 5-year warranty.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nWhich Timepiece Should You Choose: Seamaster 300M or Rolex Submariner?\n\n\n\nBoth Seamaster 300M and the Rolex Submariner are top-rated timepieces and either one will look good on your wrist. Making a choice comes down to your needs, tastes, and budget. Both watches are made of high-quality materials and have very similar capabilities If anything, the Seamaster 300m has the edge on technical ability thanks to its antimagnetic and Co-Axial-equipped movements, which provide buyers quite a lot of value in terms of performance. With costs, the Rolex Submariner comes with a pretty hefty price tag. It all boils down to whether you want to spend twice as much money on a Rolex watch. Remember the Submariner can hold or increase its value better or even appreciate.\n\n\n\nBuy Omega and Rolex Watches\n\n\n\nNeed to buy a Seamaster 300M or Rolex Submariner watch? Look no further than Bob’s Watches. We offer authentic Omega and Rolex watches at fair market value. You can also sell your used Rolex and Omega watches to us. Get in touch to learn home. \nThe post Omega Seamaster 300m vs Rolex Submariner appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2022-11-24T01:57:00-08:00", "date_modified": "2023-03-03T17:11:51-08:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/20JM1990-2-Edit-1.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=53191", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-submariner-date-modern-vs-vintage-comparison.html", "title": "Modern vs Vintage Comparison \u2013 Rolex Submariner Date", "content_html": "While the Rolex Submariner itself was first introduced in 1953, it didn\u2019t actually gain a date display until almost a decade and a half later in 1967 with the launch of the reference 1680. Since then, the Rolex Submariner Date has become a constant presence in the brand\u2019s catalog and it has expanded to the point where it is now available in different colors and even precious metal configurations. Rolex still produces a version of the Submariner Date that is crafted from stainless steel and fitted with a classic black dial and matching black bezel insert, although the model that Rolex produces today is quite a bit different than the first version that debuted more than half a century ago.
\nBelow we are going over a complete comparison between the vintage and modern Rolex Submariner Date watches, and highlighting the key differences between them, and the way this classic date-displaying dive watch has evolved over the years.
\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Submariner.
\n\n\t
\n![\"Vintage](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Vintage-Rolex-submariner-date-scaled-e1659723376362.jpg\" "\\"Vintage")
\n\t
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Rolex-submariner-date-scaled-e1659723520114.jpg\" "\\"Modern")
\n\t
\n![\"Vintage](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/vintage-submariner-date-1-scaled-e1659723929266.jpg\" "\\"Vintage")
Arguably the single most noticeable way that the Rolex Submariner has changed from the vintage reference 1680 to the modern reference 126610LN is in regards to its case. While the official case diameter has only grown a single millimeter from 40mm to 41mm, the case proportions have dramatically changed, and the modern version includes thicker lugs and crown guards. Additionally, while the lugs on the vintage Submariner 1680 feature their springbar holes drilled completely through them (known as a \u201choles case\u201d among collectors), the outer flanks of the lugs on the modern Submariner 126610LN are completely smooth (referred to as a \u201cno-holes case\u201d).
\nOn top of that, while both models are ultimately made from stainless steel, the new modern Submariner Date is crafted from Oystersteel, which is Rolex\u2019s own blend of 904L stainless steel that it produced from within its own in-house foundry. Lastly, while the crystal fitted to the vintage ref. 1680 is made from acrylic in a thick box-shaped structure known as a \u201ctop hat\u201d crystal, the crystal fitted to the modern ref. 126610LN is flat and made from scratch-resistant synthetic sapphire, just like the rest of Rolex\u2019s contemporary watches.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/roelx-submariner-date-scaled-e1659724058270.jpg\" "\\"Modern")
While both the vintage Submariner Date 1680 and the modern Submariner Date 126610LN feature rotating timing bezels with serrated edges and black 60-minute inserts, that is more or less where the similarities end. The bezel fitted to the ref. 1680 is friction-fitted and rotates smoothly with bidirectional motion, while the bezel on the modern ref. 126610LN features a 120-click ratcheting motion and will only move counterclockwise as a safety feature for scuba divers.
\nAdditionally, the actual material used for the black bezel inserts has changed. While the vintage Submariner Date 1680 has an insert made from anodized aluminum, the modern Submariner Date 126620LN has its insert crafted from Cerachrom, which is Rolex\u2019s proprietary ceramic material that is impervious to the fading effects of UV rays and near-impossible to scratch under normal circumstances.
\n![\"Vintage](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Vintage-and-Modern-Rolex-submariner-date-scaled-e1659724124462.jpg\" "\\"Vintage")
The dials fitted to both the vintage and modern versions of the Rolex Submariner Date are black in color with geometric-shaped luminous hour markers. However, the dials found inside the vintage ref. 1680 are matte black and have their luminous hour markers painted directly onto their surface using tritium. Meanwhile, the dials fitted to the modern ref. 126610LN are known as \u201cmaxi\u201d dials due to their larger indexes, and they feature gloss black surfaces with applied hour markers that are crafted from 18k white gold and filled with blue-glowing Chromalight.
\nFurthermore, although all of the dials fitted to the vintage Submariner Date 1680 are matte black in color, the text on them can slightly differ, and the very earliest examples that were produced up until the mid-1970s even feature their \u201cSubmariner\u201d name red letters. By contrast, all of the dials fitted to the modern Submariner Date 126610LN are more-or-less identical, and the greatest update to accompany this latest generation of Submariner dial is the tiny Rolex logo placed below the 6 o\u2019clock hour marker, which is absent from the maxi dials found on the previous generation of Submariner Date watches.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/rolex-submariner-date-vintage-vs-modern-scaled-e1659723685552.jpg\" "\\"Modern")
Just like the rest of the watch, the internal movement powering the Rolex Submariner Date has slowly evolved over the years as new materials and technologies have become available. While both the vintage and modern versions of the Rolex Submariner Date feature self-winding, chronometer-certified movements that are produced in-house by Rolex, the actual designs and capabilities of the two movements are slightly different.
\nThe vintage Rolex Submariner Date ref. 1680 is powered by the Caliber 1575 movement, which runs at a frequency of 19,800vph and offers users an approximate power reserve of 42 hours. Additionally, while the Rolex Cal. 1575 features an automatically changing date display, there is no Quickset functionality for the date, meaning that it cannot be adjusted independently of the time.
\nOn the other hand, the movement powering the modern Rolex Submariner Date ref. 126610LN is the Caliber 3235, which is the latest generation of Rolex in-house movements. Based upon the brand\u2019s Chronergy escapement and featuring Rolex\u2019s proprietary blue Parachrom hairspring, the Cal. 3235 features both a Quickset date feature and offers users a longer power reserve of approximately 70 hours. Furthermore, while both movements are officially certified chronometers, the COSC standards for the Cal. 1575 guarantee -4/+6 seconds per day of timekeeping accuracy, while the Superlative Chronometer standards for the Cal. 3235 promise even tighter timekeeping tolerances of -2/+2 seconds per day, after casing.
\nThe post Modern vs Vintage Comparison \u2013 Rolex Submariner Date appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "While the Rolex Submariner itself was first introduced in 1953, it didn\u2019t actually gain a date display until almost a decade and a half later in 1967 with the launch of the reference 1680. Since then, the Rolex Submariner Date has become a constant presence in the brand\u2019s catalog and it has expanded to the point where it is now available in different colors and even precious metal configurations. Rolex still produces a version of the Submariner Date that is crafted from stainless steel and fitted with a classic black dial and matching black bezel insert, although the model that Rolex produces today is quite a bit different than the first version that debuted more than half a century ago.\nBelow we are going over a complete comparison between the vintage and modern Rolex Submariner Date watches, and highlighting the key differences between them, and the way this classic date-displaying dive watch has evolved over the years.\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Submariner.\n\n\tShop Rolex Submariner Watches\nVintage Rolex Submariner Date 1680\n\nSubmariner Reference 1680 Key Features\n\nYear of Introduction: 1967\nReference Number: 1680\nCase Size: 40mm\nMaterials: Stainless Steel\nFunctions: Time w/ Running Seconds, Date Display (Non-Quickset), Rotating Timing Bezel\nBezel: Bidirectional, Black Aluminum Insert w/ 60-Minute Scale\nDial: Black w/ Luminous Markers (Matte Style)\nLuminous Material: Tritium\nCrystal: Acrylic (Box Shaped w/ Cyclops Lens)\nMovement: Rolex Caliber 1575 Automatic Movement\nWater Resistance: 200 Meters / 660 Feet\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet\nClasp: Latching Fold-Over Clasp w/ Fold-Out Extension\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Submariner 1680 Watches\nModern Rolex Submariner Date 126610LN\n\nSubmariner Reference 126610LN Key Features\n\nYear of Introduction: 2020\nReference Number: 126610LN\nCase Size: 41mm\nMaterials: Oystersteel (904L Stainless Steel)\nFunctions: Time w/ Running Seconds, Date Display (Quickset), Rotating Timing Bezel\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black Cerachrom Insert w/ 60-Minute Scale\nDial: Black w/ Luminous Markers (Maxi Style)\nLuminous Material: Chromalight\nCrystal: Sapphire (Flat w/ Cyclops Lens)\nMovement: Rolex Caliber 3235 Automatic Movement\nWater Resistance: 300 Meters / 1,060 Feet\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet\nClasp: Oysterlock Safety Clasp w/ Glidelock Extension\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Submariner 126610 Watches\n\nExternal Case Differences: Modern vs. Vintage Submariner Date\nArguably the single most noticeable way that the Rolex Submariner has changed from the vintage reference 1680 to the modern reference 126610LN is in regards to its case. While the official case diameter has only grown a single millimeter from 40mm to 41mm, the case proportions have dramatically changed, and the modern version includes thicker lugs and crown guards. Additionally, while the lugs on the vintage Submariner 1680 feature their springbar holes drilled completely through them (known as a \u201choles case\u201d among collectors), the outer flanks of the lugs on the modern Submariner 126610LN are completely smooth (referred to as a \u201cno-holes case\u201d).\nOn top of that, while both models are ultimately made from stainless steel, the new modern Submariner Date is crafted from Oystersteel, which is Rolex\u2019s own blend of 904L stainless steel that it produced from within its own in-house foundry. Lastly, while the crystal fitted to the vintage ref. 1680 is made from acrylic in a thick box-shaped structure known as a \u201ctop hat\u201d crystal, the crystal fitted to the modern ref. 126610LN is flat and made from scratch-resistant synthetic sapphire, just like the rest of Rolex\u2019s contemporary watches.\n\nBezel Differences: Submariner Date Watches\nWhile both the vintage Submariner Date 1680 and the modern Submariner Date 126610LN feature rotating timing bezels with serrated edges and black 60-minute inserts, that is more or less where the similarities end. The bezel fitted to the ref. 1680 is friction-fitted and rotates smoothly with bidirectional motion, while the bezel on the modern ref. 126610LN features a 120-click ratcheting motion and will only move counterclockwise as a safety feature for scuba divers.\nAdditionally, the actual material used for the black bezel inserts has changed. While the vintage Submariner Date 1680 has an insert made from anodized aluminum, the modern Submariner Date 126620LN has its insert crafted from Cerachrom, which is Rolex\u2019s proprietary ceramic material that is impervious to the fading effects of UV rays and near-impossible to scratch under normal circumstances.\n\nMatte vs. Maxi Dials: Rolex Submariner Date Watches\nThe dials fitted to both the vintage and modern versions of the Rolex Submariner Date are black in color with geometric-shaped luminous hour markers. However, the dials found inside the vintage ref. 1680 are matte black and have their luminous hour markers painted directly onto their surface using tritium. Meanwhile, the dials fitted to the modern ref. 126610LN are known as \u201cmaxi\u201d dials due to their larger indexes, and they feature gloss black surfaces with applied hour markers that are crafted from 18k white gold and filled with blue-glowing Chromalight.\nFurthermore, although all of the dials fitted to the vintage Submariner Date 1680 are matte black in color, the text on them can slightly differ, and the very earliest examples that were produced up until the mid-1970s even feature their \u201cSubmariner\u201d name red letters. By contrast, all of the dials fitted to the modern Submariner Date 126610LN are more-or-less identical, and the greatest update to accompany this latest generation of Submariner dial is the tiny Rolex logo placed below the 6 o\u2019clock hour marker, which is absent from the maxi dials found on the previous generation of Submariner Date watches.\n\nInternal Movements: Vintage Cal. 1575 vs. Modern Cal. 3235\nJust like the rest of the watch, the internal movement powering the Rolex Submariner Date has slowly evolved over the years as new materials and technologies have become available. While both the vintage and modern versions of the Rolex Submariner Date feature self-winding, chronometer-certified movements that are produced in-house by Rolex, the actual designs and capabilities of the two movements are slightly different.\nThe vintage Rolex Submariner Date ref. 1680 is powered by the Caliber 1575 movement, which runs at a frequency of 19,800vph and offers users an approximate power reserve of 42 hours. Additionally, while the Rolex Cal. 1575 features an automatically changing date display, there is no Quickset functionality for the date, meaning that it cannot be adjusted independently of the time.\nOn the other hand, the movement powering the modern Rolex Submariner Date ref. 126610LN is the Caliber 3235, which is the latest generation of Rolex in-house movements. Based upon the brand\u2019s Chronergy escapement and featuring Rolex\u2019s proprietary blue Parachrom hairspring, the Cal. 3235 features both a Quickset date feature and offers users a longer power reserve of approximately 70 hours. Furthermore, while both movements are officially certified chronometers, the COSC standards for the Cal. 1575 guarantee -4/+6 seconds per day of timekeeping accuracy, while the Superlative Chronometer standards for the Cal. 3235 promise even tighter timekeeping tolerances of -2/+2 seconds per day, after casing.\nThe post Modern vs Vintage Comparison \u2013 Rolex Submariner Date appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2022-08-05T11:42:20-07:00", "date_modified": "2022-08-08T08:48:35-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Brandon Frazin", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/brandon-frazin", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c0fad99bd2bab762221bfc849c597bb3?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Brandon Frazin", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/brandon-frazin", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c0fad99bd2bab762221bfc849c597bb3?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Vintage-vs-Modern-Rolex-submariner-date-banner.png", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=41143", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-batman-vs-coke-gmt-comparison.html", "title": "Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Coke GMT-Master II Comparison", "content_html": "In case you somehow didn\u2019t know, the Rolex Batman is the blue and black Rolex GMT-Master II model, which gets its nickname from having the same colors as the Dark Knight comic book character. On the other hand, the Rolex Coke is the GMT-Master II with a black and red bezel. Both are beloved by Rolex collectors around the world and offer a different take on the collection\u2019s classic split-color design.
\nNow, when it comes to comparing these two models, things can get a little tricky. The Rolex Batman GMT-Master II \u2013 the ref. 126710BLNR \u2013 is still in production today. However, the Coke GMT-Master was produced from 1989 to 2007. So, to put them head to head, we\u2019re going to compare the new Rolex Batman GMT-Master II against the most recent iteration of the Rolex Coke GMT-Master II, the reference 16710.
\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex GMT-Master II.
\n\n\t
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/20JM1853-2-Edit-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
\n\t
\nThe Rolex Batman GMT-Master II is an absolute icon and modern staple of the brand\u2019s collection. In fact, it\u2019s one of the most collectible watches on the planet, with a waitlist that spans years and secondary market pieces holding great value.
\nThe original Rolex Batman was first introduced in 2013 with the ref. 116710BLNR \u2013 nearly 60 years after the original GMT-Master, and some 30 years after the first GMT-Master II was introduced with the quickest hour hand. At Baselworld 2019, Rolex launched an updated Batman GMT-Master II, the reference 126710BLNR, with a new movement, slightly redesigned case, and Jubilee bracelet. Two years later, Rolex also added the option for an Oyster bracelet, giving collectors a choice between the sportier three-link Oyster bracelet or the more refined and dressy five-link Jubilee bracelet.
\nSo what are the defining features of the modern Rolex Batman GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR? Two main things. Firstly, there\u2019s that blue and black Cerachrom (aka ceramic) bezel insert with engraved numerals and graduations. The blue and black combination is still considered quite new and noteworthy amongst collectors, especially with the durable ceramic upgrade we\u2019ve seen in the modern generation of the GMT-Master II collection. The Batman bezel is also a first of its kind, marking the first time Rolex ever produced a bi-color ceramic bezel.
\nThen there\u2019s the bracelet. In 2019, Rolex officially unveiled the Batman GMT in an all-stainless version with a dressy, elegant Jubilee bracelet. Previously, it had only been sold on the sportier three-piece link Oyster bracelet. While die-hard Rolex enthusiasts were a little disappointed that they didn\u2019t have the option for the original Oyster, they were eventually vindicated with the return of the Oyster bracelet Batman in 2021. Along with the new Cal. 3285 movement, this beautiful upgrade has set this watch apart from the rest.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/20JM0957-Edit-2.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
\n\t
\nWhile the Rolex Coke GMT is no longer in production, it did have a great run of nearly 25 years. Offered alongside the classic red and blue (Pepsi) and all-black bezels, the red and black \u201cCoke\u201d insert got its name for the resemblance to the bottles of the iconic soda manufacturer.
\nThe GMT-Master II Coke was an awesome and notable watch, and its signature red and black bezel was first introduced on the inaugural GMT-Master II reference 16760 from the 1980s, making it a highly collectible icon to this day. But what exactly sets this model apart from the latest and greatest Batman? Well, a few things.
\nThe Coke GMT-Master II 16710 featured an aluminum bezel insert just like all other Rolex watches that pre-date the arrival of Cerachrom. In fact, it was one of the last GMT-Master II models to feature aluminum bezels before they were replaced by ceramic in the current generation of the GMT-Master II, which first started to make an appearance in 2005. This makes this black and red bezel highly collectible today. The GMT-Master II ref. 16710 also pre-dates the \u201cSuper\u201d case and \u201cMaxi\u201d dial era, which included larger hour markers and hands, broader lugs, and a bigger crown guard. Similar to the modern Rolex Batman, the ref. 16710 is also available on either a Jubilee or Oyster bracelet.
\nTo sum it up, the Rolex Coke ref. 16710 features aluminum instead of Cerachrom, smaller hour markers, and a sleeker case. While the Batman Rolex is slightly more robust with larger, more contemporary features on the dial, more lustrous ceramic, and a newer-style case and bracelet.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/IMG_5213-Edit-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Rolex did discontinue the original Batman GMT ref. 116710BLNR, but that was only done to make room for the brand-new GMT-Master II ref. 126710, which is also sold with the famous Dark Knight black and blue ceramic bezel insert. The Batman GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR is still in production.
\nRolex is notorious for only making relatively minor changes to its existing lineup. Seeing a completely new bezel colorway for the GMT after decades of seeing the same hues, and in two-tone ceramic for the first time ever none-the-less, was exciting. Perhaps, that could explain its popularity.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/20JM0960-Edit.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The Rolex Coke holds a special place in Rolex GMT-Master II history. When Rolex introduced the series with the newly independent GMT hand, it was only sold with a red and black Coke bezel, which was also a new colorway at the time. Additionally, as a discontinued Rolex, the Coke GMT-Master II is very collectible, which is enough to win over even the most experienced luxury watch enthusiasts.
\nIt\u2019s somewhat surprising that Rolex no longer produces the GMT-Master II with a monochromatic black bezel. The catalog currently only offers the bezel in two-tone. The black bezel option had been a fixture for decades, gracing ref. 16710 and even its predecessor, the ref. 116710. It\u2019s possible to buy a GMT-Master II with an aluminum or ceramic bezel in all-black. However, the secondary market is currently your only option. It\u2019s hard to say why Rolex discontinues certain models, and only time will tell if Rolex adds the all-black bezel option back to their lineup.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/IMG_5220-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Coke GMT-Master II Comparison appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "In case you somehow didn\u2019t know, the Rolex Batman is the blue and black Rolex GMT-Master II model, which gets its nickname from having the same colors as the Dark Knight comic book character. On the other hand, the Rolex Coke is the GMT-Master II with a black and red bezel. Both are beloved by Rolex collectors around the world and offer a different take on the collection\u2019s classic split-color design.\nNow, when it comes to comparing these two models, things can get a little tricky. The Rolex Batman GMT-Master II \u2013 the ref. 126710BLNR \u2013 is still in production today. However, the Coke GMT-Master was produced from 1989 to 2007. So, to put them head to head, we\u2019re going to compare the new Rolex Batman GMT-Master II against the most recent iteration of the Rolex Coke GMT-Master II, the reference 16710.\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex GMT-Master II.\n\n\tShop Rolex GMT-Master II Watches\nRolex Batman GMT-Master II Watches\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Batman GMT-Master II Watches\nThe Rolex Batman GMT-Master II is an absolute icon and modern staple of the brand\u2019s collection. In fact, it\u2019s one of the most collectible watches on the planet, with a waitlist that spans years and secondary market pieces holding great value.\nThe original Rolex Batman was first introduced in 2013 with the ref. 116710BLNR \u2013 nearly 60 years after the original GMT-Master, and some 30 years after the first GMT-Master II was introduced with the quickest hour hand. At Baselworld 2019, Rolex launched an updated Batman GMT-Master II, the reference 126710BLNR, with a new movement, slightly redesigned case, and Jubilee bracelet. Two years later, Rolex also added the option for an Oyster bracelet, giving collectors a choice between the sportier three-link Oyster bracelet or the more refined and dressy five-link Jubilee bracelet.\nSo what are the defining features of the modern Rolex Batman GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR? Two main things. Firstly, there\u2019s that blue and black Cerachrom (aka ceramic) bezel insert with engraved numerals and graduations. The blue and black combination is still considered quite new and noteworthy amongst collectors, especially with the durable ceramic upgrade we\u2019ve seen in the modern generation of the GMT-Master II collection. The Batman bezel is also a first of its kind, marking the first time Rolex ever produced a bi-color ceramic bezel.\nThen there\u2019s the bracelet. In 2019, Rolex officially unveiled the Batman GMT in an all-stainless version with a dressy, elegant Jubilee bracelet. Previously, it had only been sold on the sportier three-piece link Oyster bracelet. While die-hard Rolex enthusiasts were a little disappointed that they didn\u2019t have the option for the original Oyster, they were eventually vindicated with the return of the Oyster bracelet Batman in 2021. Along with the new Cal. 3285 movement, this beautiful upgrade has set this watch apart from the rest.\nRolex Coke GMT-Master II Watches\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Coke GMT-Master II Watches\nWhile the Rolex Coke GMT is no longer in production, it did have a great run of nearly 25 years. Offered alongside the classic red and blue (Pepsi) and all-black bezels, the red and black \u201cCoke\u201d insert got its name for the resemblance to the bottles of the iconic soda manufacturer.\nThe GMT-Master II Coke was an awesome and notable watch, and its signature red and black bezel was first introduced on the inaugural GMT-Master II reference 16760 from the 1980s, making it a highly collectible icon to this day. But what exactly sets this model apart from the latest and greatest Batman? Well, a few things.\nThe Coke GMT-Master II 16710 featured an aluminum bezel insert just like all other Rolex watches that pre-date the arrival of Cerachrom. In fact, it was one of the last GMT-Master II models to feature aluminum bezels before they were replaced by ceramic in the current generation of the GMT-Master II, which first started to make an appearance in 2005. This makes this black and red bezel highly collectible today. The GMT-Master II ref. 16710 also pre-dates the \u201cSuper\u201d case and \u201cMaxi\u201d dial era, which included larger hour markers and hands, broader lugs, and a bigger crown guard. Similar to the modern Rolex Batman, the ref. 16710 is also available on either a Jubilee or Oyster bracelet.\nTo sum it up, the Rolex Coke ref. 16710 features aluminum instead of Cerachrom, smaller hour markers, and a sleeker case. While the Batman Rolex is slightly more robust with larger, more contemporary features on the dial, more lustrous ceramic, and a newer-style case and bracelet.\n\nIs The Rolex Batman Discontinued?\nRolex did discontinue the original Batman GMT ref. 116710BLNR, but that was only done to make room for the brand-new GMT-Master II ref. 126710, which is also sold with the famous Dark Knight black and blue ceramic bezel insert. The Batman GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR is still in production.\nWhy Is The Rolex Batman So Popular?\nRolex is notorious for only making relatively minor changes to its existing lineup. Seeing a completely new bezel colorway for the GMT after decades of seeing the same hues, and in two-tone ceramic for the first time ever none-the-less, was exciting. Perhaps, that could explain its popularity.\n\nWhy Is The Rolex Coke So Popular?\nThe Rolex Coke holds a special place in Rolex GMT-Master II history. When Rolex introduced the series with the newly independent GMT hand, it was only sold with a red and black Coke bezel, which was also a new colorway at the time. Additionally, as a discontinued Rolex, the Coke GMT-Master II is very collectible, which is enough to win over even the most experienced luxury watch enthusiasts.\nWhy Did Rolex Discontinue The Black GMT?\nIt\u2019s somewhat surprising that Rolex no longer produces the GMT-Master II with a monochromatic black bezel. The catalog currently only offers the bezel in two-tone. The black bezel option had been a fixture for decades, gracing ref. 16710 and even its predecessor, the ref. 116710. It\u2019s possible to buy a GMT-Master II with an aluminum or ceramic bezel in all-black. However, the secondary market is currently your only option. It\u2019s hard to say why Rolex discontinues certain models, and only time will tell if Rolex adds the all-black bezel option back to their lineup.\n\nThe post Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Coke GMT-Master II Comparison appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2022-08-04T09:15:00-07:00", "date_modified": "2022-08-05T16:09:31-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Coke-vs-Batman-BANNER.png", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=53050", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-daytona-modern-vs-vintage-comparison.html", "title": "Rolex Daytona \u2013 Modern vs. Vintage Comparison Guide", "content_html": "Over the years, the classic stainless steel Rolex Daytona has slowly evolved, but when it first appeared in 1963, it was fitted with a matching steel bezel that was engraved with its signature tachymeter scale. While the current-production stainless steel Daytona is now fitted with a black Cerachrom bezel, a stainless steel bezel represents Rolex\u2019s original vision for the Daytona, and from the time that the model first made an appearance in the 1960s all the way up until 2016, a stainless steel bezel remained option within the Rolex Daytona collection.
\nWith that in mind, the classic stainless steel bezel Daytona changed a lot from the first generation of vintage manually-wound models to the final version that was powered by an in-house automatic movement. This evolution can be seen when comparing the vintage reference 6265, which was the final model from the first generation of Daytona watches, to both the reference 16520 and the reference 116520, which were the following two generations of stainless steel Daytona watches that were fitted with matching steel bezels, and that remained in production all the way up until a ceramic bezel was introduced to the stainless steel model in 2016.
\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Daytona.
\n\n\t
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Rolex_Daytona_5D3_9663-2-3-1.jpg\" "\\"Vintage")
\n\t
\n![\"rolex-daytona-16520-white-dial-red-letter-stainless-steel-1\"](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/rolex-daytona-16520-white-dial-red-letter-stainless-steel-1.jpg\")
\n\t
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/20JM6058-4-Edit.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
\n\t
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/20JM6045-3-Edit.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
One of the greatest differences between the vintage Rolex Daytona ref. 6265 and its reference 16520 successor is that the vintage reference 6265 features a 37mm case that does not include crown-guards, while the more modern ref. 16520 has a 40mm case that is near-identical to the one found on the reference 116520 and features prominent guards on either side of its winding crown. Additionally, While all three of these models feature screw-down chronograph pushers paired with screw-down crowns and solid screw-down casebacks, the vintage reference 6265 features an acrylic crystal protecting its dial, while both the ref. 16520 and ref. 116520 have crystals that are made from scratch-resistant synthetic sapphire.
\nFurthermore, in regards to the dials themselves, a number of key differences can also be observed. On all of the dials fitted to the vintage Daytona 6265, the chronograph registers appear in a contrasting color, while the hour markers are applied indexes with luminous dots placed next to them. Conversely, on the dials fitted to both the ref. 16520 and ref. 116520, the chronograph registers feature contrasting rings, rather than being completely filled by a different color, while the applied hour markers are filled with lume instead of having separate luminous dots placed next to them
\nWhen it comes to the differences between the dials fitted to the Rolex Daytona 16520 and its more modern ref. 116520 counterpart, the two most noticeable areas where they differ is in regards to the placement of their sub-dials and also the shape of their hour markers. On the more modern ref. 116520, the two registers at the 3 o\u2019clock and 9 o\u2019clock locations are placed slightly higher on the dial, and the location of the hours counter and the running seconds indicator have swapped places, with the running seconds hand now appearing at the 6 o\u2019clock location on the dials of the newer Daytona 116520. As far as the hour markers, both are luminous-filled and applied; however, the indexes found on the older ref. 16520 are longer and thinner than the style found on its more modern sibling.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Rolex_Daytona_16520_5D3_8747-3-4-Edit-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
While the external differences between the various stainless steel bezel Rolex Daytona watches can all be spotted with a well-trained eye, arguably one of the most significant differences between these three Daytona models has to do with the movements used to power them. Although all offer the ability to measure events up to 12 hours in length, the actual movements themselves are all very different.
\nThe vintage Rolex Daytona 6265 is powered by the manually-wound Valjoux 727 movement, which can also be found inside a number of other chronograph watches produced by manufacturers of the same era. In addition to representing a significant aesthetic departure from its predecessor, the Rolex Daytona 16520 also features a significantly different movement and is powered by the Rolex Caliber 4030, which is a self-winding chronograph based on the legendary Zenith El Primero. Although Rolex significantly modified the El Primero to create the Cal. 4030, its origin is the reason behind this generation\u2019s \u201cZenith Daytona\u201d nickname.
\nWhile the Daytona 16520 and the reference 116520 offer a lot of visual similarities and are both self-winding chronographs, the more-modern Daytona 116520 is powered by Rolex\u2019s own in-house Caliber 4130 movement. From strictly a performance perspective, Rolex\u2019s in-house Cal. 4130 is superior to its Zenith-based predecessor; however, many watch collectors favor the older reference 16520 due to its important place in Rolex\u2019s history as the brand\u2019s first-ever self-winding chronograph.
\nRegardless of whether you go modern or vintage, all three of these stainless steel Rolex Daytona watches are fitted with matching steel tachymeter bezels, and in addition to no longer being available directly from retailers and boutiques, all three of these references represent Rolex\u2019s original vision for its iconic racing chronograph.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/20JM0535-2-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex Daytona – Modern vs. Vintage Comparison Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "Over the years, the classic stainless steel Rolex Daytona has slowly evolved, but when it first appeared in 1963, it was fitted with a matching steel bezel that was engraved with its signature tachymeter scale. While the current-production stainless steel Daytona is now fitted with a black Cerachrom bezel, a stainless steel bezel represents Rolex\u2019s original vision for the Daytona, and from the time that the model first made an appearance in the 1960s all the way up until 2016, a stainless steel bezel remained option within the Rolex Daytona collection.\nWith that in mind, the classic stainless steel bezel Daytona changed a lot from the first generation of vintage manually-wound models to the final version that was powered by an in-house automatic movement. This evolution can be seen when comparing the vintage reference 6265, which was the final model from the first generation of Daytona watches, to both the reference 16520 and the reference 116520, which were the following two generations of stainless steel Daytona watches that were fitted with matching steel bezels, and that remained in production all the way up until a ceramic bezel was introduced to the stainless steel model in 2016.\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Daytona.\n\n\tShop Rolex Daytona Watches\nRolex Daytona 6265\n\nDaytona 6265 Key Features\n\nReference Number: 6265\nProduction Years: 1971 – 1988 (Approx.)\nCase Size: 37mm\nMaterials: Stainless Steel\nFunctions: Time w/ Running Seconds, 12-Hour Chronograph, Tachymeter Bezel\nBezel: Fixed, Stainless Steel w/ Engraved Tachymeter Scale\nDial: Black or Silver w/ Luminous Hour Markers; Exotic \u201cPaul Newman\u201d Dials Also Available\nLuminous Material: Tritium\nCrystal: Acrylic\nMovement: Valjoux 727 (Manual-Winding; Valjoux-Base)\nStrap/Bracelet: Oyster or Jubilee Bracelet\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Daytona 6265 Watches\nRolex Daytona 16520\n\nDaytona 16520 Key Features\n\nReference Number: 16520\nProduction Years: 1988 – 2000 (Approx.)\nCase Size: 40mm\nMaterials: Stainless Steel\nFunctions: Time w/ Running Seconds, 12-Hour Chronograph, Tachymeter Bezel\nBezel: Fixed, Stainless Steel w/ Engraved Tachymeter Scale\nDial: Black or White w/ Luminous Hour Markers\nLuminous Material: Tritium or Luminova\nCrystal: Sapphire\nMovement: Rolex Caliber 4030 (Self-Winding; Zenith-Base)\nStrap/Bracelet: Oyster Bracelet\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Daytona 16520 Watches\nRolex Daytona 116520\n\nDaytona 116520 Key Features\n\nReference Number: 116520\nProduction Years: 2000 – 2016 (Approx.)\nCase Size: 40mm\nMaterials: Stainless Steel\nFunctions: Time w/ Running Seconds, 12-Hour Chronograph, Tachymeter Bezel\nBezel: Fixed, Stainless Steel w/ Engraved Tachymeter Scale\nDial: Black or White w/ Luminous Hour Markers\nLuminous Material: Super-LumiNova or Chromalight\nCrystal: Sapphire\nMovement: Rolex Caliber 4130 (Self-Winding; In-House)\nStrap/Bracelet: Oyster Bracelet\n\n\n\tShop Rolex Daytona 116520 Watches\n\nExternal Differences: Vintage vs. Modern Rolex Daytona Watches\nOne of the greatest differences between the vintage Rolex Daytona ref. 6265 and its reference 16520 successor is that the vintage reference 6265 features a 37mm case that does not include crown-guards, while the more modern ref. 16520 has a 40mm case that is near-identical to the one found on the reference 116520 and features prominent guards on either side of its winding crown. Additionally, While all three of these models feature screw-down chronograph pushers paired with screw-down crowns and solid screw-down casebacks, the vintage reference 6265 features an acrylic crystal protecting its dial, while both the ref. 16520 and ref. 116520 have crystals that are made from scratch-resistant synthetic sapphire.\nFurthermore, in regards to the dials themselves, a number of key differences can also be observed. On all of the dials fitted to the vintage Daytona 6265, the chronograph registers appear in a contrasting color, while the hour markers are applied indexes with luminous dots placed next to them. Conversely, on the dials fitted to both the ref. 16520 and ref. 116520, the chronograph registers feature contrasting rings, rather than being completely filled by a different color, while the applied hour markers are filled with lume instead of having separate luminous dots placed next to them\nWhen it comes to the differences between the dials fitted to the Rolex Daytona 16520 and its more modern ref. 116520 counterpart, the two most noticeable areas where they differ is in regards to the placement of their sub-dials and also the shape of their hour markers. On the more modern ref. 116520, the two registers at the 3 o\u2019clock and 9 o\u2019clock locations are placed slightly higher on the dial, and the location of the hours counter and the running seconds indicator have swapped places, with the running seconds hand now appearing at the 6 o\u2019clock location on the dials of the newer Daytona 116520. As far as the hour markers, both are luminous-filled and applied; however, the indexes found on the older ref. 16520 are longer and thinner than the style found on its more modern sibling.\n\nDifferent Movements: Rolex Daytona 6265 vs. 16520 vs. 116520\nWhile the external differences between the various stainless steel bezel Rolex Daytona watches can all be spotted with a well-trained eye, arguably one of the most significant differences between these three Daytona models has to do with the movements used to power them. Although all offer the ability to measure events up to 12 hours in length, the actual movements themselves are all very different.\nThe vintage Rolex Daytona 6265 is powered by the manually-wound Valjoux 727 movement, which can also be found inside a number of other chronograph watches produced by manufacturers of the same era. In addition to representing a significant aesthetic departure from its predecessor, the Rolex Daytona 16520 also features a significantly different movement and is powered by the Rolex Caliber 4030, which is a self-winding chronograph based on the legendary Zenith El Primero. Although Rolex significantly modified the El Primero to create the Cal. 4030, its origin is the reason behind this generation\u2019s \u201cZenith Daytona\u201d nickname.\nWhile the Daytona 16520 and the reference 116520 offer a lot of visual similarities and are both self-winding chronographs, the more-modern Daytona 116520 is powered by Rolex\u2019s own in-house Caliber 4130 movement. From strictly a performance perspective, Rolex\u2019s in-house Cal. 4130 is superior to its Zenith-based predecessor; however, many watch collectors favor the older reference 16520 due to its important place in Rolex\u2019s history as the brand\u2019s first-ever self-winding chronograph.\nRegardless of whether you go modern or vintage, all three of these stainless steel Rolex Daytona watches are fitted with matching steel tachymeter bezels, and in addition to no longer being available directly from retailers and boutiques, all three of these references represent Rolex\u2019s original vision for its iconic racing chronograph.\n\nThe post Rolex Daytona – Modern vs. Vintage Comparison Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2022-07-22T10:48:11-07:00", "date_modified": "2023-03-31T14:24:03-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Brandon Frazin", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/brandon-frazin", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c0fad99bd2bab762221bfc849c597bb3?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Brandon Frazin", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/brandon-frazin", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c0fad99bd2bab762221bfc849c597bb3?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/modern-vs-vintage-rolex-daytona-watches.png", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=46124", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-stella-dial-vs-oyster-perpetual-op.html", "title": "Rolex Stella Dial vs. Oyster Perpetual Watches", "content_html": "A fresh trend that’s been sweeping through the luxury watch space recently is the brightly colored dial. That’s thanks in large part to the new line of Rolex Oyster Perpetual watches that were released in the latter half of 2020. With shades like yellow, turquoise, red, and more, the colorful Oyster Perpetual watches were a welcome addition to the more muted tones that we’ve come to associate with fine timepieces, although some of these brightly colored Rolex dials have already been discontinued after only about a year and a half of production.
\nHowever, those who are familiar with Rolex watches will recognize that boldly colored dials are not new to the brand’s catalog but in fact, have a history that dates back to the 1970s. Those vintage dials are known as Rolex Stella dials and many collectors have correctly pointed out that the new Oyster Perpetual watches are (more-or-less) modern revivals of the old-school Stellas. Let’s dig in a little deeper and find out the similarities and differences between the new colorful Rolex Oyster Perpetual watches and the vintage Stella dials that inspired them.
\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on Rolex Watches.
\n\n\t
\n\nIn the 1970s, Rolex began furnishing select Day-Date watches with colorful lacquered enamel dials. Rolex called them “Lacquered Stella” in the catalogs of the era, and there are two popular but incorrect theories about why they received this name. One theory claims that the name was taken from the Italian word for “star” while the other maintains that they were named after American artist Frank Stella, renowned for his kaleidoscope-like creations.
\nThe name actually comes from a Swiss company called Stella that supplied Rolex’s dial manufacturers with special lacquers and pigments that were used in the production of these brightly colored dials. However, today they are simply known as Rolex Stella dials within the collecting community. It is understood that these dials were manufactured in limited quantities and were originally destined for primarily the Middle East market. The combination of the flamboyant high gloss dials with the normally conservative 36mm Day-Date President watch was a striking and unexpected one.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screen-Shot-2021-01-26-at-11.46.06-AM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
While Rolex Day-Date models are most frequently found with either black, white, silver, or champagne dials, the colors selected for the Stella variants were significantly less traditional. Rolex Stella dial color choices include:
\nPerhaps the aesthetic was too unexpected for most because the Rolex Stella watches were not particularly popular during their time. However, similar to several other once-overlooked Rolex references (most notably, the vintage Daytona references), Stella dials have reemerged as some of the most collectible vintage Rolex watches in today’s market. And finding one, especially in good condition, is a challenge since not only were they manufactured in smaller numbers but hard enamel also has a tendency to crack.
\n![\"Vintage](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/20JM4186-Edit-3-1.jpg\" "\\"Vintage")
Rolex Day-Date watches fitted with Stella dials were primarily made during the 1970s and 1980s, but production tapered off in the early-1990s. Additionally, there are yellow gold, white gold, and platinum versions of Rolex Stella watches, as well as gem-set editions. As a result, these special edition dials can be found across several references, depending on their year of production:
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/20JM5771-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Vintage")
In September 2020, Rolex unveiled a new generation of Oyster Perpetual watches, boasting new calibers, new sizes, and new dial colors. Although the watches still offered the choice of neutral-toned dials, it’s the brightly colored versions that got everyone talking and quickly made Rolex’s entry-level model one of the most in-demand timepieces in the world.
\nAt the time of their original release in September 2020, Rolex Oyster Perpetual dial color options included:
\nHowever, less than two years after they were first announced, Rolex quietly discontinued a number of the colorful Oyster Perpetual dials at Watches & Wonders Geneva 2022. Both the Coral Red and Yellow options have been removed from the catalog entirely, and the fan-favorite Turquoise Blue “Tiffany” dial is no longer available for the 41mm model. Additionally, the number of options available for each model has also drastically been reduced. For example, the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 41 is now only available with Black, Silver, Bright Blue, or Green dials, with the green option being the only one left that features a saturated and glossy finish similar to what can be found on vintage Rolex Stella dials.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screen-Shot-2021-01-26-at-11.50.45-AM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
For those who aren’t familiar with the Oyster Perpetual collection, it is Rolex’s entry-level model that is exclusively available in stainless steel and fitted with a time-only dial, a smooth bezel, and a 3-link Oyster bracelet.
\nThe new-generation Rolex Oyster Perpetual watches is currently available in five different case sizes:
\nWith that in mind, even upon their initial launch, not all sizes offered all of the different dial color choices. For example, while the 36mm Oyster Perpetual model was initially available with all of the different dial colors, the Candy Pink option was notably not offered for the 41mm model. Since this point, the number of options available for the various models has been further reduced, making it even harder for buyers to get the exact watch they want.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screen-Shot-2021-01-26-at-11.52.09-AM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
They may look similar at first glance due to their eye-catching dial shades, but the Day-Date Stella dials and the new Oyster Perpetual watches represent two opposite ends of the Rolex watch spectrum. The Day-Date is Rolex’s most prestigious watch model – so much so that it is more commonly known as the Rolex President and it’s the watch that we’ve come to expect on the wrists of the world’s most famous and powerful people.
\nThe Rolex Day-Date is only ever made in solid 18k gold or platinum, and diamond embellishments are always an option. Other flourishes often found on Day-Date watches include fluted bezels and President bracelets. The watch combines both a day and a date window, with the latter indication further enhanced by a Cyclops magnification lens protruding from the surface of the crystal above it.
\nOn the other hand, the Oyster Perpetual is Rolex’s starter watch, offering the two most important design traits of a modern Rolex: a water-resistant Oyster case and a self-winding Perpetual movement. The face of the watch is straightforward in its design, featuring a trio of hands at the center, an unadorned smooth bezel, and a flat sapphire crystal. It only comes with a three-link Oyster bracelet, which is the brand\u2019s most casual choice.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screen-Shot-2021-01-26-at-11.53.49-AM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Given these fundamental differences, it is refreshing that Rolex would pick its entry-level model to showcase a vibrant and collectible dial style once reserved for its most exclusive line of watches. Rolex even revived the idea of the Stella style for a short while in 2013 when it released a few Day-Date models with colorful dials and matching leather straps. However, the most easy-going Rolex model has most recently been chosen to serve up the candy-colored dials – and buyers have been eating it up.
\nAlthough the Rolex Oyster Perpetual is by no means an inexpensive watch, it is far more attainable than a Day-Date President, especially if we\u2019re comparing it to an ultra-coveted vintage Day-Date with a Stella dial.\u00a0If the watch-centric corners of Instagram are any indication, the \u201cTiffany\u201d turquoise editions and the sun-drenched Yellow options are the current favorites among the new OP colorways, which makes it even more surprising that the Yellow and Coral Red options are no longer available.
\nRolex has long been considered a conservative brand, sticking to classic palettes and timeless silhouettes. Yet, given the advent of more cheerful options in recent years like the Rainbow Daytona, multi-colored sapphire “Gummy Bear” Yacht-Master, the gradient gem-set Pearlmaster models, and now the brightly-toned Oyster Perpetual watches, it’s clear that Rolex also is very capable of adding a splash of color to shake things up. With that in mind, given that Rolex only kept all of the colorful Oyster Perpetual dials as part of the catalog for less than two years, it’s also clear that Rolex knows precisely when and how to add a dash of color to its lineup for maximum effect.
\n![\"Vintage](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screen-Shot-2021-01-26-at-11.48.18-AM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex Stella Dial vs. Oyster Perpetual Watches appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "A fresh trend that’s been sweeping through the luxury watch space recently is the brightly colored dial. That’s thanks in large part to the new line of Rolex Oyster Perpetual watches that were released in the latter half of 2020. With shades like yellow, turquoise, red, and more, the colorful Oyster Perpetual watches were a welcome addition to the more muted tones that we’ve come to associate with fine timepieces, although some of these brightly colored Rolex dials have already been discontinued after only about a year and a half of production.\nHowever, those who are familiar with Rolex watches will recognize that boldly colored dials are not new to the brand’s catalog but in fact, have a history that dates back to the 1970s. Those vintage dials are known as Rolex Stella dials and many collectors have correctly pointed out that the new Oyster Perpetual watches are (more-or-less) modern revivals of the old-school Stellas. Let’s dig in a little deeper and find out the similarities and differences between the new colorful Rolex Oyster Perpetual watches and the vintage Stella dials that inspired them.\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on Rolex Watches.\n\n\tShop Rolex Watches\n\nWhat Is the Rolex Stella?\nIn the 1970s, Rolex began furnishing select Day-Date watches with colorful lacquered enamel dials. Rolex called them “Lacquered Stella” in the catalogs of the era, and there are two popular but incorrect theories about why they received this name. One theory claims that the name was taken from the Italian word for “star” while the other maintains that they were named after American artist Frank Stella, renowned for his kaleidoscope-like creations.\nThe name actually comes from a Swiss company called Stella that supplied Rolex’s dial manufacturers with special lacquers and pigments that were used in the production of these brightly colored dials. However, today they are simply known as Rolex Stella dials within the collecting community. It is understood that these dials were manufactured in limited quantities and were originally destined for primarily the Middle East market. The combination of the flamboyant high gloss dials with the normally conservative 36mm Day-Date President watch was a striking and unexpected one.\n\nRolex Stella Dials Colors\nWhile Rolex Day-Date models are most frequently found with either black, white, silver, or champagne dials, the colors selected for the Stella variants were significantly less traditional. Rolex Stella dial color choices include:\n\nBlue\nGreen\nOrange\nOxblood\nPeach\nPink\nPurple\nRed\nSalmon\nTurquoise\n\nPerhaps the aesthetic was too unexpected for most because the Rolex Stella watches were not particularly popular during their time. However, similar to several other once-overlooked Rolex references (most notably, the vintage Daytona references), Stella dials have reemerged as some of the most collectible vintage Rolex watches in today’s market. And finding one, especially in good condition, is a challenge since not only were they manufactured in smaller numbers but hard enamel also has a tendency to crack.\n\nRolex Models With Stella Dials\nRolex Day-Date watches fitted with Stella dials were primarily made during the 1970s and 1980s, but production tapered off in the early-1990s. Additionally, there are yellow gold, white gold, and platinum versions of Rolex Stella watches, as well as gem-set editions. As a result, these special edition dials can be found across several references, depending on their year of production:\n\nDay-Date ref. 1802\nDay-Date ref. 1803\nDay-Date ref. 1804\nDay-Date ref. 18038\nDay-Date ref. 18039\nDay-Day ref. 18079\nDay-Date ref. 18248\nDay-Date ref. 18239\n\n\nThe New Rolex Oyster Perpetual Collection\nIn September 2020, Rolex unveiled a new generation of Oyster Perpetual watches, boasting new calibers, new sizes, and new dial colors. Although the watches still offered the choice of neutral-toned dials, it’s the brightly colored versions that got everyone talking and quickly made Rolex’s entry-level model one of the most in-demand timepieces in the world.\nAt the time of their original release in September 2020, Rolex Oyster Perpetual dial color options included:\n\nBright Black\nSilver\nBright Blue\nCoral red\nGreen\nCandy Pink\nTurquoise Blue\nYellow\nPink\n\nHowever, less than two years after they were first announced, Rolex quietly discontinued a number of the colorful Oyster Perpetual dials at Watches & Wonders Geneva 2022. Both the Coral Red and Yellow options have been removed from the catalog entirely, and the fan-favorite Turquoise Blue “Tiffany” dial is no longer available for the 41mm model. Additionally, the number of options available for each model has also drastically been reduced. For example, the Rolex Oyster Perpetual 41 is now only available with Black, Silver, Bright Blue, or Green dials, with the green option being the only one left that features a saturated and glossy finish similar to what can be found on vintage Rolex Stella dials.\n\nRolex Oyster Perpetual Sizes\nFor those who aren’t familiar with the Oyster Perpetual collection, it is Rolex’s entry-level model that is exclusively available in stainless steel and fitted with a time-only dial, a smooth bezel, and a 3-link Oyster bracelet.\nThe new-generation Rolex Oyster Perpetual watches is currently available in five different case sizes:\n\nOyster Perpetual 28 ref. 276200\nOyster Perpetual 31 ref. 277200\nOyster Perpetual 34 ref. 124200\nOyster Perpetual 36 ref. 126000\nOyster Perpetual 41 ref. 124300\n\nWith that in mind, even upon their initial launch, not all sizes offered all of the different dial color choices. For example, while the 36mm Oyster Perpetual model was initially available with all of the different dial colors, the Candy Pink option was notably not offered for the 41mm model. Since this point, the number of options available for the various models has been further reduced, making it even harder for buyers to get the exact watch they want.\n\nRolex Stella Dials vs. Oyster Perpetual\nThey may look similar at first glance due to their eye-catching dial shades, but the Day-Date Stella dials and the new Oyster Perpetual watches represent two opposite ends of the Rolex watch spectrum. The Day-Date is Rolex’s most prestigious watch model – so much so that it is more commonly known as the Rolex President and it’s the watch that we’ve come to expect on the wrists of the world’s most famous and powerful people.\nThe Rolex Day-Date is only ever made in solid 18k gold or platinum, and diamond embellishments are always an option. Other flourishes often found on Day-Date watches include fluted bezels and President bracelets. The watch combines both a day and a date window, with the latter indication further enhanced by a Cyclops magnification lens protruding from the surface of the crystal above it.\nOn the other hand, the Oyster Perpetual is Rolex’s starter watch, offering the two most important design traits of a modern Rolex: a water-resistant Oyster case and a self-winding Perpetual movement. The face of the watch is straightforward in its design, featuring a trio of hands at the center, an unadorned smooth bezel, and a flat sapphire crystal. It only comes with a three-link Oyster bracelet, which is the brand\u2019s most casual choice.\n\nAn Attainable Splash of Color\nGiven these fundamental differences, it is refreshing that Rolex would pick its entry-level model to showcase a vibrant and collectible dial style once reserved for its most exclusive line of watches. Rolex even revived the idea of the Stella style for a short while in 2013 when it released a few Day-Date models with colorful dials and matching leather straps. However, the most easy-going Rolex model has most recently been chosen to serve up the candy-colored dials – and buyers have been eating it up.\nAlthough the Rolex Oyster Perpetual is by no means an inexpensive watch, it is far more attainable than a Day-Date President, especially if we\u2019re comparing it to an ultra-coveted vintage Day-Date with a Stella dial.\u00a0If the watch-centric corners of Instagram are any indication, the \u201cTiffany\u201d turquoise editions and the sun-drenched Yellow options are the current favorites among the new OP colorways, which makes it even more surprising that the Yellow and Coral Red options are no longer available.\nRolex has long been considered a conservative brand, sticking to classic palettes and timeless silhouettes. Yet, given the advent of more cheerful options in recent years like the Rainbow Daytona, multi-colored sapphire “Gummy Bear” Yacht-Master, the gradient gem-set Pearlmaster models, and now the brightly-toned Oyster Perpetual watches, it’s clear that Rolex also is very capable of adding a splash of color to shake things up. With that in mind, given that Rolex only kept all of the colorful Oyster Perpetual dials as part of the catalog for less than two years, it’s also clear that Rolex knows precisely when and how to add a dash of color to its lineup for maximum effect.\n\nThe post Rolex Stella Dial vs. Oyster Perpetual Watches appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2022-04-07T01:00:09-07:00", "date_modified": "2022-06-03T14:39:31-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Screen-Shot-2021-01-26-at-11.44.49-AM.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=50410", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-gmt-master-ii-116710blnr-vs-126710blnr-ultimate-guide.html", "title": "Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR Ultimate Guide", "content_html": "For the last several years, Rolex has unveiled a new stainless steel sports watch that quickly becomes the most desirable (and unattainable) timepiece on the planet. One of the hottest watch releases of the last decade was the 2013 launch of the black and blue Rolex GMT-Master II reference 116710BLNR, which was replaced by the updated ref. 126710BLNR in 2019. Often named the “Batman” (or “Batgirl” for the Jubilee bracelet variants), these stainless steel GMT-Master II watches stand out for their bi-colored blue and black bezels. The two-tone bezel is of course not new – it appeared on the very first GMT-Master watch released in the mid-1950s and has graced the majority of the references in Rolex’s famed pilot watch lineup ever since. However, what is newer is a two-tone Cerachrom (the brand\u2019s proprietary ceramic material) bezel.
\nNow that Rolex has made two different generations of the GMT-Master Batman, it’s only natural to wonder what the differences and similarities are between these two black and blue luxury travel watches. From similar cases, dials, and materials to different movements, bracelets, and prices, discover all the details with our ultimate guide to the Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR.
\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex GMT-Master II.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/shop-the-collection1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Screen-Shot-2021-11-02-at-5.03.39-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
\n\t
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Screen-Shot-2021-11-02-at-5.05.12-PM-2.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
\n\t
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Rolex_GMT_116710_5D3_4022-2-Edit-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
BLNR stands for the French words “bleu noir,” which means “Blue Black.” That is of course in reference to the blue and black bezels of the ref. 116710BLNR and ref. 126710BLNR, which are made from Rolex’s proprietary ceramic alloy that the company calls Cerachrom. This Rolex-exclusive material is crafted from extremely hard ceramic and it is highly resistant to both scratches and fading from exposure to the elements.
\nWhen the BLNR bezel made its debut on the ref. 116710 in 2013, the two-color combination on a single-piece ceramic component was a world first. To make the blue and black BLNR Cerachrom bezel, Rolex uses a blend of zirconia and a blue pigment. A special metal salt solution is applied to the upper portion of the bezel (from the 18-hour to 6-hour markings) and when heated, that section turns black (while the lower portion turns blue) thanks to a reaction between the blue pigment and the salts.
\nAlternatively, you’ll also find the GMT-Master II 116710LN where the LN is shorthand for “lunette noir” or black bezel, in addition to the GMT-Master II reference 126710BLRO where BLRO is code for “bleu rouge” or “blue red.” As you might imagine, these BLRO versions of the reference 126710 differ from their BLNR counterparts in that they feature the red and blue “Pepsi” bezel, rather than the black and blue “Batman” bezel.
\nClick here for our Ultimate Guide on the Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Batgirl nickname debate.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Screen-Shot-2021-08-25-at-5.05.50-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Both the Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR and the GMT-Master II 126710BLNR feature 40mm stainless steel cases, black dials, and blue and black \u201cBatman\u201d bezels made from a single piece of Cerachrom. While at first glance these two watches may appear identical, there are some important variances to consider.
\nAlthough the case of the newer GMT-Master II ref. 126710 may seem identical to the previous generation, Rolex actually slightly re-shaped the lugs for a slightly more refined appearance. Still measuring 40mm in diameter, the changes to the case are minimal and would likely go unnoticed by all but the most observant \u2013 especially without having a GMT-Master II ref. 116710 on hand for a side-by-side comparison.
\nWhile slightly different than the case found on the ref. 116710BLNR, the re-designed case of its successor is still classifiable as a “super case” by all definitions of that term; the revamped case of the newer GMT-Master II remains noticeably thicker than the cases used on older GMT-Master references with aluminum bezels.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Screen-Shot-2021-11-02-at-5.15.03-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The most obvious update that accompanied the GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR upon its release in 2019 was the Jubilee bracelet. In contrast, the older GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR is exclusively fitted with an Oyster bracelet. Thanks to its five-link curvy design, the Jubilee bracelet is the dressier option when compared to the Oyster bracelet’s flat three-link design. Due to this dressier nature, the GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR with a Jubilee bracelet picked up the “Batgirl” nickname to go hand-in-hand with the “Batman” nickname of the GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR with an Oyster bracelet.
\nAlthough Rolex only offered the GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR with a Jubilee for a few years, in 2021, the Oyster bracelet also became an option for the model. In short, the GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR is only available with an Oyster bracelet while you can choose to go with a Jubilee or Oyster with the ref. 126710BLNR.
\nRegardless of which bracelet, the clasps are the same. Both bracelets receive Rolex\u2019s Oysterlock safety clasp, which features the brand’s Easylink comfort extension system that allows users to quickly increase (or decrease) the circumference of their bracelet by 5mm.
\nAesthetically, the dial fitted to the newer ref. 126710BLNR is virtually identical to the one found in the previous generation GMT-Master ref. 116710BLNR. However, the dial signature below the 6 o’clock location has been slightly updated on the latest version. On the GMT-Master II ref. 126710, Rolex has added a small crown insignia (the Rolex logo) between the words “Swiss” and “Made” that appear just below the 6 o’clock hour marker.
\nBeyond this minor signature update and a slight revision of handset proportions, the two dials are otherwise completely identical. Both are considered “maxi dials” with larger hour markers, and both are finished with Rolex’s proprietary Chromalight luminescent material, which provides them with a long-lasting blue glow.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Screen-Shot-2021-11-02-at-5.09.57-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
While the previous GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR Batman was powered by Rolex’s Caliber 3186 movement, the succeeding ref. 126710 received the Caliber 3285 \u2013 Rolex’s latest generation of in-house GMT movement that is based upon the brand’s new and improved Chronergy escapement. This new-generation movement has now completely taken over from its Cal. 31xx series predecessors and can now be found inside models from both the GMT-Master II and Explorer II collections.
\nAlthough Rolex guarantees the same timekeeping performance for the two movements (+/- 2 seconds per day), the increased efficiency provided by the Chronergy escapement allows the Caliber 3285 to have a power reserve of 70 hours – a noticeable improvement over the 48-hour power reserve offered by the Caliber 3186. Beyond a lengthier reserve, the Caliber 3285 also benefits from the use of Rolex’s Paraflex shock absorbers, which provide its oscillator with a greater degree of impact resistance.
\nDespite the fact that the core functionality remained largely the same, the Caliber 3285 is an entirely different movement compared to the Cal. 3186. Nearly all of its components have been redesigned and the updated Chronergy escapement found inside the Caliber 3285 promises better efficiency and represents the next generation in Rolex’s mechanical movement technologies.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Rolex_GMT_116710_5D3_9593-7-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The retail price of a GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR with an Oyster bracelet is $9,500 while the Jubilee bracelet variant is $9,700. However, like almost all stainless steel Rolex sports watches, these BLNR GMT-Master II models sell for much higher in the secondary market.
\nThe current open market price for a pre-owned GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR starts at nearly $20,000, which is impressive considering that the brand-new retail price for the watch is just under the five-figure mark. A quick math calculation will tell you that if you are lucky enough to purchase a brand-new Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR at retail, you can immediately turn around and sell it, doubling your money, and making a highly-respectable $10k profit in the process.
\nOn the other hand, the now-discontinued Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR can be purchased for a little less in the pre-owned market. A pre-owned GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR starts at around $16,500 on the secondary market. Although that’s less than a pre-owned ref. 126710BLNR, you will not have the option between Oyster and Jubilee bracelets, and this is still significantly higher than the retail price of a new GMT-Master II 126710BLNR.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Screen-Shot-2021-04-02-at-2.55.34-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Despite being only a slightly updated version of the previous Batman GMT-Master II, the newer ref. 126710BLNR was easily the hottest watch from Baselworld 2019 and sparked lengthy waitlists at dealers the morning that it was announced – and those waitlists have only gotten longer, especially now that the model is available with either the Oyster or Jubilee bracelet.
\nOverall, the biggest differences between ref. 116710BLNR and ref. 126710BLNR Batman GMT-Master II watches are the movements, the bracelets fitted to them, and the prices they cost to buy on the secondary market. While the updated ref. 126710BLNR does offer an increased power reserve over its predecessor, the different aesthetic provided by the option of the Jubilee bracelet is arguably a more important factor to consider when buying a Batman/Batgirl GMT.
\nIn the end, both BLNR GMT-Master II watches will keep time to within 2 seconds per day and include the super practical GMT function. Additionally, both the ref. 116710BLNR and the ref. 126710BLNR represent some of the most desirable and sought-after timepieces on this planet. Our advice? Simply buy the one you like best!
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/IMG_5220-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR Ultimate Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "For the last several years, Rolex has unveiled a new stainless steel sports watch that quickly becomes the most desirable (and unattainable) timepiece on the planet. One of the hottest watch releases of the last decade was the 2013 launch of the black and blue Rolex GMT-Master II reference 116710BLNR, which was replaced by the updated ref. 126710BLNR in 2019. Often named the “Batman” (or “Batgirl” for the Jubilee bracelet variants), these stainless steel GMT-Master II watches stand out for their bi-colored blue and black bezels. The two-tone bezel is of course not new – it appeared on the very first GMT-Master watch released in the mid-1950s and has graced the majority of the references in Rolex’s famed pilot watch lineup ever since. However, what is newer is a two-tone Cerachrom (the brand\u2019s proprietary ceramic material) bezel.\nNow that Rolex has made two different generations of the GMT-Master Batman, it’s only natural to wonder what the differences and similarities are between these two black and blue luxury travel watches. From similar cases, dials, and materials to different movements, bracelets, and prices, discover all the details with our ultimate guide to the Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR.\nRolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR\n\nBlue and Black GMT-Master II 116710BLNR and 126710BLNR Timeline\n\n2005: Rolex announces a new generation GMT-Master II with a Cerachrom bezel. The first reference was the yellow gold 116718LN with a black bezel.\n2007: Rolex launches the stainless steel 116710LN with a black bezel.\n2013: Rolex introduces the stainless 116710BLNR as its first watch with a two-tone Cerachrom bezel.\n2019: Rolex releases the 126710BLNR with a Jubilee bracelet.\n2021: Rolex offers the 126710BLNR with the option of an Oyster bracelet.\n\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex GMT-Master II.\n\nRolex GMT-Master II Reference 116710BLNR\n\nGMT-Master II 116710BLNR Key Features:\n\nReference Number: 116710BLNR\nProduction Years: 2013 \u2013 2019\nCase Size: 40mm\nMaterials: Oystersteel (904L Stainless Steel)\nFunctions: Time w/ Running Seconds, Date Display, GMT-Functionality\nDial: Black w/ Luminous Hour Markers\nLuminous Material: Chromalight\nBezel: Bidirectional, Black and Blue Cerachrom Insert w/ 24-Hour Scale\nCrystal: Sapphire (Flat w/ Cyclops Lens)\nMovement: Rolex Caliber 3186\nWater Resistance: 100 Meters / 330 Feet\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet\n\n\n\tBlack Rolex 116710\nRolex GMT-Master II Reference 126710BLNR\n\nGMT-Master II 126710BLNR Key Features:\n\nReference Number: 126710BLNR\nProduction Years: 2019 \u2013 Present\nCase Size: 40mm\nMaterials: Oystersteel (904L Stainless Steel)\nFunctions: Time w/ Running Seconds, Date Display, GMT-Functionality\nDial: Black w/ Luminous Hour Markers\nLuminous Material: Chromalight\nBezel: Bidirectional, Black and Blue Cerachrom Insert w/ 24-Hour Scale\nCrystal: Sapphire (Flat w/ Cyclops Lens)\nMovement: Rolex Caliber 3285\nWater Resistance: 100 Meters / 330 Feet\nBracelet: Jubilee Bracelet or Oyster Bracelet (as of 2021)\n\n\n\tBlack Rolex 126710 Batman\n\nWhat Is BLNR And Where Do The Batman and Batgirl Names Fit In?\nBLNR stands for the French words “bleu noir,” which means “Blue Black.” That is of course in reference to the blue and black bezels of the ref. 116710BLNR and ref. 126710BLNR, which are made from Rolex’s proprietary ceramic alloy that the company calls Cerachrom. This Rolex-exclusive material is crafted from extremely hard ceramic and it is highly resistant to both scratches and fading from exposure to the elements.\nWhen the BLNR bezel made its debut on the ref. 116710 in 2013, the two-color combination on a single-piece ceramic component was a world first. To make the blue and black BLNR Cerachrom bezel, Rolex uses a blend of zirconia and a blue pigment. A special metal salt solution is applied to the upper portion of the bezel (from the 18-hour to 6-hour markings) and when heated, that section turns black (while the lower portion turns blue) thanks to a reaction between the blue pigment and the salts.\nAlternatively, you’ll also find the GMT-Master II 116710LN where the LN is shorthand for “lunette noir” or black bezel, in addition to the GMT-Master II reference 126710BLRO where BLRO is code for “bleu rouge” or “blue red.” As you might imagine, these BLRO versions of the reference 126710 differ from their BLNR counterparts in that they feature the red and blue “Pepsi” bezel, rather than the black and blue “Batman” bezel.\nClick here for our Ultimate Guide on the Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Batgirl nickname debate.\n\nDesign Comparison: 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR\nBoth the Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR and the GMT-Master II 126710BLNR feature 40mm stainless steel cases, black dials, and blue and black \u201cBatman\u201d bezels made from a single piece of Cerachrom. While at first glance these two watches may appear identical, there are some important variances to consider.\n116710BLNR vs. 126710 BLNR – Case\nAlthough the case of the newer GMT-Master II ref. 126710 may seem identical to the previous generation, Rolex actually slightly re-shaped the lugs for a slightly more refined appearance. Still measuring 40mm in diameter, the changes to the case are minimal and would likely go unnoticed by all but the most observant \u2013 especially without having a GMT-Master II ref. 116710 on hand for a side-by-side comparison.\nWhile slightly different than the case found on the ref. 116710BLNR, the re-designed case of its successor is still classifiable as a “super case” by all definitions of that term; the revamped case of the newer GMT-Master II remains noticeably thicker than the cases used on older GMT-Master references with aluminum bezels.\n\n116710BLNR vs. 126710 BLNR – Bracelet\nThe most obvious update that accompanied the GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR upon its release in 2019 was the Jubilee bracelet. In contrast, the older GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR is exclusively fitted with an Oyster bracelet. Thanks to its five-link curvy design, the Jubilee bracelet is the dressier option when compared to the Oyster bracelet’s flat three-link design. Due to this dressier nature, the GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR with a Jubilee bracelet picked up the “Batgirl” nickname to go hand-in-hand with the “Batman” nickname of the GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR with an Oyster bracelet.\nAlthough Rolex only offered the GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR with a Jubilee for a few years, in 2021, the Oyster bracelet also became an option for the model. In short, the GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR is only available with an Oyster bracelet while you can choose to go with a Jubilee or Oyster with the ref. 126710BLNR.\nRegardless of which bracelet, the clasps are the same. Both bracelets receive Rolex\u2019s Oysterlock safety clasp, which features the brand’s Easylink comfort extension system that allows users to quickly increase (or decrease) the circumference of their bracelet by 5mm.\n116710BLNR vs. 126710 BLNR – Dial Signature\nAesthetically, the dial fitted to the newer ref. 126710BLNR is virtually identical to the one found in the previous generation GMT-Master ref. 116710BLNR. However, the dial signature below the 6 o’clock location has been slightly updated on the latest version. On the GMT-Master II ref. 126710, Rolex has added a small crown insignia (the Rolex logo) between the words “Swiss” and “Made” that appear just below the 6 o’clock hour marker.\nBeyond this minor signature update and a slight revision of handset proportions, the two dials are otherwise completely identical. Both are considered “maxi dials” with larger hour markers, and both are finished with Rolex’s proprietary Chromalight luminescent material, which provides them with a long-lasting blue glow.\n\nMovement Comparison: 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR\nWhile the previous GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR Batman was powered by Rolex’s Caliber 3186 movement, the succeeding ref. 126710 received the Caliber 3285 \u2013 Rolex’s latest generation of in-house GMT movement that is based upon the brand’s new and improved Chronergy escapement. This new-generation movement has now completely taken over from its Cal. 31xx series predecessors and can now be found inside models from both the GMT-Master II and Explorer II collections.\nAlthough Rolex guarantees the same timekeeping performance for the two movements (+/- 2 seconds per day), the increased efficiency provided by the Chronergy escapement allows the Caliber 3285 to have a power reserve of 70 hours – a noticeable improvement over the 48-hour power reserve offered by the Caliber 3186. Beyond a lengthier reserve, the Caliber 3285 also benefits from the use of Rolex’s Paraflex shock absorbers, which provide its oscillator with a greater degree of impact resistance.\nDespite the fact that the core functionality remained largely the same, the Caliber 3285 is an entirely different movement compared to the Cal. 3186. Nearly all of its components have been redesigned and the updated Chronergy escapement found inside the Caliber 3285 promises better efficiency and represents the next generation in Rolex’s mechanical movement technologies.\n\nPrice Comparison: 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR\nThe retail price of a GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR with an Oyster bracelet is $9,500 while the Jubilee bracelet variant is $9,700. However, like almost all stainless steel Rolex sports watches, these BLNR GMT-Master II models sell for much higher in the secondary market.\nThe current open market price for a pre-owned GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR starts at nearly $20,000, which is impressive considering that the brand-new retail price for the watch is just under the five-figure mark. A quick math calculation will tell you that if you are lucky enough to purchase a brand-new Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR at retail, you can immediately turn around and sell it, doubling your money, and making a highly-respectable $10k profit in the process.\nOn the other hand, the now-discontinued Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR can be purchased for a little less in the pre-owned market. A pre-owned GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR starts at around $16,500 on the secondary market. Although that’s less than a pre-owned ref. 126710BLNR, you will not have the option between Oyster and Jubilee bracelets, and this is still significantly higher than the retail price of a new GMT-Master II 126710BLNR.\n\nRolex GMT-Master II BLNR\nDespite being only a slightly updated version of the previous Batman GMT-Master II, the newer ref. 126710BLNR was easily the hottest watch from Baselworld 2019 and sparked lengthy waitlists at dealers the morning that it was announced – and those waitlists have only gotten longer, especially now that the model is available with either the Oyster or Jubilee bracelet.\nOverall, the biggest differences between ref. 116710BLNR and ref. 126710BLNR Batman GMT-Master II watches are the movements, the bracelets fitted to them, and the prices they cost to buy on the secondary market. While the updated ref. 126710BLNR does offer an increased power reserve over its predecessor, the different aesthetic provided by the option of the Jubilee bracelet is arguably a more important factor to consider when buying a Batman/Batgirl GMT.\nIn the end, both BLNR GMT-Master II watches will keep time to within 2 seconds per day and include the super practical GMT function. Additionally, both the ref. 116710BLNR and the ref. 126710BLNR represent some of the most desirable and sought-after timepieces on this planet. Our advice? Simply buy the one you like best!\n\nThe post Rolex GMT-Master II 116710BLNR vs. 126710BLNR Ultimate Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2021-11-02T06:01:38-07:00", "date_modified": "2023-03-16T13:02:42-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=49405", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-batman-vs-batgirl-ultimate-debate.html", "title": "Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Batgirl: The Ultimate Debate", "content_html": "Back in February 2021, we published an article about how the \u201cRolex Batgirl\u201d nickname might not make the most sense for the GMT-Master II reference 126710BLNR. We argued that given the various other names for Rolex GMT watches, it might just be easier for everyone if all the GMT-Master II models with black and blue bezels were just called Rolex Batman watches. However, since we initially published that article, Rolex has updated the stainless steel GMT-Master II and now offers the ref. 126710BLNR with either the option of an Oyster or Jubilee bracelet. Now that you can get the current model with either bracelet style, is there still a reason why there should be two different nicknames for the black and blue Rolex GMT-Master II?
\nWhen Rolex discontinued the first Batman GMT reference 116710BLNR in 2019 and replaced it with the updated reference 126710BLNR, the most noticeable difference was that the new model featured the Jubilee bracelet, rather than an Oyster bracelet like before. While the updated model also featured a new-generation movement and a handful of other small refinements, the biggest factor separating the two watches was the style of bracelet fitted to them. To help distinguish between Rolex\u2019s two different black and blue GMT watches, collectors began calling the ref. 126710BLNR the \u201cBatgirl\u201d – but now that the current stainless steel GMT-Master II models are available with either style of bracelet, is it time to retire the \u201cBatgirl\u201d nickname?
\nBefore we dive in, it\u2019s important to remember that Rolex nicknames are entirely informal and in reality, there is no right or wrong answer. An equal case could be made for both opinions regarding the proper nickname for the black and blue Rolex GMT-Master II. Therefore, to make sure that we are being thorough in our analysis, we looped in a few of our industry friends to weigh in on the ultimate Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Batgirl debate.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Rolex_GMT_116710B_5D3_8813-2-3-Edit-4-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
\u2013 Reference Number: 116710BLNR
\n\u2013 Production Years: 2013 – 2019
\n\u2013 Case Size: 40mm
\n\u2013 Materials: Oystersteel (904L Stainless Steel)
\n\u2013 Functions: Time w/ Running Seconds, Date Display, GMT-Functionality
\n\u2013 Dial: Black w/ Luminous Hour Markers
\n\u2013 Bezel: Bidirectional, Black and Blue Cerachrom Insert w/ 24-Hour Scale
\n\u2013 Crystal: Sapphire (Flat w/ Cyclops Lens)
\n\u2013 Movement: Rolex Caliber 3186
\n\u2013 Water Resistance: 100 Meters / 330 Feet
\n\u2013 Bracelet: Oyster Bracelet
\n
![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Screen-Shot-2021-08-25-at-5.09.26-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
\u2013 Reference Number: 126710BLNR
\n\u2013 Production Years: 2019 – Present
\n\u2013 Case Size: 40mm
\n\u2013 Materials: Oystersteel (904L Stainless Steel)
\n\u2013 Functions: Time w/ Running Seconds, Date Display, GMT-Functionality
\n\u2013 Dial: Black w/ Luminous Hour Markers
\n\u2013 Bezel: Bidirectional, Black and Blue Cerachrom Insert w/ 24-Hour Scale
\n\u2013 Crystal: Sapphire (Flat w/ Cyclops Lens)
\n\u2013 Movement: Rolex Caliber 3285
\n\u2013 Water Resistance: 100 Meters / 330 Feet
\n\u2013 Bracelet: Jubilee Bracelet or Oyster Bracelet (as of 2021)
\n
When it comes to nicknames for the Rolex GMT-Master and GMT-Master II, the most commonly used ones are typically based solely on the color of the insert itself. For example, all of the Rolex GMT watches that are fitted with red and blue inserts go by the same \u201cPepsi\u201d nickname, regardless of the specific watch model, its materials, or even the generation of the bezel insert itself. If the \u201cPepsi\u201d nickname can apply to both a modern white gold GMT-Master II with a ceramic and a stainless steel Rolex GMT-Master from the 1960s that has a faded aluminum bezel (while also applying to every single other red/blue Rolex GMT watch), then the \u201cBatman\u201d nickname can be used for all of the different black and blue GMT-Master II watches.
\nMost of the other famous nicknames for the Rolex GMT (such as the \u201cCoke\u201d and \u201cRoot Beer\u201d) follow a similar format to the Pepsi moniker. Even outside of the GMT-Master II collection, a single nickname can often apply to multiple different Rolex references or configurations. For example, it is ultimately a Paul Newman dial that defines a Paul Newman Daytona, a blue dial and bezel that classifies a two-tone Submariner as a Bluesy, and any Day-Date is a Rolex President as long as it has a President-style bracelet, regardless of its case size, metal type, or the style of dial and bezel fitted to it.
\nFurthermore, the current-production Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR is now available with either the Oyster or Jubilee bracelet (as of 2021), which only further complicates matters. Since 2019, Rolex Batman watches were those with Oyster bracelets, while the Rolex Batgirl models were those that had the Jubilee bracelet. This meant that the reference 116710BLNR was the Batman, while the reference 126710BLNR was the Batgirl. However, now that you can get the GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR with an Oyster bracelet, wouldn\u2019t it just be easier if all the different black and blue GMT-Master II watches simply went by the same \u201cRolex Batman\u201d nickname?
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Rolex_GMT_116710B_5D3_8018-Edit-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Rolex nicknames are entirely unofficial, and the \u201ctrue\u201d nickname for a watch is simply the one that is most commonly used by people. For example, Rolex\u2019s flagship collection of watches is formally known as the Day-Date, but the vast majority of people call it the President. Regardless of the watch\u2019s official name, you can go up to virtually any watch collector or enthusiast on this planet, say the words \u201cRolex President,\u201d and that person will know exactly what you are talking about. Similarly, just say the words \u201cRolex Batgirl\u201d and everyone will instantly know that you mean the model on the Jubilee bracelet.
\nAdditionally, there are many popular Rolex nicknames that apply to only one model or configuration. For example, the \u201cSmurf\u201d nickname exclusively pertains to the 18k white gold Rolex Submariner ref. 116619LB, the \u201cSteve McQueen\u201d name only refers to the reference 1655 Explorer II, and the Sea-Dweller ref. 1665 actually has two different nicknames (\u201cDouble Red\u201d and \u201cGreat White\u201d) depending on the dial variation fitted to the watch. Given all these other nicknames, having two separate monikers for the different versions of the black and blue GMT-Master II simply makes sense.
\nOn top of that, there is the simple matter of shorthand clarity, which works in favor of keeping the Rolex Batgirl nickname. If you say \u201cRolex Pepsi\u201d to someone, all that person knows is that you are talking about a red and blue GMT watch. Similarly, without a second nickname for the black/blue Rolex GMT-Master II watches, the words \u201cRolex Batman\u201d will not convey anything more than the color of the bezel. However, say the words \u201cRolex Batgirl\u201d to someone, and they will automatically know that you are talking about the newer model with a Jubilee bracelet. At this point, the Rolex Batgirl nickname already exists, and while it may not follow the same format as other GMT-Master nicknames, it is undeniable that it adds clarity to the general parlance of Rolex-collecting.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Screen-Shot-2021-04-02-at-3.29.38-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Regardless of the specific reference or configuration, all of Rolex\u2019s black and blue GMT-Master II watches are incredibly similar. However, all of our guests had different favorites, along with different opinions regarding which nickname to use for these ultra-desirable luxury travel watches. Below is a quick summary of the thoughts and opinions of the different people who participated in the Rolex Batman vs. Batgirl debate.
\nI just cannot picture the Jubilee bracelet version being called the Batman. I love that it is called the Batgirl, and it will forever be the Batgirl to me. I just love that together as a community, we came up with that name and it makes so much sense – especially considering that not everything in this community always makes sense – but somehow, someone came up with it, everyone was like \u201cthat really works\u201d and people just went with it. For that reason, I can\u2019t ever call the Jubilee bracelet version of the BLNR anything except the Batgirl.
\nI purchased the original Batman on an Oyster bracelet back in 2018, but it wasn’t something that I chose because I was in love with it, but rather because the opportunity came up at the right time. However, I didn\u2019t realize how much I was going to fall in love with that watch. There is an argument to be made about how the Batman on an Oyster bracelet is possibly the most perfect modern Rolex (in my opinion), and while the Oyster bracelet was never something that initially appealed to me, once I actually owned the watch, I found that the Oyster just suited it so well. For me, it’s Oyster on the Batman and Jubilee on the Pepsi, so when it comes to which bracelet specifically for the Batman, I am 120% for the Oyster.
\n– Rob\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR (Oyster Bracelet)
\nI\u2019ve heard that the reason for one model being called the Batman and the other the Batgirl has to do with the fact that the Jubilee bracelet is slightly more feminine – I don\u2019t know if the watch community agrees with that or not, but I understand that it’s at least some of the reasoning behind the watches having two different nicknames. The introduction of the Oyster bracelet on the full stainless steel models does make things a bit more complicated, but despite the changes to the movement and all that, I think it still depends on the bracelet. If the watch is on a Jubilee bracelet then I call it the Batgirl, and if it\u2019s on an Oyster then I call it the Batman.
\nI own the Batgirl, and in terms of comfort, the Jubilee bracelet is top-notch. The GMT is essentially a watch made for traveling, so having that aspect of added comfort is fantastic – especially during the summer months when you are dealing with hotter temperatures. The Jubilee bracelet is very comfortable and sits quite freely on the wrist. After some time spent actually looking at the watch, it perhaps appears a bit more robust on the Oyster, but in terms of comfort, I\u2019ll definitely go with the Jubilee.
\n– Eli\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR (Jubilee Bracelet)
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_GMT_116710B_5D3_8014-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
I think calling the Jubilee bracelet version the Batgirl can be a good talking point when introducing the watch to different types of people (such as my wife). When I told her I\u2019d be talking about the Rolex Batman and Batgirl, she was more intrigued because she thought it might be a woman\u2019s watch or a watch that would be more relatable to women. The Batgirl nickname for the Jubilee bracelet version can be a good way to get more people into this hobby by engaging different genders and making everything a bit more gender-neutral.
\nI definitely prefer the newer model on the Jubilee bracelet; it just seems more dynamic and the look of it is much more satisfying to photograph. The color of blue is a bit more refined and it just looks more mature and maybe possibly a shade darker. On the older models from 2013, the shade of blue just doesn\u2019t work for me for some reason – it just seems a bit more cartoon-like, which is fitting for the Batman nickname, but I still prefer the new one. I’ve seen it on the Oyster bracelet in person a couple times, but to me personally, it just seems a little more sterile and I just prefer it on the Jubilee.
\n– Sam\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR (Jubilee Bracelet)
\nI\u2019m not a big fan of the Batgirl nickname. I think the name itself makes sense and helps with general shorthand, but within the context of other GMT-Master nicknames, it just doesn\u2019t work. Every red and blue GMT insert is known as a Pepsi and anything with brown is often called a Root Beer (even though not everyone agrees with that), so it seems weird to now start differentiating between the different black and blue GMT watches. The Batgirl nickname isn’t going anywhere, but if we are going to call the Jubilee bracelet model the Batgirl, then we need to start calling the Oyster bracelet version of the ref. 126710BLNR something different like the \u201cBatman Beyond\u201d or the \u201cBatman Returns\u201d – and then we also need to start differentiating between the different Pepsi models… Diet Pepsi? Pepsi Max? At what point does it end?
\nI prefer the Oyster bracelet for the Batman from a purely aesthetic standpoint. However, at the same time, if you already own a ceramic Submariner or a Sea-Dweller, then the Jubilee bracelet version is a bit more unique – especially for that person who might already have a few modern Rolex sports watches in their collection.
\n– Ripley\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR
\nNow that they offer the GMT-Master II reference 126710BLNR with both bracelet styles, the whole Batgirl nickname is a bit of a moot point. Even when the Jubilee bracelet version was first announced in 2019, I didn\u2019t necessarily feel that we needed a whole new nickname for the watch, and now that you can order the current model with either the Oyster or Jubilee, can\u2019t they just all be called Batman watches?
\nI think the Jubilee is a little more refined. It\u2019s a little nicer and it just feels a little more elevated, while the Oyster feels more utilitarian. Neither one is better or worse than the other, but it ultimately comes down to individual usage and personal preference. It is two different camps of people and it can also depend on the specific watch. I think the Jubilee is a great pairing with the GMT in general and if we were talking about the Pepsi version, then I might have a different answer. However, when it comes to the Batman, I think I still prefer the Oyster bracelet.
\n– Justin\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/IMG_5220-Edit-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Batgirl: The Ultimate Debate appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "Back in February 2021, we published an article about how the \u201cRolex Batgirl\u201d nickname might not make the most sense for the GMT-Master II reference 126710BLNR. We argued that given the various other names for Rolex GMT watches, it might just be easier for everyone if all the GMT-Master II models with black and blue bezels were just called Rolex Batman watches. However, since we initially published that article, Rolex has updated the stainless steel GMT-Master II and now offers the ref. 126710BLNR with either the option of an Oyster or Jubilee bracelet. Now that you can get the current model with either bracelet style, is there still a reason why there should be two different nicknames for the black and blue Rolex GMT-Master II?\nWhen Rolex discontinued the first Batman GMT reference 116710BLNR in 2019 and replaced it with the updated reference 126710BLNR, the most noticeable difference was that the new model featured the Jubilee bracelet, rather than an Oyster bracelet like before. While the updated model also featured a new-generation movement and a handful of other small refinements, the biggest factor separating the two watches was the style of bracelet fitted to them. To help distinguish between Rolex\u2019s two different black and blue GMT watches, collectors began calling the ref. 126710BLNR the \u201cBatgirl\u201d – but now that the current stainless steel GMT-Master II models are available with either style of bracelet, is it time to retire the \u201cBatgirl\u201d nickname?\nBefore we dive in, it\u2019s important to remember that Rolex nicknames are entirely informal and in reality, there is no right or wrong answer. An equal case could be made for both opinions regarding the proper nickname for the black and blue Rolex GMT-Master II. Therefore, to make sure that we are being thorough in our analysis, we looped in a few of our industry friends to weigh in on the ultimate Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Batgirl debate.\nRolex GMT-Master II Batman vs. Batgirl\n\nRolex GMT-Master II Reference 116710BLNR\n\nGMT-Master II 116710BLNR Key Features:\n\u2013 Reference Number: 116710BLNR\n\u2013 Production Years: 2013 – 2019\n\u2013 Case Size: 40mm\n\u2013 Materials: Oystersteel (904L Stainless Steel)\n\u2013 Functions: Time w/ Running Seconds, Date Display, GMT-Functionality\n\u2013 Dial: Black w/ Luminous Hour Markers\n\u2013 Bezel: Bidirectional, Black and Blue Cerachrom Insert w/ 24-Hour Scale\n\u2013 Crystal: Sapphire (Flat w/ Cyclops Lens)\n\u2013 Movement: Rolex Caliber 3186\n\u2013 Water Resistance: 100 Meters / 330 Feet\n\u2013 Bracelet: Oyster Bracelet\n\nRolex GMT-Master II Reference 126710BLNR\n\nGMT-Master II 126710BLNRKey Features:\n\u2013 Reference Number: 126710BLNR\n\u2013 Production Years: 2019 – Present\n\u2013 Case Size: 40mm\n\u2013 Materials: Oystersteel (904L Stainless Steel)\n\u2013 Functions: Time w/ Running Seconds, Date Display, GMT-Functionality\n\u2013 Dial: Black w/ Luminous Hour Markers\n\u2013 Bezel: Bidirectional, Black and Blue Cerachrom Insert w/ 24-Hour Scale\n\u2013 Crystal: Sapphire (Flat w/ Cyclops Lens)\n\u2013 Movement: Rolex Caliber 3285\n\u2013 Water Resistance: 100 Meters / 330 Feet\n\u2013 Bracelet: Jubilee Bracelet or Oyster Bracelet (as of 2021)\n\n\nA Case For The Rolex Batman Nickname\nWhen it comes to nicknames for the Rolex GMT-Master and GMT-Master II, the most commonly used ones are typically based solely on the color of the insert itself. For example, all of the Rolex GMT watches that are fitted with red and blue inserts go by the same \u201cPepsi\u201d nickname, regardless of the specific watch model, its materials, or even the generation of the bezel insert itself. If the \u201cPepsi\u201d nickname can apply to both a modern white gold GMT-Master II with a ceramic and a stainless steel Rolex GMT-Master from the 1960s that has a faded aluminum bezel (while also applying to every single other red/blue Rolex GMT watch), then the \u201cBatman\u201d nickname can be used for all of the different black and blue GMT-Master II watches.\nMost of the other famous nicknames for the Rolex GMT (such as the \u201cCoke\u201d and \u201cRoot Beer\u201d) follow a similar format to the Pepsi moniker. Even outside of the GMT-Master II collection, a single nickname can often apply to multiple different Rolex references or configurations. For example, it is ultimately a Paul Newman dial that defines a Paul Newman Daytona, a blue dial and bezel that classifies a two-tone Submariner as a Bluesy, and any Day-Date is a Rolex President as long as it has a President-style bracelet, regardless of its case size, metal type, or the style of dial and bezel fitted to it.\nFurthermore, the current-production Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR is now available with either the Oyster or Jubilee bracelet (as of 2021), which only further complicates matters. Since 2019, Rolex Batman watches were those with Oyster bracelets, while the Rolex Batgirl models were those that had the Jubilee bracelet. This meant that the reference 116710BLNR was the Batman, while the reference 126710BLNR was the Batgirl. However, now that you can get the GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR with an Oyster bracelet, wouldn\u2019t it just be easier if all the different black and blue GMT-Master II watches simply went by the same \u201cRolex Batman\u201d nickname?\n\nA Case For The Rolex Batgirl Nickname\nRolex nicknames are entirely unofficial, and the \u201ctrue\u201d nickname for a watch is simply the one that is most commonly used by people. For example, Rolex\u2019s flagship collection of watches is formally known as the Day-Date, but the vast majority of people call it the President. Regardless of the watch\u2019s official name, you can go up to virtually any watch collector or enthusiast on this planet, say the words \u201cRolex President,\u201d and that person will know exactly what you are talking about. Similarly, just say the words \u201cRolex Batgirl\u201d and everyone will instantly know that you mean the model on the Jubilee bracelet.\nAdditionally, there are many popular Rolex nicknames that apply to only one model or configuration. For example, the \u201cSmurf\u201d nickname exclusively pertains to the 18k white gold Rolex Submariner ref. 116619LB, the \u201cSteve McQueen\u201d name only refers to the reference 1655 Explorer II, and the Sea-Dweller ref. 1665 actually has two different nicknames (\u201cDouble Red\u201d and \u201cGreat White\u201d) depending on the dial variation fitted to the watch. Given all these other nicknames, having two separate monikers for the different versions of the black and blue GMT-Master II simply makes sense.\nOn top of that, there is the simple matter of shorthand clarity, which works in favor of keeping the Rolex Batgirl nickname. If you say \u201cRolex Pepsi\u201d to someone, all that person knows is that you are talking about a red and blue GMT watch. Similarly, without a second nickname for the black/blue Rolex GMT-Master II watches, the words \u201cRolex Batman\u201d will not convey anything more than the color of the bezel. However, say the words \u201cRolex Batgirl\u201d to someone, and they will automatically know that you are talking about the newer model with a Jubilee bracelet. At this point, the Rolex Batgirl nickname already exists, and while it may not follow the same format as other GMT-Master nicknames, it is undeniable that it adds clarity to the general parlance of Rolex-collecting.\n\nRolex Batman vs. Rolex Batgirl: Guest Opinions\nRegardless of the specific reference or configuration, all of Rolex\u2019s black and blue GMT-Master II watches are incredibly similar. However, all of our guests had different favorites, along with different opinions regarding which nickname to use for these ultra-desirable luxury travel watches. Below is a quick summary of the thoughts and opinions of the different people who participated in the Rolex Batman vs. Batgirl debate.\nRob – @spanishrob\nI just cannot picture the Jubilee bracelet version being called the Batman. I love that it is called the Batgirl, and it will forever be the Batgirl to me. I just love that together as a community, we came up with that name and it makes so much sense – especially considering that not everything in this community always makes sense – but somehow, someone came up with it, everyone was like \u201cthat really works\u201d and people just went with it. For that reason, I can\u2019t ever call the Jubilee bracelet version of the BLNR anything except the Batgirl.\nI purchased the original Batman on an Oyster bracelet back in 2018, but it wasn’t something that I chose because I was in love with it, but rather because the opportunity came up at the right time. However, I didn\u2019t realize how much I was going to fall in love with that watch. There is an argument to be made about how the Batman on an Oyster bracelet is possibly the most perfect modern Rolex (in my opinion), and while the Oyster bracelet was never something that initially appealed to me, once I actually owned the watch, I found that the Oyster just suited it so well. For me, it’s Oyster on the Batman and Jubilee on the Pepsi, so when it comes to which bracelet specifically for the Batman, I am 120% for the Oyster.\n– Rob\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR (Oyster Bracelet)\nEli – @watchesofgibraltar\nI\u2019ve heard that the reason for one model being called the Batman and the other the Batgirl has to do with the fact that the Jubilee bracelet is slightly more feminine – I don\u2019t know if the watch community agrees with that or not, but I understand that it’s at least some of the reasoning behind the watches having two different nicknames. The introduction of the Oyster bracelet on the full stainless steel models does make things a bit more complicated, but despite the changes to the movement and all that, I think it still depends on the bracelet. If the watch is on a Jubilee bracelet then I call it the Batgirl, and if it\u2019s on an Oyster then I call it the Batman.\nI own the Batgirl, and in terms of comfort, the Jubilee bracelet is top-notch. The GMT is essentially a watch made for traveling, so having that aspect of added comfort is fantastic – especially during the summer months when you are dealing with hotter temperatures. The Jubilee bracelet is very comfortable and sits quite freely on the wrist. After some time spent actually looking at the watch, it perhaps appears a bit more robust on the Oyster, but in terms of comfort, I\u2019ll definitely go with the Jubilee.\n– Eli\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR (Jubilee Bracelet)\n\nSam – @samray_gtr\nI think calling the Jubilee bracelet version the Batgirl can be a good talking point when introducing the watch to different types of people (such as my wife). When I told her I\u2019d be talking about the Rolex Batman and Batgirl, she was more intrigued because she thought it might be a woman\u2019s watch or a watch that would be more relatable to women. The Batgirl nickname for the Jubilee bracelet version can be a good way to get more people into this hobby by engaging different genders and making everything a bit more gender-neutral.\nI definitely prefer the newer model on the Jubilee bracelet; it just seems more dynamic and the look of it is much more satisfying to photograph. The color of blue is a bit more refined and it just looks more mature and maybe possibly a shade darker. On the older models from 2013, the shade of blue just doesn\u2019t work for me for some reason – it just seems a bit more cartoon-like, which is fitting for the Batman nickname, but I still prefer the new one. I’ve seen it on the Oyster bracelet in person a couple times, but to me personally, it just seems a little more sterile and I just prefer it on the Jubilee.\n– Sam\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710BLNR (Jubilee Bracelet)\nRipley – @ripley.sellers\nI\u2019m not a big fan of the Batgirl nickname. I think the name itself makes sense and helps with general shorthand, but within the context of other GMT-Master nicknames, it just doesn\u2019t work. Every red and blue GMT insert is known as a Pepsi and anything with brown is often called a Root Beer (even though not everyone agrees with that), so it seems weird to now start differentiating between the different black and blue GMT watches. The Batgirl nickname isn’t going anywhere, but if we are going to call the Jubilee bracelet model the Batgirl, then we need to start calling the Oyster bracelet version of the ref. 126710BLNR something different like the \u201cBatman Beyond\u201d or the \u201cBatman Returns\u201d – and then we also need to start differentiating between the different Pepsi models… Diet Pepsi? Pepsi Max? At what point does it end?\nI prefer the Oyster bracelet for the Batman from a purely aesthetic standpoint. However, at the same time, if you already own a ceramic Submariner or a Sea-Dweller, then the Jubilee bracelet version is a bit more unique – especially for that person who might already have a few modern Rolex sports watches in their collection.\n– Ripley\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR\nJustin – @abeautifulwrist\nNow that they offer the GMT-Master II reference 126710BLNR with both bracelet styles, the whole Batgirl nickname is a bit of a moot point. Even when the Jubilee bracelet version was first announced in 2019, I didn\u2019t necessarily feel that we needed a whole new nickname for the watch, and now that you can order the current model with either the Oyster or Jubilee, can\u2019t they just all be called Batman watches?\nI think the Jubilee is a little more refined. It\u2019s a little nicer and it just feels a little more elevated, while the Oyster feels more utilitarian. Neither one is better or worse than the other, but it ultimately comes down to individual usage and personal preference. It is two different camps of people and it can also depend on the specific watch. I think the Jubilee is a great pairing with the GMT in general and if we were talking about the Pepsi version, then I might have a different answer. However, when it comes to the Batman, I think I still prefer the Oyster bracelet.\n– Justin\u2019s Favorite: Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 116710BLNR\n\nThe post Rolex Batman vs. Rolex Batgirl: The Ultimate Debate appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2021-08-26T06:01:32-07:00", "date_modified": "2023-03-20T15:13:16-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Screen-Shot-2021-08-25-at-5.05.50-PM.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=38707", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/watch-101/omega-speedmaster-professional-vs-omega-speedmaster-reduced.html", "title": "Omega Speedmaster Professional vs. Omega Speedmaster Reduced", "content_html": "The Omega Speedmaster is easily among the brand’s most famous watches, and the classic Speedmaster Professional is the quintessential example that has been flight-qualified by NASA and holds the distinction of being the first watch worn on the moon. With that in mind, Omega has expanded the Speedmaster collection over the years to include a surprisingly wide range of different chronograph watches, and for about two decades from the late 1980s until about 2009, Omega produced a smaller version of the classic Speedmaster with an automatic movement, which was known as the Omega Speedmaster Reduced.
\nHowever, despite the numerous similarities between these two Omega watches (including their similar overall aesthetics), the classic Omega Speedmaster Professional is a very different watch compared to the Speedmaster Reduced. While the core concept and general design language are shared between these two Omega models, everything else about them from their movements to their cases, dials, bezels, and bracelets are completely different and the closer you compare them, the more apparent the differences become. If you have been trying to decide between the original Omega Speedmaster Professional and the more compact Speedmaster Reduced, then read on to discover all of the similarities and differences between these two Omega chronograph watches.
\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Screen-Shot-2021-08-16-at-3.03.56-PM.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
– First introduced in 1957.
\n– Launched as part of a trio of sport/tool watches alongside the first Seamaster 300 and Railmaster models.
\n– Originally designed for the world of automotive racing.
\n– The world’s first watch to feature an external tachymeter bezel.
\n– First Omega watch to reach outer space (1962).
\n– Flight qualified by NASA for all manned space missions (1965).
\n– First watch worn on the moon (1969).
\n– Still used aboard the International Space Station today.
\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Omega Speedmaster.
\n
The Omega Speedmaster’s illustrious history began more than 60 years ago in 1957, which turned out to be a seminal year for the brand and marked the release of not only the model that would give birth to the first watch to visit the moon but also the Seamaster 300 and Railmaster lines. While the Omega Speedmaster Professional’s legacy is long and well-documented, having spent a huge amount of time in the press ever since the 50th anniversary of the moon landing, there is a brief and often-forgotten chapter to this story that we want to focus on today: The emergence and disappearance of the Omega Speedmaster Reduced.
\nIf you haven’t heard of the “Reduced” before, don’t worry. It hasn’t been available for the better part of a decade, as Omega discontinued it around 2009. With that in mind, while it was available, the Reduced was often seen as the “lite” version of the Speedmaster Professional, not just because of its smaller size (it measured 39mm wide instead of 42mm), but also because of the ways in which it departed from the design of the original, with the intention of making the Speedmaster line more affordable and suitable for a modern market that demanded automatic-winding timepieces.
\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Screen-Shot-2021-08-16-at-3.13.29-PM.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Under the hood, the Speedmaster Reduced used an automatic ETA base caliber (2890-A2) that was upgraded to include chronograph functionality by way of a dial-side module made by Dubois-D\u00e9praz (thus becoming the Omega Caliber 3220). This differed significantly from the Omega Speedmaster Professional, which is famously a hand-wound caliber with an integrated chronograph mechanism. While some purists may not regard the Speedy Reduced as worthy of true Speedmaster status because of this, the change in the movement did had a few interesting effects aesthetically, which should also be taken into consideration when deciding which version of the Omega Speedmaster belongs on your wrist.
\nFirst and foremost, whenever a bolt-on module like the Dubois-D\u00e9praz 2020 is used (which was featured in the original Reduced models released in 1988), it influences the arrangement of the pushers and the winding crown. If you look at the Speedmaster Reduced model side-on, you will notice that the pushers sit slightly higher than the winding crown, rather than in a straight line as you would expect to see on an integrated chronograph. This is because the pushers and the crown are engaged with what are effectively two separate mechanisms geared to run on the same power source, and it is often one of the tell-tale signs of a modular chronograph movement.
\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Omega_SpeedMaster_20JM9551-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Speedmaster")
Beyond the different pusher and crown arrangements, the sub-dial layout is also different on these two Speedmaster models. At first glance, the Speedy Reduced is clearly an Omega Speedmaster, but exactly how much it varies from the standard Professional model doesn\u2019t really become apparent until the two watches are placed side-by-side. At this point, the differences are unmistakable and there are also quite a few of them.
\nThe sub-dials of the Speedy Reduced are placed far closer to the periphery of the dial than the tri-compax cluster of the Speedmaster Professional, and this is even more noticeable due to its smaller case size. This aesthetic update gives the impression that the movement of the Speedmaster Reduced is trying to bust its way free of the case, and many collectors prefer the calm serenity of the Professional, where all of the registers simply fall into their natural place, without overlapping with any of the hour markers.
\nAnother stark difference between the two dials of these similar Omega watches is the presence of five-minute numerals on the original Speedy Reduced model, which are completely absent on the Professional. Combined with the smaller dial, these additional numerals make the display of the Speedmaster Reduced seem a bit more cluttered, yet not in an unpleasing way. Whether or not this resonates with you comes down to personal preference. If you are looking to add an Omega Speedmaster to your collection and you prefer smaller diameters, automatic movements, and “active” dials rather than clean and simple displays, then the Speedy Reduced might be the perfect option.
\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Screen-Shot-2019-11-04-at-3.03.32-PM.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Perhaps the single most attractive aspect of this extinct model for collectors is far more affordable on the pre-owned market than its big brother. This is, in part, due to the movement used inside the watch, but more likely to do with its lack of provenance. It is highly improbable that Omega will ever find itself in possession of the kind of PR gold that the moon landings dropped into its lap and as such, the Omega Speedmaster Professional will forever occupy special status within the brand.
\nHowever, the Speedmaster Reduced is a really fascinating anomaly. It existed in the collection for a little over two decades (from about 1988 until 2009), it has a self-winding movement, there are a few neat special editions (such as the Schumacher editions, panda dials, and even a blue dial released in Japan), and it fits the current trend of smaller-sized watches. With some of these models still available on the pre-owned market and priced significantly lower than a standard Omega Speedmaster Professional, a Speedy Reduced makes for an interesting addition to any collection.
\nAdditionally, if you’re gunning to snare a piece of history, aim for the earlier models that debuted in the late 1980s and early to mid-1990s. These pieces still used radioactive tritium lume, which has the potential to age inimitably gracefully and develop a rich and wonderful patina if it has been kept in the right conditions.
\nDue to the amount of attention that Omega has directed towards the Speedmaster Professional over the last decade (including an entirely new generation with Co-Axial escapements and Master Chronometer certification), and given that the past decade coincided with an explosion of internet coverage of the watch industry, the Omega Speedmaster Reduced is a model that does occasionally get overlooked and missed. And it is these types of watches – the ones that are just outside of the general consciousness – that collectors should look towards for the chance to snare a relative bargain. After all, at the current pre-owned prices, you can’t go far wrong, and since Omega no longer produces the Speedmaster reduced, prices are only likely to increase in the coming years.
\n![\"Omega](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Screen-Shot-2021-08-16-at-3.08.26-PM.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The post Omega Speedmaster Professional vs. Omega Speedmaster Reduced appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "The Omega Speedmaster is easily among the brand’s most famous watches, and the classic Speedmaster Professional is the quintessential example that has been flight-qualified by NASA and holds the distinction of being the first watch worn on the moon. With that in mind, Omega has expanded the Speedmaster collection over the years to include a surprisingly wide range of different chronograph watches, and for about two decades from the late 1980s until about 2009, Omega produced a smaller version of the classic Speedmaster with an automatic movement, which was known as the Omega Speedmaster Reduced.\nHowever, despite the numerous similarities between these two Omega watches (including their similar overall aesthetics), the classic Omega Speedmaster Professional is a very different watch compared to the Speedmaster Reduced. While the core concept and general design language are shared between these two Omega models, everything else about them from their movements to their cases, dials, bezels, and bracelets are completely different and the closer you compare them, the more apparent the differences become. If you have been trying to decide between the original Omega Speedmaster Professional and the more compact Speedmaster Reduced, then read on to discover all of the similarities and differences between these two Omega chronograph watches.\nOmega Speedmaster\n\nSpeedmaster Collection Key Facts:\n– First introduced in 1957.\n– Launched as part of a trio of sport/tool watches alongside the first Seamaster 300 and Railmaster models.\n – Originally designed for the world of automotive racing.\n– The world’s first watch to feature an external tachymeter bezel.\n– First Omega watch to reach outer space (1962).\n– Flight qualified by NASA for all manned space missions (1965).\n– First watch worn on the moon (1969).\n– Still used aboard the International Space Station today.\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Omega Speedmaster.\n\nOmega Speedmaster Professional vs. Omega Speedmaster Reduced Comparison Video\n\nAbout The Omega Speedmaster Reduced\nThe Omega Speedmaster’s illustrious history began more than 60 years ago in 1957, which turned out to be a seminal year for the brand and marked the release of not only the model that would give birth to the first watch to visit the moon but also the Seamaster 300 and Railmaster lines. While the Omega Speedmaster Professional’s legacy is long and well-documented, having spent a huge amount of time in the press ever since the 50th anniversary of the moon landing, there is a brief and often-forgotten chapter to this story that we want to focus on today: The emergence and disappearance of the Omega Speedmaster Reduced.\nIf you haven’t heard of the “Reduced” before, don’t worry. It hasn’t been available for the better part of a decade, as Omega discontinued it around 2009. With that in mind, while it was available, the Reduced was often seen as the “lite” version of the Speedmaster Professional, not just because of its smaller size (it measured 39mm wide instead of 42mm), but also because of the ways in which it departed from the design of the original, with the intention of making the Speedmaster line more affordable and suitable for a modern market that demanded automatic-winding timepieces.\n\nMovement: Speedmaster Professional vs. Speedmaster Reduced\nUnder the hood, the Speedmaster Reduced used an automatic ETA base caliber (2890-A2) that was upgraded to include chronograph functionality by way of a dial-side module made by Dubois-D\u00e9praz (thus becoming the Omega Caliber 3220). This differed significantly from the Omega Speedmaster Professional, which is famously a hand-wound caliber with an integrated chronograph mechanism. While some purists may not regard the Speedy Reduced as worthy of true Speedmaster status because of this, the change in the movement did had a few interesting effects aesthetically, which should also be taken into consideration when deciding which version of the Omega Speedmaster belongs on your wrist.\nFirst and foremost, whenever a bolt-on module like the Dubois-D\u00e9praz 2020 is used (which was featured in the original Reduced models released in 1988), it influences the arrangement of the pushers and the winding crown. If you look at the Speedmaster Reduced model side-on, you will notice that the pushers sit slightly higher than the winding crown, rather than in a straight line as you would expect to see on an integrated chronograph. This is because the pushers and the crown are engaged with what are effectively two separate mechanisms geared to run on the same power source, and it is often one of the tell-tale signs of a modular chronograph movement.\n\nDial: Speedmaster Professional vs. Speedmaster Reduced\nBeyond the different pusher and crown arrangements, the sub-dial layout is also different on these two Speedmaster models. At first glance, the Speedy Reduced is clearly an Omega Speedmaster, but exactly how much it varies from the standard Professional model doesn\u2019t really become apparent until the two watches are placed side-by-side. At this point, the differences are unmistakable and there are also quite a few of them.\nThe sub-dials of the Speedy Reduced are placed far closer to the periphery of the dial than the tri-compax cluster of the Speedmaster Professional, and this is even more noticeable due to its smaller case size. This aesthetic update gives the impression that the movement of the Speedmaster Reduced is trying to bust its way free of the case, and many collectors prefer the calm serenity of the Professional, where all of the registers simply fall into their natural place, without overlapping with any of the hour markers.\nAnother stark difference between the two dials of these similar Omega watches is the presence of five-minute numerals on the original Speedy Reduced model, which are completely absent on the Professional. Combined with the smaller dial, these additional numerals make the display of the Speedmaster Reduced seem a bit more cluttered, yet not in an unpleasing way. Whether or not this resonates with you comes down to personal preference. If you are looking to add an Omega Speedmaster to your collection and you prefer smaller diameters, automatic movements, and “active” dials rather than clean and simple displays, then the Speedy Reduced might be the perfect option.\n\nPrice: Speedmaster Professional vs. Speedmaster Reduced\nPerhaps the single most attractive aspect of this extinct model for collectors is far more affordable on the pre-owned market than its big brother. This is, in part, due to the movement used inside the watch, but more likely to do with its lack of provenance. It is highly improbable that Omega will ever find itself in possession of the kind of PR gold that the moon landings dropped into its lap and as such, the Omega Speedmaster Professional will forever occupy special status within the brand.\nHowever, the Speedmaster Reduced is a really fascinating anomaly. It existed in the collection for a little over two decades (from about 1988 until 2009), it has a self-winding movement, there are a few neat special editions (such as the Schumacher editions, panda dials, and even a blue dial released in Japan), and it fits the current trend of smaller-sized watches. With some of these models still available on the pre-owned market and priced significantly lower than a standard Omega Speedmaster Professional, a Speedy Reduced makes for an interesting addition to any collection.\nAdditionally, if you’re gunning to snare a piece of history, aim for the earlier models that debuted in the late 1980s and early to mid-1990s. These pieces still used radioactive tritium lume, which has the potential to age inimitably gracefully and develop a rich and wonderful patina if it has been kept in the right conditions.\nDue to the amount of attention that Omega has directed towards the Speedmaster Professional over the last decade (including an entirely new generation with Co-Axial escapements and Master Chronometer certification), and given that the past decade coincided with an explosion of internet coverage of the watch industry, the Omega Speedmaster Reduced is a model that does occasionally get overlooked and missed. And it is these types of watches – the ones that are just outside of the general consciousness – that collectors should look towards for the chance to snare a relative bargain. After all, at the current pre-owned prices, you can’t go far wrong, and since Omega no longer produces the Speedmaster reduced, prices are only likely to increase in the coming years.\n\nThe post Omega Speedmaster Professional vs. Omega Speedmaster Reduced appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2021-08-16T06:01:42-07:00", "date_modified": "2022-10-26T15:01:03-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Screen-Shot-2021-08-16-at-3.12.21-PM.jpg", "tags": [ "Buying Guides", "Comparisons", "Watch 101", "Watch Review" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=45215", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/breitling-superocean-vs-omega-seamaster.html", "title": "Breitling Superocean Vs. Omega Seamaster Collection Comparison", "content_html": "A Breitling versus Omega head-to-head is not one that comes up as often as you might imagine. For most of their respective histories, the brands have occupied two different spheres of the same Venn diagram, rarely overlapping in factors such as styling, price, or functionality.
\nHowever, both brands do produce extensive lines of water-resistant sports watches, but what are those models? Breitling\u2019s dive watch category is currently divided between the contemporary Superocean and the neo-vintage Superocean Heritage II. On the other hand, Omega\u2019s collection of professional divers is contained within one category, the Seamaster, of which there are numerous sub-models. Those include the Planet Ocean, Aqua Terra, and Railmaster, just to name a few. It\u2019s also worth noting that both brands also offer wildly successful vintage-inspired divers, complicating matters even further.
\nThis comparison guide ultimately aims to answer the question, what is the difference between the Seamaster and Superocean? As you will soon find out, most of it boils down to aesthetic differences characteristic of each brand and price point. Join us as we break it down as best we can to determine which watch belongs on your wrist, the Breitling Superocean? Or the Omega Seamaster?
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Breitling_Superocean_A1332024_20JM6038-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
Traditionally, Omega has been seen as a level above Breitling in the luxury watch hierarchy, although at least some of it could be attributed to marketing. While the latter company has produced a number of breakthroughs and culturally significant pieces through the years, it is Omega which is usually the \u2018other\u2019 brand non-watch enthusiasts will have heard of (the first obviously being Rolex). Much of that recognition hinges on the priceless advertising of stepping onto the moon, and a lot more comes from being the current manufacturer of choice for James Bond.
\nBreitling has started to majorly expand its global reach since Georges Kern arrived at the company as the new CEO in 2017. The once somewhat scattergun catalog of watches he inherited has been ruthlessly streamlined by dividing the whole thing up into three main categories \u2013 land, sea and air \u2013 in an effort to try and build its customer base beyond just the aviation-obsessed. Kern has also taken a cue from the fashion du jour of directing his sights back into the archives, identifying classic favorites and reissuing them with a 21st-century twist.
\nAs for Omega, it too has been working hard to simplify its output, although for a number of years now. The 1970s and 80s were a tough time for the brand, and its response to the quartz crisis was to jump on every fad and bandwagon that rolled its way. It resulted in the creation of some relatively unorthodox models, many of which were made part of the brand\u2019s two most famous families; the Speedmaster and Seamaster. As a result, the collections became rather diluted, and all the confusion is only now finding some semblance of order and consistency.
\nArguably to an even greater degree than Breitling, Omega has not been shy about opening up the vaults and drawing inspiration from past glories \u2013 and many of those models are very glorious indeed. On paper, the two brands seem to be fairly well matched. However, what happens when we get their respective dive watch collections into a standoff?
\nBreitling\u2019s range is split down the middle, between the thoroughly modern Superocean and the vintage-inspired Superocean Heritage II series. As for the Omega Seamaster, that name still encompasses a colossal number of different types including the Planet Ocean, Aqua Terra, and contemporary Railmaster models.
\nBelow, we are going to explore the two brand\u2019s offerings for underwater adventurers and (as much as possible) compare them like for like.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screen-Shot-2020-09-30-at-2.55.41-PM.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
One thing both watchmakers can safely claim is a highly impressive legacy. Founded in 1884, Breitling came into being at a time of incredible progress in all forms of technology, continuing on from the Industrial Revolution. After modest beginnings, the brand started to expand in both scope and ambition; however, it wouldn\u2019t truly come of age until WWI.
\nThe first conflict to witness aerial combat, the war led to a massive expansion in aviation and, consequently, the need for high precision pilot\u2019s watches. Breitling\u2019s owner, Gaston Breitling (the son of founder L\u00e9on Breitling) shifted his workshop\u2019s focus towards creating timepieces for this new breed of flyer and in 1915, the company unveiled the first-ever chronograph wristwatch with an independent pusher. The invention, which separated the start and stop function of the chrono, proved a major boon for aviators and allowed them an easier and more accurate way of keeping track of flight times.
\nFrom then on, the brand\u2019s name would be unequivocally linked to the skies \u2013 and to chronographs in particular, with perhaps their greatest achievement encompassing both fields being the iconic Navitimer. Over the years, Breitling has partnered with the British RAF and the U.S. Army, and while the brand can\u2019t claim the moon as Omega can, it was a Breitling that would be the first worn in space by an American. Lt. Commander Scott Carpenter, one of the original Mercury 7 astronauts, orbited the Earth three times with a modified version of the Navitimer (called the Cosmonaute) on his wrist.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Breitling_Superocean_Heritage_20JM6195-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
Breitling\u2019s litany of successes with pilot\u2019s watches and chronographs has sometimes overshadowed its dive watches. However, the release of the first of the Superocean collection in 1957 saw Breitling more than hold its own against three of the biggest and most famous examples of the genre: the Rolex Submariner, the Blancpain Fifty-Fathoms, and the Omega Seamaster.
\nFar from simply making up the numbers, the two 39mm Superocean models (the ref. 1004 time-only variant and the ref. 807 chronograph) were highly capable performers in their own right, their 200m water resistance matching Rolex and Omega and doubling the depth rating offered by Blancpain. In addition, the cleanliness of Breitling\u2019s designs meant they were both extremely practical in terms of legibility as well as being aesthetically accomplished.
\nBreitling\u2019s Superocean watches continued to be updated and fine-tuned over the subsequent decades, becoming even more adept with the incorporation of helium escape valves and thicker cases. Today, the hardiest examples are rated down to an incredible 2,000 meters and represent the pinnacle of the modern luxury dive watch.
\nIn 2007, the original models celebrated their half-century and Breitling marked the occasion with a reissue of the debut reference 807, dubbed the Superocean Heritage. While not an exact carbon copy, it was pretty close, with its large sword hands and braided steel bracelet. The 1950s Flying \u2018B\u2019 logo and \u2018Superocean\u2019 script were also both reinstated, adding up to more of an affectionate nod to past glories rather than an all-out, over-the-top duplicate.
\nThat version was itself superseded in 2017 (on the inaugural model\u2019s 60th birthday) by the Superocean Heritage II. With far more similarities than differences to the original Heritage, this second generation is most easily identified by the slightly revamped handset and the inclusion of an ultra hard-wearing ceramic bezel. Inside the three-handed models though, lies the Tudor-built Cal. MT5612 (branded as the Breitling B02 movement), taking over from the previous ETA-based 2824-2. It signified a major collaboration between the two brands, with Tudor receiving the Breitling B01 chronograph movement in return for use in its Heritage Black Bay Chrono.
\nThe Breitling Superocean Heritage II series now consists of some 30 different models, across a range of sizes, metals, and colors. They have been an enormous success for the manufacturer and are arguably one of the best heritage-inspired dive watches that have been circulating the industry in recent years. As for the Superocean collection, that too has been an impressive performer in terms of sales and it has even been opened up to a unisex audience, something that would have been flat-out unthinkable just a few short years ago.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Omega_SeaMaster_PlanetOcean_5D3_0952-2-2-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The Seamaster is Omega\u2019s longest-running name; there has been a model with the title in the brand\u2019s catalog ever since 1948. That year was also the company\u2019s 100th anniversary and the original Seamaster was created as Omega\u2019s congratulatory pat on the back to itself for reaching a century in business. However, that piece was a simple three-handed dress watch, the only thing earning it the \u2018Seamaster\u2019 name being the rubber gaskets for the crown and case back (rather than the previous lead or shellac type) that improved its water resistance.
\nThe debut Seamaster in its true dive watch form came along in 1957 as one-third of the company\u2019s \u2018Professional Collection\u2019. Officially called the Omega Seamaster 300 (although it was only water-resistant to 200 meters), the CK2913 lined up alongside the CK2914 Railmaster (an antimagnetic model designed to do battle against the Rolex Milgauss and IWC Ingenieur) and the CK2915 Speedmaster, the legendary and soon-to-be-moon-bound chronograph.
\nFrom the outset, the Omega Seamaster has taken aim at the same summit as the Rolex Submariner, both vying for the title of being the world\u2019s favorite dive watch. It is a fracas that still continues today, in much the same way that collectors continue to debate as to whether the Speedmaster or the Daytona is the greatest racer\u2019s chronograph of all time.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Screen-Shot-2020-03-05-at-2.09.36-PM.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The CK2913, like its contemporaries, employed all the same features paramount to a hardworking dive model. Offering a large-for-the-time 39mm case size, it too had excellent readability, with its studiously unfussy dial indexes \u2013 a mix of sharp, lume-filled triangles and Arabic numerals at the cardinal points. The broad-arrow hands were similarly legible, and the simple coin-edged black bezel rotated to aid divers in keeping track of immersion times.
\nHowever, the Seamaster\u2019s bezel was noticeably thinner than its rivals. In addition, the first two versions of the CK2913 had what are known as \u2018back count\u2019 or \u2018countdown\u2019 bezels, where the numerals count down clockwise from 50 to 10, the opposite of how we would see them today. There were actually seven variants of the CK2913; the other five reverting to the standard forward counting numerals. However, the original Breitling Superocean had no numerals on its bezel at all.
\nOf course, the key to all dive watches is the winding crown, traditionally the weakest link in any design and the most likely point of water ingress. Rolex held the patent for the screw-down type and so Omega developed its own system. Dubbing it the Naiad (after the Greek for water nymph) it mounted the crown on a special pressure-sensitive spring inside the casing, so the deeper the watch was taken, the tighter the seal would get. It meant the Seamaster\u2019s performance at greater depths was virtually unparalleled, but the downside was that it was prone to leaks at shallower levels.
\nLike the Speedmaster, Omega\u2019s new underwater companion proved to be a big hit with the public. It has stayed in production ever since; however in the years since its initial introduction, Omega has slapped the name Seamaster on a bewildering array of different types and styles of timepieces. Omega wouldn\u2019t really regain its focus until the mid-1990s when it released the first of the Seamaster 300M range. A tough and extremely good-looking creation, it found its way onto James Bond\u2019s wrist in Goldeneye, and hasn\u2019t looked back. Agent 007 has worn an Omega, and usually some form of Seamaster, in every film ever since.
\nJust as Breitling scored a significant success by returning to the beginning, so has Omega in the shape of a number of heritage pieces of its own. In 2014, Omega introduced a production-run model, harking back strongly to the original Seamaster diver but with modern twists, called the Omega Seamaster 300 Master Co-Axial Chronometer. Both it and Breitling\u2019s retro-inspired model are proving strong sellers in today\u2019s market, as are the rest of the two company\u2019s dive models. Below, we put the pair of nostalgic classics against each other.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/zBREITLING-SUPEROCEAN-128889.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
Case Size: 42mm; 44mm; 46mm
\nFunctionality: Time-Only; Time w/ Date; Chronograph w/ Date; Chronograph w/ Day-Date
\nMaterials: Stainless Steel; Steel and 18k Red Gold; 18k Red Gold
\nDial: Blue; Black; Silver; Green
\nBezel: Blue; Black, Unidirectional w/ Ceramic Insert
\nCrystal: Cambered Sapphire, Glare-Proof (both sides)
\nMovement: Breitling Manufacture B20; Breitling Manufacture B01; ETA-Based B13; ETA-Based B10
\nWater Resistance: 100 meters / 330 feet; 200 meters / 660 feet
\nBracelet: Leather; Rubber; Steel; NATO
\nRetail Price: $4,380-$19,600
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/shop-the-collection1.jpg\" "\\"Shop")
![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/zy-132024.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Case Size: 39mm; 41mm
\nFunctionality: Time-Only
\nMaterials: Stainless Steel; Steel and Yellow Gold; Steel and Sedna Gold; Yellow Gold; Sedna Gold; Titanium; Platinum
\nDial: Blue; Black; Green
\nBezel: Blue; Black; Green, Unidirectional w/ Ceramic Insert
\nCrystal: Domed Sapphire, Glare-Proof (inside)
\nMovement: Omega Manufacture Master Co-Axial Caliber 8400; Master Chronometer Caliber 8913
\nWater Resistance: 300 meters / 1,000 feet
\nBracelet: Leather; Steel; Steel and Gold; Solid Gold; Solid Platinum
\nRetail Price: $6,500-$66,000
\n
At their most basic, both the Seamaster and Superocean are simple, time-only models that reflect their respective originators. For the Omega Seamaster 300, that is also where it ends. Each of the 27 pieces in the series is an elegant three-hander, with nothing extraneous to muddy up the symmetry and minimalism of the dial.
\nThe main difference between the watches lies in their metals and bracelets. The all-steel version on a brown leather strap marks the entry point, closely followed by a pair of titanium examples, two-tone blends of steel and gold, and finally ending with the top-level models crafted from solid 18k gold (yellow or Sedna) or the shimmering luxury of platinum. Each variant is sized at 41mm except for the limited edition 1957 Trilogy model which is a period-exact 39mm and only available in stainless steel.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/130321s.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The Breitling Superocean also has time-only models, but only in its so-called \u2018Capsule\u2019 and \u2018Boutique\u2019 collections. What are they? Well, the Capsule Collection models are not officially limited editions as they\u2019re not numbered, but they are only being produced for a specific amount of time (so they are limited editions in all but name). As it pertains to the Superocean Heritage II, that leaves us with a handful of the closest recreations of the initial Superocean ref. 1004 from 1957.
\nAs for the Boutique Collection, these are genuine, numbered limited editions. The Superocean Heritage \u201957 is a black dial, three-hand piece with quirky rainbow-colored indexes, emitting a real beach hippie vibe \u2013 and \u2018ONE OF 250\u2019 engraved on the back. All simple enough? Not so fast! There is also another version of the colorful Boutique model, this time with blue detailing, just called a Limited Edition and restricted to 1,000 units, with a proportion of the profits going to frontline Covid-19 charities.
\nThe rest of the contemporary catalog consists of both time-and-date watches and chronographs, with all models carrying on the tradition of the debut ref. 807. There are Limited and Boutique versions of both of these as well, including the top-of-the-range all-Sedna gold Superocean Heritage B20 Automatic 42.
\nOn the whole, Breitling certainly has the most variation, especially when you take its choice of sizes into consideration as well. Most of the range is available in 42mm and 44mm, which is relatively restrained by Breitling\u2019s standards. There are also two pieces in 46mm, both time-and-date in steel, with either all black on a mesh steel bracelet or blue on a rubber strap and a newer ladies range in 38mm.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Breitling_Superocean_20JM6401-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
One aspect both the Seamaster and Superocean collections share is a full-production roster that takes the debut models as an aesthetic starting point, building on them to appeal to a modern audience, as well as limited edition pieces that are virtually exact copies.
\nOf the two brands, it is arguably Omega that has stayed truest to the vintage original. The main Seamaster 300 range takes plenty of design prompts from the CK2913, most noticeably in the handset and hour markers, which are lifted almost directly from the inaugural model.
\nIf you wanted to get really technical about it, the contemporary piece is closest to the third iteration of the first watch, the CK2913-3. It has the trademark broad arrow hand with a forward counting bezel. With that in mind, the small arrow on the seconds hand is a modern touch.
\nThe bezel, although slightly thicker than on the debut Seamaster, still has the same clean styling, with hash marks only at five minute intervals all the way round, as opposed to for the first 15-minutes as you would find on later examples. Options-wise, there is something for everyone. The steel all-black model manages the trick of being both handsome and understated, while the titanium versions with blue dials and bezels subtly up the wrist presence. If incognito isn\u2019t your thing, the two-tone pieces are more noticeable, while the 18k gold and platinum-crafted watches at the highest end scream for attention.
\nHowever, the real triumph (for vintage fans at least) is the beautiful limited-edition 39mm. It is a virtual photocopy of the CK2913 and is something that looks as if it has just been retrieved from a vault after more than 60-years. Omega has recreated every last detail, right down to the 1950s font for the dial script. While it features a sapphire crystal rather than one made from acrylic like on the original model, Omega has even gone as far as to put a tiny Omega logo engraving in the center \u2013 just like the ones found on the brand\u2019s acrylic crystals.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/134326ss-2-2.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Compared to the Seamaster 300 series, Breitling\u2019s collection of Heritage models has gone further with the modernization. While even the smallest of the three available sizes (excluding the ladies 38mm option) is far larger than the original (42mm compared to 39mm), the overall shape has been extensively modified too. The lugs are longer and about twice the thickness of the ref. 1004 and 807, leaving the whole watch looking taller and significantly less squat and rounded.
\nHowever, the dial is a reasonably close recreation, and the handset especially. The sword-type minute hand and large arrow-tipped hour hand are both filled with lume and are highly readable, as befits a dive watch. The indexes though are shorter than on the inaugural model and without the circular plots at the four main points. And the date function tucked away at six o\u2019clock is not something that you will find on the original either.
\nAs for the bezel, that has the same sparsity of numerals, consisting of just simple lines at the five minute marks. Bearing in mind the attention-grabbers Breitling has produced in the past, the Superocean Heritage collection is remarkably toned-down, and without any of the bright luridness we see at the top end of the Seamaster range. The most eye-catching pieces are the all-blue examples, and even those are admirably restrained and undemonstrative.
\nAgain, the limited-edition pieces, whether in the Capsule or Boutique Collections, run the first editions a very close race. Here, most of the basics are practically indistinguishable from the 50s model (the one exception being the use of modern materials), with the different color schemes being the primary separating factor. Strangely however, Breitling has also opted to issue them as 42mm watches \u2013 a decidedly non-vintage size for a heritage-inspired watch.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Breitling_Superocean_Heritage_20JM6184-Edit-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
It would be wrong to lay all of the credit for Omega\u2019s resurgence over the last couple of decades at the feet of its new catalog of in-house movements, but it is impossible to deny that they have had a massive effect. Since the adoption of George Daniels\u2019s Co-Axial escapement, Omega has continued to make great strides in its technology. For example, Omega is the first company to mass-produce silicon hairsprings, the main contributing factor to the new movements\u2019 antimagnetic Master Co-Axial certification.
\nOmega leads the way in producing watches impervious to the effects of magnetic fields, one of the major causes of timekeeping inaccuracies. By focusing on building components from non-magnetic components materials rather than simply shielding them with a soft iron cage (\u00e0 la Rolex\u2019s Milgauss), Omega has created models that can withstand more than 15,000 gauss while still keeping the cases a wearable size.
\nThe Caliber 8400 inside the majority of the Seamaster 300 models contains all of Omega\u2019s most up-to-date advancements, the Si14 hairspring included, as well as an automatic winding system that pivots on ball bearings. This greatly reduces the wear to one of the components most affected by friction, thus reducing the frequency of necessary servicing.
\nPerhaps best of all, although not particularly faithful to the original, is the display case back on the Omega Seamaster 300 Collection. The quality of finishing on the Caliber 8400 is extraordinary for a watch in this price group, and being able to view it in action is a real treat. As with the rest of the Co-Axial calibers, this one beats at 25,200vph (considered the optimum frequency for this kind of escapement) and offers users a 60-hour power reserve.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/133065ss-3-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The first generation models from Breitling\u2019s Superocean Heritage collection were all powered by ETA-derived movements. However, when the Swatch Group completed the acquisition of the \u00e9bauche manufacturer a number of years, the Swiss Competition Commission (COMCO) ruled the conglomerate was now a virtual monopoly and stepped in to regulate the ETA supply of movements to any non-Swatch companies until the end of 2020.
\nThis created a tricky situation for Breitling (wholly owned by CVC Capital Partners) and led the brand to formulate an arrangement with Rolex\u2019s sister company, Tudor. The Caliber B20 inside the time-and-date Superocean Heritage models is actually a slightly reworked Tudor MT5612. Breitling still describes it as an in-house movement, although it doesn\u2019t specify exactly whose house it is referring to here.
\nNevertheless, it is an impressive, no-frills workhorse and the perfect accompaniment to this type of watch. Its 70-hour reserve outdoes the Omega Cal. 8400, but the movement doesn\u2019t benefit from a silicon hairspring \u2013 although, curiously, the Tudor MT5612 does, and Breitling replaces it as one of its modifications.
\nAs for the rest, they are powered by a range of engines. The Cal. B01 is a genuine in-house chronograph (and the movement supplied to Tudor for its Black Bay Chrono model in exchange for the MT5612) and it is fitted to the 44mm pieces with 3/6/9 chronograph counters. The remaining two movements are both ETA-based, with the B13 (taken from the ETA 7750) driving the day-date chronographs with the 12/6/9 sub-dials, while the limited edition time-only models use the B10, once the ETA 2892-A2.
\nEach of the four Breitling movements beats at 28,800vph and are (of course) COSC-certified. Furthermore, all are well-proven and highly reliable mass-produced calibers, although we are still waiting to see what Breitling will be using instead of the third-party mechanisms when the time comes.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screen-Shot-2020-11-27-at-4.15.09-PM.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
It is difficult to overstate just how well both brands have done on these rejuvenated blasts from the past. Each has stuck incredibly close to the DNA of their respective originals, with any renovations sympathetic rather than radical. Improvements have been made where appropriate, and both have been granted modest size increases and materials to appeal to modern audiences.
\nBut who has done it better? Well, in terms of choice, Breitling has it wrapped up, with plenty of complications, colors and sizes; however, many collectors still favor the Omega. The stylists for both brands haven\u2019t put a foot wrong with their designs, and they have both come up with collections of attractively discreet tool models in a range of ideal colorways. They are all driven by faultless movements, and both collections are backed by brands that keep scoring success after success.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Omega_SeaMaster_PlanetOcean_5D3_0946-2-4-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Although Omega has rationalized its collections significantly over the last few years, there are still an awful lot of watches on its books with the name \u2018Seamaster\u2019 somewhere in their title. They include everything from the entry-level Aqua Terra models to the Heritage watches seen above, the Railmaster (for some reason), all the way through to the great, slab-sided PloProf with its massive 1,200 meters of water resistance.
\nIn-between, we find two other series, the Diver 300M and the Planet Ocean 600M. The former will be recognizable, and particularly the blue dial and bezel variant, to anyone who watched Pierce Brosnan play James Bond. It remains Omega\u2019s best-selling Seamaster group and now has more than 50 models in the lineup if you count all of the different colorways and configurations.
\nThe Planet Ocean, on the other hand, was first created in 2005 as a bigger and tougher variation on the luxury dive watch. This sub-collection within the Seamaster family includes even more options than the Diver 300M and features both chronograph and GMT models, with each one rated down to 600 meters and produced in sizes of between 39.5mm (37.5mm if you count the limited editions) up to 45.5mm.
\nAs for Breitling, its dive watch collections are much more clear-cut. They consist of the vintage-inspired Superocean Heritage that we\u2019ve already covered above and the modern Superocean. As with the Planet Ocean watches, the mainstream Superocean models take few prisoners. The collection ranges from 36mm unisex models through to some great hulking 48mm behemoths, very much keeping in line with Breitling\u2019s history of producing oversized wristwatches.
\nDepth ratings vary from 200m all the way to an incredible 2,000m. However, while they share few styling conventions among them, there are some definite similarities between the Breitling Superocean and the Omega Planet Ocean that make them ripe for a showdown. Below, we take a look in more detail.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/zBREITLING-SUPEROCEAN-A17391-130835.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
Case Size: 36mm; 42mm; 44mm; 46mm; 48mm
\nFunctionality: Time-Only; Time w/ Date; Chronograph w/ Date
\nMaterials: Stainless Steel; Titanium; Steel & 18k Red Gold
\nDial: Blue; Black; White; Yellow; Orange
\nBezel: Blue; Black; White, Unidirectional w/Ceramic Insert (bidirectional w/ locking mechanism on 48mm model)
\nCrystal: Cambered Sapphire, Glare-Proof (both sides)
\nMovement: Breitling 17
\nWater Resistance: 200 meters / 660 feet – 2,000 meters / 6,600 feet
\nBracelet: Rubber; Steel; NATO
\nRetail Price: $3,450-$6,100
\n
![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/z132890.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Case Size: 37.5mm; 39.5mm; 43.5mm; 45.5mm
\nFunctionality: Time w/ Date; Chronograph w/ Date; GMT
\nMaterials: Stainless Steel; Steel and Sedna Gold; Sedna Gold; Ceramic; Titanium; Platinum
\nDial: Blue; Black; White; Grey; Brown
\nBezel: Orange; Blue; Black; White; Grey; Gem-Set, Unidirectional with Cramic insert (bidirectional on GMT models)
\nCrystal: Domed Sapphire, Anti-Reflective Treatment (both sides)
\nMovement: Omega Master Co-Axial Caliber 8800/8801/8900/8906/9900/9901
\nWater Resistance: 600 meters / 2,000 feet
\nBracelet: Steel; Steel and Sedna Gold; Titanium; Leather; Rubber; NATO
\nRetail Price: $6,450-$95,000
\n
While both collections offer plenty of variety, designed to suit any and all tastes, the Planet Ocean series stands out in front. All told, there are more than a hundred different flavors of the watch, in five sizes, seven different metals, five dial colors, and three types of complication.
\nHowever, although there is no doubting the lavishness of the range, each watch still very clearly means business. Even the smallest in the lineup has a significant heft, equipped with a noticeably thicker case than Omega\u2019s Diver 300M models, in order to cope with the pressures of a 600-meter water resistance rating. On top of that, a manually operated helium escape valve is fitted to each one at the10 o\u2019clock location. Will you ever need to use it? No, of course not. But it\u2019s nice to have anyway.
\nIn terms of functionality, you can take your pick between simple time-and-date pieces (which make up the majority of those available), a handful of GMT models, and a number of chronographs. The chronograph models are only available in the largest 45.5mm size, while the GMT watches are only available in 43.5mm or 45.5mm, but you do have a choice in size for the various time-and-date models.
\nMaterials are top-notch, as you would expect from Omega\u2019s premium diving line. Steel and two-tone are the most accessible, running through grade 5 titanium examples and on up to solid 18k Sedna gold and Platinum editions. Similar to the brand\u2019s Speedmaster Dark Side of the Moon range, some of the watches in the Planet Ocean collection are crafted from colored ceramic.
\nBezels are similarly high-tech. Most of the inserts are also made of ceramic, with the majority given a Liquidmetal![\"\u2122\"](\"https://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/14.0.0/72x72/2122.png\")
diving scale. Liquidmetal is a proprietary process developed by Omega that permanently bonds the ceramic bezel insert and it metallic numerals, creating a single component engineered for maximum durability and longevity. One-upping even that, the gold models feature Ceragold \u2013 another Omega-devised method that allows the watchmaker to encrust ceramic with 18k gold and has resulted in the industry\u2019s first-ever ceramic bezel with gold markings that are completely smooth to the touch.
All in all, the Omega Planet Ocean series manages to tread that line between having the abilities of a full-throated sports model and the general bearing of a luxury watch \u2013 all from a manufacturer that is at the top of its game.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Omega_Seamaster_MichaelPhelps_5D3_3097-Edit-3.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
In comparison to the Omega, Breitling\u2019s Superocean range is a far more agricultural collection. You won\u2019t find any fancy new alloys or molten gold liquids here, and a chronograph with a date function is as complicated as it gets. You don\u2019t even get a helium escape valve on every model, and it is only found on those rated to 1,000m and deeper.
\nWhat you get instead (for the most part) is some good old fashioned Breitling machismo. Most of the collection is forged from stainless steel, with a handful of those being DLC-coated a manly matte black, with one of them given a splash of red gold to the bezel \u2013 just about the only concession to a touch of opulence. The remaining examples all have 48mm titanium cases, again with a black DLC coating.
\nAlthough the engineering may be a bit less advanced than what is found on the Omega, the Superocean\u2019s talents are prodigious. The smallest 36mm models, clearly aimed at opening up Breitling\u2019s roster to women at long last, are still waterproof to 200m. Yet the 46mm examples take that all the way down to an astonishing 2,000m (6,600ft), dwarfing not only Omega\u2019s Planet Ocean range but also the PloProf \u2013 a watch commissioned by and built for hardcore saturation divers. (Curiously though, the enormous 48mm Superocean pieces with the special locking bezel and soft iron inner case are only rated to 300m, despite their burly looks).
\nAs a whole, there is little about the Breitling Superocean family that would lead you to use the word subtle, but that is rather the point. These are larger-than-life professional dive watches aimed at outgoing people, and they fulfill their role superbly.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Omega_Seamaster5D3_9854-2-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
With more than 100 models available and spread around a wide sizing spectrum, the Omega Planet Ocean collection is the epitome of the \u2018something for everyone\u2019 rule. While all the models share a relaxed elegance due to their design and form, there are still plenty of distinct personalities in the collection. The range can be bright and playful, such as with the 43.5mm ref. 215.32.44.21.04.001, with its bezel, indexes and NATO strap all accented in a vivid orange (the unofficial signature color of the Planet Ocean series).
\nAt the opposite styling extreme, watches like the 39.5mm ref. 215.63.40.20.13.001 are achingly sophisticated, with a case forged from Omega\u2019s own red gold (named Sedna) and offering one of the more successful uses of chocolate brown for the dial and bezel, continued onto the rubber-backed leather strap. The look gives off both an incredible, luxurious warmth and a cultured understatement.
\nOne of the most varied sub-collections groups within the lineup is found across the various dual time zone models. This is where you will see the bulk of the ceramic-cased Planet Ocean pieces, with most of them in jet black and a few in deep blue. Some of the bezels have been given pops of intense color, generally mirrored on the GMT hand, while others have been left rather monochromatic. There is also one with a beautiful Sedna gold, but the standouts are the two steel references (the ref. 215.30.44.22.01.001 and the ref. 215.33.44.22.01.001), each fitted with the world\u2019s first black and white polished bi-ceramic bezel.
\nElsewhere, Omega really has covered all the bases. There are models for just about any sensibility, and the vast majority of them do what the best luxury dive watches have always done; retain a certain versatility that pairs with any outfit, whether it is a weekday business suit or kicking back at the weekend in jeans and t-shirt. Yet, the basics are consistent throughout. Each case has Omega\u2019s trademark twisted lyre lugs, every reference uses the same broad arrow handset, all the time-and-date pieces have the same Arabic numeral markers at the 12/6/9, with a small date window at the three o\u2019clock, and the chronographs have two sub counters in the same shade as the main dial.
\nAs a whole, this consistency gives a welcome cohesion to the family, regardless of the rest of the color scheme. This is a group of visually arresting, highly accomplished divers that are issued in an intelligent range of sizes and made to find a home on virtually any wrist.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screen-Shot-2020-11-27-at-4.17.13-PM.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
What the Breitling Superocean loses to Omega in the refinement stakes, it more than makes back in presence. Just about as in-your-face a collection as you will come across, Breitling\u2019s focus has clearly been centered on legibility and robustness. This latest catalog only emerged in the last few years, taking over from the previous generation \u2013 one which was criticized for an extremely busy-looking dial.
\nIndexes are still enormous with massive 12/6/9 numerals on many examples, coupled with large trapezoidal markers for the rest and thick, squared hands that are about 95% filled with lume. Regardless of size or materials, the cases all look bombproof and offer rather hefty crown-guards \u2013 something absent from the Omega, further underlining the Planet Ocean\u2019s more dressy veneer.
\nWhile these are certainly dive watches worthy of the name, the flip side to that is arguably a loss of adaptability. Although there are a couple of models in the collection unobtrusive enough to coordinate with more formal attire, these are genuine sports models made to be worn during any and all strenuous activity.
\nThat is underlined in the brand\u2019s choice of dial colors. Along with the more traditional black, white, and blue, it is impossible to miss the dazzling yellow and orange dials, and some are even paired with a correspondingly vibrant rubber strap.
\nOverall, the Breitling Superocean series is a lot of fun. They may have some truly fearsome skills, but the models don\u2019t take themselves too seriously. It\u2019s a refreshing change from a brand so steeped in the ultra-masculine and one that seems perfectly suited to this particular range of dive watches.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Omega_Seamaster_600M_5D3_5091-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The Planet Ocean models were among the first watches of the expansive Seamaster range to be given Co-Axial movements. That initial generation used the final version of the Cal. 2500 (an ETA-based engine) which had been slowed down to 25,200vph from 28,800vph, thus creating the optimal frequency for the Co-Axial system.
\nIn 2011, the second iteration of the Planet Ocean collection emerged, now fitted with Omega\u2019s own Cal. 8500 and its variants. While the movement had been in circulation for a while by this point, it was in the Planet Ocean range that it was given its first silicon hairspring and escapement. The current third series has progressed again, now powered (mostly) by the Cal. 8900. This is the Master Chronometer version of the outgoing 8500, meaning it has been certified for precision by METAS, The Federal Institute for Metrology (it was actually the first Omega caliber to win the certification).
\nThe Cal. 8900 is not only accurate to 0/+5 seconds a day, it can also withstand exposure to magnetic fields of more than 15,000 gauss. The collection also uses the Cal. 8800, which is fairly similar except for its smaller physical dimensions and the fact that it has just one mainspring barrel. The Cal. 8900 has two, mounted in series, giving a power reserve of 60-hours, as opposed to the 55-hours of the Cal. 8800. Apart from that, each one has a free-sprung balance, silicon springs, bi-directional winding, and a Co-Axial escapement. The finishing is also superb on both, with Geneva wave patterns on the rotor and bridges, and the engraved legend \u2018Omega Master Co-Axial\u2019 to help tell it apart from the older 8500.
\nAs for the chronographs, the steel and titanium variants operate on the Cal. 9900. This, too, is the first Omega chronograph movement to sport a METAS certificate and was brought into the range in 2016. Notable features include a vertical clutch (as on the Rolex Daytona\u2019s Cal. 4130), a column wheel, a titanium balance, and a silicon balance spring. The frequency is back to 28,800vph, despite the Co-Axial escapement, and twin barrels provide a 60-hour power reserve.
\nThere\u2019s no doubt that Omega\u2019s movements are up there with the very best in the industry. However, the Co-Axial calibers do tend to be relatively large, leading to thick cases. The 45.5mm Planet Ocean watches, for instance, measure some 16.5mm \u2013 just one thing to be aware of if you tend to wear your shirt sleeves fitted.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Omega_SeaMaster_PlanetOcean_5D3_0973-2-2-2.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
As some of the least expensive offerings from Breitling, the Superocean range is powered entirely by modified third party movements. That movement being primarily the Breitling 17, which starts life as the ETA 2824-2. This is the same caliber that was inside the first wave of Superocean Heritage watches before being replaced by the Tudor Cal. MT5612. Whether these regular Superocean models will receive the same treatment remains to be seen.
\nThe ETA 2824-2 is quite possibly the workhorse of all workhorse movements. It has been around since 1982, has been used in literally countless numbers of watches from many different brands, and it is a strong and technically unassuming power plant. It beats at 28,800vph (4Hz) and has a decent 38-hour reserve. It is built in four \u2018grades\u2019 \u2013 each one differentiated by the quality of their components and their tested accuracy. These are Standard, Elaborated, Top, and Chronometer (the one Breitling fits to the Superocean). To win that grade, the caliber has to be accurate to within -4/+6 seconds a day, across five positions.
\nThe brand is pretty tightlipped over what modifications actually take place to turn the ETA 2824-2 into the Breitling 17, but it is rumored that both the balance spring and mainspring, in addition to the balance wheel and escapement are all swapped out for a variety of higher-performing alternatives. On top of that, selected components are rhodium-plated, and the entire movement will receive a decorative finishing. However, most importantly, they are a watchmaker\u2019s friend. Reliable, simple to work on, and with plenty of easily accessible spare parts, they just keep on ticking, pretty much forever.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Screen-Shot-2020-11-27-at-4.18.47-PM.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
Omega has a far longer history with dive watches than Breitling, as can be seen by the comparative number of models in their respective lineups. The Planet Ocean collection is the flagship range in Omega\u2019s dive arsenal, while the Superocean watches are some of Breitling\u2019s least expensive. The most expensive Superocean actually costs less than the cheapest Planet Ocean.
\nHowever, the numbers don\u2019t tell the whole story. Yes, the Breitling Superocean watches may lack some of the finesse of their Omega rivals, but in terms of bang-for-your-buck, they are hard to fault. Furthermore, they are the kind of watches you wouldn\u2019t mind subjecting to the sometimes harsh conditions aboard the average dive boat.
\nThe Omega Planet Ocean watches are obviously a bit more luxurious. Much like similar types of timepieces from other manufacturers such as Rolex and Panerai, it is unlikely that many Planet Ocean watches will ever truly taste any of the planet\u2019s oceans, but that isn\u2019t really the point of them. They are stylish, luxury timepieces that just happen to be highly capable and extremely robust. Both series make a statement, and each has plenty of points in its favor.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Omega_Seamaster_PlanetOcean_Capture00301-Edit-2.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The post Breitling Superocean Vs. Omega Seamaster Collection Comparison appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "A Breitling versus Omega head-to-head is not one that comes up as often as you might imagine. For most of their respective histories, the brands have occupied two different spheres of the same Venn diagram, rarely overlapping in factors such as styling, price, or functionality.\nHowever, both brands do produce extensive lines of water-resistant sports watches, but what are those models? Breitling\u2019s dive watch category is currently divided between the contemporary Superocean and the neo-vintage Superocean Heritage II. On the other hand, Omega\u2019s collection of professional divers is contained within one category, the Seamaster, of which there are numerous sub-models. Those include the Planet Ocean, Aqua Terra, and Railmaster, just to name a few. It\u2019s also worth noting that both brands also offer wildly successful vintage-inspired divers, complicating matters even further.\nThis comparison guide ultimately aims to answer the question, what is the difference between the Seamaster and Superocean? As you will soon find out, most of it boils down to aesthetic differences characteristic of each brand and price point. Join us as we break it down as best we can to determine which watch belongs on your wrist, the Breitling Superocean? Or the Omega Seamaster?\nBreitling vs. Omega\n\nTraditionally, Omega has been seen as a level above Breitling in the luxury watch hierarchy, although at least some of it could be attributed to marketing. While the latter company has produced a number of breakthroughs and culturally significant pieces through the years, it is Omega which is usually the \u2018other\u2019 brand non-watch enthusiasts will have heard of (the first obviously being Rolex). Much of that recognition hinges on the priceless advertising of stepping onto the moon, and a lot more comes from being the current manufacturer of choice for James Bond.\nBreitling has started to majorly expand its global reach since Georges Kern arrived at the company as the new CEO in 2017. The once somewhat scattergun catalog of watches he inherited has been ruthlessly streamlined by dividing the whole thing up into three main categories \u2013 land, sea and air \u2013 in an effort to try and build its customer base beyond just the aviation-obsessed. Kern has also taken a cue from the fashion du jour of directing his sights back into the archives, identifying classic favorites and reissuing them with a 21st-century twist.\nAs for Omega, it too has been working hard to simplify its output, although for a number of years now. The 1970s and 80s were a tough time for the brand, and its response to the quartz crisis was to jump on every fad and bandwagon that rolled its way. It resulted in the creation of some relatively unorthodox models, many of which were made part of the brand\u2019s two most famous families; the Speedmaster and Seamaster. As a result, the collections became rather diluted, and all the confusion is only now finding some semblance of order and consistency.\nArguably to an even greater degree than Breitling, Omega has not been shy about opening up the vaults and drawing inspiration from past glories \u2013 and many of those models are very glorious indeed. On paper, the two brands seem to be fairly well matched. However, what happens when we get their respective dive watch collections into a standoff?\nBreitling\u2019s range is split down the middle, between the thoroughly modern Superocean and the vintage-inspired Superocean Heritage II series. As for the Omega Seamaster, that name still encompasses a colossal number of different types including the Planet Ocean, Aqua Terra, and contemporary Railmaster models.\nBelow, we are going to explore the two brand\u2019s offerings for underwater adventurers and (as much as possible) compare them like for like.\n\nA Little History\nBreitling\nOne thing both watchmakers can safely claim is a highly impressive legacy. Founded in 1884, Breitling came into being at a time of incredible progress in all forms of technology, continuing on from the Industrial Revolution. After modest beginnings, the brand started to expand in both scope and ambition; however, it wouldn\u2019t truly come of age until WWI.\nThe first conflict to witness aerial combat, the war led to a massive expansion in aviation and, consequently, the need for high precision pilot\u2019s watches. Breitling\u2019s owner, Gaston Breitling (the son of founder L\u00e9on Breitling) shifted his workshop\u2019s focus towards creating timepieces for this new breed of flyer and in 1915, the company unveiled the first-ever chronograph wristwatch with an independent pusher. The invention, which separated the start and stop function of the chrono, proved a major boon for aviators and allowed them an easier and more accurate way of keeping track of flight times.\nFrom then on, the brand\u2019s name would be unequivocally linked to the skies \u2013 and to chronographs in particular, with perhaps their greatest achievement encompassing both fields being the iconic Navitimer. Over the years, Breitling has partnered with the British RAF and the U.S. Army, and while the brand can\u2019t claim the moon as Omega can, it was a Breitling that would be the first worn in space by an American. Lt. Commander Scott Carpenter, one of the original Mercury 7 astronauts, orbited the Earth three times with a modified version of the Navitimer (called the Cosmonaute) on his wrist.\n\nFrom the Skies to the Sea\nBreitling\u2019s litany of successes with pilot\u2019s watches and chronographs has sometimes overshadowed its dive watches. However, the release of the first of the Superocean collection in 1957 saw Breitling more than hold its own against three of the biggest and most famous examples of the genre: the Rolex Submariner, the Blancpain Fifty-Fathoms, and the Omega Seamaster.\nFar from simply making up the numbers, the two 39mm Superocean models (the ref. 1004 time-only variant and the ref. 807 chronograph) were highly capable performers in their own right, their 200m water resistance matching Rolex and Omega and doubling the depth rating offered by Blancpain. In addition, the cleanliness of Breitling\u2019s designs meant they were both extremely practical in terms of legibility as well as being aesthetically accomplished.\nBreitling\u2019s Superocean watches continued to be updated and fine-tuned over the subsequent decades, becoming even more adept with the incorporation of helium escape valves and thicker cases. Today, the hardiest examples are rated down to an incredible 2,000 meters and represent the pinnacle of the modern luxury dive watch.\nIn 2007, the original models celebrated their half-century and Breitling marked the occasion with a reissue of the debut reference 807, dubbed the Superocean Heritage. While not an exact carbon copy, it was pretty close, with its large sword hands and braided steel bracelet. The 1950s Flying \u2018B\u2019 logo and \u2018Superocean\u2019 script were also both reinstated, adding up to more of an affectionate nod to past glories rather than an all-out, over-the-top duplicate.\nThat version was itself superseded in 2017 (on the inaugural model\u2019s 60th birthday) by the Superocean Heritage II. With far more similarities than differences to the original Heritage, this second generation is most easily identified by the slightly revamped handset and the inclusion of an ultra hard-wearing ceramic bezel. Inside the three-handed models though, lies the Tudor-built Cal. MT5612 (branded as the Breitling B02 movement), taking over from the previous ETA-based 2824-2. It signified a major collaboration between the two brands, with Tudor receiving the Breitling B01 chronograph movement in return for use in its Heritage Black Bay Chrono.\nThe Breitling Superocean Heritage II series now consists of some 30 different models, across a range of sizes, metals, and colors. They have been an enormous success for the manufacturer and are arguably one of the best heritage-inspired dive watches that have been circulating the industry in recent years. As for the Superocean collection, that too has been an impressive performer in terms of sales and it has even been opened up to a unisex audience, something that would have been flat-out unthinkable just a few short years ago.\n\nOmega\nThe Seamaster is Omega\u2019s longest-running name; there has been a model with the title in the brand\u2019s catalog ever since 1948. That year was also the company\u2019s 100th anniversary and the original Seamaster was created as Omega\u2019s congratulatory pat on the back to itself for reaching a century in business. However, that piece was a simple three-handed dress watch, the only thing earning it the \u2018Seamaster\u2019 name being the rubber gaskets for the crown and case back (rather than the previous lead or shellac type) that improved its water resistance.\nThe debut Seamaster in its true dive watch form came along in 1957 as one-third of the company\u2019s \u2018Professional Collection\u2019. Officially called the Omega Seamaster 300 (although it was only water-resistant to 200 meters), the CK2913 lined up alongside the CK2914 Railmaster (an antimagnetic model designed to do battle against the Rolex Milgauss and IWC Ingenieur) and the CK2915 Speedmaster, the legendary and soon-to-be-moon-bound chronograph.\nFrom the outset, the Omega Seamaster has taken aim at the same summit as the Rolex Submariner, both vying for the title of being the world\u2019s favorite dive watch. It is a fracas that still continues today, in much the same way that collectors continue to debate as to whether the Speedmaster or the Daytona is the greatest racer\u2019s chronograph of all time.\n\nThe Seamaster 300 Arrives\nThe CK2913, like its contemporaries, employed all the same features paramount to a hardworking dive model. Offering a large-for-the-time 39mm case size, it too had excellent readability, with its studiously unfussy dial indexes \u2013 a mix of sharp, lume-filled triangles and Arabic numerals at the cardinal points. The broad-arrow hands were similarly legible, and the simple coin-edged black bezel rotated to aid divers in keeping track of immersion times.\nHowever, the Seamaster\u2019s bezel was noticeably thinner than its rivals. In addition, the first two versions of the CK2913 had what are known as \u2018back count\u2019 or \u2018countdown\u2019 bezels, where the numerals count down clockwise from 50 to 10, the opposite of how we would see them today. There were actually seven variants of the CK2913; the other five reverting to the standard forward counting numerals. However, the original Breitling Superocean had no numerals on its bezel at all.\nOf course, the key to all dive watches is the winding crown, traditionally the weakest link in any design and the most likely point of water ingress. Rolex held the patent for the screw-down type and so Omega developed its own system. Dubbing it the Naiad (after the Greek for water nymph) it mounted the crown on a special pressure-sensitive spring inside the casing, so the deeper the watch was taken, the tighter the seal would get. It meant the Seamaster\u2019s performance at greater depths was virtually unparalleled, but the downside was that it was prone to leaks at shallower levels.\nLike the Speedmaster, Omega\u2019s new underwater companion proved to be a big hit with the public. It has stayed in production ever since; however in the years since its initial introduction, Omega has slapped the name Seamaster on a bewildering array of different types and styles of timepieces. Omega wouldn\u2019t really regain its focus until the mid-1990s when it released the first of the Seamaster 300M range. A tough and extremely good-looking creation, it found its way onto James Bond\u2019s wrist in Goldeneye, and hasn\u2019t looked back. Agent 007 has worn an Omega, and usually some form of Seamaster, in every film ever since.\nJust as Breitling scored a significant success by returning to the beginning, so has Omega in the shape of a number of heritage pieces of its own. In 2014, Omega introduced a production-run model, harking back strongly to the original Seamaster diver but with modern twists, called the Omega Seamaster 300 Master Co-Axial Chronometer. Both it and Breitling\u2019s retro-inspired model are proving strong sellers in today\u2019s market, as are the rest of the two company\u2019s dive models. Below, we put the pair of nostalgic classics against each other.\nBreitling Superocean Heritage II\n\nSuperocean Heritage II Key Features:\nCase Size: 42mm; 44mm; 46mm\nFunctionality: Time-Only; Time w/ Date; Chronograph w/ Date; Chronograph w/ Day-Date\nMaterials: Stainless Steel; Steel and 18k Red Gold; 18k Red Gold\nDial: Blue; Black; Silver; Green\nBezel: Blue; Black, Unidirectional w/ Ceramic Insert\nCrystal: Cambered Sapphire, Glare-Proof (both sides)\nMovement: Breitling Manufacture B20; Breitling Manufacture B01; ETA-Based B13; ETA-Based B10\nWater Resistance: 100 meters / 330 feet; 200 meters / 660 feet\nBracelet: Leather; Rubber; Steel; NATO\nRetail Price: $4,380-$19,600\n\nOmega Seamaster 300\n\nSeamaster 300 Key Features:\nCase Size: 39mm; 41mm\nFunctionality: Time-Only\nMaterials: Stainless Steel; Steel and Yellow Gold; Steel and Sedna Gold; Yellow Gold; Sedna Gold; Titanium; Platinum\nDial: Blue; Black; Green\nBezel: Blue; Black; Green, Unidirectional w/ Ceramic Insert\nCrystal: Domed Sapphire, Glare-Proof (inside)\nMovement: Omega Manufacture Master Co-Axial Caliber 8400; Master Chronometer Caliber 8913\nWater Resistance: 300 meters / 1,000 feet\nBracelet: Leather; Steel; Steel and Gold; Solid Gold; Solid Platinum\nRetail Price: $6,500-$66,000\n\nBreitling Superocean Heritage II vs. Omega Seamaster 300: Features and Options\nOmega\nAt their most basic, both the Seamaster and Superocean are simple, time-only models that reflect their respective originators. For the Omega Seamaster 300, that is also where it ends. Each of the 27 pieces in the series is an elegant three-hander, with nothing extraneous to muddy up the symmetry and minimalism of the dial.\nThe main difference between the watches lies in their metals and bracelets. The all-steel version on a brown leather strap marks the entry point, closely followed by a pair of titanium examples, two-tone blends of steel and gold, and finally ending with the top-level models crafted from solid 18k gold (yellow or Sedna) or the shimmering luxury of platinum. Each variant is sized at 41mm except for the limited edition 1957 Trilogy model which is a period-exact 39mm and only available in stainless steel.\n\nBreitling\nThe Breitling Superocean also has time-only models, but only in its so-called \u2018Capsule\u2019 and \u2018Boutique\u2019 collections. What are they? Well, the Capsule Collection models are not officially limited editions as they\u2019re not numbered, but they are only being produced for a specific amount of time (so they are limited editions in all but name). As it pertains to the Superocean Heritage II, that leaves us with a handful of the closest recreations of the initial Superocean ref. 1004 from 1957.\nAs for the Boutique Collection, these are genuine, numbered limited editions. The Superocean Heritage \u201957 is a black dial, three-hand piece with quirky rainbow-colored indexes, emitting a real beach hippie vibe \u2013 and \u2018ONE OF 250\u2019 engraved on the back. All simple enough? Not so fast! There is also another version of the colorful Boutique model, this time with blue detailing, just called a Limited Edition and restricted to 1,000 units, with a proportion of the profits going to frontline Covid-19 charities.\nThe rest of the contemporary catalog consists of both time-and-date watches and chronographs, with all models carrying on the tradition of the debut ref. 807. There are Limited and Boutique versions of both of these as well, including the top-of-the-range all-Sedna gold Superocean Heritage B20 Automatic 42.\nOn the whole, Breitling certainly has the most variation, especially when you take its choice of sizes into consideration as well. Most of the range is available in 42mm and 44mm, which is relatively restrained by Breitling\u2019s standards. There are also two pieces in 46mm, both time-and-date in steel, with either all black on a mesh steel bracelet or blue on a rubber strap and a newer ladies range in 38mm.\n\nBreitling Superocean Heritage II Vs. Omega Seamaster 300: Aesthetics\nOmega\nOne aspect both the Seamaster and Superocean collections share is a full-production roster that takes the debut models as an aesthetic starting point, building on them to appeal to a modern audience, as well as limited edition pieces that are virtually exact copies.\nOf the two brands, it is arguably Omega that has stayed truest to the vintage original. The main Seamaster 300 range takes plenty of design prompts from the CK2913, most noticeably in the handset and hour markers, which are lifted almost directly from the inaugural model.\nIf you wanted to get really technical about it, the contemporary piece is closest to the third iteration of the first watch, the CK2913-3. It has the trademark broad arrow hand with a forward counting bezel. With that in mind, the small arrow on the seconds hand is a modern touch.\nThe bezel, although slightly thicker than on the debut Seamaster, still has the same clean styling, with hash marks only at five minute intervals all the way round, as opposed to for the first 15-minutes as you would find on later examples. Options-wise, there is something for everyone. The steel all-black model manages the trick of being both handsome and understated, while the titanium versions with blue dials and bezels subtly up the wrist presence. If incognito isn\u2019t your thing, the two-tone pieces are more noticeable, while the 18k gold and platinum-crafted watches at the highest end scream for attention.\nHowever, the real triumph (for vintage fans at least) is the beautiful limited-edition 39mm. It is a virtual photocopy of the CK2913 and is something that looks as if it has just been retrieved from a vault after more than 60-years. Omega has recreated every last detail, right down to the 1950s font for the dial script. While it features a sapphire crystal rather than one made from acrylic like on the original model, Omega has even gone as far as to put a tiny Omega logo engraving in the center \u2013 just like the ones found on the brand\u2019s acrylic crystals.\n\nBreitling\nCompared to the Seamaster 300 series, Breitling\u2019s collection of Heritage models has gone further with the modernization. While even the smallest of the three available sizes (excluding the ladies 38mm option) is far larger than the original (42mm compared to 39mm), the overall shape has been extensively modified too. The lugs are longer and about twice the thickness of the ref. 1004 and 807, leaving the whole watch looking taller and significantly less squat and rounded.\nHowever, the dial is a reasonably close recreation, and the handset especially. The sword-type minute hand and large arrow-tipped hour hand are both filled with lume and are highly readable, as befits a dive watch. The indexes though are shorter than on the inaugural model and without the circular plots at the four main points. And the date function tucked away at six o\u2019clock is not something that you will find on the original either.\nAs for the bezel, that has the same sparsity of numerals, consisting of just simple lines at the five minute marks. Bearing in mind the attention-grabbers Breitling has produced in the past, the Superocean Heritage collection is remarkably toned-down, and without any of the bright luridness we see at the top end of the Seamaster range. The most eye-catching pieces are the all-blue examples, and even those are admirably restrained and undemonstrative.\nAgain, the limited-edition pieces, whether in the Capsule or Boutique Collections, run the first editions a very close race. Here, most of the basics are practically indistinguishable from the 50s model (the one exception being the use of modern materials), with the different color schemes being the primary separating factor. Strangely however, Breitling has also opted to issue them as 42mm watches \u2013 a decidedly non-vintage size for a heritage-inspired watch.\n\nBreitling Superocean Heritage II Vs. Omega Seamaster 300: Movements\nOmega\nIt would be wrong to lay all of the credit for Omega\u2019s resurgence over the last couple of decades at the feet of its new catalog of in-house movements, but it is impossible to deny that they have had a massive effect. Since the adoption of George Daniels\u2019s Co-Axial escapement, Omega has continued to make great strides in its technology. For example, Omega is the first company to mass-produce silicon hairsprings, the main contributing factor to the new movements\u2019 antimagnetic Master Co-Axial certification.\nOmega leads the way in producing watches impervious to the effects of magnetic fields, one of the major causes of timekeeping inaccuracies. By focusing on building components from non-magnetic components materials rather than simply shielding them with a soft iron cage (\u00e0 la Rolex\u2019s Milgauss), Omega has created models that can withstand more than 15,000 gauss while still keeping the cases a wearable size.\nThe Caliber 8400 inside the majority of the Seamaster 300 models contains all of Omega\u2019s most up-to-date advancements, the Si14 hairspring included, as well as an automatic winding system that pivots on ball bearings. This greatly reduces the wear to one of the components most affected by friction, thus reducing the frequency of necessary servicing.\nPerhaps best of all, although not particularly faithful to the original, is the display case back on the Omega Seamaster 300 Collection. The quality of finishing on the Caliber 8400 is extraordinary for a watch in this price group, and being able to view it in action is a real treat. As with the rest of the Co-Axial calibers, this one beats at 25,200vph (considered the optimum frequency for this kind of escapement) and offers users a 60-hour power reserve.\n\nBreitling\nThe first generation models from Breitling\u2019s Superocean Heritage collection were all powered by ETA-derived movements. However, when the Swatch Group completed the acquisition of the \u00e9bauche manufacturer a number of years, the Swiss Competition Commission (COMCO) ruled the conglomerate was now a virtual monopoly and stepped in to regulate the ETA supply of movements to any non-Swatch companies until the end of 2020.\nThis created a tricky situation for Breitling (wholly owned by CVC Capital Partners) and led the brand to formulate an arrangement with Rolex\u2019s sister company, Tudor. The Caliber B20 inside the time-and-date Superocean Heritage models is actually a slightly reworked Tudor MT5612. Breitling still describes it as an in-house movement, although it doesn\u2019t specify exactly whose house it is referring to here.\nNevertheless, it is an impressive, no-frills workhorse and the perfect accompaniment to this type of watch. Its 70-hour reserve outdoes the Omega Cal. 8400, but the movement doesn\u2019t benefit from a silicon hairspring \u2013 although, curiously, the Tudor MT5612 does, and Breitling replaces it as one of its modifications.\nAs for the rest, they are powered by a range of engines. The Cal. B01 is a genuine in-house chronograph (and the movement supplied to Tudor for its Black Bay Chrono model in exchange for the MT5612) and it is fitted to the 44mm pieces with 3/6/9 chronograph counters. The remaining two movements are both ETA-based, with the B13 (taken from the ETA 7750) driving the day-date chronographs with the 12/6/9 sub-dials, while the limited edition time-only models use the B10, once the ETA 2892-A2.\nEach of the four Breitling movements beats at 28,800vph and are (of course) COSC-certified. Furthermore, all are well-proven and highly reliable mass-produced calibers, although we are still waiting to see what Breitling will be using instead of the third-party mechanisms when the time comes.\n\nBreitling Superocean Heritage II vs. Omega Seamaster 300: Final Thoughts\nIt is difficult to overstate just how well both brands have done on these rejuvenated blasts from the past. Each has stuck incredibly close to the DNA of their respective originals, with any renovations sympathetic rather than radical. Improvements have been made where appropriate, and both have been granted modest size increases and materials to appeal to modern audiences.\nBut who has done it better? Well, in terms of choice, Breitling has it wrapped up, with plenty of complications, colors and sizes; however, many collectors still favor the Omega. The stylists for both brands haven\u2019t put a foot wrong with their designs, and they have both come up with collections of attractively discreet tool models in a range of ideal colorways. They are all driven by faultless movements, and both collections are backed by brands that keep scoring success after success.\n\nBreitling Superocean Versus Omega Planet Ocean\nAlthough Omega has rationalized its collections significantly over the last few years, there are still an awful lot of watches on its books with the name \u2018Seamaster\u2019 somewhere in their title. They include everything from the entry-level Aqua Terra models to the Heritage watches seen above, the Railmaster (for some reason), all the way through to the great, slab-sided PloProf with its massive 1,200 meters of water resistance.\nIn-between, we find two other series, the Diver 300M and the Planet Ocean 600M. The former will be recognizable, and particularly the blue dial and bezel variant, to anyone who watched Pierce Brosnan play James Bond. It remains Omega\u2019s best-selling Seamaster group and now has more than 50 models in the lineup if you count all of the different colorways and configurations.\nThe Planet Ocean, on the other hand, was first created in 2005 as a bigger and tougher variation on the luxury dive watch. This sub-collection within the Seamaster family includes even more options than the Diver 300M and features both chronograph and GMT models, with each one rated down to 600 meters and produced in sizes of between 39.5mm (37.5mm if you count the limited editions) up to 45.5mm.\nAs for Breitling, its dive watch collections are much more clear-cut. They consist of the vintage-inspired Superocean Heritage that we\u2019ve already covered above and the modern Superocean. As with the Planet Ocean watches, the mainstream Superocean models take few prisoners. The collection ranges from 36mm unisex models through to some great hulking 48mm behemoths, very much keeping in line with Breitling\u2019s history of producing oversized wristwatches.\nDepth ratings vary from 200m all the way to an incredible 2,000m. However, while they share few styling conventions among them, there are some definite similarities between the Breitling Superocean and the Omega Planet Ocean that make them ripe for a showdown. Below, we take a look in more detail.\nBreitling Superocean\n\nSuperocean Key Features:\nCase Size: 36mm; 42mm; 44mm; 46mm; 48mm\nFunctionality: Time-Only; Time w/ Date; Chronograph w/ Date\nMaterials: Stainless Steel; Titanium; Steel & 18k Red Gold\nDial: Blue; Black; White; Yellow; Orange\nBezel: Blue; Black; White, Unidirectional w/Ceramic Insert (bidirectional w/ locking mechanism on 48mm model)\nCrystal: Cambered Sapphire, Glare-Proof (both sides)\nMovement: Breitling 17\nWater Resistance: 200 meters / 660 feet – 2,000 meters / 6,600 feet\nBracelet: Rubber; Steel; NATO\nRetail Price: $3,450-$6,100\n\nOmega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M\n\nPlanet Ocean Key Features:\nCase Size: 37.5mm; 39.5mm; 43.5mm; 45.5mm\nFunctionality: Time w/ Date; Chronograph w/ Date; GMT\nMaterials: Stainless Steel; Steel and Sedna Gold; Sedna Gold; Ceramic; Titanium; Platinum\nDial: Blue; Black; White; Grey; Brown\nBezel: Orange; Blue; Black; White; Grey; Gem-Set, Unidirectional with Cramic insert (bidirectional on GMT models)\nCrystal: Domed Sapphire, Anti-Reflective Treatment (both sides)\nMovement: Omega Master Co-Axial Caliber 8800/8801/8900/8906/9900/9901\nWater Resistance: 600 meters / 2,000 feet\nBracelet: Steel; Steel and Sedna Gold; Titanium; Leather; Rubber; NATO\nRetail Price: $6,450-$95,000\n\nBreitling Superocean Vs. Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M: Features and Options\nOmega\nWhile both collections offer plenty of variety, designed to suit any and all tastes, the Planet Ocean series stands out in front. All told, there are more than a hundred different flavors of the watch, in five sizes, seven different metals, five dial colors, and three types of complication.\nHowever, although there is no doubting the lavishness of the range, each watch still very clearly means business. Even the smallest in the lineup has a significant heft, equipped with a noticeably thicker case than Omega\u2019s Diver 300M models, in order to cope with the pressures of a 600-meter water resistance rating. On top of that, a manually operated helium escape valve is fitted to each one at the10 o\u2019clock location. Will you ever need to use it? No, of course not. But it\u2019s nice to have anyway.\nIn terms of functionality, you can take your pick between simple time-and-date pieces (which make up the majority of those available), a handful of GMT models, and a number of chronographs. The chronograph models are only available in the largest 45.5mm size, while the GMT watches are only available in 43.5mm or 45.5mm, but you do have a choice in size for the various time-and-date models.\nMaterials are top-notch, as you would expect from Omega\u2019s premium diving line. Steel and two-tone are the most accessible, running through grade 5 titanium examples and on up to solid 18k Sedna gold and Platinum editions. Similar to the brand\u2019s Speedmaster Dark Side of the Moon range, some of the watches in the Planet Ocean collection are crafted from colored ceramic.\nBezels are similarly high-tech. Most of the inserts are also made of ceramic, with the majority given a Liquidmetal diving scale. Liquidmetal is a proprietary process developed by Omega that permanently bonds the ceramic bezel insert and it metallic numerals, creating a single component engineered for maximum durability and longevity. One-upping even that, the gold models feature Ceragold \u2013 another Omega-devised method that allows the watchmaker to encrust ceramic with 18k gold and has resulted in the industry\u2019s first-ever ceramic bezel with gold markings that are completely smooth to the touch.\nAll in all, the Omega Planet Ocean series manages to tread that line between having the abilities of a full-throated sports model and the general bearing of a luxury watch \u2013 all from a manufacturer that is at the top of its game.\n\nBreitling\nIn comparison to the Omega, Breitling\u2019s Superocean range is a far more agricultural collection. You won\u2019t find any fancy new alloys or molten gold liquids here, and a chronograph with a date function is as complicated as it gets. You don\u2019t even get a helium escape valve on every model, and it is only found on those rated to 1,000m and deeper.\nWhat you get instead (for the most part) is some good old fashioned Breitling machismo. Most of the collection is forged from stainless steel, with a handful of those being DLC-coated a manly matte black, with one of them given a splash of red gold to the bezel \u2013 just about the only concession to a touch of opulence. The remaining examples all have 48mm titanium cases, again with a black DLC coating.\nAlthough the engineering may be a bit less advanced than what is found on the Omega, the Superocean\u2019s talents are prodigious. The smallest 36mm models, clearly aimed at opening up Breitling\u2019s roster to women at long last, are still waterproof to 200m. Yet the 46mm examples take that all the way down to an astonishing 2,000m (6,600ft), dwarfing not only Omega\u2019s Planet Ocean range but also the PloProf \u2013 a watch commissioned by and built for hardcore saturation divers. (Curiously though, the enormous 48mm Superocean pieces with the special locking bezel and soft iron inner case are only rated to 300m, despite their burly looks).\nAs a whole, there is little about the Breitling Superocean family that would lead you to use the word subtle, but that is rather the point. These are larger-than-life professional dive watches aimed at outgoing people, and they fulfill their role superbly.\n\nBreitling Superocean Vs. Omega Planet Ocean 600M: Aesthetics\nOmega\nWith more than 100 models available and spread around a wide sizing spectrum, the Omega Planet Ocean collection is the epitome of the \u2018something for everyone\u2019 rule. While all the models share a relaxed elegance due to their design and form, there are still plenty of distinct personalities in the collection. The range can be bright and playful, such as with the 43.5mm ref. 215.32.44.21.04.001, with its bezel, indexes and NATO strap all accented in a vivid orange (the unofficial signature color of the Planet Ocean series).\nAt the opposite styling extreme, watches like the 39.5mm ref. 215.63.40.20.13.001 are achingly sophisticated, with a case forged from Omega\u2019s own red gold (named Sedna) and offering one of the more successful uses of chocolate brown for the dial and bezel, continued onto the rubber-backed leather strap. The look gives off both an incredible, luxurious warmth and a cultured understatement.\nOne of the most varied sub-collections groups within the lineup is found across the various dual time zone models. This is where you will see the bulk of the ceramic-cased Planet Ocean pieces, with most of them in jet black and a few in deep blue. Some of the bezels have been given pops of intense color, generally mirrored on the GMT hand, while others have been left rather monochromatic. There is also one with a beautiful Sedna gold, but the standouts are the two steel references (the ref. 215.30.44.22.01.001 and the ref. 215.33.44.22.01.001), each fitted with the world\u2019s first black and white polished bi-ceramic bezel.\nElsewhere, Omega really has covered all the bases. There are models for just about any sensibility, and the vast majority of them do what the best luxury dive watches have always done; retain a certain versatility that pairs with any outfit, whether it is a weekday business suit or kicking back at the weekend in jeans and t-shirt. Yet, the basics are consistent throughout. Each case has Omega\u2019s trademark twisted lyre lugs, every reference uses the same broad arrow handset, all the time-and-date pieces have the same Arabic numeral markers at the 12/6/9, with a small date window at the three o\u2019clock, and the chronographs have two sub counters in the same shade as the main dial.\nAs a whole, this consistency gives a welcome cohesion to the family, regardless of the rest of the color scheme. This is a group of visually arresting, highly accomplished divers that are issued in an intelligent range of sizes and made to find a home on virtually any wrist.\n\nBreitling\nWhat the Breitling Superocean loses to Omega in the refinement stakes, it more than makes back in presence. Just about as in-your-face a collection as you will come across, Breitling\u2019s focus has clearly been centered on legibility and robustness. This latest catalog only emerged in the last few years, taking over from the previous generation \u2013 one which was criticized for an extremely busy-looking dial.\nIndexes are still enormous with massive 12/6/9 numerals on many examples, coupled with large trapezoidal markers for the rest and thick, squared hands that are about 95% filled with lume. Regardless of size or materials, the cases all look bombproof and offer rather hefty crown-guards \u2013 something absent from the Omega, further underlining the Planet Ocean\u2019s more dressy veneer.\nWhile these are certainly dive watches worthy of the name, the flip side to that is arguably a loss of adaptability. Although there are a couple of models in the collection unobtrusive enough to coordinate with more formal attire, these are genuine sports models made to be worn during any and all strenuous activity.\nThat is underlined in the brand\u2019s choice of dial colors. Along with the more traditional black, white, and blue, it is impossible to miss the dazzling yellow and orange dials, and some are even paired with a correspondingly vibrant rubber strap.\nOverall, the Breitling Superocean series is a lot of fun. They may have some truly fearsome skills, but the models don\u2019t take themselves too seriously. It\u2019s a refreshing change from a brand so steeped in the ultra-masculine and one that seems perfectly suited to this particular range of dive watches.\n\nBreitling Superocean Vs. Omega Planet Ocean 600M: Movements\nOmega\nThe Planet Ocean models were among the first watches of the expansive Seamaster range to be given Co-Axial movements. That initial generation used the final version of the Cal. 2500 (an ETA-based engine) which had been slowed down to 25,200vph from 28,800vph, thus creating the optimal frequency for the Co-Axial system.\nIn 2011, the second iteration of the Planet Ocean collection emerged, now fitted with Omega\u2019s own Cal. 8500 and its variants. While the movement had been in circulation for a while by this point, it was in the Planet Ocean range that it was given its first silicon hairspring and escapement. The current third series has progressed again, now powered (mostly) by the Cal. 8900. This is the Master Chronometer version of the outgoing 8500, meaning it has been certified for precision by METAS, The Federal Institute for Metrology (it was actually the first Omega caliber to win the certification).\nThe Cal. 8900 is not only accurate to 0/+5 seconds a day, it can also withstand exposure to magnetic fields of more than 15,000 gauss. The collection also uses the Cal. 8800, which is fairly similar except for its smaller physical dimensions and the fact that it has just one mainspring barrel. The Cal. 8900 has two, mounted in series, giving a power reserve of 60-hours, as opposed to the 55-hours of the Cal. 8800. Apart from that, each one has a free-sprung balance, silicon springs, bi-directional winding, and a Co-Axial escapement. The finishing is also superb on both, with Geneva wave patterns on the rotor and bridges, and the engraved legend \u2018Omega Master Co-Axial\u2019 to help tell it apart from the older 8500.\nAs for the chronographs, the steel and titanium variants operate on the Cal. 9900. This, too, is the first Omega chronograph movement to sport a METAS certificate and was brought into the range in 2016. Notable features include a vertical clutch (as on the Rolex Daytona\u2019s Cal. 4130), a column wheel, a titanium balance, and a silicon balance spring. The frequency is back to 28,800vph, despite the Co-Axial escapement, and twin barrels provide a 60-hour power reserve.\nThere\u2019s no doubt that Omega\u2019s movements are up there with the very best in the industry. However, the Co-Axial calibers do tend to be relatively large, leading to thick cases. The 45.5mm Planet Ocean watches, for instance, measure some 16.5mm \u2013 just one thing to be aware of if you tend to wear your shirt sleeves fitted.\n\nBreitling\nAs some of the least expensive offerings from Breitling, the Superocean range is powered entirely by modified third party movements. That movement being primarily the Breitling 17, which starts life as the ETA 2824-2. This is the same caliber that was inside the first wave of Superocean Heritage watches before being replaced by the Tudor Cal. MT5612. Whether these regular Superocean models will receive the same treatment remains to be seen.\nThe ETA 2824-2 is quite possibly the workhorse of all workhorse movements. It has been around since 1982, has been used in literally countless numbers of watches from many different brands, and it is a strong and technically unassuming power plant. It beats at 28,800vph (4Hz) and has a decent 38-hour reserve. It is built in four \u2018grades\u2019 \u2013 each one differentiated by the quality of their components and their tested accuracy. These are Standard, Elaborated, Top, and Chronometer (the one Breitling fits to the Superocean). To win that grade, the caliber has to be accurate to within -4/+6 seconds a day, across five positions.\nThe brand is pretty tightlipped over what modifications actually take place to turn the ETA 2824-2 into the Breitling 17, but it is rumored that both the balance spring and mainspring, in addition to the balance wheel and escapement are all swapped out for a variety of higher-performing alternatives. On top of that, selected components are rhodium-plated, and the entire movement will receive a decorative finishing. However, most importantly, they are a watchmaker\u2019s friend. Reliable, simple to work on, and with plenty of easily accessible spare parts, they just keep on ticking, pretty much forever.\n\nBreitling Superocean Vs. Omega Seamaster Planet Ocean 600M: Final Thoughts\nOmega has a far longer history with dive watches than Breitling, as can be seen by the comparative number of models in their respective lineups. The Planet Ocean collection is the flagship range in Omega\u2019s dive arsenal, while the Superocean watches are some of Breitling\u2019s least expensive. The most expensive Superocean actually costs less than the cheapest Planet Ocean.\nHowever, the numbers don\u2019t tell the whole story. Yes, the Breitling Superocean watches may lack some of the finesse of their Omega rivals, but in terms of bang-for-your-buck, they are hard to fault. Furthermore, they are the kind of watches you wouldn\u2019t mind subjecting to the sometimes harsh conditions aboard the average dive boat.\nThe Omega Planet Ocean watches are obviously a bit more luxurious. Much like similar types of timepieces from other manufacturers such as Rolex and Panerai, it is unlikely that many Planet Ocean watches will ever truly taste any of the planet\u2019s oceans, but that isn\u2019t really the point of them. They are stylish, luxury timepieces that just happen to be highly capable and extremely robust. Both series make a statement, and each has plenty of points in its favor.\n\nThe post Breitling Superocean Vs. Omega Seamaster Collection Comparison appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2021-07-26T01:01:59-07:00", "date_modified": "2021-07-26T10:11:04-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/banner-om-breit.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=40461", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/breitling-watches-superocean-heritage.html", "title": "Breitling Watches: Superocean vs. Superocean Heritage \u2013 What\u2019s The Difference?", "content_html": "What is the difference between the Breitling Superocean and the Superocean Heritage? Both Breitling watches share similar monikers, but the Superocean Heritage is dedicated to honoring Breitling dive watches from the 1950s, while the Superocean continues to evolve and features a noticeably more contemporary aesthetic. Both models include classic dive watch amenities, such as a luminous display on the dial, a waterproof case, and a rotatable bezel. However, the Superocean Heritage keeps it simple with minimal markings on its bezel insert, while the Superocean often features more robust bezels decorated with 60-minute graduations.
\nThis comparison review will take a brief look at the Breitling Superocean\u2019s history and what sets both models apart. Are you wondering which model will suit your wrist the best? Both editions of the Superocean are available in various case sizes, movement functions, dial and bezel colors, and bracelet options to accommodate any lifestyle while bringing their own aesthetic to the brand\u2019s catalog. Read on to learn more about the iconic diver that proved Breitling was more than just a manufacturer of pilot\u2019s watches.
\n
![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Screen-Shot-2021-06-28-at-3.31.36-PM.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
Breitling has been developing and producing precision watches since 1884. Its history in aviation is storied, having created one of the first pilot\u2019s wristwatches with a chronograph movement. However, Breitling watches also have a strong reputation throughout the dive watch industry, with its most notable model, the Superocean beginning production in 1957 and the Superocean Heritage entering the market 50 years later in 2007.
\nThe Superocean\u2019s production run, which spans over half a century, has yielded numerous variations of the series that continue to evolve to include the latest in watch fashion and watchmaking technologies. The Superocean Heritage continues to evolve and maintains a design aesthetic that closely mirrors that of the very first model ever produced. When choosing between the two, what it really comes down to is personal taste. Do you prefer the look and feel of retro Breitling models, or does a modern timepiece speak to you more? Let\u2019s take a closer look at some Breitling dive watches.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/MicrosoftTeams-image-56-1.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
To better understand the Breitling Superocean collection, let\u2019s take a closer look at its history. The Superocean hit the market in 1957 with the three-hand reference 1004 and the chronograph reference 807. Breitling\u2019s foray into the world of dive watches came just after Rolex had released the iconic Submariner in 1953. Accompanied by the Breitling name and an impressive 200-meters of water resistance, the Superocean was a success. Its design took a minimalist approach with simple yet highly legible markers on the dial and bezel, along with bold and easy-to-read hands. This design ethos would be revived with the Superocean Heritage model that would come to the market 50 years later.
\nDuring its production run, the Superocean saw many notable upgrades, such as updates to its luminous material, the addition of a Helium Escape Valve, and depth ratings that promise water resistance up to 2,000 meters on certain models. Today, the collection also includes the Superocean II and it is available in 36mm, 42mm, 44mm, 46mm, and 48mm case sizes. Like many other Breitling watches, this impressive diver can also be had in a plethora of dial and bezel color options, metal finishes, and bracelet types, making it a varied and interesting watch to pursue and collect.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Screen-Shot-2021-06-28-at-3.33.21-PM.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
The Breitling Superocean 2005 was introduced in the 1960s and touted an innovative \u201cslow-motion\u201d feature. This function earns its name due to the chronograph hand circling the dial once per hour instead of once per minute. Given that the watch was specifically designed for diving, this unusual feature makes its chronograph function far more useful for measuring submersion times. This function was accompanied by an interesting disc indicator just above the 6-hour marker to allow users to distinguish when the chronograph was engaged.
\nThe Superocean 2005 Execution 2 was released a few years later in 1971 and debuted a seconds register at the 9-hour marker and baton hour markers and broader hands. The \u201cYachting\u201d bezel option was also introduced with this model and was offered alongside a classic diving bezel with a traditional 60-minute scale. Both 2005 editions were intriguing Superocean variants that showcased Breitling\u2019s watchmaking prowess.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Screen-Shot-2021-06-28-at-3.34.26-PM.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
The Breitling Superocean collection saw many more noteworthy upgrades between 1971 and the introduction of the Superocean Heritage in 2007. However, this model is one of the most fascinating recent additions with its flawless 1950s-inspired design, date aperture on the dial, and classic mesh bracelet. Side-by-side, the original Superocean and the Superocean Heritage boast many similarities, including the bezel, which omits the numeral markers often seen on bezels offered from other brands, similar arrow hands, and a contrasting luminous display for a legible reading on land or in the ocean.
\nThe Breitling Superocean Heritage is reminiscent of a time when luxury dive watches were simply professional timing tools but today, its striking design is also enjoyed by those who cared about making a statement on the wrist. This is compared to the current Superocean, which is still quite fashionable but is more of a purpose-built timing tool that emphasizes functionality rather than neo-vintage design.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/MicrosoftTeams-image-57-1.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
The Breitling Superocean Heritage II collection entered the market around the Superocean\u2019s 60th anniversary in 2017. The second generation of the Superocean Heritage was produced with a 42mm, 44mm, or 46mm case size and offered users 200 meters of water resistance, just like the original 1950s model. Similarly, the Breitling Superocean Heritage II was also equipped with either a traditional three-hand movement or one with chronograph functionality. Cutting-edge technology, coupled with a nostalgic dive watch aesthetic, make both editions of the Breitling Superocean Heritage collection a joy to wear.
\nThe Breitling Superocean Heritage II is also available on the secondary market with various bezel and dial colors, bracelet types, and case sizes, making it easy to find the perfect Superocean Heritage watch to suit your wrist. Conversely, the original Superocean embraces a much more contemporary style while still offering the same high-performance and water resistance that has defined the collection since the inaugural models of the 1950s.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Breitling_20JM1605-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
Personal style will always play a big part in choosing between the Breitling Superocean and Superocean Heritage. The Superocean Heritage keeps it classy with a simple and vintage-inspired design, while the Superocean is noticeably more modern and utilitarian. However, another important factor to consider is your budget and the slightly different prices between Superocean and Superocean Heritage watches.
\nFor as low as $3,600, you can invest in the Breitling Superocean at retail. On the secondary market, pre-owned prices start out as low as approximately $2,500. The Breitling Superocean Heritage offers a somewhat similar investment proposition, but prices are slightly higher. Current entry-level retail prices start out at $4,380 and pre-owned examples frequently trade hands around $4k. With that in mind, whether you opt for the modern Superocean or the vintage-inspired Superocean Heritage, both Breitling dive watches offer expert-level craftsmanship, chronometer-certified movements, and a rich history of underwater explorations that dates back to the early days of diving in the 1950s.
\n![\"Breitling](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/MicrosoftTeams-image-58.jpg\" "\\"Breitling")
The post Breitling Watches: Superocean vs. Superocean Heritage – What’s The Difference? appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "What is the difference between the Breitling Superocean and the Superocean Heritage? Both Breitling watches share similar monikers, but the Superocean Heritage is dedicated to honoring Breitling dive watches from the 1950s, while the Superocean continues to evolve and features a noticeably more contemporary aesthetic. Both models include classic dive watch amenities, such as a luminous display on the dial, a waterproof case, and a rotatable bezel. However, the Superocean Heritage keeps it simple with minimal markings on its bezel insert, while the Superocean often features more robust bezels decorated with 60-minute graduations.\nThis comparison review will take a brief look at the Breitling Superocean\u2019s history and what sets both models apart. Are you wondering which model will suit your wrist the best? Both editions of the Superocean are available in various case sizes, movement functions, dial and bezel colors, and bracelet options to accommodate any lifestyle while bringing their own aesthetic to the brand\u2019s catalog. Read on to learn more about the iconic diver that proved Breitling was more than just a manufacturer of pilot\u2019s watches.\nBreitling Superocean vs. Superocean Heritage Table of Contents\n\nAbout Breitling Superocean Dive Watches\nBreitling Superocean Watches – History and Models\n\nThe Original Superocean Reference 2005\nBreitling Superocean Heritage\nBreitling Superocean Heritage II\n\n\nWhich Breitling Superocean Should I Buy?\n\n\n\nAbout Breitling Superocean Dive Watches\nBreitling has been developing and producing precision watches since 1884. Its history in aviation is storied, having created one of the first pilot\u2019s wristwatches with a chronograph movement. However, Breitling watches also have a strong reputation throughout the dive watch industry, with its most notable model, the Superocean beginning production in 1957 and the Superocean Heritage entering the market 50 years later in 2007.\nThe Superocean\u2019s production run, which spans over half a century, has yielded numerous variations of the series that continue to evolve to include the latest in watch fashion and watchmaking technologies. The Superocean Heritage continues to evolve and maintains a design aesthetic that closely mirrors that of the very first model ever produced. When choosing between the two, what it really comes down to is personal taste. Do you prefer the look and feel of retro Breitling models, or does a modern timepiece speak to you more? Let\u2019s take a closer look at some Breitling dive watches.\n\nBreitling Superocean Watches – History and Models\nTo better understand the Breitling Superocean collection, let\u2019s take a closer look at its history. The Superocean hit the market in 1957 with the three-hand reference 1004 and the chronograph reference 807. Breitling\u2019s foray into the world of dive watches came just after Rolex had released the iconic Submariner in 1953. Accompanied by the Breitling name and an impressive 200-meters of water resistance, the Superocean was a success. Its design took a minimalist approach with simple yet highly legible markers on the dial and bezel, along with bold and easy-to-read hands. This design ethos would be revived with the Superocean Heritage model that would come to the market 50 years later.\nDuring its production run, the Superocean saw many notable upgrades, such as updates to its luminous material, the addition of a Helium Escape Valve, and depth ratings that promise water resistance up to 2,000 meters on certain models. Today, the collection also includes the Superocean II and it is available in 36mm, 42mm, 44mm, 46mm, and 48mm case sizes. Like many other Breitling watches, this impressive diver can also be had in a plethora of dial and bezel color options, metal finishes, and bracelet types, making it a varied and interesting watch to pursue and collect.\n\nThe Original Superocean Reference 2005\nThe Breitling Superocean 2005 was introduced in the 1960s and touted an innovative \u201cslow-motion\u201d feature. This function earns its name due to the chronograph hand circling the dial once per hour instead of once per minute. Given that the watch was specifically designed for diving, this unusual feature makes its chronograph function far more useful for measuring submersion times. This function was accompanied by an interesting disc indicator just above the 6-hour marker to allow users to distinguish when the chronograph was engaged.\nThe Superocean 2005 Execution 2 was released a few years later in 1971 and debuted a seconds register at the 9-hour marker and baton hour markers and broader hands. The \u201cYachting\u201d bezel option was also introduced with this model and was offered alongside a classic diving bezel with a traditional 60-minute scale. Both 2005 editions were intriguing Superocean variants that showcased Breitling\u2019s watchmaking prowess.\n\nBreitling Superocean Heritage\nThe Breitling Superocean collection saw many more noteworthy upgrades between 1971 and the introduction of the Superocean Heritage in 2007. However, this model is one of the most fascinating recent additions with its flawless 1950s-inspired design, date aperture on the dial, and classic mesh bracelet. Side-by-side, the original Superocean and the Superocean Heritage boast many similarities, including the bezel, which omits the numeral markers often seen on bezels offered from other brands, similar arrow hands, and a contrasting luminous display for a legible reading on land or in the ocean.\nThe Breitling Superocean Heritage is reminiscent of a time when luxury dive watches were simply professional timing tools but today, its striking design is also enjoyed by those who cared about making a statement on the wrist. This is compared to the current Superocean, which is still quite fashionable but is more of a purpose-built timing tool that emphasizes functionality rather than neo-vintage design.\n\nBreitling Superocean Heritage II\nThe Breitling Superocean Heritage II collection entered the market around the Superocean\u2019s 60th anniversary in 2017. The second generation of the Superocean Heritage was produced with a 42mm, 44mm, or 46mm case size and offered users 200 meters of water resistance, just like the original 1950s model. Similarly, the Breitling Superocean Heritage II was also equipped with either a traditional three-hand movement or one with chronograph functionality. Cutting-edge technology, coupled with a nostalgic dive watch aesthetic, make both editions of the Breitling Superocean Heritage collection a joy to wear.\nThe Breitling Superocean Heritage II is also available on the secondary market with various bezel and dial colors, bracelet types, and case sizes, making it easy to find the perfect Superocean Heritage watch to suit your wrist. Conversely, the original Superocean embraces a much more contemporary style while still offering the same high-performance and water resistance that has defined the collection since the inaugural models of the 1950s.\n\nWhich Breitling Superocean Should I Buy?\nPersonal style will always play a big part in choosing between the Breitling Superocean and Superocean Heritage. The Superocean Heritage keeps it classy with a simple and vintage-inspired design, while the Superocean is noticeably more modern and utilitarian. However, another important factor to consider is your budget and the slightly different prices between Superocean and Superocean Heritage watches.\nFor as low as $3,600, you can invest in the Breitling Superocean at retail. On the secondary market, pre-owned prices start out as low as approximately $2,500. The Breitling Superocean Heritage offers a somewhat similar investment proposition, but prices are slightly higher. Current entry-level retail prices start out at $4,380 and pre-owned examples frequently trade hands around $4k. With that in mind, whether you opt for the modern Superocean or the vintage-inspired Superocean Heritage, both Breitling dive watches offer expert-level craftsmanship, chronometer-certified movements, and a rich history of underwater explorations that dates back to the early days of diving in the 1950s.\n\nThe post Breitling Watches: Superocean vs. Superocean Heritage – What’s The Difference? appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2021-07-08T06:01:24-07:00", "date_modified": "2023-03-20T16:28:55-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Screen-Shot-2021-06-28-at-2.51.41-PM.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=48368", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-vs-grand-seiko.html", "title": "Rolex vs. Grand Seiko Ultimate Comparison Guide", "content_html": "\nWhen it comes to a reliable wristwatch that will hold its value, which brand is better? Rolex or Grand Seiko? For some, that answer is easy: a new or pre-owned Rolex, hands down. But there is certainly an argument for Grand Seiko, which much like Rolex, adheres to the industry’s strictest standards for accuracy and focuses on enduring and functional designs.
\n\n\n\nRolex, with its genius marketing techniques, trumps Grand Seiko when it comes to brand presence. It appears that Seiko’s ethos has always been to focus on performance over expensive advertising (just look at both brands’ websites and you’ll understand what we mean by that). Additionally, in regard to general notoriety, Rolex is by far more established and well-known. Simply put, if you want to make a statement or display a high level of social standing, then Rolex is the brand to wear.
\n\n\n\nHowever, there’s far more to the argument of Rolex vs. Grand Seiko than just brand presence. To better help you decide which watch company is the better investment, let’s take a closer look at both brands’ respective price points, comparable models, and overall reverence.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/20JM2062-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
– Founded in 1905.
\n\n\n\n– Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland.
\n\n\n\n– First brand to earn chronometer certification for a wristwatch.
\n\n\n\n– Invented the waterproof Oyster case in 1926.
\n\n\n\n– Produces approximately a million watches per year.
\n\n\n\n– The world\u2019s most famous luxury watch manufacturer.
\n\n\n\n– All watches are made in Switzerland.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex\"](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/shop-the-collection1-3.jpg\" "\\"Shop")
![\"Grand](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/20JM2049-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Grand")
– Seiko was founded in 1881; the first Grand Seiko was in 1960.
\n\n\n\n– Headquarters in Tokyo, Japan.
\n\n\n\n– Only sold in Japan until 2010.
\n\n\n\n– Became a separate brand from Seiko in 2017.
\n\n\n\n– Invented the Spring Drive movement.
\n\n\n\n– Watches inspired by nature.
\n\n\n\n– All watches are made in Japan.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Screen-Shot-2021-06-04-at-4.09.46-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Seiko\u2019s roots date back to 1881 when founder Kintar\u014d Hattori opened a watch shop in Japan. However, it wasn\u2019t until 1960 that the first Grand Seiko was released to the market, effectively transforming Seiko from more than just an affordable and reliable watchmaker into a high-end watch brand. With the arrival of Grand Seiko, the company had now entered the luxury watch game with prices often comparable to that of other industry heavy hitters such as Rolex.
\n\n\n\nOn the other hand, Rolex was established in 1905 and established itself as a high-end watch manufacturer early in the company\u2019s history. Rolex\u2019s iconic waterproof Oyster case made history when it debuted in 1926, followed shortly by the Perpetual self-winding movement in 1931. The revolution from traditional pocket watches to durable waterproof wristwatches had begun, with Rolex leading the pack.
\n\n\n\nThat brings us back to the question of which is the better investment, Rolex or Grand Seiko? Both companies have since become masters of their craft, producing ground-breaking movements decorated with various distinctions that celebrate their accuracy and reliability. Both companies also boast somewhat comparable price points. With that in mind, let\u2019s take a closer look at comparable models produced by Rolex and Grand Seiko in this battle of the brands.
\n\n\n\nDive watches are one of the most popular types of timepieces in the entire industry and both Rolex and Grand Seiko offer some standout options.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-55.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The Rolex Submariner is, without a doubt, one of the most iconic dive watches ever created. It dates back to 1953, featuring a design that has remained largely intact, despite decades of evolution and upgrades. New to the market is the reference 126610LN, which includes a unidirectional diver\u2019s bezel topped with a ceramic insert, large hour markers and Mercedes hands filled with luminous blue Chromalight, and full Oystersteel (904L stainless steel) construction. It features a 41mm case, water-resistance up to 1,000 feet, and Rolex\u2019s new-generation Caliber 3235 movement.
\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: 126610LN
\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 41mm
\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire
\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel
\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Unidirectional
\n\n\n\n– Movement: Mechanical, Self-Winding
\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 70 Hours
\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date
\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $9,150
\n\n\n\n![\"Grand](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/SBGA229G-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Grand")
The Grand Seiko ref. SBGA229 hails from the brand\u2019s Sport Collection. It features a strikingly similar feature set as the Submariner with a stainless steel construction, a black dial topped with large Lumibrite plots, and a black unidirectional timing bezel. At 44mm in diameter, it’s quite a bit larger than the Submariner and features a lower depth rating of 660 feet. Outward appearances aside, the SBGA229 has the Submariner beat with a more accurate movement. The Calibre 3235 powering the Submariner promises accuracy up to -2/+2 seconds per day, while the SBGA229 is powered by the Caliber 9R65 Spring Drive movement with an accuracy rating of fewer than 15 seconds per month.
\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: SBGA229
\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 44.2mm
\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire
\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel
\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Unidirectional
\n\n\n\n– Movement: Spring Drive
\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 72 Hours
\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date, Power Reserve Indicator
\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $6,000
\n\n\n\nThe Grand Seiko SBGA229 will set you back several thousand dollars less than the Submariner. However, while the Submariner is currently commanding significantly more than its original retail price on the secondary market, the SBGA229 is holding steady at or just below retail when purchased pre-owned. If you\u2019re lucky enough to invest in the Submariner at retail, it is positioned as a better investment than reference SBGA229. However, unless you plan on spending several years on a waiting list, you will likely end up paying nearly twice the price of the Grand Seiko if you wish to add the Rolex Submariner 126610LN to your collection.
\n\n\n\nChronographs are another incredibly popular type of timepiece and both Rolex and Grand Seiko offer watches that offer this type of stopwatch functionality.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-57.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The Rolex Cosmograph Daytona is a relatively straightforward watch, with a tachymeter bezel calibrated to 400 units, a 12-hour stopwatch function within the movement, coordinating sub-dials, and central hour, minute, and seconds hands. The reference 116500LN hit the market in 2016, bringing with it the first instance of a ceramic bezel within the stainless steel Daytona series. It features an Oystersteel construction, Chromalight finished hour markers and hands, and either a white or black dial. At 40mm in diameter, the Rolex Daytona has become more than just a reliable motorsport wristwatch; it\u2019s also a comfortable, everyday timepiece and a universally recognized status symbol.
\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: 116500LN
\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 40mm
\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire
\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel
\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Tachymeter
\n\n\n\n– Movement: Mechanical, Self-Winding
\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 72 Hours
\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, 12-Hour Chronograph
\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $13,150
\n\n\n\n![\"Grand](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/SBGC221G-1.jpg\" "\\"Grand")
At 46.4mm in diameter and 16.2mm thick, Grand Seiko\u2019s chronograph wears substantially larger on the wrist than the Rolex Daytona. However, it compensates for its large size with a lightweight combination of titanium and ceramic. Another notable difference between the two brands is the bezel. The Daytona features a Tachymeter bezel, and the Grand Seiko is equipped with a 24-hour bezel for use with its additional GMT hand. Both watches are powered by a chronograph movement with a 72-hour power reserve; however, while the Daytona relies on a traditional mechanical movement, the Grand Seiko uses one of the brand\u2019s Spring Drive movements, which offers superior timekeeping accuracy. Additionally, one of the biggest selling points for the Grand Seiko chronograph over the Daytona is the additional functionality of its movement. In addition to its time-telling and chronograph functions, it also offers users a date display, power reserve indicator, and a secondary time zone displayed by an additional 24-hour GMT hand.
\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: SBGC221 (White Dial) & SBGC223 (Black Dial)
\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 46.4mm
\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire
\n\n\n\n– Materials: Titanium & Ceramic
\n\n\n\n– Bezel: 24-Hour
\n\n\n\n– Movement: Spring Drive
\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 72 Hours
\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date, 12-Hour Chronograph, Power Reserve Indicator, GMT Functionality
\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $14,800
\n\n\n\nThe stainless steel Rolex Daytona has been a hot item on the secondary market since its debut in 2016, and it often commands more than twice its retail price pre-owned. Incredibly high demand for steel Rolex sports watches, coupled with persisting low inventory, has driven the Daytona 116500LN\u2019s price to more than $30k used. The Grand Seiko Chronograph SBGC221 and SBGC223 average between $12k and $16k pre-owned, depending on the condition of the watch and the dial color. Again, Rolex wins this price comparison but only if you are able to find one at its original retail price. Given the current open-market prices for these two different chronograph watches, you will likely end up paying more than twice for the Rolex Daytona compared to its Grand Seiko Chronograph counterpart.
\n\n\n\nAlongside a range of purpose-built sports watches, both Rolex and Grand Seiko produce classic watches that are designed to be worn every day throughout a variety of different activities.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-56.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Rolex introduced the first Datejust in 1945. However, it wasn\u2019t until 2009 that the series received a larger 41mm case with the arrival of the Datejust II (compared to the 36mm case diameter of its predecessor). The Rolex Datejust 41 hit the market a few years later in 2016, replacing the Datejust II and featuring a more refined case and the new-generation Caliber 3235 movement. A few years later in 2019, Rolex released the highly-anticipated reference 126300. It is an entirely Oystersteel edition of the current 41mm series with a smooth bezel, Oyster or Jubilee bracelet, and the option of a variety of different dial colors.
\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: 126300
\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 41mm
\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire
\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel
\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Smooth
\n\n\n\n– Movement: Mechanical, Self-Winding
\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 70 Hours
\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date
\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $7,650
\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/SBGP005G.jpg\")
The most notable difference between the Grand Seiko ref. SBGP005 and the Rolex Datejust 41 ref. 126300 is the movement, with the Datejust 41 utilizing a traditional self-winding mechanical movement and the Grand Seiko featuring one of the brand\u2019s high-accuracy quartz movements. Both watches are presented in stainless steel and feature a date window on the dial at the 3 o\u2019clock location. The Grand Seiko SBGP005 is also similar in size with a contemporary 40mm case diameter. One could also argue that both watches exude just the right amount of understated opulence that many luxury watch collectors crave, with top-quality materials and expert-level finishing. Additionally, with its ultra-accurate quartz movement the Grand Seiko ref. SBGP005 is a true set-it-and-forget-it watch and it is rated to be accurate within just 10 seconds per year.
\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: SBGP005
\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 40mm
\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire
\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel
\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Smooth
\n\n\n\n– Movement: High-Accuracy Quartz
\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 3 Years (battery life)
\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date
\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $3,200
\n\n\n\nOn the secondary market, the Rolex Datejust 41 ref. 126300 averages around $10k used. If you were able to purchase one at retail, your Datejust 41 has already appreciated in value. The Grand Seiko SBGP005 is currently reselling for just about the exact same as its brand-new retail price. The reference SBGP005 is indeed the more affordable option; however, it\u2019s also more likely to lose value in the coming years, whereas the Rolex Datejust 41 has already appreciated in value since coming to market in 2019.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Rolex_Submariner_114060_IMG_9463-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Rolex watches will almost always be the most expensive option compared to Grand Seiko. As we\u2019ve already highlighted above, newer models – particularly the stainless steel sports watches, tend to hold their value better, often commanding well over their original brand-new retail prices on the secondary market. Meanwhile, the vast majority of Grand Seiko watches resell for close to their original retail prices, but there are far fewer models that experience the same type of rapid and extreme appreciation as certain Rolex models.
\n\n\n\nBoth Rolex and Grand Seiko produce high-end timepieces that are exceptionally well-made. When trying to choose between these two iconic luxury watch manufacturers, it ultimately comes down to your budget and how important resale value is going to be long term. Rolex watches hold their value better than almost any other luxury timepiece, but the future resale value may mean very little if you plan on keeping your watch forever.
\n\n\n\nOn the other hand, Grand Seiko\u2019s use of Spring Drive and high-accuracy Quartz movements guarantee that certain models will inherently keep better time than a Rolex watch (or anything else that is powered by a traditional mechanical caliber). Again, this may ultimately mean very little if you trade off wearing a number of different watches on a regular basis, where day-to-day accuracy becomes significantly less important.
\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to choosing between Rolex and Grand Seiko, a solid case can be made for either brand and personal preference will likely be the key factors. With that in mind, Rolex and Grand Seiko are very different brands, with different designs, different movements, and different company values. Given all of these differences, there is definitely room in a collection for both Rolex and Grand Seiko watches, and regardless of whether you buy a Rolex or a Grand Seiko first, you will be receiving one of the very finest luxury timepieces available from an iconic brand that is renowned for pursuing perfection.
\n\n\n\n*Images courtesy of Grand Seiko.
\n\n\n![\"Grand](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/20JM2041-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Grand")
The post Rolex vs. Grand Seiko Ultimate Comparison Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "When it comes to a reliable wristwatch that will hold its value, which brand is better? Rolex or Grand Seiko? For some, that answer is easy: a new or pre-owned Rolex, hands down. But there is certainly an argument for Grand Seiko, which much like Rolex, adheres to the industry’s strictest standards for accuracy and focuses on enduring and functional designs.\n\n\n\nRolex, with its genius marketing techniques, trumps Grand Seiko when it comes to brand presence. It appears that Seiko’s ethos has always been to focus on performance over expensive advertising (just look at both brands’ websites and you’ll understand what we mean by that). Additionally, in regard to general notoriety, Rolex is by far more established and well-known. Simply put, if you want to make a statement or display a high level of social standing, then Rolex is the brand to wear.\n\n\n\nHowever, there’s far more to the argument of Rolex vs. Grand Seiko than just brand presence. To better help you decide which watch company is the better investment, let’s take a closer look at both brands’ respective price points, comparable models, and overall reverence.\n\n\n\nRolex Watches\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex Fast Facts:\n\n\n\n– Founded in 1905.\n\n\n\n– Headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland.\n\n\n\n– First brand to earn chronometer certification for a wristwatch.\n\n\n\n– Invented the waterproof Oyster case in 1926.\n\n\n\n– Produces approximately a million watches per year.\n\n\n\n– The world\u2019s most famous luxury watch manufacturer.\n\n\n\n– All watches are made in Switzerland.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nGrand Seiko Watches\n\n\n\n\n\n\nGrand Seiko Fast Facts:\n\n\n\n– Seiko was founded in 1881; the first Grand Seiko was in 1960.\n\n\n\n– Headquarters in Tokyo, Japan.\n\n\n\n– Only sold in Japan until 2010.\n\n\n\n– Became a separate brand from Seiko in 2017.\n\n\n\n– Invented the Spring Drive movement.\n\n\n\n– Watches inspired by nature.\n\n\n\n– All watches are made in Japan.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex vs. Grand Seiko: History Steeped in Innovation\n\n\n\nSeiko\u2019s roots date back to 1881 when founder Kintar\u014d Hattori opened a watch shop in Japan. However, it wasn\u2019t until 1960 that the first Grand Seiko was released to the market, effectively transforming Seiko from more than just an affordable and reliable watchmaker into a high-end watch brand. With the arrival of Grand Seiko, the company had now entered the luxury watch game with prices often comparable to that of other industry heavy hitters such as Rolex.\n\n\n\nOn the other hand, Rolex was established in 1905 and established itself as a high-end watch manufacturer early in the company\u2019s history. Rolex\u2019s iconic waterproof Oyster case made history when it debuted in 1926, followed shortly by the Perpetual self-winding movement in 1931. The revolution from traditional pocket watches to durable waterproof wristwatches had begun, with Rolex leading the pack.\n\n\n\nThat brings us back to the question of which is the better investment, Rolex or Grand Seiko? Both companies have since become masters of their craft, producing ground-breaking movements decorated with various distinctions that celebrate their accuracy and reliability. Both companies also boast somewhat comparable price points. With that in mind, let\u2019s take a closer look at comparable models produced by Rolex and Grand Seiko in this battle of the brands.\n\n\n\nRolex vs. Grand Seiko: Dive Watches\n\n\n\nDive watches are one of the most popular types of timepieces in the entire industry and both Rolex and Grand Seiko offer some standout options.\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner ref. 126610LN\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner is, without a doubt, one of the most iconic dive watches ever created. It dates back to 1953, featuring a design that has remained largely intact, despite decades of evolution and upgrades. New to the market is the reference 126610LN, which includes a unidirectional diver\u2019s bezel topped with a ceramic insert, large hour markers and Mercedes hands filled with luminous blue Chromalight, and full Oystersteel (904L stainless steel) construction. It features a 41mm case, water-resistance up to 1,000 feet, and Rolex\u2019s new-generation Caliber 3235 movement.\n\n\n\nSubmariner 126610LN Specs:\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: 126610LN\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 41mm\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Unidirectional\n\n\n\n– Movement: Mechanical, Self-Winding\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 70 Hours\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $9,150\n\n\n\nGrand Seiko Dive Watch ref. SBGA229\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Grand Seiko ref. SBGA229 hails from the brand\u2019s Sport Collection. It features a strikingly similar feature set as the Submariner with a stainless steel construction, a black dial topped with large Lumibrite plots, and a black unidirectional timing bezel. At 44mm in diameter, it’s quite a bit larger than the Submariner and features a lower depth rating of 660 feet. Outward appearances aside, the SBGA229 has the Submariner beat with a more accurate movement. The Calibre 3235 powering the Submariner promises accuracy up to -2/+2 seconds per day, while the SBGA229 is powered by the Caliber 9R65 Spring Drive movement with an accuracy rating of fewer than 15 seconds per month.\n\n\n\nGrand Seiko SBGA229 Specs:\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: SBGA229\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 44.2mm\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Unidirectional\n\n\n\n– Movement: Spring Drive\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 72 Hours\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date, Power Reserve Indicator\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $6,000\n\n\n\nRolex vs. Grand Seiko Dive Watch Price Comparison:\n\n\n\nThe Grand Seiko SBGA229 will set you back several thousand dollars less than the Submariner. However, while the Submariner is currently commanding significantly more than its original retail price on the secondary market, the SBGA229 is holding steady at or just below retail when purchased pre-owned. If you\u2019re lucky enough to invest in the Submariner at retail, it is positioned as a better investment than reference SBGA229. However, unless you plan on spending several years on a waiting list, you will likely end up paying nearly twice the price of the Grand Seiko if you wish to add the Rolex Submariner 126610LN to your collection.\n\n\n\nRolex vs. Grand Seiko: Chronographs\n\n\n\nChronographs are another incredibly popular type of timepiece and both Rolex and Grand Seiko offer watches that offer this type of stopwatch functionality.\n\n\n\nRolex Daytona ref. 116500LN\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Cosmograph Daytona is a relatively straightforward watch, with a tachymeter bezel calibrated to 400 units, a 12-hour stopwatch function within the movement, coordinating sub-dials, and central hour, minute, and seconds hands. The reference 116500LN hit the market in 2016, bringing with it the first instance of a ceramic bezel within the stainless steel Daytona series. It features an Oystersteel construction, Chromalight finished hour markers and hands, and either a white or black dial. At 40mm in diameter, the Rolex Daytona has become more than just a reliable motorsport wristwatch; it\u2019s also a comfortable, everyday timepiece and a universally recognized status symbol.\n\n\n\nDaytona 116500LN Specs:\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: 116500LN\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 40mm\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Tachymeter\n\n\n\n– Movement: Mechanical, Self-Winding\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 72 Hours\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, 12-Hour Chronograph\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $13,150\n\n\n\nGrand Seiko Chronograph ref. SBGC221 & SBGC223\n\n\n\n\n\n\nAt 46.4mm in diameter and 16.2mm thick, Grand Seiko\u2019s chronograph wears substantially larger on the wrist than the Rolex Daytona. However, it compensates for its large size with a lightweight combination of titanium and ceramic. Another notable difference between the two brands is the bezel. The Daytona features a Tachymeter bezel, and the Grand Seiko is equipped with a 24-hour bezel for use with its additional GMT hand. Both watches are powered by a chronograph movement with a 72-hour power reserve; however, while the Daytona relies on a traditional mechanical movement, the Grand Seiko uses one of the brand\u2019s Spring Drive movements, which offers superior timekeeping accuracy. Additionally, one of the biggest selling points for the Grand Seiko chronograph over the Daytona is the additional functionality of its movement. In addition to its time-telling and chronograph functions, it also offers users a date display, power reserve indicator, and a secondary time zone displayed by an additional 24-hour GMT hand.\n\n\n\nGrand Seiko SBGC221 Specs:\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: SBGC221 (White Dial) & SBGC223 (Black Dial)\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 46.4mm\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire\n\n\n\n– Materials: Titanium & Ceramic\n\n\n\n– Bezel: 24-Hour\n\n\n\n– Movement: Spring Drive\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 72 Hours\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date, 12-Hour Chronograph, Power Reserve Indicator, GMT Functionality\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $14,800\n\n\n\nRolex vs. Grand Seiko Chronograph Price Comparison:\n\n\n\nThe stainless steel Rolex Daytona has been a hot item on the secondary market since its debut in 2016, and it often commands more than twice its retail price pre-owned. Incredibly high demand for steel Rolex sports watches, coupled with persisting low inventory, has driven the Daytona 116500LN\u2019s price to more than $30k used. The Grand Seiko Chronograph SBGC221 and SBGC223 average between $12k and $16k pre-owned, depending on the condition of the watch and the dial color. Again, Rolex wins this price comparison but only if you are able to find one at its original retail price. Given the current open-market prices for these two different chronograph watches, you will likely end up paying more than twice for the Rolex Daytona compared to its Grand Seiko Chronograph counterpart.\n\n\n\nRolex vs. Grand Seiko: Classic Watches\n\n\n\nAlongside a range of purpose-built sports watches, both Rolex and Grand Seiko produce classic watches that are designed to be worn every day throughout a variety of different activities.\n\n\n\nRolex Datejust 41 ref. 126300\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex introduced the first Datejust in 1945. However, it wasn\u2019t until 2009 that the series received a larger 41mm case with the arrival of the Datejust II (compared to the 36mm case diameter of its predecessor). The Rolex Datejust 41 hit the market a few years later in 2016, replacing the Datejust II and featuring a more refined case and the new-generation Caliber 3235 movement. A few years later in 2019, Rolex released the highly-anticipated reference 126300. It is an entirely Oystersteel edition of the current 41mm series with a smooth bezel, Oyster or Jubilee bracelet, and the option of a variety of different dial colors.\n\n\n\nDatejust 126300 Specs:\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: 126300\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 41mm\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Smooth\n\n\n\n– Movement: Mechanical, Self-Winding\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 70 Hours\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $7,650\n\n\n\nGrand Seiko Heritage ref. SBGP005\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe most notable difference between the Grand Seiko ref. SBGP005 and the Rolex Datejust 41 ref. 126300 is the movement, with the Datejust 41 utilizing a traditional self-winding mechanical movement and the Grand Seiko featuring one of the brand\u2019s high-accuracy quartz movements. Both watches are presented in stainless steel and feature a date window on the dial at the 3 o\u2019clock location. The Grand Seiko SBGP005 is also similar in size with a contemporary 40mm case diameter. One could also argue that both watches exude just the right amount of understated opulence that many luxury watch collectors crave, with top-quality materials and expert-level finishing. Additionally, with its ultra-accurate quartz movement the Grand Seiko ref. SBGP005 is a true set-it-and-forget-it watch and it is rated to be accurate within just 10 seconds per year.\n\n\n\nGrand Seiko SBGP005 Specs:\n\n\n\n– Reference Number: SBGP005\n\n\n\n– Case Size: 40mm\n\n\n\n– Crystal: Sapphire\n\n\n\n– Materials: Stainless Steel\n\n\n\n– Bezel: Smooth\n\n\n\n– Movement: High-Accuracy Quartz\n\n\n\n– Power Reserve: 3 Years (battery life)\n\n\n\n– Dial: Hours, Minutes, Seconds, Date\n\n\n\n– Retail Price: $3,200\n\n\n\nRolex vs. Grand Seiko Classic Watch Price Comparison:\n\n\n\nOn the secondary market, the Rolex Datejust 41 ref. 126300 averages around $10k used. If you were able to purchase one at retail, your Datejust 41 has already appreciated in value. The Grand Seiko SBGP005 is currently reselling for just about the exact same as its brand-new retail price. The reference SBGP005 is indeed the more affordable option; however, it\u2019s also more likely to lose value in the coming years, whereas the Rolex Datejust 41 has already appreciated in value since coming to market in 2019.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex vs. Grand Seiko: Which One Is Better?\n\n\n\nRolex watches will almost always be the most expensive option compared to Grand Seiko. As we\u2019ve already highlighted above, newer models – particularly the stainless steel sports watches, tend to hold their value better, often commanding well over their original brand-new retail prices on the secondary market. Meanwhile, the vast majority of Grand Seiko watches resell for close to their original retail prices, but there are far fewer models that experience the same type of rapid and extreme appreciation as certain Rolex models.\n\n\n\nBoth Rolex and Grand Seiko produce high-end timepieces that are exceptionally well-made. When trying to choose between these two iconic luxury watch manufacturers, it ultimately comes down to your budget and how important resale value is going to be long term. Rolex watches hold their value better than almost any other luxury timepiece, but the future resale value may mean very little if you plan on keeping your watch forever.\n\n\n\nOn the other hand, Grand Seiko\u2019s use of Spring Drive and high-accuracy Quartz movements guarantee that certain models will inherently keep better time than a Rolex watch (or anything else that is powered by a traditional mechanical caliber). Again, this may ultimately mean very little if you trade off wearing a number of different watches on a regular basis, where day-to-day accuracy becomes significantly less important.\n\n\n\nWhen it comes to choosing between Rolex and Grand Seiko, a solid case can be made for either brand and personal preference will likely be the key factors. With that in mind, Rolex and Grand Seiko are very different brands, with different designs, different movements, and different company values. Given all of these differences, there is definitely room in a collection for both Rolex and Grand Seiko watches, and regardless of whether you buy a Rolex or a Grand Seiko first, you will be receiving one of the very finest luxury timepieces available from an iconic brand that is renowned for pursuing perfection.\n\n\n\n*Images courtesy of Grand Seiko.\n\n\n\nThe post Rolex vs. Grand Seiko Ultimate Comparison Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2021-06-07T01:01:52-07:00", "date_modified": "2023-03-24T14:34:17-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Screen-Shot-2021-06-04-at-4.08.06-PM.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=46458", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/difference-rolex-submariner-rolex-sea-dweller.html", "title": "What Is the Difference Between the Rolex Submariner and the Rolex Sea-Dweller?", "content_html": "Rolex’s current status as the undisputed leader in fine watchmaking has really been founded on two things: the timeless designs of its core offerings, and the overall versatility of everything it produces. For the most part, almost every model in the brand\u2019s portfolio can easily do double duty – tough and capable enough to serve as your daily watch, styled tastefully enough to be worn with just about any attire.
\nNowhere is this better demonstrated than with the brand’s dive watches. The Submariner, the Sea-Dweller, and (to a lesser extent) the Deepsea, exemplify that ‘one watch for any occasion’ quality. While the latter might be a little too imposing to slip under a tailored shirtsleeve at the most formal of events, the former two have perfected the minimalist elegance, which means that they will never look out of place.
\nBut what is there to choose between them? At first glance, they appear practically identical and in reality, they do share many of the same qualities. However, each has its own virtues and talents, and there are enough distinctions between them to make a meaningful comparison worthwhile. Below, we have outlined everything you need to know about two of the very best dive watches in the business: the Rolex Submariner and the Rolex Sea-Dweller.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM5429-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Case Size: 41mm
\nMaterials: Stainless Steel, Yellow Rolesor, 18k Yellow Gold, 18k White Gold
\nFunctions: Time w/Running Seconds, Date Display
\nDial: Black or Blue with Chromalight Hour Markers
\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black/Blue/Green Cerachrom w/ 60-Minute Scale
\nCrystal: Sapphire w/Cyclops on Date Models
\nWater Resistance: 300 Meters / 1,000 Feet
\nMovement: Caliber 3235
\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet
\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Submariner.
\n
![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM5437-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Case Size: 43mm
\nMaterials: Stainless Steel, Yellow Rolesor
\nFunctions: Time w/Running Seconds. Date Display
\nDial: Black with Chromalight Hour Markers
\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black Cerachrom w/ 60-Minute Scale
\nCrystal: Sapphire w/Cyclops
\nWater Resistance: 1,220 Meters / 4,000 Feet
\nMovement: Caliber 3235
\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet
\nClick here to discover the differences between the Deepsea and the Rolex Sea-Dweller.
\n
![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM5446-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
As Rolex’s two dive watch collections, the Submariner and the Sea-Dweller have intertwined histories. However, the Sea-Dweller has always been positioned as the more advanced and capable model between these two professional dive watches.
\nAnyone with even a passing acquaintance with Rolex will probably be aware of these two model\u2019s backstory, so we won’t go into forensic detail here, but rather stick to the salient points.
\nThe Submariner came first, created all the way back in 1953, and going on general sale the following year. Although it wasn\u2019t the earliest example of a modern dive watch as is sometimes touted (the argument for that honor will go on forever, but the most likely contender will remain the Blancpain Fifty Fathoms, which launched only a few months prior). However, it was the first to be rated waterproof down to the magic number of 100 meters.
\nThe Sub was built to cater to the fledgling sport of scuba diving, which was exploding in popularity thanks to the invention of the Aqualung by famed underwater pioneer, Jacques Cousteau. The Frenchman’s groundbreaking innovation, coupled with his enthralling Oscar-winning documentaries of the subaquatic world, captured the imagination of the public and brought the craze for recreational diving to the masses.
\nRecognizing the new gap in the market, Rolex board member Rene-Paul Jeanneret actually worked with Cousteau himself to develop a watch that would serve, with the two men already good friends.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM8017-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The end result was a stainless steel model with a high contrast white on black dial and a bidirectional rotating bezel, housed in one of the brand’s already proven 38mm Oyster cases. To ensure its then-unheard of water resistance, Rolex upgraded their existing screw-down crown design, building in a pair of O-ring gaskets to create two internal sealed zones to protect the mechanism from any moisture intrusion. They christened their new system the Twinlock.
\nAfter a busy first handful of years in production, during which time the Submariner received a seemingly never-ending series of tweaks and fine-tuning, the enduring blueprint for the watch arrived with the ref. 5512 in 1959. 40mm in diameter, with a reworked bezel design to make it easy to manipulate even while wearing gloves, and with guards to protect the winding crown, the fundamental shape barely altered for the next half-century.
\nHowever, that doesn’t mean the Rolex Submariner stood still. Already a highly desirable watch by the 60s, it earned legendary status after appearing on Sean Connery\u2019s wrist in the James Bond film, Dr. No, (and then became Bond\u2019s go-to watch for a host of other outings) and has never looked back.
\nIt is one of the most frequently upgraded and relentlessly improved models that Rolex makes, although you would be hard put to spot it from the outside. Its movement has been regularly renewed, the bezel perfected by making it rotate in only one direction (a failsafe against mistakenly underestimating immersion time), and the materials from which it is made have been kept right on the cutting-edge.
\nOver its long run, it has picked up a date function, tripled its water-resistance to 300 meters, been cast in a wide variety of colors and metals (including solid gold iterations), and even been given gemstone enhancements. The latest version, released in 2020, finally brought about an increase in size, up to a still relatively modest 41mm.
\nIt may be just a hair short of its 70th birthday, but the Rolex Submariner is still the benchmark for every luxury dive watch in production today, one that has been emulated endlessly but never bettered. When someone talking about horology uses the word iconic, this is the watch they mean.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_SeaDweller_5D3_2497-2-3-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
In a situation reminiscent of how the original GMT-Master came into being, the Sea-Dweller was created in a collaboration between Rolex and a professional outfit in dire need of a timepiece capable of performing a specific task. But where it was Pan Am Airlines contributing their expertise to the formation of the GMT, with the Sea-Dweller, it was French commercial diving specialists, COMEX.
\nThroughout the 1960s, as exploration of the world’s oceans uncovered vast oil reserves, more and more saturation divers were needed to work at enormous depths. These crews often lived in dry habitats deep underwater, sometimes for weeks at a time. Due to the huge pressures and the narcotic effects of nitrogen at these depths, the divers needed to breathe a gas mixture in which helium replaces the nitrogen in the air.
\nThe problem COMEX divers had experienced with their watches was actually on the ascent back to the surface. With helium molecules being almost the smallest out of all the natural gases, they were able to seep in past the seals of even Rolex’s fabled Oyster cases, where they would expand as the diver returned to sea level, eventually blowing the crystal off the face of the watch.
\nWhat COMEX needed was a way for the gas to escape safely before that happened, and they turned to Rolex for help. Rolex in turn worked with fellow Swiss brand Doxa and together they invented the HEV or Helium Escape Valve. Simply put, the HEV is a small, spring-loaded one-way regulator set into the case at nine o’clock, which opens once the pressure inside the watch is greater than the ambient, allowing the helium to safely vacate the case. So, in effect, the watch and diver decompress at the same time.
\nThe first examples were retrofitted to a ref. 5513 Submariner and put through extensive, and successful, field testing. In 1967, Rolex announced the debut of the purpose-built Sea-Dweller. While, looks-wise, it may have been quite obviously based on the Submariner, the ref. 1665 (known by collectors alternatively as the Double Red or the Great White depending on era and color of dial text) had a significantly thicker case and crystal. On top of that, it saw the introduction of the next generation of Rolex’s winding crown system, this time with three sealed zones instead of two and called (not surprisingly) the Triplock. All told, it gave the Sea-Dweller a waterproof rating of an incredible 2,000 ft.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_SeaDweller_5D3_2494-2-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
However, although it shared the Submariner\u2019s aesthetics – no-nonsense minimalism designed for perfect legibility – the two watches have progressed in very different ways. Even by the end of the 60s when the Sea-Dweller first appeared, the Submariner was far more of a status symbol than the proper tool watch it had once been. The arrival of a date display, and especially its controversial Cyclops magnification lens, had already driven it in that direction, and Rolex deciding to release the watch in solid 18k yellow gold and Rolesor (two-tone steel and gold) editions removed the last of any pretense.
\nThe Rolex Sea-Dweller, on the other hand, was more than capable of taking over. Bigger and weightier, it was a steel-only creation for the majority of its run, and while it too had a date function, there was no magnifying lens over the top to unbalance the dial. By the end of the 1970s, it had doubled its rating to 4,000ft, making it just about the most accomplished diver on the market. More importantly, it retained the essence of the ‘old’ Rolex: a manufacturer of watches designed to accompany the fearless on real adventures rather than the daily commute and Monday meetings.
\nHowever, in a rare misjudgment of the market, Rolex actually discontinued the Sea-Dweller for a short while, retiring it in 2008 to make way for the insane Deepsea – a triumph of engineering able to withstand some 12,800ft of crushing underwater pressures. Happily, the middle child was reintroduced in 2014 with the ref. 116600, the first Sea-Dweller to be fitted with a Cerachrom bezel on its redesigned Maxi case.
\nAfter that, Rolex marked the Sea-Dweller\u2019s 50th anniversary with a big shakeup in 2017, increasing the model\u2019s dimensions to 43mm on the current iteration, the ref. 126600. But while the larger size worked to separate the watch visually from the Submariner, the new version was given a Cyclops lens of its own, much to the chagrin of many purists. Opinions were split still further with the unveiling of the ref. 126603 in 2019 – the first two-tone Sea-Dweller, perhaps introducing the once king of the oceans to a more corporate role.
\nAlthough it might be argued the addition of 18k gold has lost the Rolex Sea-Dweller some of its edge, the combination of elegant styling and ferocious abilities could well make it the best all-around luxury dive watch available today.
\nSo, let’s see which Rolex dive watch is the right choice for you.
\n![\"Stainless](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM5434-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Stainless")
It is fair to say that when Rolex released the first Submariner, the rest of the watchmaking industry essentially said, “Oh, that’s what a dive watch is supposed to look like” (with a couple of exceptions). The basic formula was really set in stone from that point, so much so that the brand clearly felt no need to mess with it when it came time to create the Rolex Sea-Dweller.
\nBoth watches appear remarkably similar, and even their sizes are heading back towards parity with the release of the current Sub. The 3mm difference between the current Sea-Dweller and the previous generation of the Submariner has now closed to two, with the pair coming in at 43mm and 41mm, respectively.
\nOn a like-for-like basis (steel vs. steel or Rolesor vs. Rolesor, all with black dials and bezels) you have to concentrate hard to tell them apart. There are differences though. If you look at the engraving on the bezels, you will notice the Sea-Dweller carries its minute markings all the way around, whereas on the Submariner, they stop after the first 15 minutes.
\nThese are actually there to make it easier to accurately time vital decompression stops at the end of a dive, with the thinking obviously being that Sea-Dweller wearers will have been deeper and need to spend longer amounts of time at their decompression stops. Other than that, Rolex has changed up the text color on the Sea-Dweller. The two-tone model gets its name in gold to match its bezel numerals, while the standard piece has its script in red as a nod to the original DRSD, or Double Red Sea-Dweller. On the Submariner, all wording is now in white.
\nThe most noticeable difference between the two models only really becomes apparent once they are on your wrist. At approximately 15.25mm (not including the Cyclops lens), the Sea-Dweller is slightly thicker than its older brother, as well as being larger in diameter by 2mm.
\nBut what else is there to say about the pair? Not only are they the archetype for what a dive model should look like, that basic form is so ingrained in our minds that it is usually also the image that pops up as soon as you just think of a dive watch. In other words, you can’t go wrong with either.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Seadweller_126600_Rolex_Seadweller_116600_5D3_1134-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Originally, both these watches were exclusively crafted from stainless steel, as befit their tool-like natures. That changed at the end of the 1960s, at least for the Submariner, with the arrival of the ref. 1680/8, the first time the Sub had been cast in 18k yellow gold. A two-tone Rolesor edition followed soon after with the next generation, and both it and the all-gold model were available with either blue or black dials and bezels. Modern versions of all these are still in the contemporary roster, among others.
\nAdded to those are a solid 18k white gold piece with blue Cerachrom bezel (ref. 126619LB) and three stainless steel examples; with a standard black dial and bezel (ref. 126610LN) and with a black dial and green bezel (ref. 126610LV). The last of the steel models, the ref. 124060, is a little different. When the Submariner was given its date function in 1969, Rolex actually split the range, producing both date and no-date models – a trend that continues to this day.
\nIt was the date-displaying watches that were offered in all sorts of precious metal finery, while the no-date variant has always been cast exclusively in stainless steel. In fact, if you wanted to get really technical about it, the Submariner No-Date is the one called simply the Submariner, while all the others are officially Rolex Submariner Date watches.
\nThere is no such confusion with the Sea-Dweller. Always in the role of the more serious player, it was a steel-only offering from its inception in 1967 all the way up until 2019, when the ref. 126603 emerged in its two-tone Rolesor getup. Those are the only two available today, with none of the color variations of its sibling. Regardless of metal type, dials and bezels are black on both Rolex Sea-Dweller references.
\nThe metals themselves are as impressive as you would imagine. All golds are 18k in purity and manufactured by Rolex inside its own in-house foundry, as is the brand’s proprietary stainless steel alloy, which is christened Oystersteel. Part of the 904L family, it is particularly resistant to corrosion from the effects of seawater, and therefore ideal for the job.
\nA similar statement can be made for the ceramic inserts used in the bezels. The brand debuted its Cerachrom material in 2005 on the GMT-Master II, before rolling it out across much of the Professional Collection. Scratchproof, fade-proof, and impervious to corrosion, the numerals are coated in either platinum or 18k gold via a PVD process to keep from losing their luster over time.
\nOn the dial, the hour markers – the trademark mix of dots and batons, with an inverted triangle at 12 o’clock – are outlined in white gold, as are the Mercedes hands (another signature of Rolex sports watches) to keep them from tarnishing. Essentially, any modern Submariner or Sea-Dweller that you buy today should look brand-new pretty much forever, with the only exceptions being any scratches or scuffs to the metal itself.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM8039-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
At their heart, both the Submariner and Sea-Dweller are relatively simple time-and-date watches (with the one exception being the no-date Sub). The only major difference is at what depth underwater each will carry on telling you the time and what day it is.
\nThe Rolex Submariner was designed from the outset for recreational diving. Its 300m water resistance is obviously way beyond anything the majority of wearers will ever experience, but the inherent sturdiness needed to secure a rating like that more or less guarantees it as impenetrable by water during any and all daily activities.
\nAs for the Rolex Sea-Dweller, it is quite literally on another level. It was conceived in an era time before dive computers when a reliable watch could truly mean the difference between life and death for saturation crews. Built to keep working at 1,220m, or 4,000ft, it can withstand an immense amount of pressure, equal to around 1,800 PSI pushing down on the watch. Are you ever going to need that? Probably not, but the engineering prowess required to wrap up that sort of performance into a model of such modest proportions can only be admired. And let\u2019s not forget, it still has the HEV – which you won\u2019t be using unless you are actually a commercial saturation diver.
\nOne other distinction between the two concerns the bracelet. Each comes as standard with Rolex\u2019s own three-link Oyster. The Submariner has a lug-to-lug width of 21mm on the newest model, whereas the Sea-Dweller’s is 22mm, and both have the ingenious Glidelock system which allows for approximately 20mm of extension in 2mm intervals.
\nHowever, the stainless steel version of the Sea-Dweller also has the Fliplock extension, giving an additional 26mm to fit the watch over the sleeve of a drysuit or particularly thick wetsuit. With that in mind, the Rolesor edition of the Sea-Dweller lacks the Fliplock extension, as it is intended to be the more luxury-oriented option within the lineup and thus won\u2019t likely need to fit over the thick sleeve of a dry suit.
\nIn the end, the respective abilities of these watches may well be academic in your choice, as both far exceed anything that you are ever likely to encounter.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_SeaDweller_5D3_2487-2-5-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
It took Rolex a while, but the brand has finally given the Submariner the same next-generation movement that has been driving the current Sea-Dweller since 2017. The Caliber 3235 sits inside both models, the replacement for the legendary Caliber 3135, the most widely-used and successful movement Rolex has ever made.
\nThe new mechanism is much more than a simple update. It has replaced or renewed around 90% of the Cal. 3135\u2019s components, including incorporating the groundbreaking Chronergy escapement. The Cal. 3235 follows the time-honored Rolex decree of doing as much as possible with the fewest number of parts to ensure there is less to go wrong. It is also a physically large movement, which lends it an intrinsic strength.
\nAs with all Rolex movements, the Caliber 3235 is subject to the brand\u2019s own draconian accuracy benchmark, the Superlative Chronometer certificate. It guarantees a timekeeping accuracy of between -2/+2 seconds a day, tested across seven positions both before and after casing. It also has a far greater power reserve than its predecessor, up to 70-hours over the former\u2019s 48, while keeping the same 28,800vph frequency as the rest of Rolex\u2019s portfolio.
\nThe outgoing Cal. 3135 was regarded as one of the best mass-produced movements of all time, and there is no reason to think the Cal. 3235 will be any different. It may not have the exquisite finishing of some of its contemporaries from rival manufactures – something Rolex has never really done – but in terms of all-around reliability and staggering precision, there isn\u2019t really anything that comes close at this price. And, as with all Rolex watches since 2015, the brand offers an industry-leading five-year warranty.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM5449-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The retail price for a brand-new stainless steel Submariner with a black dial and bezel is $9,150 ($8,100 for the no-date model). That rises to $9,550 for the green bezel version. Both Rolesor models (black or blue dial and bezel) come in at $14,300, while the solid 18k gold models cost $36,950 and $39,650 for yellow and white gold respectively. With the Rolex Sea-Dweller, the standard stainless steel piece is currently priced at $11,700, while the two-tone version costs $16,600.
\nOf course, that is not the whole story. As anyone who has tried will tell you, picking either of these up at a Rolex retailer is not something that you can just walk in off the street and do. There are waiting lists to sit on first, unless you already have a longstanding relationship with your local retailer (read: have spent many thousands of dollars with them in the past).
\nSo, what\u2019s the story on the pre-owned market? Well, with the Rolex Sea-Dweller having been on the market for a few years now, its pre-owned price (while still higher than retail) is now more or less the same as the Sub\u2019s, which was only launched last year. Looking at stainless steel examples of the Sea-Dweller and the Submariner, both start around the $13,000-$14,000 mark.
\nThere\u2019s a tiny bit more disparity between the Rolesor models, with the Submariner ( ref. 126613) coming in at about $16,500, and the Sea-Dweller (the ref. 126603) at around $17,000. But, just as with their respective depth ratings, the difference in price is going to be largely irrelevant to anyone\u2019s choice.
\n![\"Green](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_126610LV_20JM0206-2-Edit-2.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
So there we have our comparison between two of the most famous, revered, and highly sought-after dive watches of this or any other era. The one you pick is very likely to come down to which looks better on your wrist. There\u2019s no doubt the Sea-Dweller is the heftier of the duo, with a solidity that inspires boundless confidence in its ability to withstand just about anything.
\nThe Submariner is as it always has been, the epitome of an understated and versatile sports watch, one you don\u2019t have to worry about looking out of place or clashing with an outfit. The recent return to its former slender profile has only increased its all-around versatility as well, and it is the quintessential beach-to-boardroom timepiece.
\nPrice-wise, these two Rolex dive watches are practically identical, at least on the pre-owned market, which is more-or-less the only place to buy them without spending a considerable amount of time on a waiting list. While the buy-in price might seem high, both watches are pretty much sure bets when it comes to their ability to retain their value over the years.
\nIn the end, there truly is no wrong choice. Our advice is to pick the one that appeals to you the most and matches your lifestyle the best. From there, you can rest assured in the knowledge that you own one of the very finest dive watches that money can buy.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM5432-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post What Is the Difference Between the Rolex Submariner and the Rolex Sea-Dweller? appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "Rolex’s current status as the undisputed leader in fine watchmaking has really been founded on two things: the timeless designs of its core offerings, and the overall versatility of everything it produces. For the most part, almost every model in the brand\u2019s portfolio can easily do double duty – tough and capable enough to serve as your daily watch, styled tastefully enough to be worn with just about any attire.\nNowhere is this better demonstrated than with the brand’s dive watches. The Submariner, the Sea-Dweller, and (to a lesser extent) the Deepsea, exemplify that ‘one watch for any occasion’ quality. While the latter might be a little too imposing to slip under a tailored shirtsleeve at the most formal of events, the former two have perfected the minimalist elegance, which means that they will never look out of place.\nBut what is there to choose between them? At first glance, they appear practically identical and in reality, they do share many of the same qualities. However, each has its own virtues and talents, and there are enough distinctions between them to make a meaningful comparison worthwhile. Below, we have outlined everything you need to know about two of the very best dive watches in the business: the Rolex Submariner and the Rolex Sea-Dweller.\nRolex Submariner\n\nSubmariner Key Features:\nCase Size: 41mm\nMaterials: Stainless Steel, Yellow Rolesor, 18k Yellow Gold, 18k White Gold\nFunctions: Time w/Running Seconds, Date Display\nDial: Black or Blue with Chromalight Hour Markers\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black/Blue/Green Cerachrom w/ 60-Minute Scale\nCrystal: Sapphire w/Cyclops on Date Models\nWater Resistance: 300 Meters / 1,000 Feet\nMovement: Caliber 3235\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Submariner.\n\nRolex Sea-Dweller\n\nSea-Dweller Key Features:\nCase Size: 43mm\nMaterials: Stainless Steel, Yellow Rolesor\nFunctions: Time w/Running Seconds. Date Display\nDial: Black with Chromalight Hour Markers\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black Cerachrom w/ 60-Minute Scale\nCrystal: Sapphire w/Cyclops\nWater Resistance: 1,220 Meters / 4,000 Feet\nMovement: Caliber 3235\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet\nClick here to discover the differences between the Deepsea and the Rolex Sea-Dweller.\n\n\nThe History of the Rolex Submariner and Sea-Dweller\nAs Rolex’s two dive watch collections, the Submariner and the Sea-Dweller have intertwined histories. However, the Sea-Dweller has always been positioned as the more advanced and capable model between these two professional dive watches.\nRolex Submariner History\nAnyone with even a passing acquaintance with Rolex will probably be aware of these two model\u2019s backstory, so we won’t go into forensic detail here, but rather stick to the salient points.\nThe Submariner came first, created all the way back in 1953, and going on general sale the following year. Although it wasn\u2019t the earliest example of a modern dive watch as is sometimes touted (the argument for that honor will go on forever, but the most likely contender will remain the Blancpain Fifty Fathoms, which launched only a few months prior). However, it was the first to be rated waterproof down to the magic number of 100 meters.\nThe Sub was built to cater to the fledgling sport of scuba diving, which was exploding in popularity thanks to the invention of the Aqualung by famed underwater pioneer, Jacques Cousteau. The Frenchman’s groundbreaking innovation, coupled with his enthralling Oscar-winning documentaries of the subaquatic world, captured the imagination of the public and brought the craze for recreational diving to the masses.\nRecognizing the new gap in the market, Rolex board member Rene-Paul Jeanneret actually worked with Cousteau himself to develop a watch that would serve, with the two men already good friends.\n\nThe end result was a stainless steel model with a high contrast white on black dial and a bidirectional rotating bezel, housed in one of the brand’s already proven 38mm Oyster cases. To ensure its then-unheard of water resistance, Rolex upgraded their existing screw-down crown design, building in a pair of O-ring gaskets to create two internal sealed zones to protect the mechanism from any moisture intrusion. They christened their new system the Twinlock.\nAfter a busy first handful of years in production, during which time the Submariner received a seemingly never-ending series of tweaks and fine-tuning, the enduring blueprint for the watch arrived with the ref. 5512 in 1959. 40mm in diameter, with a reworked bezel design to make it easy to manipulate even while wearing gloves, and with guards to protect the winding crown, the fundamental shape barely altered for the next half-century.\nHowever, that doesn’t mean the Rolex Submariner stood still. Already a highly desirable watch by the 60s, it earned legendary status after appearing on Sean Connery\u2019s wrist in the James Bond film, Dr. No, (and then became Bond\u2019s go-to watch for a host of other outings) and has never looked back.\nIt is one of the most frequently upgraded and relentlessly improved models that Rolex makes, although you would be hard put to spot it from the outside. Its movement has been regularly renewed, the bezel perfected by making it rotate in only one direction (a failsafe against mistakenly underestimating immersion time), and the materials from which it is made have been kept right on the cutting-edge.\nOver its long run, it has picked up a date function, tripled its water-resistance to 300 meters, been cast in a wide variety of colors and metals (including solid gold iterations), and even been given gemstone enhancements. The latest version, released in 2020, finally brought about an increase in size, up to a still relatively modest 41mm.\nIt may be just a hair short of its 70th birthday, but the Rolex Submariner is still the benchmark for every luxury dive watch in production today, one that has been emulated endlessly but never bettered. When someone talking about horology uses the word iconic, this is the watch they mean.\n\nRolex Sea-Dweller History\nIn a situation reminiscent of how the original GMT-Master came into being, the Sea-Dweller was created in a collaboration between Rolex and a professional outfit in dire need of a timepiece capable of performing a specific task. But where it was Pan Am Airlines contributing their expertise to the formation of the GMT, with the Sea-Dweller, it was French commercial diving specialists, COMEX.\nThroughout the 1960s, as exploration of the world’s oceans uncovered vast oil reserves, more and more saturation divers were needed to work at enormous depths. These crews often lived in dry habitats deep underwater, sometimes for weeks at a time. Due to the huge pressures and the narcotic effects of nitrogen at these depths, the divers needed to breathe a gas mixture in which helium replaces the nitrogen in the air.\nThe problem COMEX divers had experienced with their watches was actually on the ascent back to the surface. With helium molecules being almost the smallest out of all the natural gases, they were able to seep in past the seals of even Rolex’s fabled Oyster cases, where they would expand as the diver returned to sea level, eventually blowing the crystal off the face of the watch.\nWhat COMEX needed was a way for the gas to escape safely before that happened, and they turned to Rolex for help. Rolex in turn worked with fellow Swiss brand Doxa and together they invented the HEV or Helium Escape Valve. Simply put, the HEV is a small, spring-loaded one-way regulator set into the case at nine o’clock, which opens once the pressure inside the watch is greater than the ambient, allowing the helium to safely vacate the case. So, in effect, the watch and diver decompress at the same time.\nThe first examples were retrofitted to a ref. 5513 Submariner and put through extensive, and successful, field testing. In 1967, Rolex announced the debut of the purpose-built Sea-Dweller. While, looks-wise, it may have been quite obviously based on the Submariner, the ref. 1665 (known by collectors alternatively as the Double Red or the Great White depending on era and color of dial text) had a significantly thicker case and crystal. On top of that, it saw the introduction of the next generation of Rolex’s winding crown system, this time with three sealed zones instead of two and called (not surprisingly) the Triplock. All told, it gave the Sea-Dweller a waterproof rating of an incredible 2,000 ft.\n\nHowever, although it shared the Submariner\u2019s aesthetics – no-nonsense minimalism designed for perfect legibility – the two watches have progressed in very different ways. Even by the end of the 60s when the Sea-Dweller first appeared, the Submariner was far more of a status symbol than the proper tool watch it had once been. The arrival of a date display, and especially its controversial Cyclops magnification lens, had already driven it in that direction, and Rolex deciding to release the watch in solid 18k yellow gold and Rolesor (two-tone steel and gold) editions removed the last of any pretense.\nThe Rolex Sea-Dweller, on the other hand, was more than capable of taking over. Bigger and weightier, it was a steel-only creation for the majority of its run, and while it too had a date function, there was no magnifying lens over the top to unbalance the dial. By the end of the 1970s, it had doubled its rating to 4,000ft, making it just about the most accomplished diver on the market. More importantly, it retained the essence of the ‘old’ Rolex: a manufacturer of watches designed to accompany the fearless on real adventures rather than the daily commute and Monday meetings.\nHowever, in a rare misjudgment of the market, Rolex actually discontinued the Sea-Dweller for a short while, retiring it in 2008 to make way for the insane Deepsea – a triumph of engineering able to withstand some 12,800ft of crushing underwater pressures. Happily, the middle child was reintroduced in 2014 with the ref. 116600, the first Sea-Dweller to be fitted with a Cerachrom bezel on its redesigned Maxi case.\nAfter that, Rolex marked the Sea-Dweller\u2019s 50th anniversary with a big shakeup in 2017, increasing the model\u2019s dimensions to 43mm on the current iteration, the ref. 126600. But while the larger size worked to separate the watch visually from the Submariner, the new version was given a Cyclops lens of its own, much to the chagrin of many purists. Opinions were split still further with the unveiling of the ref. 126603 in 2019 – the first two-tone Sea-Dweller, perhaps introducing the once king of the oceans to a more corporate role.\nAlthough it might be argued the addition of 18k gold has lost the Rolex Sea-Dweller some of its edge, the combination of elegant styling and ferocious abilities could well make it the best all-around luxury dive watch available today.\nSo, let’s see which Rolex dive watch is the right choice for you.\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Rolex Sea-Dweller: Looks\nIt is fair to say that when Rolex released the first Submariner, the rest of the watchmaking industry essentially said, “Oh, that’s what a dive watch is supposed to look like” (with a couple of exceptions). The basic formula was really set in stone from that point, so much so that the brand clearly felt no need to mess with it when it came time to create the Rolex Sea-Dweller.\nBoth watches appear remarkably similar, and even their sizes are heading back towards parity with the release of the current Sub. The 3mm difference between the current Sea-Dweller and the previous generation of the Submariner has now closed to two, with the pair coming in at 43mm and 41mm, respectively.\nOn a like-for-like basis (steel vs. steel or Rolesor vs. Rolesor, all with black dials and bezels) you have to concentrate hard to tell them apart. There are differences though. If you look at the engraving on the bezels, you will notice the Sea-Dweller carries its minute markings all the way around, whereas on the Submariner, they stop after the first 15 minutes.\nThese are actually there to make it easier to accurately time vital decompression stops at the end of a dive, with the thinking obviously being that Sea-Dweller wearers will have been deeper and need to spend longer amounts of time at their decompression stops. Other than that, Rolex has changed up the text color on the Sea-Dweller. The two-tone model gets its name in gold to match its bezel numerals, while the standard piece has its script in red as a nod to the original DRSD, or Double Red Sea-Dweller. On the Submariner, all wording is now in white.\nThe most noticeable difference between the two models only really becomes apparent once they are on your wrist. At approximately 15.25mm (not including the Cyclops lens), the Sea-Dweller is slightly thicker than its older brother, as well as being larger in diameter by 2mm.\nBut what else is there to say about the pair? Not only are they the archetype for what a dive model should look like, that basic form is so ingrained in our minds that it is usually also the image that pops up as soon as you just think of a dive watch. In other words, you can’t go wrong with either.\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Rolex Sea-Dweller: Options\nOriginally, both these watches were exclusively crafted from stainless steel, as befit their tool-like natures. That changed at the end of the 1960s, at least for the Submariner, with the arrival of the ref. 1680/8, the first time the Sub had been cast in 18k yellow gold. A two-tone Rolesor edition followed soon after with the next generation, and both it and the all-gold model were available with either blue or black dials and bezels. Modern versions of all these are still in the contemporary roster, among others.\nAdded to those are a solid 18k white gold piece with blue Cerachrom bezel (ref. 126619LB) and three stainless steel examples; with a standard black dial and bezel (ref. 126610LN) and with a black dial and green bezel (ref. 126610LV). The last of the steel models, the ref. 124060, is a little different. When the Submariner was given its date function in 1969, Rolex actually split the range, producing both date and no-date models – a trend that continues to this day.\nIt was the date-displaying watches that were offered in all sorts of precious metal finery, while the no-date variant has always been cast exclusively in stainless steel. In fact, if you wanted to get really technical about it, the Submariner No-Date is the one called simply the Submariner, while all the others are officially Rolex Submariner Date watches.\nThere is no such confusion with the Sea-Dweller. Always in the role of the more serious player, it was a steel-only offering from its inception in 1967 all the way up until 2019, when the ref. 126603 emerged in its two-tone Rolesor getup. Those are the only two available today, with none of the color variations of its sibling. Regardless of metal type, dials and bezels are black on both Rolex Sea-Dweller references.\nThe metals themselves are as impressive as you would imagine. All golds are 18k in purity and manufactured by Rolex inside its own in-house foundry, as is the brand’s proprietary stainless steel alloy, which is christened Oystersteel. Part of the 904L family, it is particularly resistant to corrosion from the effects of seawater, and therefore ideal for the job.\nA similar statement can be made for the ceramic inserts used in the bezels. The brand debuted its Cerachrom material in 2005 on the GMT-Master II, before rolling it out across much of the Professional Collection. Scratchproof, fade-proof, and impervious to corrosion, the numerals are coated in either platinum or 18k gold via a PVD process to keep from losing their luster over time.\nOn the dial, the hour markers – the trademark mix of dots and batons, with an inverted triangle at 12 o’clock – are outlined in white gold, as are the Mercedes hands (another signature of Rolex sports watches) to keep them from tarnishing. Essentially, any modern Submariner or Sea-Dweller that you buy today should look brand-new pretty much forever, with the only exceptions being any scratches or scuffs to the metal itself.\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Rolex Sea-Dweller: Features\nAt their heart, both the Submariner and Sea-Dweller are relatively simple time-and-date watches (with the one exception being the no-date Sub). The only major difference is at what depth underwater each will carry on telling you the time and what day it is.\nThe Rolex Submariner was designed from the outset for recreational diving. Its 300m water resistance is obviously way beyond anything the majority of wearers will ever experience, but the inherent sturdiness needed to secure a rating like that more or less guarantees it as impenetrable by water during any and all daily activities.\nAs for the Rolex Sea-Dweller, it is quite literally on another level. It was conceived in an era time before dive computers when a reliable watch could truly mean the difference between life and death for saturation crews. Built to keep working at 1,220m, or 4,000ft, it can withstand an immense amount of pressure, equal to around 1,800 PSI pushing down on the watch. Are you ever going to need that? Probably not, but the engineering prowess required to wrap up that sort of performance into a model of such modest proportions can only be admired. And let\u2019s not forget, it still has the HEV – which you won\u2019t be using unless you are actually a commercial saturation diver.\nOne other distinction between the two concerns the bracelet. Each comes as standard with Rolex\u2019s own three-link Oyster. The Submariner has a lug-to-lug width of 21mm on the newest model, whereas the Sea-Dweller’s is 22mm, and both have the ingenious Glidelock system which allows for approximately 20mm of extension in 2mm intervals.\nHowever, the stainless steel version of the Sea-Dweller also has the Fliplock extension, giving an additional 26mm to fit the watch over the sleeve of a drysuit or particularly thick wetsuit. With that in mind, the Rolesor edition of the Sea-Dweller lacks the Fliplock extension, as it is intended to be the more luxury-oriented option within the lineup and thus won\u2019t likely need to fit over the thick sleeve of a dry suit.\nIn the end, the respective abilities of these watches may well be academic in your choice, as both far exceed anything that you are ever likely to encounter.\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Rolex Sea-Dweller: Movements\nIt took Rolex a while, but the brand has finally given the Submariner the same next-generation movement that has been driving the current Sea-Dweller since 2017. The Caliber 3235 sits inside both models, the replacement for the legendary Caliber 3135, the most widely-used and successful movement Rolex has ever made.\nThe new mechanism is much more than a simple update. It has replaced or renewed around 90% of the Cal. 3135\u2019s components, including incorporating the groundbreaking Chronergy escapement. The Cal. 3235 follows the time-honored Rolex decree of doing as much as possible with the fewest number of parts to ensure there is less to go wrong. It is also a physically large movement, which lends it an intrinsic strength.\nAs with all Rolex movements, the Caliber 3235 is subject to the brand\u2019s own draconian accuracy benchmark, the Superlative Chronometer certificate. It guarantees a timekeeping accuracy of between -2/+2 seconds a day, tested across seven positions both before and after casing. It also has a far greater power reserve than its predecessor, up to 70-hours over the former\u2019s 48, while keeping the same 28,800vph frequency as the rest of Rolex\u2019s portfolio.\nThe outgoing Cal. 3135 was regarded as one of the best mass-produced movements of all time, and there is no reason to think the Cal. 3235 will be any different. It may not have the exquisite finishing of some of its contemporaries from rival manufactures – something Rolex has never really done – but in terms of all-around reliability and staggering precision, there isn\u2019t really anything that comes close at this price. And, as with all Rolex watches since 2015, the brand offers an industry-leading five-year warranty.\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Rolex Sea-Dweller: Pricing\nThe retail price for a brand-new stainless steel Submariner with a black dial and bezel is $9,150 ($8,100 for the no-date model). That rises to $9,550 for the green bezel version. Both Rolesor models (black or blue dial and bezel) come in at $14,300, while the solid 18k gold models cost $36,950 and $39,650 for yellow and white gold respectively. With the Rolex Sea-Dweller, the standard stainless steel piece is currently priced at $11,700, while the two-tone version costs $16,600.\nOf course, that is not the whole story. As anyone who has tried will tell you, picking either of these up at a Rolex retailer is not something that you can just walk in off the street and do. There are waiting lists to sit on first, unless you already have a longstanding relationship with your local retailer (read: have spent many thousands of dollars with them in the past).\nSo, what\u2019s the story on the pre-owned market? Well, with the Rolex Sea-Dweller having been on the market for a few years now, its pre-owned price (while still higher than retail) is now more or less the same as the Sub\u2019s, which was only launched last year. Looking at stainless steel examples of the Sea-Dweller and the Submariner, both start around the $13,000-$14,000 mark.\nThere\u2019s a tiny bit more disparity between the Rolesor models, with the Submariner ( ref. 126613) coming in at about $16,500, and the Sea-Dweller (the ref. 126603) at around $17,000. But, just as with their respective depth ratings, the difference in price is going to be largely irrelevant to anyone\u2019s choice.\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Rolex Sea-Dweller: Which One?\nSo there we have our comparison between two of the most famous, revered, and highly sought-after dive watches of this or any other era. The one you pick is very likely to come down to which looks better on your wrist. There\u2019s no doubt the Sea-Dweller is the heftier of the duo, with a solidity that inspires boundless confidence in its ability to withstand just about anything.\nThe Submariner is as it always has been, the epitome of an understated and versatile sports watch, one you don\u2019t have to worry about looking out of place or clashing with an outfit. The recent return to its former slender profile has only increased its all-around versatility as well, and it is the quintessential beach-to-boardroom timepiece.\nPrice-wise, these two Rolex dive watches are practically identical, at least on the pre-owned market, which is more-or-less the only place to buy them without spending a considerable amount of time on a waiting list. While the buy-in price might seem high, both watches are pretty much sure bets when it comes to their ability to retain their value over the years.\nIn the end, there truly is no wrong choice. Our advice is to pick the one that appeals to you the most and matches your lifestyle the best. From there, you can rest assured in the knowledge that you own one of the very finest dive watches that money can buy.\n\nThe post What Is the Difference Between the Rolex Submariner and the Rolex Sea-Dweller? appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2021-02-22T01:01:35-08:00", "date_modified": "2021-02-22T11:39:53-08:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_20JM5427-Edit-1.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=46391", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-submariner-116610ln-vs-omega-seamaster-diver-300m.html", "title": "Rolex Submariner 116610LN vs. Omega Seamaster Diver 300m", "content_html": "\nIf there’s one thing guaranteed to really capture our imaginations and stir up some passion, it is a good old fashioned rivalry. We are all guilty of adopting our favorite example of something and defending it to the hilt against its closest competitor.
\n\n\n\nVying for one over the other gets us a perpetual ride on an emotional rollercoaster, sharing in the glory of victories and despairing in the gloom of defeats. But as anyone involved in these epic battles will tell you, whether it is in the world of sports, politics, business, or the arts, having an adversary constantly striving to usurp their position is one of the main drivers of innovation and excellence.
\n\n\n\nThere are a number of these clashes in the horology world, and perhaps none more so than between the Luxury watch brand Rolex and Omega watches. In some cases, one of these behemoth brands has introduced a model specifically to try and claw back some of the ground gained by the direct equivalent from its bitter adversary. For example, it could be argued that the Rolex Daytona only came into being in an attempt to clip the wings of the Omega Speedmaster, and the two have been duking it out ever since. (We\u2019ll let you know who wins and soon as it’s decided).
\n\n\n\nHowever, it is in the world of dive watches that the most fascinating of these confrontations have been fought. Fans of both manufactures will forever debate the individual virtues of two of the industry’s most outstanding and important timepieces, each a true heavyweight in its own right; the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster 300M. Below, we offer our take on the question and examine the duo side-by-side.
\n\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_116610_20JM4113-2-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Case Size: 40mm
\n\n\n\nMaterials: Stainless Steel (904L)
\n\n\n\nFunctions: Time w/Running Seconds, Date Display
\n\n\n\nDial: Black w/ Luminous Hour Markers (Chromalight)
\n\n\n\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black Cerachrom Insert w/ 60-Minute Scale
\n\n\n\nCrystal: Sapphire, Flat w/Cyclops Lens
\n\n\n\nWater Resistance: 300 Meters / 1,000 Feet
\n\n\n\nMovement: Caliber 3135 (Superlative Chronometer)
\n\n\n\nStrap/Bracelet: Oyster Bracelet (904L Stainless Steel)
\n\n\n\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Submariner.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Omega_SeaMaster_20JM4489-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Case Size: 42mm
\n\n\n\nMaterials: Stainless Steel (316L)
\n\n\n\nFunctions: Time w/Running Seconds, Date Display, Helium Escape Valve
\n\n\n\nDial: Ceramic (White/Grey/Black/Blue), Laser-Engraved Wave Pattern w/ Luminous Hour Markers
\n\n\n\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black ceramic Insert w/ 60-Minute Scale
\n\n\n\nCrystal: Sapphire (domed)
\n\n\n\nWater Resistance: 300 Meters / 1,000 Feet
\n\n\n\nMovement: Caliber 8800 (Master Chronometer)
\n\n\n\nStrap/Bracelet: Five-Link Bracelet (316L Stainless Steel)
\n\n\n\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Omega Seamaster.
\n\n\nThe sharp-eyed among you will have spotted something straight away. The Rolex Submariner ref. 116610LN is not from the most recent generation of the Sub that was just released in 2020, but from the series before. However, to keep things on as even a keel as possible, seeing as the current version of the Seamaster has been around since 2018, it didn\u2019t seem fair to compare it to a watch that was only introduced a matter of months ago.
\n\n\n\nLikewise, there are a lot of Omega Seamaster Diver 300M models in the catalog, in a whole range of different metals, sizes, and with a host of various complications. Consequently, we are going to go for a simple time-and-date model in stainless steel, which leaves us with the Omega 210.30.42.20.0X.001. (The X denotes the dial color, of which there are four – black, grey, white, and blue).
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_116610_20JM4116-2-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The appearance of a watch may be the single most subjective feature, but it is still worth highlighting the key similarities and differences between the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M.
\n\n\n\nWe\u2019ll compare the looks of our competitors first because, let\u2019s be honest, that is by far the most important factor for the vast majority of buyers. It also brings up an interesting contrast on how Rolex and Omega operate. Of the two watchmaking legends, it is Rolex that has always achieved a much greater consistency in its designs.
\n\n\n\nThe Submariner has been with us for nearly 70-years now, and during that time it has gone through innumerable upgrades and revisions. Yet, take an example of the very first reference, the ref. 6204, and stand it up next to a ref. 116610LN and the pedigree is unmistakable. A Submariner is a Submariner – and it always will be.
\n\n\n\nPractically from the very start, all the elements we would recognize today were put in place. The minimalist and high contrast dial, the black engraved bezel, and the easily legible handset. Then, from the end of the 1950s and the arrival of the ref. 5512, Rolex hit on the case design it would stick with for another half a century – a 40mm housing complete with crown guards.
\n\n\n\nBeyond periodically updating the movement and introducing a date function, the Rolex Submariner was all set. These days it is a \u2018tool\u2019 watch in name only, and the introduction of precious metal versions in the 1960s elevated it to its present role as one of the most potent status symbols money can buy. With that in mind, it is always the stainless steel models that are in the highest demand.
\n\n\n\nTherefore, when the ref. 1166xx series launched in 2010, it was (relatively speaking) a huge departure for a watch whose basics were so ingrained in the horology psyche. Rolex chose to give the Submariner its newly fashioned Super Case. Clearly, an answer to critics who felt the traditional 40mm was simply too small for a modern sports watch, the Super Case, while still keeping the same 40mm dimensions on paper, gained much thicker lugs and crown guards.
\n\n\n\nThe end result was the Rolex Submariner looking thicker and more angular, almost square in shape and feeling as if it was a bigger watch overall. The ref. 116610LN actually wears more like a 42mm (compared to its predecessor), and it was a move that split fans down the middle. Some enjoyed the additional wrist presence, others felt it was bordering on sacrilege to do away with one of the most accepted silhouettes in the entire watch industry.
\n\n\n\nHowever, there was still no question of the ref. 116610LN being mistaken for some other watch. Everything else was exactly as it should be, even though some of the materials were also given a refresh (which we\u2019ll cover later). However, it has left the reference as somewhat of a standout in modern Submariner terms. Its replacement from 2020 may have grown by a millimeter, but it has slightly returned to the model\u2019s former sweeping lines.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Omega_SeaMaster_20JM4494-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Omega\u2019s crop of watches has always had a more scattergun approach than those from Rolex. The brand has just a handful of collections in their portfolio, covering dive watches, chronographs, formal pieces, etc., and new creations are shoehorned into one of these various families somewhere or other. So we are now in a position where the Railmaster, for example, a model originally designed for scientists and engineers, is officially in the Seamaster group.
\n\n\n\nWhile there is a definite lack of cohesion compared to Rolex\u2019s ultra-streamlined catalog, it is no detriment to the quality of Omega\u2019s watches. The Seamaster name has been in use since 1948 when Omega introduced it on a dress model with not very much to justify the title. The first time it was really applied to a dive watch as we would consider it today was in 1957 when the Seamaster 300 debuted.
\n\n\n\nHowever, adding to the confusion surrounding the Seamaster collection, Omega brought out the Seamaster Diver 300M in 1993, with the names much more similar than the watches themselves. This was designed from the get-go as a Submariner killer, a thoroughly modern diver with plenty of functionality and some idiosyncratic design quirks, all looking to unseat the undisputed ruler of the oceans.
\n\n\n\nAn extremely handsome, 41mm piece, the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M included skeletonized hands, a scalloped bezel, and a Helium Escape Valve, all features that carry over onto the latest iteration. The current model has grown to 42mm and has reintroduced the wave pattern onto its dial, something which appeared on the first few references but was missing for five years between 2012 and 2017.
\n\n\n\nIt is certainly a distinctive looking face, although busier than that of the Submariner but still offers excellent legibility across the range of colors. The blue, black, and white dial versions are perfectly readable, with only the grey requiring a little more effort. Ultimately, the Submariner and Seamaster are two of the best-looking luxury divers available today, and both are more than versatile enough to be worn dressed up or down.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_116610_Copy-of-5D3_2091-Edit-2.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
For this comparison, we are looking at the stainless steel examples of both the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M, but this does not mean that these two professional dive watches use the exact same materials in their construction.
\n\n\n\nHow do you make the latest version of your watch stand out if the aesthetics have been set in stone for generations and you don\u2019t want to change them? What can you offer that will make people opt for the newest model over one they possibly already have?
\n\n\n\nOne of the answers seems to be an improvement in materials. The ref. 1166xx series of the Rolex Submariner was the first to be given the brand\u2019s Cerachrom bezel, a proprietary ceramic alloy that is touted as being completely scratch and fade resistant, with the engraved graduations coated in either gold or platinum to preserve their integrity and brilliance.
\n\n\n\nThis means that the bezel is likely to stay looking brand-new forever, as it is immune to the knocks and scrapes of everyday life and the bleaching effects of the sun or salt water. The benefits of ceramic are being pounced on by a number of top manufacturers at the moment, but not all collectors are so enthusiastic about this modern and highly resilient material.
\n\n\n\nMany collectors, especially vintage fans, like their watches to have a backstory. A model with its history reflected in its faded bezel can actually command a premium on the pre-owned market. Classic Submariner watches with aluminum inserts that have been bleached by UV rays or time spent underwater (called \u201cghost bezels\u201d) are actively sought out for their one-of-a-kind nature. There will be no other example aged in exactly the same way, something we won\u2019t be able to say about Cerachrom bezel watches in 30 or 40 years.
\n\n\n\nElsewhere on the Submariner, Rolex is still leading the way. The brand\u2019s adoption of 904L stainless steel in the mid-80s (now rechristened Oystersteel) threw down a gauntlet no other brand has yet picked up. Expensive and extremely difficult to machine, Oystersteel has a greater corrosion resistance than the 316L steel used across the rest of the industry, as well as holding a polish particularly well. This means that a stainless steel Rolex watch has a unique shine to it.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Omega_SeaMaster_20JM4496-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The latest Omega Seamaster Diver 300M, released in 2018 for the model\u2019s 25th anniversary, also has a ceramic bezel, but with a white enamel dive scale. That means it misses out on the Liquidmetal treatment reserved for the brand\u2019s Planet Ocean range, but it is a beautifully engineered component nonetheless.
\n\n\n\nHowever, unlike the Submariner, the Omega Seamaster also has a ceramic dial. Or to be more precise, a zirconium dioxide ceramic dial, identified by the material\u2019s chemical symbol (ZrO2) displayed on the dial beneath the central pinion where the hands attach. All that should ensure that your watch stays looking exactly the same color for the rest of its life.
\n\n\n\nHowever, there are a couple of areas where the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M can\u2019t quite match the Rolex. While the Submariner, and the rest of the brand\u2019s watches, use 18k gold for handsets and for outlining hour markers to prevent future tarnishing, the ones on the Seamaster are steel with a rhodium plating.
\n\n\n\nThe luminescent material used on the Omega Seamaster is Super-LumiNova versus Rolex\u2019s proprietary Chromalight. Whether or not one is \u201cbetter\u201d than another is up for debate, but it is said (by Rolex, admittedly) that the blue glow of their Chromalight is easier to see in the dark than the Super-LumiNova and lasts twice as long (although most owners report that it isn\u2019t quite as bright).
\n\n\n\nFinally, both watches have scratch-resistant sapphire crystals. On the Seamaster, it is slightly domed and treated with an anti-reflective coating on both sides, while on the Submariner it is flat with the brand\u2019s signature Cyclops magnification lens positioned above the date window at the 3 o\u2019clock location.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_116610_5D3_5355-Edit-3-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
While both the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M feature chronometer-certified movements that are designed and manufactured entirely in-house, there are some key differences between them.
\n\n\n\nWhen the Rolex Submariner 116610LN first came out in 2010, its movement was already some 22-years old. The Caliber 3135 was and is Rolex\u2019s most successful and widely-used caliber, first built in 1988 and still fitted inside some models today. Regarded as one of the finest mass-produced mechanical movements ever created, it\u2019s the perfect engine for a hardy sports watch; physically large and relatively simple, it is a no-frills workhorse with remarkable resilience and accuracy.
\n\n\n\nBy the time of the ref. 116610LN\u2019s release, the Cal. 3135 had received a number of updates, most importantly with the inclusion of Rolex\u2019s proprietary blue Parachrom hairspring. The incredibly fine coil that regulates the frequency of the balance wheel (and thus timekeeping), the hairspring\u2019s biggest enemies have always been changes in temperature and the disruptive effects of magnetic fields.
\n\n\n\nRolex overcame both with Parachrom, an alloy of niobium and zirconium with an oxide coating that is completely antimagnetic and virtually unaffected by fluctuations in the ambient temperature. First used in the Daytona\u2019s Cal. 4130, it now sits inside nearly every Rolex movement.
\n\n\n\nWhile the brand may have long ago abandoned the idea of its watches being the full-blooded tool models they once were, they still retain some of that original idea, and nowhere more than in the calibers which drive them. There\u2019s nothing fancy about a Rolex movement, no indulgent finishing on the bridges or a display case-back anywhere in the catalog to let you see them working away. What they are instead is so robustly engineered they will just keep on ticking forever, all the while keeping to Rolex\u2019s own self-imposed precision guidelines of -2/+2 seconds a day – and you can\u2019t really ask for more than that.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Omega_SeaMaster_20JM4490-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
Omega\u2019s dedication to revolutionizing its movement portfolio is well known. The brand was the only company with the foresight to adopt George Daniels\u2019 groundbreaking Co-Axial escapement when he came knocking in the 1990s and Omega has been capitalizing on it ever since. Additionally, the brand\u2019s cooperative with the Swiss government\u2019s METAS regulation agency has meant that its calibers now conform to some of the most stringent accuracy standards in the entire industry.
\n\n\n\nInside the latest edition of the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M is the in-house Caliber 8800, one of the brand\u2019s Master Chronometer movements. This certification, conducted in-house at Omega in tests controlled by METAS, guarantees not only an accuracy of between 0/+5 seconds a day but also that the movement is able to withstand up to 15,000 gauss of magnetic force. Although Rolex doesn\u2019t publish its numbers for the Cal. 3135, its magnetic resistance is assumed to be less than 1,000 gauss (since this is the magnetic resistance promised by the Milgauss, the Rolex\u2019s antimagnetic watch for scientists).
\n\n\n\nOn top of that, Omega has employed a special hairspring of its own to rival Rolex\u2019s Parachrom, a type of silicon called Si14. In terms of real-world use, whether or not one is better than the other is another cause for discussion, but it shows a continuation of the sort of forward-thinking that has seen Omega very much close the distance between itself and Rolex in recent years.
\n\n\n\nElsewhere there isn\u2019t a huge amount to separate the two watches\u2019 movements. The Omega Cal. 8800 just pips the Rolex on power reserve, with 55 hours compared to 48. Additionally, the Seamaster has a sapphire case-back to offer a view of all the brand\u2019s hard work and innovation. As for the Co-Axial escapement, its major USP is a reduction in service intervals thanks to its unique way of frictionless operation. With that in mind, the recommended maintenance schedule for both watches is around five years, so in that respect, there seems to be nothing to choose between them.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_Omega_SeaMaster_20JM4522-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
As far as functionality, the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M are incredibly similar, but this does not mean that these two professional dive watches do the exact same things.
\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner ref. 116610LN is, like everything the brand makes with the exception of the Cellini collection, part of the Oyster Perpetual family. That means it has both a self-winding movement (the \u2018Perpetual\u2019 part) and a waterproof case (the \u2018Oyster\u2019 part of its name).
\n\n\n\nThe Oyster case ensures every Rolex watch has a water resistance down to at least 100 meters, and with the Submariner, a thicker housing coupled with a Triplock crown means that it is rated to 300 meters (1,000 feet). It is the ideal companion for recreational diving as well as being more than tough enough to survive the majority of day-to-day situations on dry land.
\n\n\n\nOther than its impressive levels of protection, the Submariner is fairly modest in its functionality. It obviously has a rotating bezel, undoubtedly the easiest and most foolproof way of recording elapsed time. Simply turn the bezel so that the triangle above the 12 o\u2019clock (the zero marker) aligns with the minute hand, and as the hand moves around the dial, it shows how many minutes have passed against the 60-minute scale on the bezel.
\n\n\n\nBeyond that, the Submariner 116610LN is a time-and-date model, the Cal. 3135\u2019s balance frequency of 28,800vph ensures that gentle, eight-beats-per-second glide of the seconds hand. The date display, for better or worse (some fans love it, others don\u2019t) sits in its usual position at three o\u2019clock covered by the Cyclops magnifying lens, and the movement\u2019s cam and jewel system causes the instantaneous changeover right at midnight.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Rolex_Submariner_116610-5D3_9153-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The Omega Seamaster is very similar in its abilities to the Submariner. It too is a date-and-time piece, although its non-magnified date display has moved on this latest generation from the three o\u2019clock location to six o\u2019clock. It leaves the dial looking more symmetrical than before, and possibly better balanced overall than the Rolex Submariner. Water-resistance is identical at 300 meters (which is not really a surprise given the watch\u2019s name).
\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster\u2019s bezel is also unidirectional with a 60-minute scale. However, the watch has received criticism from some in the past for its bezel being slightly tricky to turn, particularly when wearing gloves or with wet/greasy hands. Its shallow, scalloped knurling is not as easy to grip as the Submariner\u2019s serrated edge, so Omega has slightly reduced the tension on the newest version, making the action noticeably smoother.
\n\n\n\nThat being said, the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M does have one thing the Submariner doesn\u2019t have (or need). The manually-operated helium escape valve has been a feature on the watch since its first iteration in the 1990s, protruding from the side of the case at 10 o\u2019clock. In some ways it is a nice decorative feature, complementing the crown on the other side. But as far as usefulness is concerned, it has pretty much none – at least for the vast majority of its owners.
\n\n\n\nThe helium escape valve (HEV) was actually invented by Rolex, ironically enough, as a solution to a problem encountered by commercial saturation divers. These professionals spend much of their time living in extremely deep water habitats. At those depths, the nitrogen has been replaced by helium in the air mix the divers breathe; this solves the issues surrounding the narcotic effects of nitrogen when it is put under great pressure.
\n\n\n\nThe drawback is that helium molecules are some of the smallest in existence, and eventually they can seep past a watch\u2019s gaskets (or enter the case as soon as the wearer needs to adjust the time or date). As the diver returns to the surface, and the pressures inside the habitat return to normal, the trapped helium molecules expand and can blow the crystal clear off the watch.
\n\n\n\nThe valve was developed as a way to let the gas safely escape before it causes any damage. Therefore, an HEV on a dive watch is largely pointless unless you happen to be a saturation diver. It is designed to be operated in a dry, highly pressurized environment that is saturated with helium and it has nothing to do with the actual water-resistance of a watch.
\n\n\n\nMany serious scuba divers actually dislike the addition, seeing as it one extra point of potential water ingress. The valve on the Omega Seamaster is also manually operated, unlike the one on Rolex\u2019s Sea-Dweller, which is flush with the side of the case and opens automatically once the internal pressure builds up. Omega does claim, however, that the most recent iteration of its helium escape valve can be safely opened underwater, and while you may not have a use for it, it is still a nice conversation starter.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Omega_SeaMaster_20JM4501-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The decision to go for the Rolex Submariner or the Omega Seamaster Diver 300m usually comes down to two things: looks and price. There\u2019s no way around it, the Rolex Submariner 116610LN is far more expensive than the Omega. Prices on the pre-owned market (your only option now that the watch is discontinued) start at around $11,000 and go up from there. A brand-new stainless steel Omega Seamaster Diver 300m, costs $5,200 on a bracelet, straight from an authorized retailer.
\n\n\n\nWith the Submariner costing nearly twice the price of the Seamaster, this represents a massive difference. But what does the extra money get you? Both watches have very similar capabilities and each has a nice blend of modern materials. If anything, the Omega Seamaster Diver 300m has the edge on technical ability, with its Co-Axial-equipped movement and huge magnetic resistance.
\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner, now in its seventh decade as the last word in luxury dive watches, is as it always has been. It is like the perfectly tailored black tuxedo – the epitome of classic taste and refinement. The Omega is also a perfectly tailored tuxedo, but one that has been matched with a slightly more vibrant and unconventional tie. With that in mind, there is nothing about the Submariner that could be considered controversial or divisive – and for some, that is exactly why the Submariner doesn\u2019t resonate with them. It is simply too safe, while the Seamaster isn\u2019t afraid to experiment and shake things up a bit.
\n\n\n\nIn the end, it will ultimately come down to how each model makes you feel and the impression you want to make. Both watches have been worn by James Bond, and both the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300m are more than capable of being the only watch that you will ever need for the rest of your life.
\n\n\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2021-02-10-at-1.52.33-PM.jpg\" "\\"Omega")
The post Rolex Submariner 116610LN vs. Omega Seamaster Diver 300m appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "If there’s one thing guaranteed to really capture our imaginations and stir up some passion, it is a good old fashioned rivalry. We are all guilty of adopting our favorite example of something and defending it to the hilt against its closest competitor.\n\n\n\nVying for one over the other gets us a perpetual ride on an emotional rollercoaster, sharing in the glory of victories and despairing in the gloom of defeats. But as anyone involved in these epic battles will tell you, whether it is in the world of sports, politics, business, or the arts, having an adversary constantly striving to usurp their position is one of the main drivers of innovation and excellence.\n\n\n\nThere are a number of these clashes in the horology world, and perhaps none more so than between the Luxury watch brand Rolex and Omega watches. In some cases, one of these behemoth brands has introduced a model specifically to try and claw back some of the ground gained by the direct equivalent from its bitter adversary. For example, it could be argued that the Rolex Daytona only came into being in an attempt to clip the wings of the Omega Speedmaster, and the two have been duking it out ever since. (We\u2019ll let you know who wins and soon as it’s decided).\n\n\n\nHowever, it is in the world of dive watches that the most fascinating of these confrontations have been fought. Fans of both manufactures will forever debate the individual virtues of two of the industry’s most outstanding and important timepieces, each a true heavyweight in its own right; the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster 300M. Below, we offer our take on the question and examine the duo side-by-side.\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner ref. 116610LN\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSubmariner 116610LN Key Features:\n\n\n\nCase Size: 40mm\n\n\n\nMaterials: Stainless Steel (904L)\n\n\n\nFunctions: Time w/Running Seconds, Date Display\n\n\n\nDial: Black w/ Luminous Hour Markers (Chromalight)\n\n\n\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black Cerachrom Insert w/ 60-Minute Scale\n\n\n\nCrystal: Sapphire, Flat w/Cyclops Lens\n\n\n\nWater Resistance: 300 Meters / 1,000 Feet\n\n\n\nMovement: Caliber 3135 (Superlative Chronometer)\n\n\n\nStrap/Bracelet: Oyster Bracelet (904L Stainless Steel)\n\n\n\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Submariner.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe Omega Seamaster Diver 300M\n\n\n\n\n\n\nSeamaster Diver 300M Key Features:\n\n\n\nCase Size: 42mm\n\n\n\nMaterials: Stainless Steel (316L)\n\n\n\nFunctions: Time w/Running Seconds, Date Display, Helium Escape Valve\n\n\n\nDial: Ceramic (White/Grey/Black/Blue), Laser-Engraved Wave Pattern w/ Luminous Hour Markers\n\n\n\nBezel: Unidirectional, Black ceramic Insert w/ 60-Minute Scale\n\n\n\nCrystal: Sapphire (domed)\n\n\n\nWater Resistance: 300 Meters / 1,000 Feet\n\n\n\nMovement: Caliber 8800 (Master Chronometer)\n\n\n\nStrap/Bracelet: Five-Link Bracelet (316L Stainless Steel)\n\n\n\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Omega Seamaster.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nThe sharp-eyed among you will have spotted something straight away. The Rolex Submariner ref. 116610LN is not from the most recent generation of the Sub that was just released in 2020, but from the series before. However, to keep things on as even a keel as possible, seeing as the current version of the Seamaster has been around since 2018, it didn\u2019t seem fair to compare it to a watch that was only introduced a matter of months ago.\n\n\n\nLikewise, there are a lot of Omega Seamaster Diver 300M models in the catalog, in a whole range of different metals, sizes, and with a host of various complications. Consequently, we are going to go for a simple time-and-date model in stainless steel, which leaves us with the Omega 210.30.42.20.0X.001. (The X denotes the dial color, of which there are four – black, grey, white, and blue).\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Omega Seamaster: Looks\n\n\n\nThe appearance of a watch may be the single most subjective feature, but it is still worth highlighting the key similarities and differences between the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M.\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Looks\n\n\n\nWe\u2019ll compare the looks of our competitors first because, let\u2019s be honest, that is by far the most important factor for the vast majority of buyers. It also brings up an interesting contrast on how Rolex and Omega operate. Of the two watchmaking legends, it is Rolex that has always achieved a much greater consistency in its designs.\n\n\n\nThe Submariner has been with us for nearly 70-years now, and during that time it has gone through innumerable upgrades and revisions. Yet, take an example of the very first reference, the ref. 6204, and stand it up next to a ref. 116610LN and the pedigree is unmistakable. A Submariner is a Submariner – and it always will be.\n\n\n\nPractically from the very start, all the elements we would recognize today were put in place. The minimalist and high contrast dial, the black engraved bezel, and the easily legible handset. Then, from the end of the 1950s and the arrival of the ref. 5512, Rolex hit on the case design it would stick with for another half a century – a 40mm housing complete with crown guards.\n\n\n\nBeyond periodically updating the movement and introducing a date function, the Rolex Submariner was all set. These days it is a \u2018tool\u2019 watch in name only, and the introduction of precious metal versions in the 1960s elevated it to its present role as one of the most potent status symbols money can buy. With that in mind, it is always the stainless steel models that are in the highest demand.\n\n\n\nTherefore, when the ref. 1166xx series launched in 2010, it was (relatively speaking) a huge departure for a watch whose basics were so ingrained in the horology psyche. Rolex chose to give the Submariner its newly fashioned Super Case. Clearly, an answer to critics who felt the traditional 40mm was simply too small for a modern sports watch, the Super Case, while still keeping the same 40mm dimensions on paper, gained much thicker lugs and crown guards.\n\n\n\nThe end result was the Rolex Submariner looking thicker and more angular, almost square in shape and feeling as if it was a bigger watch overall. The ref. 116610LN actually wears more like a 42mm (compared to its predecessor), and it was a move that split fans down the middle. Some enjoyed the additional wrist presence, others felt it was bordering on sacrilege to do away with one of the most accepted silhouettes in the entire watch industry.\n\n\n\nHowever, there was still no question of the ref. 116610LN being mistaken for some other watch. Everything else was exactly as it should be, even though some of the materials were also given a refresh (which we\u2019ll cover later). However, it has left the reference as somewhat of a standout in modern Submariner terms. Its replacement from 2020 may have grown by a millimeter, but it has slightly returned to the model\u2019s former sweeping lines.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster Diver 300M Looks\n\n\n\nOmega\u2019s crop of watches has always had a more scattergun approach than those from Rolex. The brand has just a handful of collections in their portfolio, covering dive watches, chronographs, formal pieces, etc., and new creations are shoehorned into one of these various families somewhere or other. So we are now in a position where the Railmaster, for example, a model originally designed for scientists and engineers, is officially in the Seamaster group.\n\n\n\nWhile there is a definite lack of cohesion compared to Rolex\u2019s ultra-streamlined catalog, it is no detriment to the quality of Omega\u2019s watches. The Seamaster name has been in use since 1948 when Omega introduced it on a dress model with not very much to justify the title. The first time it was really applied to a dive watch as we would consider it today was in 1957 when the Seamaster 300 debuted.\n\n\n\nHowever, adding to the confusion surrounding the Seamaster collection, Omega brought out the Seamaster Diver 300M in 1993, with the names much more similar than the watches themselves. This was designed from the get-go as a Submariner killer, a thoroughly modern diver with plenty of functionality and some idiosyncratic design quirks, all looking to unseat the undisputed ruler of the oceans.\n\n\n\nAn extremely handsome, 41mm piece, the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M included skeletonized hands, a scalloped bezel, and a Helium Escape Valve, all features that carry over onto the latest iteration. The current model has grown to 42mm and has reintroduced the wave pattern onto its dial, something which appeared on the first few references but was missing for five years between 2012 and 2017.\n\n\n\nIt is certainly a distinctive looking face, although busier than that of the Submariner but still offers excellent legibility across the range of colors. The blue, black, and white dial versions are perfectly readable, with only the grey requiring a little more effort. Ultimately, the Submariner and Seamaster are two of the best-looking luxury divers available today, and both are more than versatile enough to be worn dressed up or down.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Omega Seamaster: Materials\n\n\n\nFor this comparison, we are looking at the stainless steel examples of both the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M, but this does not mean that these two professional dive watches use the exact same materials in their construction.\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Materials\n\n\n\nHow do you make the latest version of your watch stand out if the aesthetics have been set in stone for generations and you don\u2019t want to change them? What can you offer that will make people opt for the newest model over one they possibly already have?\n\n\n\nOne of the answers seems to be an improvement in materials. The ref. 1166xx series of the Rolex Submariner was the first to be given the brand\u2019s Cerachrom bezel, a proprietary ceramic alloy that is touted as being completely scratch and fade resistant, with the engraved graduations coated in either gold or platinum to preserve their integrity and brilliance.\n\n\n\nThis means that the bezel is likely to stay looking brand-new forever, as it is immune to the knocks and scrapes of everyday life and the bleaching effects of the sun or salt water. The benefits of ceramic are being pounced on by a number of top manufacturers at the moment, but not all collectors are so enthusiastic about this modern and highly resilient material.\n\n\n\nMany collectors, especially vintage fans, like their watches to have a backstory. A model with its history reflected in its faded bezel can actually command a premium on the pre-owned market. Classic Submariner watches with aluminum inserts that have been bleached by UV rays or time spent underwater (called \u201cghost bezels\u201d) are actively sought out for their one-of-a-kind nature. There will be no other example aged in exactly the same way, something we won\u2019t be able to say about Cerachrom bezel watches in 30 or 40 years.\n\n\n\nElsewhere on the Submariner, Rolex is still leading the way. The brand\u2019s adoption of 904L stainless steel in the mid-80s (now rechristened Oystersteel) threw down a gauntlet no other brand has yet picked up. Expensive and extremely difficult to machine, Oystersteel has a greater corrosion resistance than the 316L steel used across the rest of the industry, as well as holding a polish particularly well. This means that a stainless steel Rolex watch has a unique shine to it.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster Diver 300M Materials\n\n\n\nThe latest Omega Seamaster Diver 300M, released in 2018 for the model\u2019s 25th anniversary, also has a ceramic bezel, but with a white enamel dive scale. That means it misses out on the Liquidmetal treatment reserved for the brand\u2019s Planet Ocean range, but it is a beautifully engineered component nonetheless.\n\n\n\nHowever, unlike the Submariner, the Omega Seamaster also has a ceramic dial. Or to be more precise, a zirconium dioxide ceramic dial, identified by the material\u2019s chemical symbol (ZrO2) displayed on the dial beneath the central pinion where the hands attach. All that should ensure that your watch stays looking exactly the same color for the rest of its life.\n\n\n\nHowever, there are a couple of areas where the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M can\u2019t quite match the Rolex. While the Submariner, and the rest of the brand\u2019s watches, use 18k gold for handsets and for outlining hour markers to prevent future tarnishing, the ones on the Seamaster are steel with a rhodium plating.\n\n\n\nThe luminescent material used on the Omega Seamaster is Super-LumiNova versus Rolex\u2019s proprietary Chromalight. Whether or not one is \u201cbetter\u201d than another is up for debate, but it is said (by Rolex, admittedly) that the blue glow of their Chromalight is easier to see in the dark than the Super-LumiNova and lasts twice as long (although most owners report that it isn\u2019t quite as bright).\n\n\n\nFinally, both watches have scratch-resistant sapphire crystals. On the Seamaster, it is slightly domed and treated with an anti-reflective coating on both sides, while on the Submariner it is flat with the brand\u2019s signature Cyclops magnification lens positioned above the date window at the 3 o\u2019clock location.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Omega Seamaster: Movements\n\n\n\nWhile both the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M feature chronometer-certified movements that are designed and manufactured entirely in-house, there are some key differences between them.\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Movement\n\n\n\nWhen the Rolex Submariner 116610LN first came out in 2010, its movement was already some 22-years old. The Caliber 3135 was and is Rolex\u2019s most successful and widely-used caliber, first built in 1988 and still fitted inside some models today. Regarded as one of the finest mass-produced mechanical movements ever created, it\u2019s the perfect engine for a hardy sports watch; physically large and relatively simple, it is a no-frills workhorse with remarkable resilience and accuracy.\n\n\n\nBy the time of the ref. 116610LN\u2019s release, the Cal. 3135 had received a number of updates, most importantly with the inclusion of Rolex\u2019s proprietary blue Parachrom hairspring. The incredibly fine coil that regulates the frequency of the balance wheel (and thus timekeeping), the hairspring\u2019s biggest enemies have always been changes in temperature and the disruptive effects of magnetic fields.\n\n\n\nRolex overcame both with Parachrom, an alloy of niobium and zirconium with an oxide coating that is completely antimagnetic and virtually unaffected by fluctuations in the ambient temperature. First used in the Daytona\u2019s Cal. 4130, it now sits inside nearly every Rolex movement.\n\n\n\nWhile the brand may have long ago abandoned the idea of its watches being the full-blooded tool models they once were, they still retain some of that original idea, and nowhere more than in the calibers which drive them. There\u2019s nothing fancy about a Rolex movement, no indulgent finishing on the bridges or a display case-back anywhere in the catalog to let you see them working away. What they are instead is so robustly engineered they will just keep on ticking forever, all the while keeping to Rolex\u2019s own self-imposed precision guidelines of -2/+2 seconds a day – and you can\u2019t really ask for more than that.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster Diver 300M Movement\n\n\n\nOmega\u2019s dedication to revolutionizing its movement portfolio is well known. The brand was the only company with the foresight to adopt George Daniels\u2019 groundbreaking Co-Axial escapement when he came knocking in the 1990s and Omega has been capitalizing on it ever since. Additionally, the brand\u2019s cooperative with the Swiss government\u2019s METAS regulation agency has meant that its calibers now conform to some of the most stringent accuracy standards in the entire industry.\n\n\n\nInside the latest edition of the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M is the in-house Caliber 8800, one of the brand\u2019s Master Chronometer movements. This certification, conducted in-house at Omega in tests controlled by METAS, guarantees not only an accuracy of between 0/+5 seconds a day but also that the movement is able to withstand up to 15,000 gauss of magnetic force. Although Rolex doesn\u2019t publish its numbers for the Cal. 3135, its magnetic resistance is assumed to be less than 1,000 gauss (since this is the magnetic resistance promised by the Milgauss, the Rolex\u2019s antimagnetic watch for scientists).\n\n\n\nOn top of that, Omega has employed a special hairspring of its own to rival Rolex\u2019s Parachrom, a type of silicon called Si14. In terms of real-world use, whether or not one is better than the other is another cause for discussion, but it shows a continuation of the sort of forward-thinking that has seen Omega very much close the distance between itself and Rolex in recent years.\n\n\n\nElsewhere there isn\u2019t a huge amount to separate the two watches\u2019 movements. The Omega Cal. 8800 just pips the Rolex on power reserve, with 55 hours compared to 48. Additionally, the Seamaster has a sapphire case-back to offer a view of all the brand\u2019s hard work and innovation. As for the Co-Axial escapement, its major USP is a reduction in service intervals thanks to its unique way of frictionless operation. With that in mind, the recommended maintenance schedule for both watches is around five years, so in that respect, there seems to be nothing to choose between them.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Vs. Omega Seamaster: Functions\n\n\n\nAs far as functionality, the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M are incredibly similar, but this does not mean that these two professional dive watches do the exact same things.\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Functions\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner ref. 116610LN is, like everything the brand makes with the exception of the Cellini collection, part of the Oyster Perpetual family. That means it has both a self-winding movement (the \u2018Perpetual\u2019 part) and a waterproof case (the \u2018Oyster\u2019 part of its name).\n\n\n\nThe Oyster case ensures every Rolex watch has a water resistance down to at least 100 meters, and with the Submariner, a thicker housing coupled with a Triplock crown means that it is rated to 300 meters (1,000 feet). It is the ideal companion for recreational diving as well as being more than tough enough to survive the majority of day-to-day situations on dry land.\n\n\n\nOther than its impressive levels of protection, the Submariner is fairly modest in its functionality. It obviously has a rotating bezel, undoubtedly the easiest and most foolproof way of recording elapsed time. Simply turn the bezel so that the triangle above the 12 o\u2019clock (the zero marker) aligns with the minute hand, and as the hand moves around the dial, it shows how many minutes have passed against the 60-minute scale on the bezel.\n\n\n\nBeyond that, the Submariner 116610LN is a time-and-date model, the Cal. 3135\u2019s balance frequency of 28,800vph ensures that gentle, eight-beats-per-second glide of the seconds hand. The date display, for better or worse (some fans love it, others don\u2019t) sits in its usual position at three o\u2019clock covered by the Cyclops magnifying lens, and the movement\u2019s cam and jewel system causes the instantaneous changeover right at midnight.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOmega Seamaster Diver 300M Functions\n\n\n\nThe Omega Seamaster is very similar in its abilities to the Submariner. It too is a date-and-time piece, although its non-magnified date display has moved on this latest generation from the three o\u2019clock location to six o\u2019clock. It leaves the dial looking more symmetrical than before, and possibly better balanced overall than the Rolex Submariner. Water-resistance is identical at 300 meters (which is not really a surprise given the watch\u2019s name).\n\n\n\nThe Seamaster\u2019s bezel is also unidirectional with a 60-minute scale. However, the watch has received criticism from some in the past for its bezel being slightly tricky to turn, particularly when wearing gloves or with wet/greasy hands. Its shallow, scalloped knurling is not as easy to grip as the Submariner\u2019s serrated edge, so Omega has slightly reduced the tension on the newest version, making the action noticeably smoother.\n\n\n\nThat being said, the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M does have one thing the Submariner doesn\u2019t have (or need). The manually-operated helium escape valve has been a feature on the watch since its first iteration in the 1990s, protruding from the side of the case at 10 o\u2019clock. In some ways it is a nice decorative feature, complementing the crown on the other side. But as far as usefulness is concerned, it has pretty much none – at least for the vast majority of its owners.\n\n\n\nThe helium escape valve (HEV) was actually invented by Rolex, ironically enough, as a solution to a problem encountered by commercial saturation divers. These professionals spend much of their time living in extremely deep water habitats. At those depths, the nitrogen has been replaced by helium in the air mix the divers breathe; this solves the issues surrounding the narcotic effects of nitrogen when it is put under great pressure.\n\n\n\nThe drawback is that helium molecules are some of the smallest in existence, and eventually they can seep past a watch\u2019s gaskets (or enter the case as soon as the wearer needs to adjust the time or date). As the diver returns to the surface, and the pressures inside the habitat return to normal, the trapped helium molecules expand and can blow the crystal clear off the watch.\n\n\n\nThe valve was developed as a way to let the gas safely escape before it causes any damage. Therefore, an HEV on a dive watch is largely pointless unless you happen to be a saturation diver. It is designed to be operated in a dry, highly pressurized environment that is saturated with helium and it has nothing to do with the actual water-resistance of a watch.\n\n\n\nMany serious scuba divers actually dislike the addition, seeing as it one extra point of potential water ingress. The valve on the Omega Seamaster is also manually operated, unlike the one on Rolex\u2019s Sea-Dweller, which is flush with the side of the case and opens automatically once the internal pressure builds up. Omega does claim, however, that the most recent iteration of its helium escape valve can be safely opened underwater, and while you may not have a use for it, it is still a nice conversation starter.\n\n\n\n\n\n\nRolex Submariner Versus Omega Seamaster: Which to Choose?\n\n\n\nThe decision to go for the Rolex Submariner or the Omega Seamaster Diver 300m usually comes down to two things: looks and price. There\u2019s no way around it, the Rolex Submariner 116610LN is far more expensive than the Omega. Prices on the pre-owned market (your only option now that the watch is discontinued) start at around $11,000 and go up from there. A brand-new stainless steel Omega Seamaster Diver 300m, costs $5,200 on a bracelet, straight from an authorized retailer.\n\n\n\nWith the Submariner costing nearly twice the price of the Seamaster, this represents a massive difference. But what does the extra money get you? Both watches have very similar capabilities and each has a nice blend of modern materials. If anything, the Omega Seamaster Diver 300m has the edge on technical ability, with its Co-Axial-equipped movement and huge magnetic resistance.\n\n\n\nThe Rolex Submariner, now in its seventh decade as the last word in luxury dive watches, is as it always has been. It is like the perfectly tailored black tuxedo – the epitome of classic taste and refinement. The Omega is also a perfectly tailored tuxedo, but one that has been matched with a slightly more vibrant and unconventional tie. With that in mind, there is nothing about the Submariner that could be considered controversial or divisive – and for some, that is exactly why the Submariner doesn\u2019t resonate with them. It is simply too safe, while the Seamaster isn\u2019t afraid to experiment and shake things up a bit.\n\n\n\nIn the end, it will ultimately come down to how each model makes you feel and the impression you want to make. Both watches have been worn by James Bond, and both the Rolex Submariner and the Omega Seamaster Diver 300m are more than capable of being the only watch that you will ever need for the rest of your life.\n\n\n\nThe post Rolex Submariner 116610LN vs. Omega Seamaster Diver 300m appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2021-02-17T01:01:40-08:00", "date_modified": "2023-07-03T11:20:42-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Screen-Shot-2021-02-10-at-1.50.31-PM.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=10069", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-submariner-review-reference-114060-vs-reference-116610.html", "title": "Rolex Submariner 114060 vs. 116610 Comparison Guide", "content_html": "Hands down, the black, stainless steel Submariner is Rolex\u2019s most famous and frequently purchased watch – and for a good reason too. Its timeless and instantly recognizable design is versatile enough to work in both formal and casual situations, and its robust construction guarantees that it will last a lifetime. After deciding to purchase a black, stainless steel Rolex Submariner from the previous generation with Cerachrom (ceramic) bezels, there will still be one important decision left: do you get the reference 114060 or the reference 116610?
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Screen-Shot-2020-10-29-at-4.27.53-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Production Years: 2010 – 2020
\nCase Size: 40mm
\nFunctions: Time-Only (ref. 114060); Time + Date (ref. 116610)
\nDial: Black, Luminous hour markers
\nBezel: Unidirectional, 60-minute timing scale, Black ceramic insert
\nMovement: Cal. 3130 (ref. 114060); Cal. 3135 (ref. 116610)
\nWater Resistance: 300 meters / 1,000 feet
\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet with Glidelock Extension
\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Submariner.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/shop-the-collection1.jpg\" "\\"Shop")
![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_116610_5D3_6262-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Both Submariner watches measure 40mm in diameter with depth ratings of 300 meters. Both watches are made from 904L stainless steel with solid-link Oyster bracelets. Both watches feature black dials with 18-karat, white gold hands and hour markers. And both watches are fitted with black ceramic bezel inserts. However, one watch costs an average of $2,000 more than the other when purchased on the open market.
\nThey differ in that the reference 116610 has a date complication displayed through a window in the dial at the 3 o\u2019clock position. Because there is a date feature, the movement in the reference 116610 is different from the one found in the reference 114060 (no-date) Submariner. The ref. 116610 is powered by the time-tested Caliber 3135 movement, while the no-date Submariner is fitted with Rolex\u2019s Caliber 3130. Both movements are COSC chronometer-certified and feature Parachrom hairsprings for greater resistance to shocks and temperature fluctuations.
\nTo enhance the date window\u2019s visibility, the crystal on the reference 116610 features a \u201cCyclops\u201d magnification lens at the 3 o\u2019clock position. The Cyclops protrudes slightly from the sapphire crystal\u2019s surface and enhances the date display by 2.5 times its natural size. In addition to magnifying the date aperture, the Cyclops is also one of Rolex\u2019s most distinct and recognizable features, appearing on the vast majority of its date-displaying models.
\nPast generations of no-date Submariner models differed from their date-displaying counterparts in that their movements were not COSC rated. However, since the Cal. 3135 and Cal. 3130 movements that are fitted to this generation of Submariner watches are both chronometer-certified and offer identical power reserves, any real-world performance difference should be virtually non-existent.
\nSome buyers will select the reference 116610 for the utility of the date function, while others may pick it because they enjoy the visual appearance that the Cyclops lens adds to the watch’s face. Other buyers will opt for the reference 114060 Submariner due to its lower price, while some may select it because they prefer the symmetrical design of its dial.
\nBoth Submariner references are excellent watches, and either selection will be a very sound purchase. People generally prefer one Submariner to the other for various reasons, which is precisely why Rolex produces both models. Whether you pick the ref. 114060 or the ref. 116610, both models are superb watches and great investments.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_116610_5D3_1894-3-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The history of both the Date and No-Date Submariner begins in 1953 with the very first Submariner: the reference 6204. There was no date on the dial and the watch was water-resistant to only 100 meters. The iconic Mercedes hour hand was not yet introduced, and bezel movement was bi-directional. However, the foundation for the Submariner as we know it today was there, with a black 60-minute bezel, a luminous display on the dial, and a stainless steel case and bracelet.
\nThe Submariner continued production for several years without the Date mechanism on the dial until the release of ref. 1680 in 1966. Powering the watch was the Caliber 1575 Perpetual movement, the same calibre used in the Sea-Dweller, which hit the market the following year in 1967. Early editions of the ref. 1680 featured a red Submariner logo on the dial and are highly collectible today.
\nThe first Submariner Date remained on the market until the 1970s, seeing several dial variations and even a solid 18k yellow gold version in the form of the ref. 1680/8. When the dive watch came to market in the 1950s as a professional\u2019s tool watch, the date wasn\u2019t a practical feature as the watch was built specifically for underwater use. As popularity for the Submariner continued to rise, it just made sense to include the calendar function on the dial for all of those who also wear their Submariner watches on dry land.
\nHowever, Rolex never abandoned the Submariner’s purpose-built roots and continued to produce a no-date model to be offered alongside the more popular Submariner Date. This practice continues to this day, but while the date-displaying options have been offered in a number of different metals and colors over the years, the Rolex Submariner No-Date has only ever been available in stainless steel and fitted with a black dial and a black bezel.
\nUntil just recently, the ref. 114060 and ref. 116610 Submariner watches were the latest versions of the stainless steel (aka Oystersteel) model. The reference 116610 came to market in 2010, followed shortly by the no-date reference 114060 in 2012. As members of the 6-digit Submariner generation, both references feature “Maxi” dials outfitted with larger hour markers and wider hands, bezel inserts crafted from Rolex\u2019s proprietary Cerachrom ceramic material, and a contemporary case distinguished by larger crown guards and wider, more angular lugs.
\nThe Submariner bracelet also received a major upgrade in the form of completely solid links and a machined Oysterlock clasp with a Glidelock extension system that allows for tool-free adjustment of the bracelet in 2mm increments up to a total of 20mm. Both models maintain the same 300-meter water-resistance of their predecessors, which is more than enough for even professional-level scuba diving. They also still include scratch-resistant sapphire crystals and run on the same Cal. 3135 and Cal. 3130 movements for the Date and No-Date model, respectively.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_116610V_5D3_3406-Editt-7-1-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Rolex celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Submariner collection in 2003 by releasing a green bezel edition of the successful ref. 16610 (labeled as the ref. 16610LV). In addition to featuring an aluminum bezel in Rolex’s signature green hue, the “Kermit,” as many collectors came to call it, also features a black “Maxi” dial. This was the first instance of a Maxi dial within the Submariner series, pre-dating the 6-digit collection. The ref. 16610LV was also the only instance of a Maxi dial and an aluminum bezel in the collection’s entire history.
\nThe Kermit was discontinued in 2010 and replaced with a brand-new anniversary Submariner, the reference 116610LV. “LV” refers to the French term “Lunette Verte” that denotes its stunning green ceramic bezel. The black dial was replaced with a remarkable green sunburst dia – the only time that a dial color other than black has ever been featured on a stainless steel Submariner. The green-on-green feature set and larger appearance of the case earned the ref. 116610LV the nickname “Hulk” within the Rolex collecting world.
\n2020 marked the release of the current generation of stainless steel Submariner dive watches. The reference 114060 and ref. 116610 were both discontinued and replaced with the reference 124060 and ref. 126610. In addition to receiving a larger 41mm case, the newest series also features brand-new movements utilizing Rolex’s proprietary Chronergy escapement. The ref. 124060 is equipped with the Caliber 3230 movement, while the ref. 126610 Submariner Date is powered by the Caliber 3235 movement.
\nThis ref. 116610LV Submariner “Hulk” was also discontinued in 2020 and replaced by the ref. 126610LV. A combination of both the Hulk and Kermit, this edition features a green ceramic bezel and black Maxi dial fitted to its larger 41mm case. While this reference is still pretty new, it has already earned various nicknames, including the “Hermit” (Hulk + Kermit) and Cermit (Ceramic + Kermit). Generally more difficult to obtain than their all-black counterparts, these green Submariner watches represent some of the most collectible modern stainless steel Submariner models.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_116610V_5D3_0100-3-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Oystersteel: Rolex first started using 904L stainless steel during the 1980s. Referred to now as \u201cOystersteel\u201d by the company and forged from within Rolex\u2019s own in-house foundry, this metal finish is incredibly resistant to corrosion, making it ideal for the brand’s famed dive watch.
\nSapphire Crystal: Replacing acrylic, sapphire crystal is incredibly hard and virtually impervious to the scratches and scuffs that come from everyday wear and use. Rolex first started using sapphire crystals on the Submariner collection with the introduction of the ref. 16800 at the end of the 1970s.
\nChromalight: Chromalight replaced Super-Luminova and offers a bright blue glow, rather than the more standard green color found on most watches. Chromalight is Rolex\u2019s own proprietary lume and it will provide a continuous glow for up to 8 hours.
\nCerachrom: Cerachrom is the name given by Rolex to its proprietary ceramic material. Every 6-digit Submariner is equipped with Cerachrom bezel inserts, replacing aluminum like on previous generations. Cerachrom is virtually scratch-proof and it will not corrode or fade in color in the same way that aluminum bezels will after prolonged wear and use.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_116610_5D3_2414-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Even though the case maintains the same 40mm as its 5-digit predecessors, it appears noticeably larger on the wrist due to its thicker lugs, larger crown guards, and wider Cerachrom bezel. Overall, the Super Case is more angular and chunky while still not overtaking the wrist.
\nThe newer case made first its debut within the Submariner series in 2008 with the introduction of the full yellow gold ref. 116618 and white gold ref. 116619. It features a Triplock screw-down crown with three waterproof sealed zones, a monobloc middle case, and a screw-down case back. The Super Case answers the market’s desire for a larger wrist presence without adding to the watch\u2019s actual case diameter.
\nAnother feature of the Submariner’s Super Case that is often overlooked is the bezel mounting system. The ref. 114060 and ref. 116610 both feature a design in which the bezel ring sits on four spring-loaded support rollers, with one of them being a click spring to ensure the bezel\u2019s unidirectional movement. This design allows the bezel to rotate incredibly smoothly with perfect alignment and provides even tension throughout the entire rotation of the bezel.
\nAll Rolex Submariner watches are fitted with the brand\u2019s three-link Oyster bracelet. New to the 6-digit series is the use of completely solid links (including end-links) along with a more sturdy and refined machined clasp. Compared to the bracelets found on the previous generation, 6-digit Submariner watches offer a heavier, more substantial presence on the wrist. The newer bracelet is not as prone to stretching as editions with hollow center links.
\nThe updated bracelets also feature updated Oysterlock clasps with Rolex\u2019s patented Glidelock extension system. This feature allows the wearer to increase the bracelet\u2019s length up to 20mm in 2mm increments, completely on the fly and without the need for any tools. This feature is particularly useful for those who live in warmer regions as the bracelet is easy to micro-adjust as the wrist swells in humid weather. Of course, the Glidelock extension system was originally designed for scuba divers so that they could expand their bracelets to fit over the sleeve of a thick wetsuit.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_114060_IMG_9427-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
When Rolex unveiled the current generation of Submariner watches with 41mm case diameters, all of the models from the previous 40mm generation were discontinued, and this included both the reference 114060 and the reference 116610. As of September 2020, both stainless steel Submariner watches are now only available on the pre-owned market, and both models have prices that are higher than their original retail prices.
\nBefore it was discontinued, the reference 114060 had a retail price of $7,500. On the secondary market, that price is quite a bit higher, averaging between $10k and $12k depending on the watch\u2019s age and overall condition.
\nPrior to being discontinued, the ref. 116610 with a black dial and bezel retailed for $8,550. These days, the average price is around $12k to $14k. With the recent discontinuation of both models, it will be interesting to see how these prices change both in the short and long run. The current-production no-date Submariner ref. 124060 retails for $8,100, while the Submariner Date ref. 126610 with a black dial and black bezel retails for $9,150.
\nWith collectors clamoring to get their hands on the newest edition of the stainless steel Submariner, the price for ref. 114060 and ref. 116610 watches might see a bump as those who seek a ceramic bezel Submariner turn to the discontinued model instead of waiting an unknown amount of time to purchase the newest edition at retail or even pay a premium on the secondary market.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_116610-5D3_9782-3-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
So, where is the best place to buy Rolex Submariner ref. 114060 and ref. 116610 watches? Both references were produced for roughly a full decade and are readily available on the secondary market. However, where you choose to spend your money is an important decision.
\nIf you prefer to shop in person, local jewelry stores might be a great option as you will have the opportunity to inspect the watch in person. However, many jewelry stores can\u2019t compete with online prices due to higher overhead. Additionally, a jewelry store may not be as knowledgeable about Rolex Submariner watches compared to a place that specializes in timepieces. If getting the best deal is important to you, shopping online is the smartest option.
\nWhile Craigslist and eBay might seem like tempting options, they aren\u2019t always the safest. Aside from the obvious risk of meeting a stranger from Craigslist with a large sum of money, you can never be completely sure that the watch is genuine. Furthermore, while these types of websites are well-known and reputable themselves, you are not really buying the watch from the website, but ultimately buying the watch from just another user that is selling it.
\nInstead, choose an online seller you can trust and that stands behind their products with a lifetime authenticity guarantee. Bob\u2019s Watches is the most trusted name in pre-owned Rolex watches and guarantees that any Submariner 114060 or Submariner 116610 watch you buy from us is 100% genuine right down to every little screw and gasket. In addition to being able to rest assured that the timepiece you buy from us is completely genuine and competitively priced, every single watch listed on our site is in stock and ready to ship.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_116610_5D3_5303-2-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex Submariner 114060 vs. 116610 Comparison Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "Hands down, the black, stainless steel Submariner is Rolex\u2019s most famous and frequently purchased watch – and for a good reason too. Its timeless and instantly recognizable design is versatile enough to work in both formal and casual situations, and its robust construction guarantees that it will last a lifetime. After deciding to purchase a black, stainless steel Rolex Submariner from the previous generation with Cerachrom (ceramic) bezels, there will still be one important decision left: do you get the reference 114060 or the reference 116610?\nRolex Submariner 114060 & Submariner 116610\n\nSubmariner Generation Key Facts\nProduction Years: 2010 – 2020\nCase Size: 40mm\nFunctions: Time-Only (ref. 114060); Time + Date (ref. 116610)\nDial: Black, Luminous hour markers\nBezel: Unidirectional, 60-minute timing scale, Black ceramic insert\nMovement: Cal. 3130 (ref. 114060); Cal. 3135 (ref. 116610)\nWater Resistance: 300 meters / 1,000 feet\nBracelet: Oyster Bracelet with Glidelock Extension\nClick here for our Ultimate Buying Guide on the Rolex Submariner.\n\n\nComparing Rolex Submariner ref. 114060 to ref. 116610\nBoth Submariner watches measure 40mm in diameter with depth ratings of 300 meters. Both watches are made from 904L stainless steel with solid-link Oyster bracelets. Both watches feature black dials with 18-karat, white gold hands and hour markers. And both watches are fitted with black ceramic bezel inserts. However, one watch costs an average of $2,000 more than the other when purchased on the open market.\nThey differ in that the reference 116610 has a date complication displayed through a window in the dial at the 3 o\u2019clock position. Because there is a date feature, the movement in the reference 116610 is different from the one found in the reference 114060 (no-date) Submariner. The ref. 116610 is powered by the time-tested Caliber 3135 movement, while the no-date Submariner is fitted with Rolex\u2019s Caliber 3130. Both movements are COSC chronometer-certified and feature Parachrom hairsprings for greater resistance to shocks and temperature fluctuations.\nTo enhance the date window\u2019s visibility, the crystal on the reference 116610 features a \u201cCyclops\u201d magnification lens at the 3 o\u2019clock position. The Cyclops protrudes slightly from the sapphire crystal\u2019s surface and enhances the date display by 2.5 times its natural size. In addition to magnifying the date aperture, the Cyclops is also one of Rolex\u2019s most distinct and recognizable features, appearing on the vast majority of its date-displaying models.\nPast generations of no-date Submariner models differed from their date-displaying counterparts in that their movements were not COSC rated. However, since the Cal. 3135 and Cal. 3130 movements that are fitted to this generation of Submariner watches are both chronometer-certified and offer identical power reserves, any real-world performance difference should be virtually non-existent.\nSome buyers will select the reference 116610 for the utility of the date function, while others may pick it because they enjoy the visual appearance that the Cyclops lens adds to the watch’s face. Other buyers will opt for the reference 114060 Submariner due to its lower price, while some may select it because they prefer the symmetrical design of its dial.\nBoth Submariner references are excellent watches, and either selection will be a very sound purchase. People generally prefer one Submariner to the other for various reasons, which is precisely why Rolex produces both models. Whether you pick the ref. 114060 or the ref. 116610, both models are superb watches and great investments.\n\nHistory of the Rolex Submariner 114060 and Submariner 116610\nThe history of both the Date and No-Date Submariner begins in 1953 with the very first Submariner: the reference 6204. There was no date on the dial and the watch was water-resistant to only 100 meters. The iconic Mercedes hour hand was not yet introduced, and bezel movement was bi-directional. However, the foundation for the Submariner as we know it today was there, with a black 60-minute bezel, a luminous display on the dial, and a stainless steel case and bracelet.\nThe First Submariner with a Date Display\nThe Submariner continued production for several years without the Date mechanism on the dial until the release of ref. 1680 in 1966. Powering the watch was the Caliber 1575 Perpetual movement, the same calibre used in the Sea-Dweller, which hit the market the following year in 1967. Early editions of the ref. 1680 featured a red Submariner logo on the dial and are highly collectible today.\nThe first Submariner Date remained on the market until the 1970s, seeing several dial variations and even a solid 18k yellow gold version in the form of the ref. 1680/8. When the dive watch came to market in the 1950s as a professional\u2019s tool watch, the date wasn\u2019t a practical feature as the watch was built specifically for underwater use. As popularity for the Submariner continued to rise, it just made sense to include the calendar function on the dial for all of those who also wear their Submariner watches on dry land.\nHowever, Rolex never abandoned the Submariner’s purpose-built roots and continued to produce a no-date model to be offered alongside the more popular Submariner Date. This practice continues to this day, but while the date-displaying options have been offered in a number of different metals and colors over the years, the Rolex Submariner No-Date has only ever been available in stainless steel and fitted with a black dial and a black bezel.\nReference 114060 and Reference 116610 Submariner Watches\nUntil just recently, the ref. 114060 and ref. 116610 Submariner watches were the latest versions of the stainless steel (aka Oystersteel) model. The reference 116610 came to market in 2010, followed shortly by the no-date reference 114060 in 2012. As members of the 6-digit Submariner generation, both references feature “Maxi” dials outfitted with larger hour markers and wider hands, bezel inserts crafted from Rolex\u2019s proprietary Cerachrom ceramic material, and a contemporary case distinguished by larger crown guards and wider, more angular lugs.\nThe Submariner bracelet also received a major upgrade in the form of completely solid links and a machined Oysterlock clasp with a Glidelock extension system that allows for tool-free adjustment of the bracelet in 2mm increments up to a total of 20mm. Both models maintain the same 300-meter water-resistance of their predecessors, which is more than enough for even professional-level scuba diving. They also still include scratch-resistant sapphire crystals and run on the same Cal. 3135 and Cal. 3130 movements for the Date and No-Date model, respectively.\n\nThe Green Submariner 116610LV\nRolex celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Submariner collection in 2003 by releasing a green bezel edition of the successful ref. 16610 (labeled as the ref. 16610LV). In addition to featuring an aluminum bezel in Rolex’s signature green hue, the “Kermit,” as many collectors came to call it, also features a black “Maxi” dial. This was the first instance of a Maxi dial within the Submariner series, pre-dating the 6-digit collection. The ref. 16610LV was also the only instance of a Maxi dial and an aluminum bezel in the collection’s entire history.\nThe Kermit was discontinued in 2010 and replaced with a brand-new anniversary Submariner, the reference 116610LV. “LV” refers to the French term “Lunette Verte” that denotes its stunning green ceramic bezel. The black dial was replaced with a remarkable green sunburst dia – the only time that a dial color other than black has ever been featured on a stainless steel Submariner. The green-on-green feature set and larger appearance of the case earned the ref. 116610LV the nickname “Hulk” within the Rolex collecting world.\n2020 marked the release of the current generation of stainless steel Submariner dive watches. The reference 114060 and ref. 116610 were both discontinued and replaced with the reference 124060 and ref. 126610. In addition to receiving a larger 41mm case, the newest series also features brand-new movements utilizing Rolex’s proprietary Chronergy escapement. The ref. 124060 is equipped with the Caliber 3230 movement, while the ref. 126610 Submariner Date is powered by the Caliber 3235 movement.\nThis ref. 116610LV Submariner “Hulk” was also discontinued in 2020 and replaced by the ref. 126610LV. A combination of both the Hulk and Kermit, this edition features a green ceramic bezel and black Maxi dial fitted to its larger 41mm case. While this reference is still pretty new, it has already earned various nicknames, including the “Hermit” (Hulk + Kermit) and Cermit (Ceramic + Kermit). Generally more difficult to obtain than their all-black counterparts, these green Submariner watches represent some of the most collectible modern stainless steel Submariner models.\n\nMaterials Used/Rolex Terminology You Need to Know\nOystersteel: Rolex first started using 904L stainless steel during the 1980s. Referred to now as \u201cOystersteel\u201d by the company and forged from within Rolex\u2019s own in-house foundry, this metal finish is incredibly resistant to corrosion, making it ideal for the brand’s famed dive watch.\nSapphire Crystal: Replacing acrylic, sapphire crystal is incredibly hard and virtually impervious to the scratches and scuffs that come from everyday wear and use. Rolex first started using sapphire crystals on the Submariner collection with the introduction of the ref. 16800 at the end of the 1970s.\nChromalight: Chromalight replaced Super-Luminova and offers a bright blue glow, rather than the more standard green color found on most watches. Chromalight is Rolex\u2019s own proprietary lume and it will provide a continuous glow for up to 8 hours.\nCerachrom: Cerachrom is the name given by Rolex to its proprietary ceramic material. Every 6-digit Submariner is equipped with Cerachrom bezel inserts, replacing aluminum like on previous generations. Cerachrom is virtually scratch-proof and it will not corrode or fade in color in the same way that aluminum bezels will after prolonged wear and use.\n\nThe \u201cSuper Case” Submariner\nEven though the case maintains the same 40mm as its 5-digit predecessors, it appears noticeably larger on the wrist due to its thicker lugs, larger crown guards, and wider Cerachrom bezel. Overall, the Super Case is more angular and chunky while still not overtaking the wrist.\nThe newer case made first its debut within the Submariner series in 2008 with the introduction of the full yellow gold ref. 116618 and white gold ref. 116619. It features a Triplock screw-down crown with three waterproof sealed zones, a monobloc middle case, and a screw-down case back. The Super Case answers the market’s desire for a larger wrist presence without adding to the watch\u2019s actual case diameter.\nAnother feature of the Submariner’s Super Case that is often overlooked is the bezel mounting system. The ref. 114060 and ref. 116610 both feature a design in which the bezel ring sits on four spring-loaded support rollers, with one of them being a click spring to ensure the bezel\u2019s unidirectional movement. This design allows the bezel to rotate incredibly smoothly with perfect alignment and provides even tension throughout the entire rotation of the bezel.\nThe Oyster Bracelet\nAll Rolex Submariner watches are fitted with the brand\u2019s three-link Oyster bracelet. New to the 6-digit series is the use of completely solid links (including end-links) along with a more sturdy and refined machined clasp. Compared to the bracelets found on the previous generation, 6-digit Submariner watches offer a heavier, more substantial presence on the wrist. The newer bracelet is not as prone to stretching as editions with hollow center links.\nThe updated bracelets also feature updated Oysterlock clasps with Rolex\u2019s patented Glidelock extension system. This feature allows the wearer to increase the bracelet\u2019s length up to 20mm in 2mm increments, completely on the fly and without the need for any tools. This feature is particularly useful for those who live in warmer regions as the bracelet is easy to micro-adjust as the wrist swells in humid weather. Of course, the Glidelock extension system was originally designed for scuba divers so that they could expand their bracelets to fit over the sleeve of a thick wetsuit.\n\nRolex Submariner 114060 vs. 116610 Pricing and Availability\nWhen Rolex unveiled the current generation of Submariner watches with 41mm case diameters, all of the models from the previous 40mm generation were discontinued, and this included both the reference 114060 and the reference 116610. As of September 2020, both stainless steel Submariner watches are now only available on the pre-owned market, and both models have prices that are higher than their original retail prices.\nSubmariner 114060 Price\nBefore it was discontinued, the reference 114060 had a retail price of $7,500. On the secondary market, that price is quite a bit higher, averaging between $10k and $12k depending on the watch\u2019s age and overall condition.\nSubmariner 116610 Price\nPrior to being discontinued, the ref. 116610 with a black dial and bezel retailed for $8,550. These days, the average price is around $12k to $14k. With the recent discontinuation of both models, it will be interesting to see how these prices change both in the short and long run. The current-production no-date Submariner ref. 124060 retails for $8,100, while the Submariner Date ref. 126610 with a black dial and black bezel retails for $9,150.\nWith collectors clamoring to get their hands on the newest edition of the stainless steel Submariner, the price for ref. 114060 and ref. 116610 watches might see a bump as those who seek a ceramic bezel Submariner turn to the discontinued model instead of waiting an unknown amount of time to purchase the newest edition at retail or even pay a premium on the secondary market.\n\nWhere to Find the 114060 & 116610 Rolex for Sale\nSo, where is the best place to buy Rolex Submariner ref. 114060 and ref. 116610 watches? Both references were produced for roughly a full decade and are readily available on the secondary market. However, where you choose to spend your money is an important decision.\nIf you prefer to shop in person, local jewelry stores might be a great option as you will have the opportunity to inspect the watch in person. However, many jewelry stores can\u2019t compete with online prices due to higher overhead. Additionally, a jewelry store may not be as knowledgeable about Rolex Submariner watches compared to a place that specializes in timepieces. If getting the best deal is important to you, shopping online is the smartest option.\nWhile Craigslist and eBay might seem like tempting options, they aren\u2019t always the safest. Aside from the obvious risk of meeting a stranger from Craigslist with a large sum of money, you can never be completely sure that the watch is genuine. Furthermore, while these types of websites are well-known and reputable themselves, you are not really buying the watch from the website, but ultimately buying the watch from just another user that is selling it.\nInstead, choose an online seller you can trust and that stands behind their products with a lifetime authenticity guarantee. Bob\u2019s Watches is the most trusted name in pre-owned Rolex watches and guarantees that any Submariner 114060 or Submariner 116610 watch you buy from us is 100% genuine right down to every little screw and gasket. In addition to being able to rest assured that the timepiece you buy from us is completely genuine and competitively priced, every single watch listed on our site is in stock and ready to ship.\n\nThe post Rolex Submariner 114060 vs. 116610 Comparison Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2020-11-02T01:01:14-08:00", "date_modified": "2023-03-24T15:39:25-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Rolex_Submariner_116610_5D3_5309-2-Edit-2-1-2-1.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ], "summary": "Hands down, the black, stainless steel Submariner is Rolex's most famous and frequently purchased watch \u2013 and for good reason too. Its timeless and instantly recognizable design is versatile enough to work in both formal and casual situations, and its robust construction guarantees that it will last a lifetime." }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=41755", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-yacht-master-ii-vs-sky-dweller.html", "title": "Rolex Yacht-Master II vs. Rolex Sky-Dweller Comparison", "content_html": "Although they are by far the two most complicated watches in Rolex\u2019s current lineup, on the face of it, the Sky-Dweller and the Yacht-Master II wouldn\u2019t seem to have that much in common. Certainly, as far as the visuals are concerned, there is a world of difference. One is elegantly understated, the other just about as in-your-face as anything in the portfolio. However, once you get away from the aesthetics, the pair of watches actually share a number of similarities. Below we examine each model, and explore what makes them both rather special additions to the Rolex lineup.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Screen-Shot-2020-04-21-at-3.38.45-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Rolex has built much of its unassailable reputation by producing watches that are stylish, elegant, robust, and most of all, mechanically simple. Aside from the Daytona\u2019s chronograph complication, as far as Rolex’s main production models are concerned, a GMT function or the President\u2019s double calendar is really as complicated as the brand has ever gotten.
\nDig back far enough into the archives and you will find a moonphase model from the 1950s (now resurrected in the Cellini line) but apart from that, for the first century in business, Rolex has really been perfecting the art of the simple three-hand time teller, with perhaps a date display if you\u2019re lucky.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Rolex_Yachtmaster_116689_5D3_9822-3-Edit.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
That all changed in 2007, when Rolex launched the sequel to the original Yacht-Master, and brought us the inventively titled Yacht-Master II. Identical to its sibling in no way whatsoever, the Yacht-Master II (sometimes referred to as the Yacht-Master 2 or YMII) was as radical a departure from the usually conservative Rolex playbook as you could get.
\nAt 44mm, it was easily the largest watch in the collection, and was a big, bold attention-grabber marketed at a particularly niche section of the buying public. Shouting its name in huge letters across the bezel, and given a mishmash of elements on its dial, there was no chance of it going unnoticed. It was released in two variants initially, the ref. 116689 in white gold was the slightly more underplayed (and expensive) of the pair, while the ref. 116688 in yellow gold with a bright blue Cerachrom bezel was the real grandstander.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/zRolex-Yacht-Master-II-116688-131928.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Inside both, the Cal. 4160 was a heavily reworked version of the Daytona\u2019s Cal. 4130, and it powered the industry\u2019s first programmable flyback or fly-forward regatta timer with a mechanical memory. What would you possibly ever need one of those for? Well, the clue is very much in the name, with the watch built explicitly for the world\u2019s competitive yacht-racing crowd.
\nRolex has been involved in the impossibly glamorous sport of professional sailing for decades, sponsoring some of the highest profile events around the globe, including the Rolex Fastnet and the Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race. It was to help captains of the ships in these races overcome the timing challenges of regatta competitions that the Yacht-Master II\u2019s very specific complication was invented.
\nEach contest begins with a countdown to the starting gun, usually between five and 10 minutes long, during which the boats must tack back and forth behind the start line. The watch\u2019s timer allows the wearer to set that duration on the dial as a normal method but, crucially, also gives the ability to resynchronize it with the official clock if it is accidentally started too early or late. In addition, instead of a typical flyback, the Yacht-Master II resets itself forward or backwards to the nearest minute rather than to zero.
\nThe complex operations require not only two pushers either side of the winding crown, but also the first generation of Rolex\u2019s Ring Command Bezel, which links the outer bezel of the watch directly to the internal movement. The bezel on the Yacht-Master II serves as a form of\u00a0analogue on/off switch, locking and unlocking the various features, to facilitate the setting process for the countdown timer.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Rolex_YachtmasterII_116541_5D3_3135-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Since the original launch of the Yacht-Master II collection, the range has expanded to include a two-tone Everose Rolesor edition and an all stainless steel piece, both fitted with blue Cerachom bezels. In 2013, the Yacht-Master II got an update to its movement in the form of the Cal. 4161. An evolution of the Cal. 4160 that contains 360 components and took Rolex over 35,000 hours to devise.
\nAlthough no one was in any doubt that the watch was an impressive technical achievement, the aesthetics split opinions. There was none of the subtlety that traditionalists have long valued with Rolex, with the face made up of an unusual set of features – a small seconds sub dial at the bottom and a horseshoe-shaped counter around the top, numbered 1 to 10 for the regatta countdown, along with an arrow-tipped additional hand.
\nHowever, as with many offerings from the brand, the Yacht-Master II’s looks have found their footing over time, and the watch has become more and more accepted. Today, although not worn by that many skippers (in the same way Rolex\u2019s dive watches rarely see the ocean) the Yacht-Master II has certainly found an appreciative audience beyond its intended boat-racing market.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Rolex_Yachtmaster_116680_5D3_7233-Edit-2-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Even though you would never guess from its appearance, the Sky-Dweller is an even more complex beast than the Yacht-Master II. Its graceful silhouette and fluted bezel land it firmly in dress watch territory, and at first glance it could be mistaken for a Datejust or Day-Date. However, look closer and you see the dial has far more information to tell us than either of those classic pieces, and it actually does what no other Rolex watch ever has.
\nAs well as a date function at the standard three o\u2019clock position, the rotating off-centered disc is a new take on a dual time zone display, and expertly hidden is the brand\u2019s first ever annual calendar. To cram all that in on a watch with no additional buttons to ruin the symmetry of the case is little short of amazing, and involves an updated version of Rolex’s Ring Command Bezel.\u00a0This time, instead of just allowing the functions to be turned on and off like on the Yacht-Master II, the Sky-Dweller\u2019s three-position bezel selects each individual operation as you rotate it, and all settings and adjustments are done with just the winding crown.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/z132720.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
First released in 2012, the Sky-Dweller was originally only available in all precious metal; either yellow gold, Everose gold, or white gold. The hefty price tags attached to each, coupled with the somewhat unorthodox looks, meant that the watch failed to catch on at the beginning. Three more versions followed in 2014, with a changeup of dial color and bracelet options, but they were still pricey, solid-gold affairs.
\nIt was only in 2017 that the first two-tone and stainless steel models arrived (albeit with an 18k white gold bezel), with a corresponding drop in price, bringing the Sky-Dweller within reach of a wider audience and starting it on its journey towards its current highly desirable status. All iterations are driven by another massively complex movement, in this case the Cal. 9001. Made up of 380 parts, it is the most component-heavy caliber Rolex has made and powers not only the standard functions and the GMT, but also the annual calendar, a system that the brand calls SAROS.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Rolex_skydweller_326139-5D3_9809-Edit-2.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Like all annual calendars, the Sky-Dweller’s date only needs correcting once a year, at the end of February. At all other times, the mechanism compensates for the different number of days in the month. And the way it presents the month display for the complication is also unique: above each of the 12 hour markers is a small aperture, used to represent the month of the year. The current one is filled in in a solid color – so a blocked out window above the six o\u2019clock signifies June, over the seven is for July, etc.\u00a0It is a superbly economical way of doing things, and allows for a far more uncluttered display than would otherwise be possible.
\nThe GMT function is likewise a novel experience. The small inner disc does away with the need for an extra hand as on the GMT-Master or Explorer II. Instead, it is simply marked with a 24-hour scale and rotates to show the correct time at the top, which is indicated by a small triangle.\u00a0All told, the Sky-Dweller adds up to one of the most complete and impressive luxury traveler\u2019s watches presently on offer.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/SkyDweller_5D3_5626-2-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
So we have two pretty extraordinary watches, each designed for a definite purpose, and containing technology unseen anywhere else in the brand’s collection. One is a born showman, the other quietly sophisticated, but both do their respective jobs extremely well.
\nIs there a case for calling one better than the other? Like all these things, is it completely subjective. Yes, the chances are that you will rarely (if ever) use the Yacht-Master II\u2019s party piece for its intended purpose. However, the countdown timer can still be used for timing anything else (just as long it doesn\u2019t take more than 10 minutes). Additionally, it is a quirky, imposing, supersized watch that is guaranteed to get you seen.
\nThe Sky-Dweller, on the other hand, wins out in day-to-day usability, with the annual calendar one of the most valued complications a watch can have, and the GMT functionality perfect for jet-setters or frequent travelers. At 42mm, it is also slightly more compact than the Yacht-Master II, and can be worn with a wider selection of outfits.\u00a0The model you choose will always come down to personal taste, but it is reassuring to know both come from just about the finest watchmaker on the planet, and have an engineering virtuosity that is second to none.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Screen-Shot-2020-04-21-at-3.26.47-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex Yacht-Master II vs. Rolex Sky-Dweller Comparison appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "Although they are by far the two most complicated watches in Rolex\u2019s current lineup, on the face of it, the Sky-Dweller and the Yacht-Master II wouldn\u2019t seem to have that much in common. Certainly, as far as the visuals are concerned, there is a world of difference. One is elegantly understated, the other just about as in-your-face as anything in the portfolio. However, once you get away from the aesthetics, the pair of watches actually share a number of similarities. Below we examine each model, and explore what makes them both rather special additions to the Rolex lineup.\n\nRolex Complications\nRolex has built much of its unassailable reputation by producing watches that are stylish, elegant, robust, and most of all, mechanically simple. Aside from the Daytona\u2019s chronograph complication, as far as Rolex’s main production models are concerned, a GMT function or the President\u2019s double calendar is really as complicated as the brand has ever gotten.\nDig back far enough into the archives and you will find a moonphase model from the 1950s (now resurrected in the Cellini line) but apart from that, for the first century in business, Rolex has really been perfecting the art of the simple three-hand time teller, with perhaps a date display if you\u2019re lucky.\n\nThe Rolex Yacht-Master II\nThat all changed in 2007, when Rolex launched the sequel to the original Yacht-Master, and brought us the inventively titled Yacht-Master II. Identical to its sibling in no way whatsoever, the Yacht-Master II (sometimes referred to as the Yacht-Master 2 or YMII) was as radical a departure from the usually conservative Rolex playbook as you could get.\nAt 44mm, it was easily the largest watch in the collection, and was a big, bold attention-grabber marketed at a particularly niche section of the buying public. Shouting its name in huge letters across the bezel, and given a mishmash of elements on its dial, there was no chance of it going unnoticed. It was released in two variants initially, the ref. 116689 in white gold was the slightly more underplayed (and expensive) of the pair, while the ref. 116688 in yellow gold with a bright blue Cerachrom bezel was the real grandstander.\n\nInside both, the Cal. 4160 was a heavily reworked version of the Daytona\u2019s Cal. 4130, and it powered the industry\u2019s first programmable flyback or fly-forward regatta timer with a mechanical memory. What would you possibly ever need one of those for? Well, the clue is very much in the name, with the watch built explicitly for the world\u2019s competitive yacht-racing crowd.\nRolex has been involved in the impossibly glamorous sport of professional sailing for decades, sponsoring some of the highest profile events around the globe, including the Rolex Fastnet and the Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race. It was to help captains of the ships in these races overcome the timing challenges of regatta competitions that the Yacht-Master II\u2019s very specific complication was invented.\nEach contest begins with a countdown to the starting gun, usually between five and 10 minutes long, during which the boats must tack back and forth behind the start line. The watch\u2019s timer allows the wearer to set that duration on the dial as a normal method but, crucially, also gives the ability to resynchronize it with the official clock if it is accidentally started too early or late. In addition, instead of a typical flyback, the Yacht-Master II resets itself forward or backwards to the nearest minute rather than to zero.\nThe complex operations require not only two pushers either side of the winding crown, but also the first generation of Rolex\u2019s Ring Command Bezel, which links the outer bezel of the watch directly to the internal movement. The bezel on the Yacht-Master II serves as a form of\u00a0analogue on/off switch, locking and unlocking the various features, to facilitate the setting process for the countdown timer.\n\nSince the original launch of the Yacht-Master II collection, the range has expanded to include a two-tone Everose Rolesor edition and an all stainless steel piece, both fitted with blue Cerachom bezels. In 2013, the Yacht-Master II got an update to its movement in the form of the Cal. 4161. An evolution of the Cal. 4160 that contains 360 components and took Rolex over 35,000 hours to devise.\nAlthough no one was in any doubt that the watch was an impressive technical achievement, the aesthetics split opinions. There was none of the subtlety that traditionalists have long valued with Rolex, with the face made up of an unusual set of features – a small seconds sub dial at the bottom and a horseshoe-shaped counter around the top, numbered 1 to 10 for the regatta countdown, along with an arrow-tipped additional hand.\nHowever, as with many offerings from the brand, the Yacht-Master II’s looks have found their footing over time, and the watch has become more and more accepted. Today, although not worn by that many skippers (in the same way Rolex\u2019s dive watches rarely see the ocean) the Yacht-Master II has certainly found an appreciative audience beyond its intended boat-racing market.\n\nThe Rolex Sky-Dweller\u00a0\nEven though you would never guess from its appearance, the Sky-Dweller is an even more complex beast than the Yacht-Master II. Its graceful silhouette and fluted bezel land it firmly in dress watch territory, and at first glance it could be mistaken for a Datejust or Day-Date. However, look closer and you see the dial has far more information to tell us than either of those classic pieces, and it actually does what no other Rolex watch ever has.\nAs well as a date function at the standard three o\u2019clock position, the rotating off-centered disc is a new take on a dual time zone display, and expertly hidden is the brand\u2019s first ever annual calendar. To cram all that in on a watch with no additional buttons to ruin the symmetry of the case is little short of amazing, and involves an updated version of Rolex’s Ring Command Bezel.\u00a0This time, instead of just allowing the functions to be turned on and off like on the Yacht-Master II, the Sky-Dweller\u2019s three-position bezel selects each individual operation as you rotate it, and all settings and adjustments are done with just the winding crown.\n\nFirst released in 2012, the Sky-Dweller was originally only available in all precious metal; either yellow gold, Everose gold, or white gold. The hefty price tags attached to each, coupled with the somewhat unorthodox looks, meant that the watch failed to catch on at the beginning. Three more versions followed in 2014, with a changeup of dial color and bracelet options, but they were still pricey, solid-gold affairs.\nIt was only in 2017 that the first two-tone and stainless steel models arrived (albeit with an 18k white gold bezel), with a corresponding drop in price, bringing the Sky-Dweller within reach of a wider audience and starting it on its journey towards its current highly desirable status. All iterations are driven by another massively complex movement, in this case the Cal. 9001. Made up of 380 parts, it is the most component-heavy caliber Rolex has made and powers not only the standard functions and the GMT, but also the annual calendar, a system that the brand calls SAROS.\n\nLike all annual calendars, the Sky-Dweller’s date only needs correcting once a year, at the end of February. At all other times, the mechanism compensates for the different number of days in the month. And the way it presents the month display for the complication is also unique: above each of the 12 hour markers is a small aperture, used to represent the month of the year. The current one is filled in in a solid color – so a blocked out window above the six o\u2019clock signifies June, over the seven is for July, etc.\u00a0It is a superbly economical way of doing things, and allows for a far more uncluttered display than would otherwise be possible.\nThe GMT function is likewise a novel experience. The small inner disc does away with the need for an extra hand as on the GMT-Master or Explorer II. Instead, it is simply marked with a 24-hour scale and rotates to show the correct time at the top, which is indicated by a small triangle.\u00a0All told, the Sky-Dweller adds up to one of the most complete and impressive luxury traveler\u2019s watches presently on offer.\n\nYacht-Master II vs. Sky-Dweller\nSo we have two pretty extraordinary watches, each designed for a definite purpose, and containing technology unseen anywhere else in the brand’s collection. One is a born showman, the other quietly sophisticated, but both do their respective jobs extremely well.\nIs there a case for calling one better than the other? Like all these things, is it completely subjective. Yes, the chances are that you will rarely (if ever) use the Yacht-Master II\u2019s party piece for its intended purpose. However, the countdown timer can still be used for timing anything else (just as long it doesn\u2019t take more than 10 minutes). Additionally, it is a quirky, imposing, supersized watch that is guaranteed to get you seen.\nThe Sky-Dweller, on the other hand, wins out in day-to-day usability, with the annual calendar one of the most valued complications a watch can have, and the GMT functionality perfect for jet-setters or frequent travelers. At 42mm, it is also slightly more compact than the Yacht-Master II, and can be worn with a wider selection of outfits.\u00a0The model you choose will always come down to personal taste, but it is reassuring to know both come from just about the finest watchmaker on the planet, and have an engineering virtuosity that is second to none.\n\nThe post Rolex Yacht-Master II vs. Rolex Sky-Dweller Comparison appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2020-04-24T06:00:55-07:00", "date_modified": "2020-04-22T11:36:00-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Screen-Shot-2020-04-21-at-3.38.45-PM.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=41718", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/non-gv-rolex-milgauss-discontinued.html", "title": "Are the Non-GV Rolex Milgauss Watches Discontinued?\u00a0", "content_html": "In the 1950s, Rolex debuted the Milgauss as a watch dedicated to the scientific community. Named for its ability to withstand 1,000 gauss, the antimagnetic Rolex Milgauss watches were part of the brand\u2019s catalog for three decades until they were discontinued in 1988. However, Rolex revived the Milgauss in 2007, combining vintage design details like the lightning bolt seconds hand and modern considerations like a larger case and updated movement.
\nWithin the modern Milgauss lineup, was one reference that featured a green sapphire crystal, also known as\u00a0glace verte\u00a0in French or ‘GV’ for short. Up until a few years ago, Rolex offered Milgauss watches with either a colorless sapphire crystal or a green one. Yet, if we take a closer look at the current Rolex catalog, it\u2019s apparent that all non-GV models have been discontinued. Let\u2019s examine further.
\n![\"Are](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Rolex_Milgauss_116989_5D3_1541-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The Rolex Milgauss that made its debut in 2007 was the ref. 116400. The watch featured a 40mm stainless steel Oyster case fitted with a stainless steel Oyster bracelet. To achieve its magnetic resistance of 1,000 gauss, the modern Milgauss includes a ferromagnetic alloy shield inside the case to protect the automatic movement powering the watch.
\nThe Milgauss’s movement is the Caliber 3131, which is also equipped with antimagnetic components such as Rolex\u2019s proprietary blue Parachrom hairspring and a paramagnetic escape wheel. The Cal. 3131 provides users with up to 48 hours of power reserve when fully wound, and like all modern Rolex movements, it is chronometer certified.
\n![\"Non-GV](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Rolex_Milgauss_116400_5D3_1816-3-3-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The dials of the new Milgauss included a seconds hand designed to look like a lightning bolt as a nod to the original model from the \u201850s. However, this time around, Rolex finished it bright orange to match other orange details on the dial. The straight hour and minute hands, along with the baton-style hour markers are all coated with lume for maximum visibility in the dark.
\nInterestingly, the early Milgauss ref. 116400 models included a combination of green glowing Super-LumiNova and blue glowing Chromalight luminescence, which made for a multi-colored display in the dark. Additionally like all Milgauss references ever made, the ref. 116400 is a time-only model, as the solid dial with no date or day windows allows for the maximum amount of magnetic resistance.
\n![\"Clear](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Rolex_Milgauss_5D3_9154-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
When it was introduced, the modern Milgauss came in three variations. There was a white dial version and a black dial version, both protected by traditional colorless sapphire crystals. The lume on black dial was the standard, white-colored, green-glowing variety; however the lume on the white dial version glowed blue in the dark but appeared orange in the light, further adding to its orange accents.
\nThere was also a black dial version topped with a green sapphire crystal – the ref. 116400GV. Unlike the black dial found in the model with the clear crystal, this one featured the same blue-glowing, orange lume from the white dial model for the 3,6, and 9 hour makers, making for a dial that glowed two different colors. The ‘Glace Verte‘ model was designated as the Anniversary Milgauss and according to Rolex, the green-tinted sapphire crystal is so arduous and time-consuming to make that the company did not see the need to patent it. The green sapphire crystal is truly a unique design touch and makes the Milgauss GV look like its glowing at the edges.
\nIn 2014, Rolex added yet another dial color to the Milgauss lineup and called it Z-Blue. The electric blue dial included the same orange lighting hand and orange details; however all of the lume was now Rolex’s blue-glowing Chromalight. Additionally, the new Z-Blue Milgauss\u00a0came exclusively fitted with the green sapphire crystal from the anniversary-edition model.
\n![\"Are](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Milgauss_116400GV_5D3_5270-3-Edit-copy.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The black dial version of the non-GV Milgauss was discontinued around 2013, meaning that this particular edition was only in production for about six years – quite a short time for a modern Rolex watch. The Milgauss with a black dial and clear sapphire was discontinued not long before the Z-Blue dial appeared the following year at Baselworld, so it could be said that the Z-blue dial replaced the second black dial option.
\nBy 2014, there were still three Milgauss models to choose from: white dial 116400\u00a0with a colorless sapphire crystal, black dial 116400GV\u00a0with a green sapphire crystal, and Z-blue dial 116400GV with a green sapphire crystal. However, sometime in 2016, Rolex ceased production of the white dial Milgauss model, therefore leaving only the two GV models behind.
\n![\"Are](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Rolex_Milgauss_5D3_6125-2-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
As of today, Rolex only offers the Milgauss with a green sapphire crystal – the Milgauss 116400GV with a black dial or a Z-Blue dial, both priced $8,300 at retail. Of course, for all those who prefer the modern Milgauss with a traditional colorless sapphire crystal, they are still readily available on the secondary market, and can even often be found for slightly less than examples with the newer\u00a0 Z-Blue dials – at least at this point in time.
\nWhat are your thoughts about the revived Rolex Milgauss watch? Do you prefer it with a green crystal or without? Which version would you choose? Let us know in the comments below.
\n![\"Clear](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Rolex_Milgauss_5D3_5639-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Are the Non-GV Rolex Milgauss Watches Discontinued?\u00a0 appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "In the 1950s, Rolex debuted the Milgauss as a watch dedicated to the scientific community. Named for its ability to withstand 1,000 gauss, the antimagnetic Rolex Milgauss watches were part of the brand\u2019s catalog for three decades until they were discontinued in 1988. However, Rolex revived the Milgauss in 2007, combining vintage design details like the lightning bolt seconds hand and modern considerations like a larger case and updated movement.\nWithin the modern Milgauss lineup, was one reference that featured a green sapphire crystal, also known as\u00a0glace verte\u00a0in French or ‘GV’ for short. Up until a few years ago, Rolex offered Milgauss watches with either a colorless sapphire crystal or a green one. Yet, if we take a closer look at the current Rolex catalog, it\u2019s apparent that all non-GV models have been discontinued. Let\u2019s examine further.\n\nThe Rolex Milgauss ref. 116400\nThe Rolex Milgauss that made its debut in 2007 was the ref. 116400. The watch featured a 40mm stainless steel Oyster case fitted with a stainless steel Oyster bracelet. To achieve its magnetic resistance of 1,000 gauss, the modern Milgauss includes a ferromagnetic alloy shield inside the case to protect the automatic movement powering the watch.\nThe Milgauss’s movement is the Caliber 3131, which is also equipped with antimagnetic components such as Rolex\u2019s proprietary blue Parachrom hairspring and a paramagnetic escape wheel. The Cal. 3131 provides users with up to 48 hours of power reserve when fully wound, and like all modern Rolex movements, it is chronometer certified.\n\nThe dials of the new Milgauss included a seconds hand designed to look like a lightning bolt as a nod to the original model from the \u201850s. However, this time around, Rolex finished it bright orange to match other orange details on the dial. The straight hour and minute hands, along with the baton-style hour markers are all coated with lume for maximum visibility in the dark.\nInterestingly, the early Milgauss ref. 116400 models included a combination of green glowing Super-LumiNova and blue glowing Chromalight luminescence, which made for a multi-colored display in the dark. Additionally like all Milgauss references ever made, the ref. 116400 is a time-only model, as the solid dial with no date or day windows allows for the maximum amount of magnetic resistance.\n\nWhen it was introduced, the modern Milgauss came in three variations. There was a white dial version and a black dial version, both protected by traditional colorless sapphire crystals. The lume on black dial was the standard, white-colored, green-glowing variety; however the lume on the white dial version glowed blue in the dark but appeared orange in the light, further adding to its orange accents.\nThere was also a black dial version topped with a green sapphire crystal – the ref. 116400GV. Unlike the black dial found in the model with the clear crystal, this one featured the same blue-glowing, orange lume from the white dial model for the 3,6, and 9 hour makers, making for a dial that glowed two different colors. The ‘Glace Verte‘ model was designated as the Anniversary Milgauss and according to Rolex, the green-tinted sapphire crystal is so arduous and time-consuming to make that the company did not see the need to patent it. The green sapphire crystal is truly a unique design touch and makes the Milgauss GV look like its glowing at the edges.\nIn 2014, Rolex added yet another dial color to the Milgauss lineup and called it Z-Blue. The electric blue dial included the same orange lighting hand and orange details; however all of the lume was now Rolex’s blue-glowing Chromalight. Additionally, the new Z-Blue Milgauss\u00a0came exclusively fitted with the green sapphire crystal from the anniversary-edition model.\n\nThe Discontinuation of the Non-GV Milgauss 116400\nThe black dial version of the non-GV Milgauss was discontinued around 2013, meaning that this particular edition was only in production for about six years – quite a short time for a modern Rolex watch. The Milgauss with a black dial and clear sapphire was discontinued not long before the Z-Blue dial appeared the following year at Baselworld, so it could be said that the Z-blue dial replaced the second black dial option.\nBy 2014, there were still three Milgauss models to choose from: white dial 116400\u00a0with a colorless sapphire crystal, black dial 116400GV\u00a0with a green sapphire crystal, and Z-blue dial 116400GV with a green sapphire crystal. However, sometime in 2016, Rolex ceased production of the white dial Milgauss model, therefore leaving only the two GV models behind.\nRolex Milgauss Production Years\n\nMilgauss 116400 with black dial: 2007 \u2013 2013\nMilgauss 116400 with white dial: 2007 \u2013 2016\nMilgauss 116400GV with black dial: 2007 \u2013 present\nMilgauss 116400GV with Z-Blue dial: 2014 – present\n\n\nAs of today, Rolex only offers the Milgauss with a green sapphire crystal – the Milgauss 116400GV with a black dial or a Z-Blue dial, both priced $8,300 at retail. Of course, for all those who prefer the modern Milgauss with a traditional colorless sapphire crystal, they are still readily available on the secondary market, and can even often be found for slightly less than examples with the newer\u00a0 Z-Blue dials – at least at this point in time.\nWhat are your thoughts about the revived Rolex Milgauss watch? Do you prefer it with a green crystal or without? Which version would you choose? Let us know in the comments below.\n\nThe post Are the Non-GV Rolex Milgauss Watches Discontinued?\u00a0 appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2020-04-20T06:00:15-07:00", "date_modified": "2020-04-17T17:21:12-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Rolex_Milgauss_116989_5D3_1541-Edit-1.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=41495", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-gmt-master-ii-16710-vs-126710.html", "title": "Rolex GMT-Master II \u2018Pepsi\u2019 16710 vs. 126710", "content_html": "When you think of the Rolex GMT-Master II, chances are that you imagine the ‘Pepsi’ version. That iconic blue and red bezel has been a mainstay of Rolex’s pilots watch collection since the first GMT-Master it was created back in 1954 – the bi-color bezel allowing airline crew to better differentiate between day and night hours while reading the second time zone via the 24-hour GMT hand.
\nWhile other bezels such as the black and red ‘Coke’ or the black and blue ‘Batman’ certainly have their fans, it is still the classic red and blue ‘Pepsi’ bezel that is most emblematic of Rolex’s iconic pilots watch. So today, we\u2019re going to take a closer look at two of the most modern Pepsi bezel Rolex GMT-Master II references, the 16710 and 126710, which are both highly sought-after by collectors.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Screen-Shot-2020-04-03-at-4.51.19-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The reference 16710 was only the second iteration of the Rolex GMT-Master II collection and therefore an important one. The new release came with a slimmer case design and the caliber 3185 automatic movement. However, during its nearly twenty year production run, it also received a number of upgrades.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/zy-131485.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
One of the biggest updates came when Rolex swapped out the COSC-certified Cal. 3185 movement for the new Cal. 3186 which offered the same independently adjustable hour hands, but featured a new and improved Parachrom hairspring. Rolex also introduced a crystal with a laser-etched crown at 6 o’clock and a case without lug holes during the life of the ref. 16710, with the later-produciton versions receiving a ‘T’ at the end of their reference numbers (ref. 16710T) to denote the update to case design. Another ongoing change was the lume, which went from Tritium to LumiNova to Super-LumiNova over the years.
\nHowever, the most important features stayed constant, like the aluminum bezel which has been known to fade over time and sunlight exposure. Even though this is a defect that was rectified by Rolex with the next generation of GMT-Master II watches, this flaw is sought after by many collectors for the unique ‘personality’ that each watch picks up as its red and blue bezel fades.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/GMT_16710_5D3_1659-2-Edit.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
In between the Pepsi ref. 16710 and the current ref. 126710, which we\u2019ll discuss here, there was the ref. 116719. Actually, there was the entire stainless steel ref. 116710 generation of GMT-Master II watches that existed in between; however the line’s iconic red and blue bezel was not available on the steel models from this generation, and was only fitted to the solid 18k white gold ref. 116719
\nThis was a particularly important model that we can\u2019t overlook, because its very design greatly influenced the popularity of the current Pepsi ref. 126710 that we have today. You see, before the ref. 126710 was introduced in 2018, the ref. 116719 was both beloved and contentious for its white gold Oyster case and bracelet that put it outside the budgets for many collectors. When the stainless steel ref.\u00a0126710BLRO GMT-Master II was released in 2018, many were excited to finally have a ceramic Pepsi bezel available on a stainless steel GMT watch.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/zRolex-GMT-Master-II-126710-131823.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
However, Rolex didn\u2019t stop there, giving the Oystersteel sports watch an elegant upgrade with the five-piece link Jubilee bracelet. Aesthetically, the ref. 126710 is more dressy than the ref. 116719 due to its new Jubilee bracelet; however its steel construction ensures that it is still a rugged and highly practical toowatch, which is just part of the reason why this reference has been such as success among collectors.
\nNow, compared to the ref. 16710, there are significant differences besides the Jubilee bracelet. While they\u2019re both 40mm and constructed from stainless steel, the case of the new ref. 126710 has a significantly more bold apperance with thicker lugs, broader crown guards, and a larger Triplock crown (compared to the smaller Twinlock on the ref. 16710).
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/GMT_126710_5D3_0981-2-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Additionally, the\u00a0Pepsi bezel on the ref. 126710 has been forged out of ceramic, aka Cerachrom. This material is extremely tough, and is is incredibly resistant to scratching and fading. Since the Cerachrom ceramic Pepsi bezel will not fade or change colors, ref. 126710BLRO watches won’t pick up the same unique character as the older aluminum Pepsi bezels on ref. 16710 watches.
\nOther upgrades to the new Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710 include a bolder Maxi dial with larger hands and hour markers. The dial also features Chromalight lume that offers a bright blue glow for up to eight hours. Internally, the new ref. 126710 also boasts a new-generation Cal. 3285 Perpetual movement, which offers users a longer 70-hour power reserve, thanks in-part to its completely redesigned and more efficient Chronergy escapement.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Screen-Shot-2020-04-07-at-10.09.40-AM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex GMT-Master II ‘Pepsi’ 16710 vs. 126710 appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "When you think of the Rolex GMT-Master II, chances are that you imagine the ‘Pepsi’ version. That iconic blue and red bezel has been a mainstay of Rolex’s pilots watch collection since the first GMT-Master it was created back in 1954 – the bi-color bezel allowing airline crew to better differentiate between day and night hours while reading the second time zone via the 24-hour GMT hand.\nWhile other bezels such as the black and red ‘Coke’ or the black and blue ‘Batman’ certainly have their fans, it is still the classic red and blue ‘Pepsi’ bezel that is most emblematic of Rolex’s iconic pilots watch. So today, we\u2019re going to take a closer look at two of the most modern Pepsi bezel Rolex GMT-Master II references, the 16710 and 126710, which are both highly sought-after by collectors.\n\nRolex GMT-Master II 16710: 1989-2007\nThe reference 16710 was only the second iteration of the Rolex GMT-Master II collection and therefore an important one. The new release came with a slimmer case design and the caliber 3185 automatic movement. However, during its nearly twenty year production run, it also received a number of upgrades.\n\nOne of the biggest updates came when Rolex swapped out the COSC-certified Cal. 3185 movement for the new Cal. 3186 which offered the same independently adjustable hour hands, but featured a new and improved Parachrom hairspring. Rolex also introduced a crystal with a laser-etched crown at 6 o’clock and a case without lug holes during the life of the ref. 16710, with the later-produciton versions receiving a ‘T’ at the end of their reference numbers (ref. 16710T) to denote the update to case design. Another ongoing change was the lume, which went from Tritium to LumiNova to Super-LumiNova over the years.\nHowever, the most important features stayed constant, like the aluminum bezel which has been known to fade over time and sunlight exposure. Even though this is a defect that was rectified by Rolex with the next generation of GMT-Master II watches, this flaw is sought after by many collectors for the unique ‘personality’ that each watch picks up as its red and blue bezel fades.\n\nRolex GMT-Master II 126710: 2018-Present\nIn between the Pepsi ref. 16710 and the current ref. 126710, which we\u2019ll discuss here, there was the ref. 116719. Actually, there was the entire stainless steel ref. 116710 generation of GMT-Master II watches that existed in between; however the line’s iconic red and blue bezel was not available on the steel models from this generation, and was only fitted to the solid 18k white gold ref. 116719\nThis was a particularly important model that we can\u2019t overlook, because its very design greatly influenced the popularity of the current Pepsi ref. 126710 that we have today. You see, before the ref. 126710 was introduced in 2018, the ref. 116719 was both beloved and contentious for its white gold Oyster case and bracelet that put it outside the budgets for many collectors. When the stainless steel ref.\u00a0126710BLRO GMT-Master II was released in 2018, many were excited to finally have a ceramic Pepsi bezel available on a stainless steel GMT watch.\n\nHowever, Rolex didn\u2019t stop there, giving the Oystersteel sports watch an elegant upgrade with the five-piece link Jubilee bracelet. Aesthetically, the ref. 126710 is more dressy than the ref. 116719 due to its new Jubilee bracelet; however its steel construction ensures that it is still a rugged and highly practical toowatch, which is just part of the reason why this reference has been such as success among collectors.\nNow, compared to the ref. 16710, there are significant differences besides the Jubilee bracelet. While they\u2019re both 40mm and constructed from stainless steel, the case of the new ref. 126710 has a significantly more bold apperance with thicker lugs, broader crown guards, and a larger Triplock crown (compared to the smaller Twinlock on the ref. 16710).\n\nAdditionally, the\u00a0Pepsi bezel on the ref. 126710 has been forged out of ceramic, aka Cerachrom. This material is extremely tough, and is is incredibly resistant to scratching and fading. Since the Cerachrom ceramic Pepsi bezel will not fade or change colors, ref. 126710BLRO watches won’t pick up the same unique character as the older aluminum Pepsi bezels on ref. 16710 watches.\nOther upgrades to the new Rolex GMT-Master II ref. 126710 include a bolder Maxi dial with larger hands and hour markers. The dial also features Chromalight lume that offers a bright blue glow for up to eight hours. Internally, the new ref. 126710 also boasts a new-generation Cal. 3285 Perpetual movement, which offers users a longer 70-hour power reserve, thanks in-part to its completely redesigned and more efficient Chronergy escapement.\n\nThe post Rolex GMT-Master II ‘Pepsi’ 16710 vs. 126710 appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2020-04-07T06:00:17-07:00", "date_modified": "2020-04-07T10:11:04-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Screen-Shot-2020-04-03-at-4.51.19-PM.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] }, { "id": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/?p=41392", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/comparisons/rolex-air-king-40mm-vs-34mm-comparison.html", "title": "Rolex Air-King 40mm vs. 34mm Comparison Guide", "content_html": "As the story goes, Hans Wilsdorf received word that British Royal Air Force pilots preferred their personally-purchased Rolex watches over their military-issued timepieces. Honored by their devotion to the Rolex brand, Wilsdorf set out to develop a set of watches to honor the pilots. The result was the Air Series, which included a dumber of short-lived models including the Air-Giant, Air-Tiger, Air-Lion, and most notably, the Rolex Air-King.
\nToday, the Rolex Air-King is the only watch from that series that still remains in production. However, it has undergone, perhaps, one of the most dramatic evolutions of any other model in the Rolex catalog.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/AirKing_116900_5D3_8810-2-Edit.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The Rolex Air-King originally entered the market as the ref. 4925 with a manually-wound movement and a 34mm case. Several other references quickly followed, which were all discontinued and finally replaced in 1958 with the ref. 5500 powered by the Cal. 1520/1530 movement, officially marking the beginning of the Air-King as we know it today.
\nThe collection would see another significant upgrade to the movement with the ref. 14000/14000M series, which utilizes the Cal. 3000 and then later the modified Cal. 3130 movement, which with the arrival of the ref. 114200 would finally grant the watch COSC Chronometer-certification status.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Rolex_AirKing_5500_3-1.jpg\" "\\"Vintage")
![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/z129479-x-Air-King-Rolex-5500-129479-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The ref. 5500 is one of the most iconic editions of the Air-King. Some might even argue that it is the quintessential vintage entry-level Rolex. It\u2019s even a fixture on many notable collector\u2019s wrists such as A-list celebrity Ryan Gosling.
\nAs previously mentioned, the ref. 5500 Air-King was powered by the self-winding Cal. 1520 and 1530 movements, and really marked the start of the Rolex Air-King as a cohesive collection. It also features a design that characterized the line for decades with a 34mm Oyster case in stainless steel, a matching smooth bezel, and a time-only dial.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/zRolex-Air-King-14000-129554.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The next significant change to the Air-King collection wouldn\u2019t come until around the late 1980s with the addition of ref. 14000. This version brought with it a higher-beat Cal. 3000 movement and a sapphire crystal. While it maintained a similar 34mm diameter and time-only movement as the ref. 5500, the ref. 14000 exudes a slightly more contemporary aesthetic due to its modern sapphire crystal and a wide variety of different and more more modern\u00a0 dial styles.
\nAbout a decade later, the ref. 14000 was upgraded to the cal. 3130 Perpetual movement with a full balance bridge, larger balance wheel, and Breguet overcoil. This upgrade was signified as \u201cmodified” with an \u201cM\u201d at the end of the reference number. This brought the Air-King up to date as far as its movement; however, it still lacked chronometer certification.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/z132321.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The 6-digit Air-King made its debut in the mid-2000s with the ref. 114200. This edition runs on the same Cal. 3130 movement as its\u00a0ref. 14000M predecessor, only now the movement came COSC Chronometer-rated, promising a higher degree of accuracy.
\nThe most significant differences between the two references lie in the slight nuances of the ref. 114200\u2019s overall design. The case remains 34mm in diameter, only now it\u2019s flanked by slightly thicker and high-polished lugs. The dial also exudes modern Rolex design with the additional ‘Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified’ text on the lower half of its dial, replacing the ‘Precision’ or ‘Super Precision’ that can be found on all previous generations. Lastly the bracelet was upgraded to feature completely solid links and a redesigned machined clasp.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Rolex_AirKing_114200_5D3_5643-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The Air-King took on a brand-new form when the ref. 116900 was introduced at Baselworld 2016 after a brief discontinuation in 2014. Its new 40mm case was borrowed from the Milgauss, and even included the same antimagnetic inner shield. The ref. 116900 asl0 received the new-style bracelet with solid links and an Oysterclasp with an innovative, tool-free 5mm Easylink extension system.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/z127266-Rolex-Air-King-116900-131438.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The ref. 116900 also received the Cal. 3131 Perpetual movement, which it also borrowed from the Milgauss, further increasing its antimagnetic capabilities. The most noticeable upgrade, however, is the dial, which now features white 5-minute Arabic hour markers, 18k white gold Arabic hour markers at the 3, 6, and 9 o\u2019clock positions, and a luminous inverted triangle at 12 o’clock.
\nMatching luminous Mercedes hands complete the display with a bright green and gold Rolex logo and matching green seconds hand. The Air-King logo is still present in its same historic font, only now it sits on the lower half of the dial. The overall design of the current Air-King dial was based on the cockpit instruments created by Rolex for the Bloodhound Super Sonic Car.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Rolex_AirKing_116900-5D3_9172-Edit.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
Side-by-side, there are many differences between the 40mm and 34mm Air-King pilot\u2019s watch. The most obvious lies in the size of the case and the design of the dial. The ref. 116900 more closely resembles a traditional sports watch, while the 34mm editions resemble a classic Rolex dress watch.
\nBoth versions run on a time-only movement; however, since the new\u00a0ref. 116900 borrows its case and movement from the Milgauss collection, it offers the same legendary antimagnetic capabilities of Rolex’s famed scientist’s watch. Additionally, the black dial and Mercedes-style hands on the current ref.\u00a0116900 give the watch a much more sporty appearance than all previous Rolex Air-King watches.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Screen-Shot-2020-03-27-at-12.45.46-PM.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
All editions of the Rolex Air-King are quite reasonable investments with the ref. 116900 retailing for $6,450. However, despite its reasonable price, the current global extreme demand for stainless steel Rolex sports watches has resulted in a shortage of Air-King at many retail locations.
\nRolex Air-King Prices are even more affordable on the secondary market, with older ref. 5500 watches being among the most affordable vintage Rolex watches available, making the Air-King a desirable choice in all of its many forms.
\n![\"Rolex](\"https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Rolex_AirKing_116900-5D3_9175-Edit-1.jpg\" "\\"Rolex")
The post Rolex Air-King 40mm vs. 34mm Comparison Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.
\n", "content_text": "As the story goes, Hans Wilsdorf received word that British Royal Air Force pilots preferred their personally-purchased Rolex watches over their military-issued timepieces. Honored by their devotion to the Rolex brand, Wilsdorf set out to develop a set of watches to honor the pilots. The result was the Air Series, which included a dumber of short-lived models including the Air-Giant, Air-Tiger, Air-Lion, and most notably, the Rolex Air-King.\nToday, the Rolex Air-King is the only watch from that series that still remains in production. However, it has undergone, perhaps, one of the most dramatic evolutions of any other model in the Rolex catalog.\n\nRolex Air-King 34mm\nThe Rolex Air-King originally entered the market as the ref. 4925 with a manually-wound movement and a 34mm case. Several other references quickly followed, which were all discontinued and finally replaced in 1958 with the ref. 5500 powered by the Cal. 1520/1530 movement, officially marking the beginning of the Air-King as we know it today.\nThe collection would see another significant upgrade to the movement with the ref. 14000/14000M series, which utilizes the Cal. 3000 and then later the modified Cal. 3130 movement, which with the arrival of the ref. 114200 would finally grant the watch COSC Chronometer-certification status.\n\nNotable Rolex Air King 34mm References\nRef. 5500\n\nThe ref. 5500 is one of the most iconic editions of the Air-King. Some might even argue that it is the quintessential vintage entry-level Rolex. It\u2019s even a fixture on many notable collector\u2019s wrists such as A-list celebrity Ryan Gosling.\nAs previously mentioned, the ref. 5500 Air-King was powered by the self-winding Cal. 1520 and 1530 movements, and really marked the start of the Rolex Air-King as a cohesive collection. It also features a design that characterized the line for decades with a 34mm Oyster case in stainless steel, a matching smooth bezel, and a time-only dial.\nRef. 14000/14000M\n\nThe next significant change to the Air-King collection wouldn\u2019t come until around the late 1980s with the addition of ref. 14000. This version brought with it a higher-beat Cal. 3000 movement and a sapphire crystal. While it maintained a similar 34mm diameter and time-only movement as the ref. 5500, the ref. 14000 exudes a slightly more contemporary aesthetic due to its modern sapphire crystal and a wide variety of different and more more modern\u00a0 dial styles.\nAbout a decade later, the ref. 14000 was upgraded to the cal. 3130 Perpetual movement with a full balance bridge, larger balance wheel, and Breguet overcoil. This upgrade was signified as \u201cmodified” with an \u201cM\u201d at the end of the reference number. This brought the Air-King up to date as far as its movement; however, it still lacked chronometer certification.\nRef. 114200\n\nThe 6-digit Air-King made its debut in the mid-2000s with the ref. 114200. This edition runs on the same Cal. 3130 movement as its\u00a0ref. 14000M predecessor, only now the movement came COSC Chronometer-rated, promising a higher degree of accuracy.\nThe most significant differences between the two references lie in the slight nuances of the ref. 114200\u2019s overall design. The case remains 34mm in diameter, only now it\u2019s flanked by slightly thicker and high-polished lugs. The dial also exudes modern Rolex design with the additional ‘Superlative Chronometer Officially Certified’ text on the lower half of its dial, replacing the ‘Precision’ or ‘Super Precision’ that can be found on all previous generations. Lastly the bracelet was upgraded to feature completely solid links and a redesigned machined clasp.\n\nEnter the 40mm Rolex Air-King ref. 116900\nThe Air-King took on a brand-new form when the ref. 116900 was introduced at Baselworld 2016 after a brief discontinuation in 2014. Its new 40mm case was borrowed from the Milgauss, and even included the same antimagnetic inner shield. The ref. 116900 asl0 received the new-style bracelet with solid links and an Oysterclasp with an innovative, tool-free 5mm Easylink extension system.\n\nThe ref. 116900 also received the Cal. 3131 Perpetual movement, which it also borrowed from the Milgauss, further increasing its antimagnetic capabilities. The most noticeable upgrade, however, is the dial, which now features white 5-minute Arabic hour markers, 18k white gold Arabic hour markers at the 3, 6, and 9 o\u2019clock positions, and a luminous inverted triangle at 12 o’clock.\nMatching luminous Mercedes hands complete the display with a bright green and gold Rolex logo and matching green seconds hand. The Air-King logo is still present in its same historic font, only now it sits on the lower half of the dial. The overall design of the current Air-King dial was based on the cockpit instruments created by Rolex for the Bloodhound Super Sonic Car.\n\nFinal Comparison\nSide-by-side, there are many differences between the 40mm and 34mm Air-King pilot\u2019s watch. The most obvious lies in the size of the case and the design of the dial. The ref. 116900 more closely resembles a traditional sports watch, while the 34mm editions resemble a classic Rolex dress watch.\nBoth versions run on a time-only movement; however, since the new\u00a0ref. 116900 borrows its case and movement from the Milgauss collection, it offers the same legendary antimagnetic capabilities of Rolex’s famed scientist’s watch. Additionally, the black dial and Mercedes-style hands on the current ref.\u00a0116900 give the watch a much more sporty appearance than all previous Rolex Air-King watches.\n\nRolex Air-King Price\nAll editions of the Rolex Air-King are quite reasonable investments with the ref. 116900 retailing for $6,450. However, despite its reasonable price, the current global extreme demand for stainless steel Rolex sports watches has resulted in a shortage of Air-King at many retail locations.\nRolex Air-King Prices are even more affordable on the secondary market, with older ref. 5500 watches being among the most affordable vintage Rolex watches available, making the Air-King a desirable choice in all of its many forms.\n\nThe post Rolex Air-King 40mm vs. 34mm Comparison Guide appeared first on Bob's Watches.", "date_published": "2020-03-31T06:00:20-07:00", "date_modified": "2020-03-27T13:13:07-07:00", "authors": [ { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" } ], "author": { "name": "Paul Altieri", "url": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/author/paul", "avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d3e540a744096739cccba1e3bb39245b?s=512&d=mm&r=g" }, "image": "https://www.bobswatches.com/rolex-blog/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Screen-Shot-2020-03-27-at-12.45.46-PM.jpg", "tags": [ "Comparisons" ] } ] }